Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on Pinterest Connect on Google Plus Connect on LinkedIn

Pope Francis Has Single-Handedly Destroyed Catholicism

September 18, AD2013

…or so you’d think if you got all your information about Catholicism from blog comboxes.

Not surprisingly, Pope Francis has been in the news lately. The media jumped on his offhand comments about homosexuals, breathlessly reported on a letter he wrote to an atheist, and made much hay over an interview given by the Vatican’s new Secretary of State (the media was apparently under the impression that Pope Francis is a very clever ventriloquist, and he was the one talking while the new Secretary’s mouth was moving – at least, that’s what they reported).

A common refrain I’m observing in the comboxes of various Catholic bloggers lately, when said blogger discusses one of these media reports, goes something like this:

“The Pope needs to stop making remarks like this! They’re too easily misunderstood! No one should have to write an article after the fact explaining what the Pope actually said/meant. The Pope needs to deliberate for hours on end before so much as opening his mouth! Every word must be crafted with the utmost perfection so that the media doesn’t get the wrong idea!” etc., etc.

And, my favorite:

“This kind of thing never happened when Benedict XVI/John Paul II was Pope!”

To these people, I respond:

Really? That’s some pretty amazing selective memory you have going on there. Granted, I’ve only been Catholic for the last ten years, but I remember:

The Condom Kerfuffle, in which the MSM proclaimed that Pope Benedict said condoms were perfectly okay for everyone to use (when he actually said that in certain situations, the use of a condom could indicate that someone was trying to act in a moral fashion by not spreading disease, and that trying to act morally could be a good first step on the road to repentance).

Pope Benedict’s speech at the University of Regensburg, in which (according to the media) the Pope said that Mohammed was evil incarnate and all Muslims were going to hell. (The Pope later explained that his words had been misunderstood by Muslims.)

The publication of Benedict’s encyclical Caritas in Veritate, in which the MSM announced that the Pope attacked capitalism as always evil in any circumstance and wholeheartedly supported the Occupy Wall Street movement.

The motu proprio Summorum Pontificum was, according to the media, Pope Benedict’s last ditch attempt to revive a dying church by resurrecting a dead language.

John Paul II’s release of Dominus Iesus in 2000 spawned dozens of newspaper headlines (one of which I remember seeing in my college newspaper) proclaiming that “the Pope says non-Catholics aren’t really Christians!”

In Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, John Paul II stated unequivocally, “Wherefore, in order that all doubt may be removed regarding a matter of great importance, a matter which pertains to the Church’s divine constitution itself, in virtue of my ministry of confirming the brethren […] I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful” (emphasis mine). Seems pretty straightforward, but the MSM headlines in response? “Pope’s words about women’s ordination spark debate” or similar.

I’m sure I could list hundreds of examples dating back decades, if not centuries, about how the media flagrantly and deliberately misrepresents a pope’s statements, leading to a need for the Vatican et al to issue a clarification. This is not a new phenomenon. The media does not exist to tell the truth – it exists to make people rich. Juicy headlines sell newspapers and garner millions of website hits, which generate revenue. “Pope Reiterates 2,000-year-old Teaching of the Church” doesn’t make money; “Pope Declares that All Atheists Go to Heaven” does. Truth has nothing to do with it, and this type of misrepresentation for personal gain is something that’s been happening as long as the papacy has existed.

Indeed, St. Peter himself could have been speaking about the mainstream media when he said, “But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves. Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with fabricated stories. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.” (2 Peter 2:1-3)

Of course, in every combox you find at least one person lamenting that the current Pope is destroying the Catholic Church. One example:

“This is doctrinal immodesty, if I may use the phrase. Rather than clothe the precious doctrine of the Body of Christ in garments of sobriety, modesty and Prudence, the truths of the Church are being sold away [by Pope Francis, presumably] cheaply to the moral perverts and enemies of Christ.”

I’m very curious what the commenter in question would have had to say about some of the Church’s earlier Popes:

  • Pope Stephen VI (896–897), who had his predecessor Pope Formosus exhumed, tried, de-fingered, briefly reburied, and thrown in the Tiber.
  • Pope John XII (955–964), who gave land to a mistress, murdered several people, and was killed by a man who caught him in bed with his wife.
  • Pope Benedict IX (1032–1044, 1045, 1047–1048), who “sold” the Papacy
  • Pope Boniface VIII (1294–1303), who is lampooned in Dante’s Divine Comedy
  • Pope Urban VI (1378–1389), who complained that he did not hear enough screaming when Cardinals who had conspired against him were tortured.
  • Pope Alexander VI (1492–1503), a Borgia, who was guilty of nepotism and whose unattended corpse swelled until it could barely fit in a coffin.
  • Pope Leo X (1513–1521), a spendthrift member of the Medici family who once spent 1/7 of his predecessors’ reserves on a single ceremony
  • Pope Clement VII (1523–1534), also a Medici, whose power-politicking with France, Spain, and Germany got Rome sacked.

(The preceding examples are taken from E. Chamberlain’s book “The Bad Popes,” as summarized by Wikipedia.)

We once had a Pope who was murdered while engaging in the act of adultery – and the Church survived! After that, can anyone honestly believe that the Church will be utterly decimated and destroyed simply because the current pope made statements about atheists that were deliberately misconstrued by the media in order to boost ratings?! Perhaps the Holy Spirit is insulted by the implication that His protection of the Truth was considered so weak and ineffective.

So please, fellow Catholics, the proper response when reading a MSM headline about the Pope changing a long-held doctrine of Catholicism is not panic or rage or despair. Rather, it’s a yawn, an eye-roll, and a resigned sigh – as well as a realization that we’re once again called upon to engage in the new evangelization for the sake of the Kingdom in the realm of social media and among our friends and family.

Photography: See our Photographers page.

About the Author:

JoAnna was baptized, raised, and married in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America but converted to Catholicism in May 2003, on G.K. Chesterton's birthday. She has five terrific kids here on earth, four saints in heaven praying for her, and a wonderful husband of 14 years who supports her in all things. By day, she is a content editor for a global information company; by night, she enjoys defending the Catholic faith online (in between her duties as chief cook and bottle washer for La Casa Wahlund). She blogs at and more sporadically at

If you enjoyed this essay, subscribe below to receive a daily digest of all our essays.

Thank you for supporting us!

  • Thank you for this article! I’ve lost count of how often I have to correct stories in the comments section. And I’ve had to calm the panic of some of my friends. Thankfully, I’ve only had to do it twice as they quickly caught on to the ruse by the press. When they can’t find something they’ll ask me. I never, NEVER trust anything reported by the press, even typically conservative sites. I do my research. So far the worst twisting I’ve ever seen was when Pope Francis, for the Year of Mercy, gave all priests the authority to remove the automatic excommunication associated with abortion, which is usually only done by the bishop in some areas (here in US and Canada priests have been able to do that). What came out on the conservative sites were variations on the following: Pope Gives Catholic Women a Year to Have as Many Abortions as They Want; Pope Says Abortion No Longer a Sin…. you get the picture.

  • Several recent comments on this article have been deemed inappropriate and removed. As a result, further comments on this article have been closed.

  • Steve

    The problem with so much information these days is that we people’s minds often respond like a stomach at a buffet all you can eat (stuff) and pick and choose what we want (or just how much can be consumed in the shortest amount of time) just because its there and cheap and we forget to taste (enjoy) the food (in the case of information use critical thinking taking our time) and then (god help us) we add the “media” dressings of choice and then wash it down with some glass of “post opinion – on the rocks” and no wonder our minds get the equivalent of acid indigestion!

  • BelovedCatholic

    Thanks JoAnna for this Article. God bless you!!!

  • Helen Stevens Blanton

    History has distorted the truth about how religion developed, the gaps in the archeological footprints between mythology and theology are becoming more apparent and people a beginning to realize we all have been believing in myths. Science and medicine have also proven that economic progress got in the way of the substances which should have been condemned that have altered the brains of many people in which now only medicine can alleviate with anti-depressants or opiates such as Suboxine for life. Example: Heroin changes the brain permanently and no amount of prayer, will power or believe in God can feed the need the nervous system no longer can produce. Intelligent people or powerful people who have the ability or power to change society were considered Gods by the dependent upon them and Kings whos authority was required in order to bring about social order used religion to keep people in submission. Females in particular were ignored throughout history and the autonomic structure of our bodies kept us in confusion about the confidence we otherwise could have had in being pro-active as family protectors. Religion has been de-bunked by in large and there is more to be discovered about what happens when we die.

  • Tracy Dixon

    People make life difficult for their self , we are in the world were everything is in control , i was living a life of poverty and pains, i never new there was a life be young that, but right now i enjoyed every dividend of life , am rich , famous , powerful,i live a life with out no stress, but all this was a surprise , for any body who want riches famous and power,then you have the chance to do that, join the illuminati today to get $25000 every 3 days and $1000000 monthly membership blessing contact the following email; . we don,t patronize people to join,. we only want you to rule your world and be free from oppression

  • illuminati

    Hello every one my name is Roberto i want to share my testimony on how i belong to illuminati order, a friend of mine always give me money…cos he is very rich, one day he said he is not going to give me fish but to teach me how to fish, so i was very happy, i never new he was a member of illuminati order since we started our friendship! so i was initiated to illuminati order and few days later i was awarded a contract worth of millions of Dollars, in my business i am doing very well, i can now influence people, render financial help etc, if you are interested in this great order kindly contact us today via email: or call +2348137838605 for assistance.

  • illuminati membership

    join the great illuminati brotherhood today and become famous and
    wealthy. to get initiated contact….

  • illuminati membership

    join the great illuminati brotherhood today and become famous and wealthy. to get initiated contact

  • illuminati membership

    WELCOME TO ILLUMINATI,; the Club of the Rich and Famous; is the world oldest and largest fraternity made up of 3 Millions Members.We are one Family under one father who is the Supreme Being. In Illuminati we believe that we were born in paradise and no member should struggle in this world. Hence all our new members are given Money Rewards once they join in order to upgrade their lifestyle.; interested viewers should contact us; on..(

    • jamey brown

      Justice Kennedy, will you stop bothering us? You’ve already showed the world your impenetrable ignorance on June 26th. You’re not helping your cause, you’re only making it worse.

  • illuminati membership

    WELCOME TO ILLUMINATI,; the Club of the Rich and Famous; is the world oldest and largest fraternity made up of 3 Millions Members.We are one Family under one father who is the Supreme Being. In Illuminati we believe that we were born in paradise and no member should struggle in this world. Hence all our new members are given Money Rewards once they join in order to upgrade their lifestyle.; interested viewers should contact us; on..(

  • illuminati membership

    WELCOME TO ILLUMINATI,; the Club of the Rich and Famous; is the world oldest and largest fraternity made up of 3 Millions Members.We are one Family under one father who is the Supreme Being. In Illuminati we believe that we were born in paradise and no member should struggle in this world. Hence all our new members are given Money Rewards once they join in order to upgrade their lifestyle.; interested viewers should contact us; on..(

  • Katherine

    I am NOT Catholic, but the Pope is the best person walking the face of the earth who has a voice heard by others. He follows Christ’s teachings. I personally don’t care about the history of human faired in the churches of the world; I care about humans who walk in the footsteps of Christ. If any church leader doesn’t do what the Pope does the church is already dead.

  • Illuminati Authority


    We have seen many people online ask questions about the stories on the Illuminati. Most have asked how they can join, while others prefered to comprehend the phenomenon further. Today, I’ll take a gander at how to join this mysterious social order.

    Fear not for your war-stricken, poverty-ridden planet: help is on the way. The Illuminati’s path for humanity – our Universal Design – has spanned centuries to safeguard the human species from extinction. For the first time in history, the Illuminati has broken its silence with Illuminatiam: a testament of this planet’s future, wisdom previously available only to elite members, and your life’s guide to all that is ahead.Join the thousands of people from all walks of life who’ve committed themselves to the betterment of the human species as a whole – Christians, Muslims, Atheists, Hindus, Buddhists, and believers of all kinds. Illuminatiam introduces time-tested mental processes that many attribute to increasing wealth, overcoming hardships, and finding happiness.If you are interested contact us on +2348166146713 Or Our Email

  • Illuminati Authority


    We have seen many people online ask questions about the stories on the Illuminati. Most have asked how they can join, while others prefered to comprehend the phenomenon further. Today, I’ll take a gander at how to join this mysterious social order.

    Fear not for your war-stricken, poverty-ridden planet: help is on the way. The Illuminati’s path for humanity – our Universal Design – has spanned centuries to safeguard the human species from extinction. For the first time in history, the Illuminati has broken its silence with Illuminatiam: a testament of this planet’s future, wisdom previously available only to elite members, and your life’s guide to all that is ahead.Join the thousands of people from all walks of life who’ve committed themselves to the betterment of the human species as a whole – Christians, Muslims, Atheists, Hindus, Buddhists, and believers of all kinds. Illuminatiam introduces time-tested mental processes that many attribute to increasing wealth, overcoming hardships, and finding happiness.If you are interested contact us on +2348166146713 Or Our Email

  • Alan

    Pope Francis is really very forward thinking and is truly commendable for has spoken about topics relevant to the current issues of the world such as environmental protection and he has addressed several oppressive, backward, thinking and practices about evolution and society.
    Pope Francis must be heard and people need to listen to see how all this will improve the world.

  • larry

    Actually Pope Francis has had many other internal helpers to destroy the Church over the years. His own religious preach heresy and false theology.

    • Yes, people have free will to do bad things. The question is, does Pope Francis agree with those who preach heresy and false theology, even within the Church? The answer is no.

      I find it sad that you don’t trust Jesus’ promise that the gates of Hell will not prevail.

    • larry

      The more I hear what the Frank says, the more I believe that he is swayed by modernist ideas which is dangerous. Pius X addressed the dangers of Modernism in an encyclical.

    • Hm, that’s interesting, because Pope Francis doesn’t teach anything contrary to what Pius X taught.

      Here is something Pius X DID teach:

      “Therefore, when we love the Pope, there are no discussions regarding what he orders or demands, or up to what point obedience must go, and in what things he is to be obeyed; when we love the Pope, we do not say that he has not spoken clearly enough, almost as if he were forced to repeat to the ear of each one the will clearly expressed so many times not only in person, but with letters and other public documents; we do not place his orders in doubt, adding the facile pretext of those unwilling to obey – that it is not the Pope who commands, but those who surround him; we do not limit the field in which he might and must exercise his authority; we do not set above the authority of the Pope that of other persons, however learned, who dissent from the Pope, who, even though learned, are not holy, because whoever is holy cannot dissent from the Pope.”

      I don’t think think Pius X would be impressed with your disrespect of Pope Francis.

  • Mcainn Freemasonry

    (Greetings to you my followers)

    you are welcome to THE GREAT ILLUMINATI THE NEW WORLD ORDER!! For the first time in history FREEMASONRY are opening doors to who ever want to join. TH GREAT ILLUMINATI the Order has become a popular topic for Stories, novels, websites, and even video Cartoons. From the Great Sadness, which was ultimately necessary, to world wars. In many people’s minds, the world Order idea ties in with the New World Order, a current political idea about a one-world government, religion, and financial system. The New World Order is the outward goal and we are the secret power working behind the scenes to achieve it. Many pseudo-entertainers are aware of Illuminati legends and work those symbols and myths into their acts to fuel further speculation. Supporters of this idea say organizations like the United Nations, European Union, the World Health Organization, the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, G-20 Economic Group, the World Court, NATO, Council on Foreign Relations, World Council of Churches and various multinational corporations are pawns of the New World Order, nudging the world closer and closer to this socialist, one-economy, one-religion if you know that you want to join kindly Email me via(mcainilluminati@gmail,com)

  • illuminati

    Good new to everyone, i am an one of the Agents sent by the Lord superior (Grand master) to bring as many of those who are interested in becoming a member of the great Illuminati temple, Beoming a Member of the ILLUMINATI. your qualifications are;-Only those who can provide service for themselves, like the Politicians, Musicians, Business Man/Woman, student, i do business, I own a Construction company, and i also own one of the Biggest Electronic Appliance shop, and my family now lives in USA, i was once like you, me & my wife were financially down to 1 square meal a day, what kind of life was that to live, I lived in poverty until i saw an opportunity to be a member of the GREAT TEMPLE OF ILLUMINATI BROTHERHOOD and i took my chances and i have been a member for close to 10 years now. The higher you get the richer you become Illuminati, it makes your business grow faster than you can ever imagine, illuminati brings out the talent in you and make you famous, as you become a member of illuminati order you will receive 2,000,000 US DOLLARS instantly on your Bank Account, there are many more other benefits you stand to gain, so if you are interested to be a member contact me now on +2347056024545 or our EMAIL JOIN US TODAY & BECOME RICH, POWERFUL AND FAMOUS ALL YOUR LIFE.

  • Brown Lara

    Do you want to be a member of the great
    brotherhood Illuminati? we are going to
    make you
    rich famous and to be a world known
    star, get a good
    job, to win elections and get into a political
    power we
    are going to enrich you in all your
    empowerment and you will never loose any
    case in
    court or were ever, you will have powers to
    people in high places email us now at or call our temple number +2348161554365

  • Brown Lara

    Hello everyone at there,for the first time, we opening to the massing to join the Illuminati member, so many people have been wondering how to join the Illuminati fraternity brotherhood, but now we are here to help you to join the Illuminati per our law, you must be introduced into fraternity by one of our member, so we are here to introduce you into brotherhood, so by registering yourself by paying your Illuminati registration form so that after some time, you will be called for initiation.if you are really ready to become a Illuminati member, contact our email or call our temple number +2348161554365 to make you a real Illuminati member so that you can be rich and famous in life okay.

  • NOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION!!! Look up “Tomás de Torquemada”: Catholicism is evil!!!

  • If the Catholic church doesn`t change and conform to modern times, only pedophiles will be catholic. The Pope mobile alone proves the “Catholic God” is invisible because it ain`t there to save The Pope or anyone else for that matter. I`ve seen the poor, lame, maimed, blind, homeless, starving, and tortured. I`ve seen the pope`s golden throne and his giant gold cross and ruby slippers; you will all burn according to Jesus:

    “But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.” — Luke 6:24

    “Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.” — James 5:1

    Mark 10:21 Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.”

    Luke 18:22 Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, “Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me.”

    Matthew 19:21 Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.19:22 But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions.19:23 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.19:24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

    Lets face it; we all know the bible is superstitious, supernatural, paranormal, metaphysical, mythological, magical, mystical, fairy tale bs or at least you know now. Faith=BS; look it up.

    Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.10:36 And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.10:37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

    Your sadistic, evil, monster-God doesn`t exist and if He did; it would be our moral duty to kill it!

    Peace, love, happiness, truth, justice, liberty, freedom, democracy, equality, empathy, and compassion to all of us; every one!

  • dwarf

    I’m very glad that someone wrote something like this. I became a Catholic when I was nine-years-old along with ten other family members, and I love my faith as strongly as a young full-blooded Irishman can.

  • michelle

    WARNING! WARNING!! WARNING!!! If you do not want to join the Illuminati do not read this message. Rules * You must be above 18 years of age. * You must have full access to the internet. * You must not discuss the secret of the Illuminati to anyone. * We are not interested in anyone who has obtained their knowledge about the Illuminati based on what they%u2019ve HEARD from Mass Media (News or Performing Arts), Conspiracy Theorists (Amateur or Professional Authors or Speculators), Internet Rumors, or other HERESY. * Once you join the Illuminati within one week of your membership you will achieved the greatest goal in life and also have wealth and fame. * No one discard the message of the GREAT ILLUMINATI if discarded the person will be tormented both day and night. * Failure to compel to the order and rules of the GREAT ILLUMINATI shall see your fame and riches taken back. * The money ALWAYS flows TOWARDS Illuminati members…And AWAY from NON Illuminati members… One of the rules of the Illuminati is “We don’t talk about the Illuminati” so I can’t say too much about it here. If you are truly interested and get back to me via email? or call +2349033119072 Do not play mind games

  • Allen W

    Do you really believe that JoAnna? Just take a look at this collection of Francis’ sayings (with links, each and every one) and then the corresponding quotes from more than 20 Popes, besides other saints, catechisms etc. :
    These Spanish priests have REALLY done their homework. And they are no lefebrists, mind you.
    THEN write another post. How about that?

  • Here is the PROOF that Jorge Mario Bergoglio (“pope” Francis) is a member of the ROTARY CLUB, a global Free-masonic organization. Right next to it (or below) I inserted what the Catholic Church has to say about belonging to the ROTARY CLUB.

  • Anderson Thomas

    and I suggest I go back to proof reading before I hit the submit button. Angels & singing and the like.

  • Anderson Thomas

    Sure just what we need another Evangelical, Lutheran heretic mommie blogger just recently turned kinda maybe Catholic. Mommie knows best, we need her to tell us real life long well informed Catholics all the angles and saints from the birth of Christ until Vatican II what we don’t know how. Sigh! we now have the love peace and harmony of the fifth dimensions signing in the heavens. All of this thanks to Francis. What a wonderful liberating protestant masonic kind heart-ed radical liberation theology communist pope he is. Yep worship of man is in and God is out. Jesus came to save us not from hell but feeling bad about ourselves. Of opinion and arses everybodys got one but they are not all equal. I suggest she goes back to doing something she knows about, Perhaps baking cookies.

    • I’ve been Catholic since 2003. Last time I checked, 12 years ago isn’t exactly “recent.”

      As to your other comments, please, keep making them. There is no better way for you to display your obvious ignorance.

  • Rowie Truth

    In those days, Pope Leo said to the clergy: ‘When Jesus the Son of Man shall come to the seat of our Majesty, say first of all, ‘Friend, wherefore art Thou come hither? And if He gives you naught in silver or gold, cast Him forth into outer darkness.'”
    (A History of the Popes, Dr Joseph McCabe, ibid., vol. 2, chapter on “The Age of Power”

    It was Pope Leo X who made the most infamous and damaging statement about Christianity in the history of the Church. His declaration revealed to the world papal knowledge of the Vatican’s false presentation of Jesus Christ and unashamedly exposed the puerile nature of the Christian religion. At a lavish Good Friday banquet in the Vatican in 1514, and in the company of “seven intimates” (Annales Ecclesiastici, Caesar Baronius, Folio Antwerp, 1597, tome 14), Leo made an amazing announcement that the Church has since tried hard to invalidate.

    People leave the catholic church, His Spirit is not there, only antichrist, God only wants Jesus anything between Him and believers. My experience is that catholics are void of His Spirit and therefor believe the lies told there. It fills a religeous desire, but it is fake and empty.

    In 2010 I recieved forgiveness and was filled with His Spirit. If the Pope, or any catholic would experience this also they would leave and never set foot in a catholic building ever again.

  • Remember Gethsemane

    The popes you listed Joanna were guilty of mortal sins, not outright heresies contrary to revealed Catholic dogma. Mortal sin can be forgiven with sincere repentance, heresy is a blatant affront to God’s truth and NOONE who dies holding heresy enters the kingdom of God, a pope who holds heresy automatically loses his office without formality, is excommunicated ipso facto no longer a Catholic, this is revealed Truth. Who canonised the two saints in your family btw?

    • God canonized the two saints in my family. 🙂 I hope and trust in His mercy!

      Pope Francis has never said or done anything heretical, so you don’t have to worry. 🙂

  • Philip MO

    Let me start answering from the last question.

    “I don’t think the differences between Catholic and
    Latin America countries are as simple as
    Catholic vs Protestant”

    Very convenient answer! What else can you say?

    Religious beliefs determine the behavior of people individually
    and collectively and it determines how well a society as a whole behaves. Belief
    system create the fabric of culture. That’s why people used to say “the
    Christian West’ in comparison to the East. This is a proved fact and can be
    easily observed. I can give well
    attested and observed facts of religious
    influence change the destiny of communities. It’s hilarious that you answer
    with simple nos just to make you right. You are in fact trying to prove that
    the word of God has no effect or the people of God can be no light in this

    “yup, those happened, in all human institutions,
    not just the Catholic Church “. Name a couple of Protestant churches
    whose head led a war and ordered killing of enemies. Yes, all have sinned, even
    Paul said ‘what a wretched sinner I am”. I am not surprised how lightly
    you try to justify centuries long inhuman atrocities of the Catholic church
    with meaningless arguments. You have no
    other option, I know!

    Pope have apologized for many of these atrocities in the
    last century but not for other sins like telling a lie, lusting etc. So all
    sins are not as consequential as killing humans right? And only the Catholic church did
    such inhuman atrocities while the command of the Lord was plain and clear – ‘love thy enemy’. Catholicism a true church? From God? Of God? ….. you are kidding.

    Even if other churches (are others true churches?) have done
    killings does that make Catholicism right?. As I said you can make only
    meaningless arguments.

    It doesn’t take much theological knowledge to understand if
    a church is truly serving God . It can’t
    be that Church which continued with a history of mass killings while ‘preserving’
    the word of God which commanded not to kill and love thy enemy.

    Look at ISIS. Thy are killing for a god!. This is what Catholicism
    did with its papal authority. They did it for the God of the Bible? God of the Bible would keep His silence for
    centuries if the Catholic church truly belonged to Him? Be honest and open.

    “Can you please show me a church that in which
    all its members are sinless?” Funny. The Pope apologized for the
    Catholic Church’s wrong doings and not of its members. The Catholic Church under
    the leadership of ‘holy’ Popes did all those beastly things. These are well acknowledged
    things then why are you arguing with meaningless words. Yes, accepting faults
    is accepting the Catholic church was and is not a Church directed by God. It’s
    as simple as that. Many Catholics understand this dilemma.

    “Do you have evidence to back up this assertion that
    monasteries tortured human souls?”

    It’s better to hear directly from ex monks and nuns than
    from me. If the situation is worse now you can imagine what it was during the
    time when Catholicism was anti human. I can easily give links but the number is
    so large that it is better you do an online search. You can only argue against

    “No, but He allows us to help” . You say God used the Catholic church to preserve
    the Bible?. Again an unfounded argument. Have you really understood the God of
    the Bible?. Do you think the God of the Bible would use a church which would
    never practice what is written in it (do not kill, love they enemy) and
    continue with its killing spree to preserve His precious word?. Study how the OT was preserved. Many secular
    atheistic institutions and museums preserve
    different versions of the Bible. Monasteries didn’t do any better. Not preserving
    the Bible matters but doing it and that is what God is expecting of a true church.

    “Look at the thousands of denominations that all claim to
    interpret the Bible correctly.

    They can’t all be right”

    True, they can’t be all right on all matters but most of
    them agree on certain basic Biblical matters which testify against Catholicism (
    I mentioned some of which in my earlier comment). Even Paul and Peter had differences
    but that doesn’t make them less Christians but they two agreed on the
    fundamental things. Here the Catholic church is in error in the fundamental
    matters such as how a person is saved.

    Regarding worshipping graven image. I am quoting from the
    article you quoted.

    “The Catholic Church does not believe any statue or
    image has any power in and of itself”. This is the non sense answer all pantheists
    give especially, the largest of them the Hindus. And this is what the Israelites
    said when they built an image while Moses was away with the Lord. This is
    simply just another usual Catholic nonsense justification. If there’s no power
    in an image and no need for a mediator as the Bible says why the hell you have
    such things. It tells a lot about the Roman church’s’ origin.

    “Prayer to saints (which includes Mary, but during the
    time the NT was written Mary was still alive…” Yet another argument
    which makes no sense.

    The Catholic would use all kinds arguments to make their
    position look right. The fact is we don’t see such things in the NT which was
    written during the life time of Mary. Where did you get the idea that what you
    say is more important than what is commanded and what is set as an example in
    the NT?

    About my usage of ‘pre advent’. I used it by mistake and what
    I tried to mean was the period of time before Jesus’ first coming.

    About Mary – queen of heaven. I am quoting below from your quoted article.

    “This title “mother of my Lord” is packed with great
    queenly significance”. See how cunningly and unintelligently this man
    tries to fool people especially the Catholics.

    I can give detailed reply to all those Catholic nonsense but
    it’s beyond the scope of this comment section.

    I am surprised how far you would go defending Catholicism. You
    use faulty logic and twist facts. I know you have no other choice except doing
    it. But know this there is a beautiful factual explanation for everything which
    debunk the Catholic position altogether. I am happy millions turn away from Catholicism
    and find the truth which sets them free.

    • So… you can’t back up any of your claims with actual evidence. thanks. That’s all I needed to know.

    • Manus

      You need proof for atrocities the Catholic church did for centuries? need proof for Catholics around the world bow before statues of Mary?
      You are living in your own insulated world where you want to hear only good and soothing words. But truth is hard and painful.
      If you know how to use Google you can find some truth within half an hour.
      Be a good Christian not a good Catholic. Bye.

    • I am being a good Christian by being a good Catholic.

      And yes, I know people have committed atrocities in the name of Catholicism. People have committed atrocities in the name of Protestantism too. (Henry VIII, Elizabeth I persecution of Catholics…) people have also committed to atrocities in the name of Islam, and in the name of atheism. Not sure what that proves except that all human beings are sinful.

      yes, Catholics honor Mary, just like Jesus did, and just like the Bible says we should (see the Magnificat). The question is, why don’t you? Do you oppose the Bible?

  • Philip MO

    It’s funny reading all the previous comments. I wonder how many of them really take into account facts surrounding the Catholic church. Firstly it contradicts the clear written revelation in the Bible (There are so many resources available online for any truth seeker with an open mind). The Catholic Church has destroyed the name of Christianity with what it did through the dark ages. A true Church of God can never do these inhuman nasty things and continue with it for centuries (Only the dumb will believe otherwise).
    See what is happening these days. Child sex scandals, financial scandals in Vatican, the Pope saying all nonsense,…….. .
    And, now the real test. Compare the Catholic countries and the Protestant countries especially America, a nation founded by Protestants. Can’t you see the big difference? Worlds brightest minds prefer Protestant nations over Catholic nations for immigration. Can’t you see the big difference between South America and United Sates of America?. Why this difference? (The Bible says by their fruits you can recognize them!).
    The Bible and the verifiable facts testify against Catholicism. Only those who are not interested in truth will defend Catholicism and remain in it.

    • “Firstly the Catholic teachings contradict the clear written revelation in the Bible.”

      Actually, that’s not true. All Catholic teachings are affirmed by Scripture.

      “The Catholic Church has destroyed the name of Christianity with what it did through the dark ages.”

      False. The Catholic Church preserved knowledge in monasteries that might have otherwise been lost during the Dark Ages. This is historical fact.

      “The Bible and the verifiable facts testify against Catholicism.”

      Also false. There’s ample evidence to the contrary.

    • Philip MO

      “All Catholic teachings are affirmed by Scripture”


      Where does the Bible say that Mary is the Queen of Heaven?. Where does the Bible say you can pray to Mary for mediation and where is an example given in the Bible? Where does the Bible say you can pray to dead mediators and for the dead? Where is an example given in the Bible for making of graven images of Mary and others for worship? (I can ask more). Yes, you can misinterpret the Bible to suit your arguments but not establish from the Bible

      No. if God is the author no portion of the Bible would have lost. God doesn’t need human help. Where there any Catholic monasteries for the compilation and preservation of the OT during pre advent period ? Then why are you talking about monasteries which were in fact places of torture of human souls.

      Haven’t you heard about the crusades where millions were slaughtered (for whatever reason) and inquisitions and all kinds of corruptions and child abuse and political fights and sexual scandals of Popes,……….which created a bad name for Christianity?

      You can say only no, no,…. just like any good Catholic would do but you can’t defend Catholicism with facts.

      Jesus said by their fruits you can recognize them. Just look at USA (built by Protestants on protestant work ethics) and Latin American countries (created by immigrant Catholics) and compare. Why Catholic Latin America countries are no match for the Protestant United States?. Religion makes the difference. Do you know that the best and brightest minds including Catholics from around the world prefer protestant nations like,America, Britain, Australia, New Zealand… for immigration and permanent settlement over Catholic nations?. You can see very clear difference in quality between communities created by Catholic population and Protestant/Evangelical population in African and Asian countries. If you are willing to see you can see these clear facts.

      Again, the scripture and facts testify against Catholicism. You can only defend it with mere meaningless words.

    • Mary’s Queenship in Scripture:

      Prayer to saints (which includes Mary, but during the time the NT was written Mary was still alive, so any reference to prayer to her would, of course, be in the context of asking for prayers from fellow Christians here on Earth):

      Where does the Bible say you can pray to dead mediators and for the dead? (BTW, what do you mean by “dead mediators”?) Same link:

      Graven images:

      “Yes, you can misinterpret the Bible to suit your arguments but not establish from the Bible.”

      Yes, this is exactly what happens with Protestantism. Look at the thousands of denominations that all claim to interpret the Bible correctly. They can’t all be right. Without an authoritative interpreter, how do we know?

      If you do have any other questions, please let me know! I’m more than happy to help answer them.

      “God doesn’t need human help.”

      No, but He allows us to help. And we need to cooperate with our own salvation — He gives us the choice to reject Him if we choose.

      “Where there any Catholic monasteries for the compilation and preservation of the OT during pre advent period ?” I’m not sure what you mean by “pre advent period.” Can you clarify?

      “Then why are you talking about monasteries which were in fact places of torture of human souls?” Do you have evidence to back up this assertion that monasteries tortured human souls?

      Re: the Crusades –

      Re: the Inquisitions:

      “all kinds of corruptions and child abuse and political fights and sexual scandals of Popes” – yup, those happened, in all human institutions, not just the Catholic Church. Humans are sinful. Isn’t it amazing that in 2,000 years of Church history, She has never once taught error as doctrine despite the sins of some of Her leaders? And that she still remains despite the sins and scandals of Her members over the years? How fortunate we are that the holiness of the Church is not dependent upon the holiness of Her members!

      Can you please show me a church that in which all its members are sinless? I don’t believe that one exists.

      I don’t think the differences between Catholic and Latin America countries are as simple as Catholic vs Protestant.

      “Again, the scripture and facts testify against Catholicism. You can only defend it with mere meaningless words.” Actually I’ve just proven it with documented evidence. Care to respond to that evidence?

    • SnowRose

      ‘Firstly the Catholic teachings contradict the clear written revelation in the Bible’
      Well that’s an odd statement as the Catholic Church is the reason you have a Bible at all. There were no other forms/versions of Christianity at that time- only Catholic. Are you saying the Church put together the Bible and then went against it? How silly.
      ‘ Only those who are not interested in truth will defend Catholicism and remain in it.’
      No, only those who defy the Truth will leave the Church Christ Himself instituted. All other churches are founded by men not Christ.

  • The Spider

    You poor stupid bastards. The Pope is anti-Christian. When are you all going to wake up and realize that? Thank God, I’m not a Catholic.

  • Pingback: 5 Favorites | Mama Needs Coffee()

  • james

    JoAnna, I think you should be given credit for sparking the longest running, most controversial blog ever recorded. Congratulations

  • Dennis Richardson

    No damn way. Long ago before Malachi Martin, Alberto Riviera, Adam Weishaupt, Ignatius Loyola, Francis Borgia, Saint Jerome or many other Roman Catholics came along Satanism has existed inside the Vatican. It has NOT been in concert with biblical scripture forever in the past. No Papacy is in the New Testament.

    • Actually, Peter’s papacy is in the new testament. See Matthew 16:18.

      Isn’t it amazing that in 2,000 years, the Catholic Church has never taught error as doctrine in the realm of faith and morals, even with some very evil people within the Church? That smacks of supernatural protection to me.

  • Mark Thompson

    The best way to be a real member of illuminati.

    Do you want to be a member of Illuminati as a brotherhood that can make you rich for ever it can also make your name famous and power control people in high places in the worldwide contact us now join Illuminati now are you a man or woman business man or business woman or an artist,Politicians and you want to become big, Powerful and famous in the world, join us to become one of our official member today in the great shall be given an ideal chance to visit the illuminati and his representative after registrations is completed by you, no sacrifice or human life needed, Illuminati brotherhood brings along wealth and famous in life, you have a full access to eradicate poverty away from your life now. it only a member who is been initiated into the church of illuminati have the authority to bring any member to the church, so before you contact any body you must be link by who is already a member, Join us today and realize your dreams. we also help out our member in protection of drugs pushing email: or you contact our phone number +2347056024545,you will be rich and famous for the rest of your life and your family and any body close to you, illuminati make there member happy so i will want you all to also be a new member of the illuminati if you are interested, urgently reply us back now, we are ready to make you a member of the illuminati…

  • Mark Thompson

    The best way to be a real member of illuminati.

    Do you want to be a member of Illuminati as a brotherhood that can make you rich for ever it can also make your name famous and power control people in high places in the worldwide contact us now join Illuminati now are you a man or woman business man or business woman or an artist,Politicians and you want to become big, Powerful and famous in the world, join us to become one of our official member today in the great shall be given an ideal chance to visit the illuminati and his representative after registrations is completed by you, no sacrifice or human life needed, Illuminati brotherhood brings along wealth and famous in life, you have a full access to eradicate poverty away from your life now. it only a member who is been initiated into the church of illuminati have the authority to bring any member to the church, so before you contact any body you must be link by who is already a member, Join us today and realize your dreams. we also help out our member in protection of drugs pushing email: or you contact our phone number +2347056024545,you will be rich and famous for the rest of your life and your family and any body close to you, illuminati make there member happy so i will want you all to also be a new member of the illuminati if you are interested, urgently reply us back now, we are ready to make you a member of the illuminati..

  • Mark Thompson

    The best way to be a real member of illuminati.

    Do you want to be a member of Illuminati as a brotherhood that can make you rich for ever it can also make your name famous and power control people in high places in the worldwide contact us now join Illuminati now are you a man or woman business man or business woman or an artist,Politicians and you want to become big, Powerful and famous in the world, join us to become one of our official member today in the great shall be given an ideal chance to visit the illuminati and his representative after registrations is completed by you, no sacrifice or human life needed, Illuminati brotherhood brings along wealth and famous in life, you have a full access to eradicate poverty away from your life now. it only a member who is been initiated into the church of illuminati have the authority to bring any member to the church, so before you contact any body you must be link by who is already a member, Join us today and realize your dreams. we also help out our member in protection of drugs pushing email: or you contact our phone number +2347056024545,you will be rich and famous for the rest of your life and your family and any body close to you, illuminati make there member happy so i will want you all to also be a new member of the illuminati if you are interested, urgently reply us back now, we are ready to make you a member of the illuminati.

  • This man is not the TRUE Pope. He has no authority, for he is a Freemason – a member of the ROTARY CLUB.

    • Well, since you have words in ALL CAPS, you can OBVIOUSLY provide EVIDENCE to back up your ACCUSATIONS.

    • These are NOT accusations, but the Truth. And if you need proof for what I say (which are all out there), then you may provide the proof of the validity of his non-canonical election as well as the validity of his status as a Catholic (since no Pope can partake to any kind of masonic organization).

      Why are you defending the lies of this man? Are you paid by the “KatholiK Gestapo” that ousted Pope Benedict XVI?

    • Here is the PROOF that Jorge Mario Bergoglio (“pope” Francis) is a
      member of the ROTARY CLUB, a global Free-masonic organization. And right below it I inserted what the Catholic Church has to say
      about belonging to the ROTARY CLUB.

    • Um… I see no evidence in this picture of an article from 1951 that proves Pope Francis is a member of the Rotary Club.

    • No worries: I was sent to you for this reason, indeed. I love to make the blind see. I will re-post HIS membership here below, sister.
      I still wonder how you can write on a blog when you are blind, yourself 🙂

    • Funny, I was wondering the same about you, brother. Especially given that you post random articles from 1951 with no relevance to the topic at hand.

    • How can the blind lead the blind?
      And when did you sell your soul to Satan? I ask because you have been denying every single evidence provided; therefore you cannot be anything other than another corrupt infiltrator meant to ruin our Church. Mother Angelica had a big problem with fake Catholics who propagate a false religion under the False Prophet.

      Repent before it is too late for you.

    • The fact that you presume to judge the state of my soul, which is reserved for God alone, is very telling. I have in fact provided proof that your so-called evidence is false. You simply refuse to see it. Let him who has eyes to see, let him see.

    • I am not judging your soul, my friend. I only tell you that what you spread are lies, and lies do not come from God. Or am I to thank you for defending heresies?

    • You are lying about me when you say I spread heresies, because I do no such thing.

    • Can you read English, darling? I said DEFEND and not SPREAD. Or do you ALSO spread heresies, now?

    • Please do not call me darling.

      Why do you lie, Paul?

    • Are you a Catholic? You sound like a Protestant to me.

    • I’m a former Protestant. I converted to Catholicism in 2003. I believe and profess everything that the holy Catholic Church believes, professes, and teaches as divine truth.
      Are you a sedevacantist? My experience they are unable to provide actual evidence to be back up their wild accusations, and thus resort to strange insults and lies to defend their positions.

    • You seem to have remained a Protestant, my dear. Do you know what the Catholic Church teaches? It does not teach heresy – that is for sure. You do not see the heresy in what Bergoglio said about the Mother of Christ because you Protestants do not accept her perpetual immaculate nature.

      Very simple.
      God Bless +++

    • Why do you lie, Paul? Absolutely Mary is immaculate. One reading my comments can clearly see I never said or claimed otherwise, nor has Pope Francis, as I have aptly proved.

    • “By the end of the decade, the Catholic Truth Society was able to declare that “Rotary is neither secret nor seditious”. It was nevertheless still regarded as a “society banned under pain of sin only” and not of “sin and excommunication”. Gradually there was a thaw in relations between the Church and Rotary. In 1970 Pope Pius VI addressed Rotarians in Italy, and in 1979 Pope John Paul II spoke to the International Convention in Rome, praising some of Rotary’s humanitarian programmes at a special audience in the Vatican. Later he accepted a Paul Harris Fellowship and a World Understanding and Peace Award from Rotary, while Catholic priests throughout the world were taking positions of authority, even serving as District Governors.”

  • bondservantofChrist

    it is sad to see people here defending the catholic ‘institution’ as if it is the main institution of Christianity, because it isnt. there are Christians who practice as Catholics, but many who are not. only disciples of Jesus Christ are Christians, not ‘catholics.’ In 2014, this pope had the reading of the muslim koran in St. Peter’s, with muslim prayers also – never done in the history of the catholics. this is not what Christ Jesus would do, or condone. the catholic church as an institution is doomed. the gates of hell will not prevail against the body of Christ, the church of Jesus Christ, not the “catholic” church. Good grief, people, get over yourselves. the arrogance that catholics have referring to their institution as “the church” is ridiculous, and wrong – all based on the idea that Peter was the first “pope” – he wasnt. he was just Christ’s lead apostle after his Ascension – it was NOT meant to incorporate a “Catholic” monopoly on Christianity.

    there are so many red flags with this current ‘leader’ of the catholics i cannot believe you people acknowledge him. Just for instance, HOW MANY OF YOU CATHOLICS WOULD APPROVE OF YOUR LOCAL PASTOR HAVING A MUSLIM IMAM READING THE MUSLIM QURAN AND RECITING MUSLIM PRAYERS FROM THE ALTAR OF YOUR CATHOLIC CHURCH THIS SUNDAY? Honestly. you would be incensed at your pastor, correct? it is blasphemy given what muslims speak about Jesus Christ, that he never died on a cross, etc, etc. WELL, GUESS WHAT, that is what your global “pastor” did. in one of his many distorted, misguided efforts at trying to forge “peace” – he allowed blasphemers to preach in church at St. Peter’s.

    But you know what I have found? I have found that most Catholics are way more committed to DEFENDING CATHOLICISM and THE POPE and THE CATHOLIC INSTITUTION, than they are about BEING PURE and COMMITTED to the PURE, HOLY GOSPEL of JESUS CHRIST. Just like many of you on here will go find a way to minimize and deflect and discount and chide what I say about these muslim blasphemers praying and reading blasphemy at the BEHEST of the “vicar” of Christ Jesus on earth.

    Go ahead and mock me. I am a married father of 5 who is a devoted follower/disciple of Jesus Christ, who was baptized, raised catholic (and I do NOT hate the catholic institution, but have great affection for it), but I have come out of the catholic “program” because it veered from the pure Gospel of Jesus Christ, holy living, Biblical authority & exegesis, etc. Catholics would rather defend CATHOLICISM and “the church” and the “tradition” than really defend the absolute purity of Biblical truth and the real prophets of the Kingdom.

    Go ahead and attack away. i expect it. Defend “catholicism” all day long, it is what you have unknowingly idolized, many of you.

  • SnowCherryBlossoms

    I have yet to find a single accusation accusing Pope Francis of destroying Doctrine to be true. Why are people slandering and lying about him like this?

  • Pingback: Pope Francis Has Single-Handedly Destroyed Catholicism : Catholic Stand | eleganzabello()

  • kim

    …….LONG HELD DOCTRINE,YOU MEAN TEACHINGS FOR CENTURIES THAT Slavery was not against natural law,charging interest on a loan was always serious sin,se in marriage a necessary evil tainted with sin. etc Surely madame you jest.

  • Rose Jennifer

    welcome to the great Illuminati temple were people are rice and famous in life are you a business man or woman or are you a politician or musician and u want to be famous in life you can achieve your dream my being a member of the great Illuminati with this you can be famous and rich in life to be a member you can contact our agent on this address ( or ( and you can call him on phone +2348101704653………..

  • usakindatheart

    to the author, you took examples from 1500’s? and before.. REALLY? as far as I know we have come out of the dark ages, and many have embraced Catholicism, and live by the practices.
    THIS pope Francis, has made comments of non judgement to gays, that atheist are do gooders, and now if you have children you breed like rabbits. What I have noticed is in pictures and videos, CHILDREN are terrified of this pope, DOGS bark at him, and cats hiss. Something is definitely wrong with this pope. His one purpose is to win the popular vote, and if he has to step on all the Catholics to do it, he has no problem with it. It sickens Catholics to see ONE MAN who was chosen to be pope to be so LIBERAL that let it all hang out is the motto he carries around his neck. There is no freedom speeches for journalist about the true nature of politics and religion, only censure. Pope Francis IS destroying Catholicism in a back handed slap kind of way, and the true Catholics have noticed. When he is called to heaven it will not be too soon for the true Catholics on this earth.

    • I encourage you to read what Pope Francis has actually said as opposed to what you think he said (or what the media has reported he said). For example, Pope Francis did NOT say “if you have children you breed like rabbits.” That is calumny. Please see here:

      Pope Francis has never promulgated any teachings that are in opposition to Church teaching, either formally or informally. If you think the has, I’d be interested to see examples (and then I can explain to you how you are mistaken).

  • Jason

    The catholic church is corrupt. It always has been. The faith that some people hold because of them however is real. Look at the facts. The roman took over Christianity when they realized they couldnt control it. The pope at the time unilaterally decided what would be allowed in the bible and what wouldnt (namely only those parts which strengthened a mans position and not a womans) Should it surprise you that it is corrupt when the most corrupt culture in the world were the ones who molded it? I believe you read the bible (all of it, not just what the church has told you is accepted) and then you take what you can from it learn and share this knowledge. One needs no blessing from a man in white or red or black to be forgiven his/her sins. I do however challenge everyone to find a church in the world in christianity that is not corrupt in some way shape or form? It will be a challenge as we are all sinners. Even the pope.

    • Yes, the pope is indeed a sinner! The Church has never said otherwise. Pretty amazing that the Church has never taught error as doctrine in light of the sinful popes who have been at Her head, isn’t it?

      Question – if we were meant to take our sins directly to God, why did Jesus establish the sacrament of reconciliation? Why did He give the Church the power and authority to bind and loose sins if She has no responsibility to do so?

    • Wow, this is so full of misconceptions and outright lies that it’s hard to know where to begin. Jason, if you’re ever interested in learning what the Catholic Church actually teaches instead of what you think it teaches, let me know. Oh, and you might want to brush up on your history as well, as it’s quite incorrect.

  • Clayton Bias

    Do you want to become a member of a great temple and be a star in the world, or you want to become very rich in life and nobody can stop you from it, or you want to become famous in life for people to know you much and give you that respect, if interested then become the Illuminati member and never be poor again cause we will give you all your wish you need from our temple as a member of the great Illuminati kingdom, contact us now via email at: or call+2348065221910

  • Hohn

    The Catholic Church is the next antichrist I am a true christen of god I was not baptised but was a bad guy had a bad life and before I tryed to kill myself I was saved by jesus I started working out about he who gives receives how u treat people is what u get and that the most important thing more then a paedophile pope is jesus and the Ten Commandments i think instead of everyone fighting about religion we should all talk about jesus so more people like me can be saved and do all of the Ten Commandments and give to the poor

    • So, you think the Catholic Church should be the Catholic Church? I quite agree!

      One question, though. Do you think Jesus approves of your lies against the Church? They are quite easily proven false.

  • Micha Elyi

    I hear Pope Francis won’t wear the traditional red shoes because he doesn’t like their taste.

  • Illuminati Choice

    WELCOME TO GREAT ILLUMINATI CHOICE IN (UNITED STATE) TO MEET YOUR DEMAND,AND DESIRE WEALTH, INFLUENCE, STARDOM, POWER AND PROTECTION, are you been passing through difficulties in life, you have a full access to eradicate poverty away and become a full Multi Millionaires by joining the great illuminati brotherhood,then you have the chance to do that today to get $25000 every 3 days and $1000000 monthly membership blessing for doing what you love to do best. contact;, CALL +17607330748,OR +234_811_5638_666, FOR A CHANGE AND BETTER LIFE…

  • Illuminati Choice

    WELCOME TO GREAT ILLUMINATI CHOICE IN (UNITED STATE) TO MEET YOUR DEMAND,AND DESIRE WEALTH, INFLUENCE, STARDOM, POWER AND PROTECTION, are you been passing through difficulties in life, you have a full access to eradicate poverty away and become a full Multi Millionaires by joining the great illuminati brotherhood,then you have the chance to do that today to get $25000 every 3 days and $1000000 monthly membership blessing for doing what you love to do best. contact;, CALL +17607330748,OR +234_811_5638_666, FOR A CHANGE AND BETTER LIFE..

  • SnowBunting

    What I’m seeing is that our Pope Francis is bringing people back to the simplicity of the teachings of Jesus Christ and powerful men do not like this, whether they are part of the hierarchy of the Church or the world. Many in Rome have lost this and have become Pharisees of a sort or simply too worldly. Many in America are making the mistake of judging him as if he were politically motivated or they are using him and twisting his words for their own agendas. So again, he is, in their opinions, threatening their views.
    He is calling every soul to the level of their conscience, stretching them, pushing them to go deeper and examine themselves. In my opinion, he is the perfect Pope for our times. God always gives what it most needed and healing can often times be painful.

  • Julie

    In context of the bad popes, none of them taught on faith or morals…the Holy Spirit preventing them.

  • Emma Jurgens

    JOIN THE ILLUMINATI FROM NIGERIA, USA, OR ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD TODAY BE RICH, FAMEMOUS , AND POSSES us on info. for immediate initiation New members registration is now open online now !!!!!


    A Cash Reward of USD $300,000 USD
    A New Sleek Dream CAR valued at USD $120,000 USD
    A Dream House bought in the country of your own choice
    One Month holiday (fully paid) to your dream tourist destination.
    One year Golf Membership package
    A V.I.P treatment in all Airports in the World
    A total Lifestyle change
    Access to Bohemian Grove
    Monthly payment of $1,000,000 USD into your bank account every month as a member
    One Month booked Appointment with Top 5 world Leaders and Top 5 Celebrities in the World.

    If you are interested send your e-mail to for immediately initiation.New members registration is now open online

  • mary riley

    OMG! Pope Francis is almost as much of a scandal as Jesus!

  • Greg Williams

    Hello my name is Nelly Emily i know you are facing problems like the one i faced but i found a solution and the solution is Priest Grace of, he is a great spell caster, i was having an issue with my husband, the loved we have shared for 10 years seemed to be falling apart, he was drifting away from home from his responsibilities and our three wonderful kids i was devastated until i encountered the great spell caster who helped me out now we are loving happily ever after,i have to tell you my friends in this forum that this is real contact him on his email on or for any problem you might be facing for he can help you out of any situation okay, Thanks great Priest once again your child Emily from USA

  • Joyce Mitar Morgan

    I don’t think Pope Francis has destroyed Catholicism…he is a Holy Spirit filled man and he preaches what the gospels and the bible teaches us…Love one another as I have loved you, and also we are to as told in EZ33 to let our brothers know they are sinning and try to save their souls, if they do not listen then your soul is saved…if they listen you both are saved. Its a simple gospel Pope Francis preaches
    In all faiths they are corrupt people, but in the Catholic Church, the Holy Spirit will eventually will bring about a truly holy man to lead us, one thing is true….the Catholic Church…and the demons of Hell can not prevail againt it..About the corrupt Popes Satan did his best way back then to destroy the church and used popes and priests to try to bring it down, like a priest like Luther…..and those that did not want to follow Church teachings…the Protest-ant faiths….

    We must learn to look at our Priests, Bishops, Cardinals , Pope and religous as human beings and sin just like you and I….

  • Unfortunately, the new pope may be one of the players behind the
    evil practice of community Gangstalking, please visit the following


    please affix 3 w’s and dot com after to view the webpage.

    The reason why I believe there is a religious basis for
    community gangstalking is because they tend to focus
    disproportionately on homosexuals. How does being homosexual or
    viewing adult websites affect national security? Not to mention that
    by doing so they are eroding the people’s trust in religion.

    I predict that the Catholic Religion will go extinct in the next

    • you aren’t the first person to make that prediction over the last 2,000 years, and you won’t be the last. Not surprisingly, it’s never come true.

  • SnowBunting

    I love and pray for Pope Francis. May God continue to Bless him and protect him from the twisted media!

  • Pingback: Yes, Catholics Can Judge! - Catholic Stand : Catholic Stand()

  • Murphy Chloe

    Hello friends i want to share my testimony and how grateful i’m since my lover came back to me because of the grate help Lord Masuka whose email address is render to me. my boyfriend broke up with me first week of july this year because he thought i was cheating on him, he told me that his friends has been telling him that i have been seeing someone else when he is not around i tried to make him understand that his friends are lieing to him but he did not give me the chance to explain to him this was how he left me. after a month of our breakup i tried to live a normal life without him but it was very hard for me to cope then i decided to contact Lord masuka via his email address which i came across this months September 12th during my search looking for help how to get my lover back he cast a love spell for me and make my lover to come back to me within the period of 48hours. with this grate joy in my heart i want to say a big thanks to lord masuka he is the best spell caster and he is the best solution.

  • Richard Mata

    The Lee Harvey Oswald connection; a conspiracy based upon
    facts that you can look up for yourselves: I saw something on the History channel the
    other day about the complete story of Lee Harvey Oswald’s last day or week
    alive regarding his “wedding ring.” This is when he shot President

    There was one thing that stood out. The ring that he left in
    his old lady’s Russian tea cup. Well, it was his old lady’s mother’s tea cup
    (who was hooked up with someone from the Russian interior ministry, or
    something to that effect).

    This ring had the Russian sickle and hammer stamped in it
    (left behind symbolically by Oswald). The Russian sickle and hammer is the equivalent
    of the Freemason square and compass.

    The compass represents God’s intelligent design (the compass,
    measures angles, degrees, and an imperfect circle according to PI as far as I understand

    The square represents Man’s architecture, because nature
    doesn’t build in right angles; as for straight lines, well you could argue that
    a crystal is a straight line, but built upon natural imperfections. Note: you
    can gain the proportion of a square from a compass according to Pythagorean’s
    theorem, because a straight line is 180 degrees, and a right angle is 90
    degrees. The “G” is supposedly represents the Great Architect.

    In order to have a proper order of operations, the word God
    should be above the compass, which is above the square. It is not according to “be
    your own god,” or “do whatever thou wilt.” This plan is specifically against
    the Catholic Church.

    Now take the Russian sickle (agriculture, or God’s
    intelligent design) and hammer (industry, or Man’s industry) and you can see
    the connection. The reason why there is no “G” is because the governmental
    ideology of Russia is communist from the beginning; thus, no freemason
    structure according to the way the United States manifests the Great Architect’s
    plan in its “free” people.

    The plan is a One World Order with mankind’s enslavement
    according to the Federal Reserve System here in America. Reportedly, every country
    in the world is on a One World Order type banking system, with the exception of
    Iran (Kaddafi was supposedly assassinated
    because he wanted to back his country’s economy with the country’s own
    gold). This is what “they” call their manifest destiny; that men are too stupid
    to run their own world, so they should be enslaved.

    This is the thinking behind the Supreme Court’s ruling (here
    in America) regarding the R.F.I.D. chip, which is currently in the Affordable
    Healthcare Act (Obamacare), which is a class II transponder system. It is an implantable
    medical device in the FDA database that is going to contain you records that
    are life sustaining (your medical records), and your records that are life
    supporting (your bank records). Note: this is why the A.C.A. was over a
    thousand pages long; to hide their plan regarding the R.F.I.D. chip, and this
    is why the current congress is only speaking of repealing Obamacare in part
    (today is 12/2/2014).

    According to this R.F.I.D. chip (which is literally the “mark
    of the beast,” because it was first used to mark your pets as your property) it
    is part of the A.C.A. under the “commerce clause” of the United States
    Constitution (where the judicial branch does not have substantive powers to
    legislate; much like Obama and his immigration bullshit) as a tax. This is
    manifest destiny thinking!

    This is because the Federal Reserve System is a Ponzi scheme
    utilized to bankrupt America, where the R.F.I.D. chip is based upon the
    Hollerith machines of Nazi Germany, and the fact that there is a number on the
    bottom of your birth certificate that is on the stock market (more manifest
    destiny thinking). Note: Obama’s stimulus package is a giant step towards
    bankrupting America due to inflation, where you received a one-time payment of
    300 dollars, but your prices at the grocery store tripled permanently (so the
    State can indoctrinate you children to Obama instead of saying the Pledge of Allegiance
    to their country by having you work two jobs, with no benefits, for the same
    food; is this Marxist?). Note: Obamacare is also Obama’s second stimulus package.

    You do know that Obama is a Marxist President in his
    ideology don’t you? You should, you elected him. Now back to Lee Harvey Oswald.
    According to sources, the Freemasons infiltrated Russia in 1917.

    Now take this fact with Italics in the 1954 Douay (Catholic)
    bible (they are not supposed to be there look at the book of Jerimias; I think
    this book manifests this fact (that they are not supposed to be there, which is
    due to a lack of purpose). The England version of this Bible uses the word “shew
    bread” instead of “show bread (which is in the American version of the same
    year).” Why is Old English (the language) used in a modern Douay Bible?

    Maybe it’s Ed Sullivan: “that a really big shew.” Maybe it’s
    Khrushchev banging his shoe on a podium before the U.N. stating “America we
    will bury you.” Maybe it’s the fact that Gorbachev won a Nobel Peace prize for
    dismantling his country. Maybe it’s the fact that Obama won a Nobel Peace prize
    for being elected President (for dismantling his country before it even
    happened; more manifest destiny thinking).

    So, how does this tie in to Lee Harvey Oswald. Well according
    to the documentary that I saw, he met with the K.G.B. guy in charge of Assassinations back then, the week
    before he assassinated President Kennedy, where President Kennedy (in a press
    conference) told the world press to manifest any One World Order corruption. This
    is what is the Great Architect’s plan is. I am a “gangstaking” victim, but I
    paid attention to their attacks over the years. I went to college and learned their
    ways with the basis that “they” are 100 percent anti-God. This is due to their cruel
    methods; I am a Catholic.

    On one more note: there was a prophecy by Saint Malachy that
    the “black” Pope would be assassinated with the Russian federation flag flying
    about the Vatican. Take this and apply this to the movie Stripes. “call me
    Psycho.” “You call me Francis and I’ll kill you.” I like how Psycho was
    shooting at that flock of birds with his M-16 don’t you. Maybe this is according
    to Saint Francis; the Patron Saint of Animals.

  • NDaniels

    There Is only one Jesus The Christ; there are not various denominations of The Word of God. Christ Was Baptized into His One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, and promised to remain with us until the end of Time, at which time, Time no longer being of the essence, we, hopefully, will witness and abide in the New Heaven and the New Earth with Christ our King, forever.

  • knight4444

    Pope Francis is the best Pope the catholic church has had in centuries. He’s speaking the truth, he’s not following the standard right wing hate propaganda, FUX news was created to lure in many catholics, who obviously have ZERO concept of the teachings of Christ but bring in arrogant, racist bill o’rielly, and shawn hannnity and here we go! The GOP has CONNED so many catholics into buying absolute GARGAGE!! Pope Francis is a jewel, that’s why the GOP HATES him.

    • Not everyone in the GOP hates him. Plenty of Democrats do as well. I’d encourage you not to make sweeping generalizations.

  • Paul Joseph C

    This man, “pope” Francis, was invalidly elected as Antonio Socci proved in his new book “Non E’ Francesco” (He is not Francis). Jorge Mario Bergoglio has a clear agenda: to destroy the Catholic Church by creating a schism. He is the False Prophet and this should not be taken lightly.
    Thank you Joanna: you have created a great page. If you ever want to know more about who Mario Bergoglio is, please visit
    This is NOT self-promotion, but rather, a call to the Truth. It is imperative for us, Catholics, to know and denounce the lies which suffocate the Truth.

    God Bless and Help us all +++

    • It’s not a call to truth at all. In fact, you are (perhaps unwittingly) acting as a tool for the Father of Lies. Pope Francis is not a false prophet, nor has he taught anything against the teachings of the Church. I beg you, please repent of your libel against the Holy Father. Look to the saints and how they modeled obedience to the Pope even when they disagreed with him.

    • Thank you for the reply, JoAnna – I appreciate it very much.
      I also apologize for my delayed response, but I hadn’t checked my spam emails.

      I will certainly pray for you to be able to perceive the cunning game of this false teacher who embraced secularism and humanism like no predecessor of his had ever done — in the history of our Church.

      I, further, not only will not repent of declaring the Truth, but I thank the Lord Jesus Christ for Having Bestowed upon an unworthy sinner like myself the gift of discernment. Remember: in the final days, Satan comes as an “angel of light”. The St. Michael the Archangel Prayer, along with the apparitions of La Salette, Fatima and Akita, are very clear about Satan entering the Church in the final stages before Christ’s Second Coming.

      Please, fix your eyes only on the Lord Christ and not on those who profess to represent Him and yet, utter heresies and blasphemies in His Holy Temple.

      May God Guide and Protect you + + +

    • “I will certainly pray for you to be able to perceive the cunning game of this false teacher who embraced secularism and humanism like no predecessor of his had ever done — in the history of our Church.”

      I see no evidence that Pope Francis has embraced either secularism or humanism. Have you listened to anything he has said? Read any of his writings? I doubt it. Why don’t you do so for yourself?

      “Please, fix your eyes only on the Lord Christ and not on those who profess to represent Him and yet, utter heresies and blasphemies in His Holy Temple.”

      I beg of you to do the same. You are being misled into disobedience by the Father of Lies.

    • Have you read his humanistic speech at the EU Parliament? He mentioned the word “god” four times. The word “lord” once…and the Name of Jesus Christ zero times.
      can be easily interpreted as Money, or Power, or The Self, or Allah, or
      Buddha, or the Universe, or Satan, or the endless list of pagan symbol
      surrounding us. Which God among these is he referring to?
      Let us see more. Francis pronounced the word “Lord” only once. Now, the word “lord”
      is not only serving the purpose of calling God by the name of Jesus
      Christ. It is used as a title for a person of authority, control, and
      power over others; a master, chief, or ruler. Someone who exercises
      authority from property rights; an owner of land or of houses. It is
      also used when speaking of a leader who exercises great influence within
      a chosen profession such as the great lords of banking, a feudal
      superior, or the proprietor of a manor. It is further utilized when
      referring to a titled nobleman, or peer, or a person whose ordinary
      appellation contains by courtesy the title Lord or some higher title.
      Therefore, which Lord is he speaking of? When a pope says the
      word “lord” we intend it as Jesus Christ, for this man is wearing the
      clothes of holiness. Then, when his speech is being printed by the
      media, the word is being presented with the capitalized initial “L”
      because understood to be indicating the Lord Jesus Christ.
      again, since the Francis did not attach the actual name of that one
      Lord, we can assume he might be referring to any powerful man on earth,
      whether he is the Antichrist, or any powerful billionaire in the world
      of politics and/or economy. Isn’t there a Lord of Darkness as well?

      After all, it does not cost a person much breath or time to simply add
      the actual name after the word “Lord”, unless the cost is the admission
      of Christ as Lord Himself.
      Four mentions of the generic word “god”. One mention of the generic word “lord”. Then, what about “Jesus Christ” without Lord
      in front? Of course he mentioned the name of Jesus Christ: that is Who
      the pope represents, some might say. It is unthinkable for the pope to
      not mention the Savior, other might believe.
      But the “god of surprises”
      often mentioned by Jorge Mario Bergoglio does not cease to shock us,
      and was able to make the “vicar” suppress the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ completely. Not once
      was that name mentioned. Neither when speaking of poverty, nor when
      expressing compassion for the immigrants or political refugees who die
      in the Mediterranean waters. Not even the shadow of His Holy Name could
      be perceived. The King of the Heavens was entirely omitted in honor of a
      nameless god who complies with the political-religious correctness
      (hypocrisy, that is) so in vogue today, and which conveniently serves
      the politician and world religion leader Francis; the all-inclusive
      church of this nameless god welcomes not just the Catholics, but the
      atheists, the Muslims, the Joel Osteeners, the New Age practitioners,
      the Hindus, the Buddhists, the Taoists, the Pantheists, the Jews, the
      self-worshipers, and all those who belong to thousands of other false and man-made doctrines which deny Jesus Christ as the Son of God.

      Hope you will be able to read his speech.I wish to disobey the one who rebels against Jesus Christ.

    • Yes, I read it, and I thought it was a good speech that was directed to the audience in question, many of whom would have probably tuned him out if he’d talked overtly about Jesus, because they have been conditioned to do so by secular society. So, your point seems to be that pope Francis is a bad pope because he tried to meet people where they are? I disagree with you. I think that makes Francis a good Pope.

      What do you think of these words by Pope Francis? “Dear friends, let us ask the Lord, through the intercession of the Virgin Mary, Mother of the Church, for the grace never to fall into the temptation of thinking we can make it without the others, that we can get along without the Church, that we can save ourselves on our own, of being Christians from the laboratory. On the contrary, you cannot love God without loving your brothers, you cannot love God outside of the Church; you cannot be in communion with God without being so in the Church, and we cannot be good Christians if we are not together with those who seek to follow the Lord Jesus, as one single people, one single body, and this is the Church.”

    • I do not think anything much of what he said, for even the devil can preach really well. But what I look at are FACTS and the HERETICAL nature of his doctrine.

    • Do you know what calumny is?

    • Calumny is what Christ Was accused of as well. If you mean THE TRUTH, yes: I do know the TRUTH. And I d know that the TRUTH is always perceived by this world as calumny.
      We are called to seek the TRUTH Who Is Christ Himself. But until we accept the false doctrine of the False Prophet we will always confuse the Word of God with the false word of Satan.

      God Bless +++

    • If you know that calumny is wrong, why are you committing it against Pope Francis?

    • Calumny is what Christ Was accused of as well. If you mean THE TRUTH,
      yes: I do know the TRUTH. And I d know that the TRUTH is always
      perceived by this world as calumny.
      We are called to seek the TRUTH
      Who Is Christ Himself. But until we accept the false doctrine of the
      False Prophet we will always confuse the Word of God with the false word
      of Satan.

    • Calumny? You mean Truth?
      Why are you instead accusing me of calumny just like the Pharisees would with Christ whenever the religious powerful was being threatened by the Truth of Our Lord?

      I thank you for blessing me, for you falsely accuse me in Jesus’ Holy Name as He Declared during His ‘Sermon on the Mount’. So, thank you. At the same time, though, you seem to not understand that I am not doing anything against this man. I am, instead, trying to make YOU see the Truth, sister.
      Do you think I would use my time to calumny somebody? And to do that just for the fun of it? I have only one interest: to break the illusion that these “masters of the craft” have come to create.

      I can only try and hope; then, of course, it is all about the other person’s choice between wanting to see and not wanting to see.

      I hope you will consider doing some investigating for yourself because you have the right to know the Truth – the entire Truth, I shall say, since you are a practicing Catholic.
      But things are not what they may appear to be —

      God Bless +

    • Yes, Paul. By bearing false witness against the Vicar of Christ, you are committing calumny. You’ve yet to prove any of your accusations against him.

    • I am sorry, my friend, but you are denying the Truth, the evidence. You will be held accountable for any souls fallen into Hell because of your stubborn and proud denial of the Truth. You must tell the truth at all times, woman, or else abandon the ship and save your soul before Christ Comes to judge.

      Do not bare false witness +++

    • Ironically, your words can be applied to yourself. I pray that someday your eyes will be opened and you will see the truth.

    • Very poor answer — The truth remains the Truth, which is Christ Jesus. And this Freemason you call “pope” is not the Vicar of Christ. Benedict XVI is still the valid Pope (…and the last one).

      God Bless +++

    • Pope Benedict XVI himself himself disagrees with you. He does not believe that Pope Francis has committed heresy. Why do you?

    • It is not I deciding who commits the heresies, but the Word of God. And to say that God is not a divine being, or to deny the existence of Hell, is pure and simple heresy.
      Once again: are you a Catholic?

    • Luckily, Pope Francis has said or done none of those things. You really need to check your sources because they are feeding you false information. Yes, I am a Catholic and have been so since 2003.

    • Abomination of Desolation by BerGOGlio +++

    • Rotary……

    • Ouch!

    • God Save us + + +
      And God Bless us for this priest:

    • First, I am speaking the TRUTH. And the TRUTH is Christ. Therefore, there is no sin in such action whatsoever but only goodness.
      And secondly, the man you call “pope” is an invalidly imposed Freemason who, like an imposter, is destroying the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.
      Simply put: it would be a mortal sin for me to defend Jorge Mario Bergogflio as well as his heresies and blasphemies.

      Please, leave the Freemasons you work for and join the truth +++
      God Bless.

    • I work as a content editor for a global information company. I don’t think my boss is a Freemason. In fact, I don’t think he’s religious at all.
      Why are you telling lies when you allegedly stand for the truth?

    • That is exactly what I meant. Your “globalizing” company seems to be divulging much confusion, and since you keep on ignoring the evidence I provide, you have proven over and over again to be paid in order to defend the Free-masonic army that is destroying the Catholic Church.
      I am sure you love all that cardinal Dolan has to say as well, so my question is: how can one person love the Word of Christ and its very opposite at the same time? Didn’t Christ Jesus (Whom you constantly fail to mention in what seems to be sort of a censorship) Teach that we cannot serve two masters?

      You have much thinking to do, sister +++
      I will pray for you.

    • The company I work for has nothing whatsoever to do with the Catholic faith. It is a purely secular company and mainly deals in the EHS&S industries. I really have no idea what you’re talking about.

    • Dear Joanna,

      Even Satan can say kind words, for he mixes truth with lies. He masks his deceit behind the facade of false love and compassion. But the continuous heresies committed by Bergoglio not only make this man fallible, but heretical and invalid in the role he was not bestowed by the Eternal Father in Heaven.

      What do you think about THESE statements and events? They are to be found also on the Vatican website —

      FEBRUARY 11, 2013
      -Pope Benedict XVI Resigns – first Papal resignation in over 600 years
      -Lightning Strikes Saint Peter’s Dome – twice

      MARCH 13, 2013
      -Jorge Mario Bergoglio becomes Pope Francis I
      -Newly elected Pope Francis jokes with Cardinals saying ‘May God forgive you for what you’ve done.’

      MARCH 14, 2013
      -Grand Master Gustavo Raffi of the Grand Orient Masonic Lodge of Italy praises election of Pope Francis

      MARCH 28, 2013
      -Pope Francis washes the feet of female Muslim prisoner

      MAY 22, 2013
      -Pope Francis Says Atheists Who Do Good Are Redeemed. ‘We all have the duty to do good. For Atheists: Just do good and we’ll find a meeting point’

      JUNE 02, 2013
      -On Jesus multiplying the Bread and Fish – ‘Here’s the miracle, that it is more a sharing than a multiplying’

      JUNE 15, 2013
      -‘We look for Jesus Christ and say: ‘This is your sin, and I will sin again’. And Jesus likes that, because it was his mission: to become the sinner for us’

      JULY 08, 2013
      -‘I also think with affection of those Muslim immigrants who this evening begin the fast of Ramadan, which I trust will bear abundant spiritual fruit.’

      JULY 13, 2013
      -Pope Reportedly Says That 1 In 50 Clergy Are Pedophiles, including Bishops and Cardinals

      JULY 26, 2013
      -Pope Francis tells youth: ‘Be rebellious’ and ‘mess’ with dioceses

      JULY 29, 2013
      -When asked about gay priests, Pope Francis replies ‘Who am I to judge?’

      AUGUST 30, 2013
      -Pope Francis breaks protocol by bowing to the Queen of Jordan

      AUGUST 31, 2013
      -Pope Francis begins the Papal Selfie trend

      SEPTEMBER 04, 2013
      -‘The issue for those who do not believe in God is in obeying their own conscience’

      SEPTEMBER 11, 2013
      -Pope implies The Virgin Mary has ‘defects’, saying “The Church and the Virgin Mary are mothers…All mothers have defects, we all have defects, but when we speak of our mother’s defects we gloss over them”

      SEPTEMBER 13, 2013
      -Pope says church is obsessed with gays, abortion, and birth control – ‘It is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time….We have to find a new balance’

      SEPTEMBER 27, 2013
      -On Adoration – ‘Fall asleep then, sleep! He is still looking at you.’

      OCTOBER 01, 2013
      -‘Proselytism is solemn nonsense, it makes no sense. We need to get to know each other, listen to each other and improve our knowledge of the world around us’
      -‘The most serious of the evils that afflict the world these days are youth unemployment and the loneliness of the old’
      -‘Each of us has a vision of good and of evil. We have to encourage people to move towards what they think is good’
      -‘I believe in God, not in a Catholic God. There is no Catholic God’
      -‘You know what I think about this? Heads of the Church have often been narcissists, flattered and thrilled by their courtiers. The court is the leprosy of the papacy’

      NOVEMBER 24, 2013
      -On Muslims – ‘We must never forget that they ‘profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, who will judge humanity on the last day.’

      NOVEMBER 26, 2013
      -‘I prefer a church which is bruised, hurting and dirty’

      DECEMBER 11, 2013
      -‘Never fear the final judgment, because Christ will always be at our side’

      DECEMBER 17, 2013
      -Pope Francis makes the cover of The Advocate – the leading LGBT magazine

      DECEMBER 20, 2013
      -On The Virgin Mary: ‘Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say: ‘Lies! I was deceived!’

      DECEMBER 23, 2013
      -Time Magazine names Pope Francis ‘Person of the Year’

      DECEMBER 27, 2013
      -Esquire Magazine names Pope Francis ‘Best Dressed Man of the Year’

      JANUARY, 2014
      -Pope sends iPhone message to televangelist Kenneth Copeland via Tony Palmer

      JANUARY 20, 2014
      -‘Those that are Muslim, with the Quran. The faith that your parents instilled in you will always help you move on.’

      JANUARY 26, 2014
      -Pope’s Peace Doves attacked by Crow and Seagull

      JANUARY 28, 2014
      -Pope Francis on the cover of Rolling Stone

      FEBRUARY 12, 2014
      -‘If you don’t feel the need for God’s mercy, don’t even bother going to Mass!’

      FEBRUARY 28, 2014
      -‘When love fails,
      and it fails many times, we have to feel the pain of that failure,
      accompany the people who have felt the failure of their love’
      -Tony Palmer, under Pope Francis’s name, releases video stating that ‘Real communion is not the bread but the brother’

      MARCH 03, 2014
      -Pope Francis accidentally says ‘the F word’

      MARCH 05, 2014
      -Pope Francis goes to Confession in public and breaks protocol
      -Pope Francis gets his own fan magazine, Il Mio Papa (or ‘My Pope’)

      MARCH 10, 2014
      -Pope Francis says The Catholic Church should not dismiss gay marriage, but should study it

      APRIL 03, 2014
      -‘Scold the Lord a little. ‘Hey you promised me this and you haven’t done it!…Prayer must be a negotiation with God’

      APRIL 17, 2014
      -Pope Francis washes feet of disabled and elderly

      APRIL 23, 2014
      -Pope Francis phones woman in invalid marriage, telling her it’s okay to take Holy Communion – ‘A little Bread and Wine does no harm’

      APRIL 24, 2014
      -‘There are some priests who are more papist than the Pope’

      APRIL 28, 2014
      -Pope Francis tweets ‘Inequality is the root of social evil’

      MAY 9, 2014
      -Pope Francis calls on governments for ‘Legitimate Redistribution’ of wealth to the poor

      MAY 12, 2014
      -Pope Francis quotes Hillary Clinton ‘It takes a village to raise a child’

      MAY 13, 2014
      -Pope Francis says he would baptize aliens

      MAY 25, 2014
      -Pope Francis arrives in Jordan. Before his arrival, those waiting at the airport in Amman felt a magnitude 4.1 earthquake that struck in Israel near its border with Jordan

      MAY 24, 2014
      -Pope Francis visits Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity. Days later, a fire breaks out at the scene.

      MAY 27, 2014
      -‘Since it is not dogma, the door is always open to rethink priestly celibacy’

      JUNE 05, 2014
      -Pope meets with Televangelist Joel Osteen at the Vatican

      JUNE 08, 2014
      -Pope Francis hosts inter-religious prayers for peace at Vatican, including Muslim prayers

      JUNE 24, 2014
      -Pope meets with Televangelist Kenneth Copeland and other Evangelicals at the Vatican

      JUNE 29, 2014
      -Pope says ‘communists are closeted Christians’.

      JULY 27, 2014
      -Pope Francis gives his Top 10 List on how to be happy – doesn’t mention Jesus once

      JULY 28, 2014
      -Pope Francis apologizes to Pentecostals

      SEPTEMBER 01, 2014
      -Pope Francis hosts all-star soccer match for peace

      SEPTEMBER 04, 2014
      -Retired Israeli President Shimon Peres proposes a new global “United Nations of Religions” to Pope Francis

      SEPTEMBER 13, 2014
      -Pope Francis announces that World War III may have already begun

      SEPTEMBER 14, 2014
      -Pope Francis marries 20 couples – some of whom were ‘living in sin’

      SEPTEMBER 17, 2014
      -Pope Francis plans on exiling Cardinal Burke

      OCTOBER 9, 2014
      -‘But God does not exist: Do not be shocked! So God does not exist!
      There is the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, they are persons,
      they are not some vague idea in the clouds … This God spray does not exist! The three persons exist!’

      OCTOBER 13, 2014
      -Pope Francis Family Synod concludes with document suggesting dramatic shift in attitude toward gays – Document must be revised after public outcry

      OCTOBER 19, 2014
      -‘The Church should not fear change…by carefully surveying the signs of the times, we are making every effort to adapt ways and methods’

      OCTOBER 27, 2014
      -‘God is not a divine being or a magician,
      but the Creator who brought everything to life…Evolution in nature is
      not inconsistent with the notion of creation, because evolution requires the creation of beings that evolve.’

      OCTOBER 27, 2014
      -‘But there is a third group of Christians…They are lukewarm. They are neither light not dark. And God does not love these’

      OCTOBER 28, 2014
      -‘Jesus prays to the Father for us’

      OCTOBER 29, 2014
      -‘It’s strange, but if I talk about these subjects then the Pope is a communist, according to some. The fact that the love for the poor is in the center of the gospel is misunderstood.’

      NOVEMBER 9, 2014
      -Pope Francis prays in Mosque with Muslim leaders

      DECEMBER 2, 2014
      -Pope Francis unites Hindus, Muslims, and Buddhists in joint declaration against ‘slavery’
      -Pope Francis compares Islamic Terrorists to Christian fundamentalists, saying ‘We have our share of them (fundamentalists). All religions have these little groups’

      DECEMBER 14, 2014
      -“I confess something to you, when I have seen a Christian…with such rigidness on the outside, I ask the Lord: ‘But Lord, throw a banana peel in front of them, so that they will take a good fall, and feel shame that they are sinners…”

      JANUARY 15, 2015
      -Pope Francis says there are limits on free speech and if someone speaks badly about his mother, they could ‘expect a punch’

      JANUARY 19, 2015
      -Pope Francis tells Catholics they ‘do not need to breed like rabbits’

      JANUARY 25, 2015
      -Balloons Replace Doves as the Vatican Symbol of Peace

      JANUARY 27, 2015
      -Pope Francis meets with transgender man dubbed ‘devil’s daughter’

      FEBRUARY 18, 2015
      -New Ways Ministry, a gay Catholic group gets audience with Pope Francis and VIP treatment at Vatican for first time

      FEBRUARY 20, 2015
      -Pope Francis references ‘traditionalists’ followed by the phrases ‘psychological and moral problems’ in private meeting

      MARCH 15, 2015
      -Pope Francis, when asked “What happens to that lost soul? Will it be punished?” reportedly replied “there is no punishment, but
      the annihilation of that soul. All the others will participate in the
      beatitude of living in the presence of the Father. The souls that are annihilated will not take part in that banquet; with the death of the body their journey is finished.”

      APRIL 7, 2015
      -Pope Francis washes the feet of men, women, and even a transsexual named ‘Isabel’ for Holy Thursday at the Roman prison Regina Coeli.

    • I don’t see anything there that can be defined as heresy when taken in context. (Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or it is likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same.)

      For example, Pope Francis was absolutely correct when he said “Who am I to judge?” in reference to gay people, when you look at his full statement in context:

      Regarding the quote of March 15, 2015 – you have no proof that Pope Francis said that. It is not even a quote from him. It is third hand hearsay from Eugenio Scalfari, who has already lost credibility due to his previous lies about Pope Francis. See here:

    • You did not see any heresy?
      I guess the proclamation of a SINFUL Virgin Mary is no longer considered to be against Catholic dogma.

      As for the March 15 2015 interview: if we say that there is no actual proof about an article written a month ago, then how can you even declare to believe in what was written 2,000 years ago by some unknown so-called evangelists? Let us then put EVERYTHING into question except for the perfection of the new god on earth, the untouchable, the spotless, the perpetually virtuous Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

      As for your phrase “Unfortunately I don’t have the time to go one by one down your list. But you are incorrect on each and every one”, that reminds me of John 9 when the blind man tells the truth to a bunch of Pharisees who love to deny the TRUTH (Whom is Jesus Christ):

      ~ Then they hurled insults at him and said, “You are this fellow’s disciple! We are disciples of Moses! We know that God spoke to Moses, but as for this fellow, we don’t even know where he comes from.”The man answered, “Now that is remarkable! You don’t know where he comes from, yet he opened my eyes. We know that God does not listen to sinners. He listens to the godly person who does his will. Nobody has ever heard of opening the eyes of a man born blind. If this man were not from God, he could do nothing. ~ John 9

      If you do not have the time to learn of the Truth, then please change your job, for you are not serving God in letting others know that same Truth Eternal. Remember: at the end of all roads there will stand a Just Judge…as long as your conscience is in peace and in transparent honesty, then I can only pray for you.

      Let us not play the little “games” though, for Christ Sees everything.
      You know that what I state is true.

      GOD BLESS +++

    • Please provide the full context of the quote in which Pope Francis allegedly says Mary was sinful. I want to see the original source as posted on the Vatican website.
      I didn’t say there was no proof that the article wasn’t written. I said that Scalfari is notoriously unreliable, and does not take notes during his interviews. He transcribed from memory, paraphrases frequently, and puts concepts into his own words. Like the article I posted says, unless the text of the interview is posted on the Vatican website, it is not to be considered reliable or official.

    • My pleasure: here are the words that left millions speechless —
      I know you will deny everything by saying that this perfect GOD-LIKE “pope” you work for is correct in insulting the Mother of Christ, but others will see through:

      BERGOGLIO: “The Gospel does not tell us anything: if she spoke a word or not… She was silent, but in her heart, how many things told the Lord! ‘You, that day, this and the other that we read, you had told me that he would be great, you had told me that you would have given him the throne of David, his forefather, that he would have reigned forever and now I see him there!’ Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say: ‘Lies! I was deceived!’ John Paul II would say this, speaking about Our Lady in that moment. But she, with her silence, hid the mystery that she did not understand and with this silence allowed for this mystery to grow and blossom in hope.”


      Hopefully you will now see the gravity of these heresies.

    • Can you explain what is heretical about the Pope’s words? I don’t see any heresy. Care to enlighten me?

    • “…‘You, that day, this and the other that we read, you had told me
      that he would be great, you had told me that you would have given him the throne of David, his forefather, that he would have reigned forever and now I see him there!’ Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say: ‘Lies! I was deceived!’”.

      To yell at God an accuse Him of Being a deceiver is to commit a grave sin, my friend. The deceiver is SATAN. Therefore the Immaculate Spouse of the Holy Spirit is now accusing the Almighty of being Satan? Mary NEVER had the “desire” to accuse God of having falsely promised Her Son the throne of David. And Mary had NO DESIRE towards anything remotely sinful in any possible way whatsoever — unlike the rest of us. This is a dogma and NEVER in the history of our Church have we witnessed a “pope” put false words into a false inner monologue attributed to the Virgin of Virgins.

      Satan – as the Immaculate Virgin Mary said – will enter the Catholic Church. Or are the Catholic Church approved apparitions of LaSalette and Akita no longer valid, now?

    • I just read it again, several times. Where does the Pope say Mary was sinful, or that she sinned? I’m not seeing it. Can you point it out?

    • “…‘You, that day, this and the other that we read, you had told me that he would be great, you had told me that you would have given him the throne of David, his forefather, that he would have reigned forever and now I see him there!’ Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say: ‘Lies! I was deceived!’”.

      To yell at God an accuse Him of Being a deceiver is to commit a grave sin, my friend. The deceiver is SATAN. Therefore the Immaculate Spouse of the Holy Spirit is now accusing the Almighty of being Satan? Mary NEVER had the “desire” to accuse God of having falsely promised Her Son the throne of David. And Mary had NO DESIRE towards anything remotely sinful in any possible way whatsoever — unlike the rest of us. This is a dogma and NEVER in the history of our Church have we witnessed a “pope” put false words into a false inner monologue attributed to the Virgin of Virgins.

      Why defend heresies? Why work for the KatholiK Gestapo of Protestant Vatican III?

    • The part you quoted did not say that Mary sinned. It says *perhaps* she was tempted to sin. And perhaps she was. But because she was conceived immaculately and saved from Original Sin, she did not sin. That’s not heresy, that’s just plain fact.
      Why do you commit calumny against Pope Francis?

    • You are obviously not a Catholic, my dear. The Virgin Mary was never “saved” in the sense that you Protestants understand it.
      She was conceived in God’s Eternal Mind before the age of man as the perfect, infallible Woman made WITHOUT original sin. Therefore, you are falling into error by saying that she was “SAVED from Original sin”.

      Also, to divulge the truth that “pope” Francis is a Freemason is not calumny. And please read this statement again, for a calumny could never be the truth. Rather, why don’t YOU provide proof of the validity of this so-called “pope”?

      Lastly, we Catholics know that a ‘sedevacantist’ automatically refutes all Popes since the Second Vatican Counsel. Let me instruct you on the fact that my believing in Pope Benedict XVI renders me a simple Catholic person. Therefore, how can you bring up the sedevacantists who, by the way, are the true followers of the true Church as founded by Christ Himself?

      There cannot be two living Popes.
      If you accept Francis, you refute the predecessor.

      You must do lots of research.
      God Bless +++

    • Mary was saved by Christ, retroactively, since God is outside of time.

    • “…‘You, that day, this and the other that we read, you had told me
      that he would be great, you had told me that you would have given him the throne of David, his forefather, that he would have reigned forever and now I see him there!’ Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say: ‘Lies! I was deceived!’”.

      To yell at God an accuse Him of Being a deceiver is to commit a grave sin, my friend. The deceiver is SATAN. Therefore the Immaculate Spouse of the Holy Spirit is now accusing the Almighty of being Satan? Mary NEVER had the “desire” to accuse God of having falsely promised Her Son the throne of David. And Mary had NO DESIRE towards anything remotely sinful in any possible way whatsoever — unlike the rest of us. This is a dogma and NEVER in the history of our Church have we witnessed a “pope” put false words into a false inner monologue attributed to the Virgin of Virgins.

      Why defend heresies? Why work for the KatholiK Gestapo of Protestant Vatican III?

    • You seem to have remained a Protestant, my dear. Do you know what the Catholic Church teaches? It does not teach heresy – that is for sure.
      You do not see the heresy in what Bergoglio said about the Mother of
      Christ because you Protestants do not accept her perpetual immaculate

      Very simple.
      God Bless +++

    • Surely. Here is the insulting and heretical statements of FALSE PROPHET JORGE MARIO BERGOGLIO:

      “…‘You, that day, this and the other that we read, you had told me
      that he would be great, you had told me that you would have given him the throne of David, his forefather, that he would have reigned forever and now I see him there!’ Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say: ‘Lies! I was deceived!’”.

      To yell at God an accuse Him of Being a deceiver is to commit a grave sin, my friend. The deceiver is SATAN. Therefore the Immaculate Spouse of the Holy Spirit isnow accusing the Almighty of being Satan? Mary NEVER had the “desire” to accuse God of having falsely promised Her Son the throne of David. And Mary had NO DESIRE towards anything remotely sinful in any possible way whatsoever — unlike the rest of us. This is a dogma and NEVER in the history of our Church have we witnessed a “pope” put false words into a false inner monologue attributed to the Virgin of Virgins.

      Why defend heresies? Why work for the KatholiK Gestapo of Protestant Vatican III? Who is to be honored first? GOD? Or a deceiving man?

    • “I see no evidence that Pope Francis has embraced either secularism or
      humanism. Have you listened to anything he has said? Read any of his
      writings? I doubt it. Why don’t you do so for yourself?”

      Did you read the speech on HUMANISM at the European Union? I sent it to you. Did you delete the Truth?

    • “I see no evidence that Pope Francis has embraced either secularism or
      humanism. Have you listened to anything he has said? Read any of his
      writings? I doubt it. Why don’t you do so for yourself?”

      Have you actually read his discourse in front of the European Union?

    • Same here. I will pray for you to be able to see the Truth.

  • Saints InProgress Chowchilla

    I am very greatful for your post. I am not very happy with the title because I use to be a person whom would only read the title and then jump to conclusions. It is for these people reading the title and comments only (the irony) please read the article before you rant off.
    Fellow Saint in Progress

  • billmarvel

    Thank you for injecting some common sense into this discussion. Apparently some Catholics –even a Cardinal or two — have lost faith in the Holy Spirit.

  • Peggy Clores

    Excellent job!

  • Zola Ingram

    Pope Francis is more like Jesus than any recent popes….read the Bible and our Church’s Catholic Social teachings…what’s your problem. You’re the ones trying to destroying the church if Jesus.

    • Zola, did you read the actual article? In it, I make the same point that you are.

  • Chris Blackington

    This article set my mind at ease, and i ended up chastising myself inwardly for taking the media’s word about the pope I have to confess. Peace be with you and God bless you all.

  • Julie

    I think when you get such extreme comments, you have to come to the point that nothing you can say will change their mind.

    The media has already misrepresented him as well as this older journalist, who later apologized for doing so.

    It behooves me how people can have so much hate and not want to find the truth about our faith, claiming to be ‘christian’.

  • jacobhalo

    The Muslims will go to hell if they have read the teachings of Jesus and they have refused to believe them.

    • Judging the state of anyone’s soul is above my pay grade.

  • Pope Francis speaks in the common language of our times. As Catholics, we wonder about some of the connotations. Let us not forget he is a man – a deep common sense and compassionate man. As Catholics we are free to take in what he says and ponder what is behind what he is saying. Perhaps many have more questions than they would like to have about his utterances but we must remember he is not speaking ex cathedra in a solemn way where we must accept what he is saying as doctrine.

    Jacque Maritain, one of the last great philosopher who perhaps will be designated as a doctor of the church in years to come, says God can use any means He wants to save the world. He does not necessarily have to just use the so called Divine Order of Things but perhaps God is waiting for us to get the natural order more in sync with the Divine. Pope John XXlll, opened the windows of the church through Vatican 2 but it seems like we were not ready for it. There was nothing wrong with Vatican 2 but apparently the people were not ready to live the ideal life on earth according to Vatican 2. Human nature has a way of playing games.

    It is obvious, the people need to find ways to clear the path and spread their day of worship into the work week. As an advocate for workers dignity, I explore the latent response of religion and philosophy to the global economy. Free trade economics is a mess where we allow human nature to avoid – doing unto others as you would have them do to you. We are putting the cart before the horse in talking about a world religion. So, I will let Pope Francis sort out the counter points knowing that there is only one true church even though other people of good will can be saved. Cardinal Newman said we must all follow our conscience even if that conscience is ill-informed.

    Was Pope Francis was inspired by another St Francis ? at Ray Tapajna LInkedin Articles or at

  • nworder

    I have read a bit about the scandalous popes. But if we go back to the NT and imagine say that Peter and Paul had encountered a church leader like one of these popes – surely they would have excommunicated them and kept them out of the church warning fellow christians about them.

    • Perhaps. But then again, Peter denied Christ 3 times and he went on to lead the Church.

    • nworder

      But Peter repented and was shattered by his failure when he was sifted but only momentarily he quickly returned in a few days.

    • And later on in Acts, Paul had to chastise Peter for teaching wrongly.

    • nworder

      So does this mean that Pope’s can be chastised if Peter was the first Pope.
      Peter said he was just a fellow elder.

  • Theodore Plum

    Perhaps it’s time to understand the true tenets of Christianity and accept that Pope Francis is doing nothing more than simply being a Christian. This is not about Catholic dogma but instead about following the teachings of Jesus.

    • Following the teaches of Jesus to their fullest extent means being Catholic, so I agree with you!

  • foundation for truth

    since the beginning of time of catechism , the only thing that has happen for humanity is suffering,humiliating,destruction,trickery,deceit, lies and genocide.Why is this happening? why did this happen? Why did your god made this possible.
    Well the damn truth is that god did not make this happen. this is the work of ignorant human beings to control through power and eventually create one world religion.
    There is a false church that’s planning salvation through peace of the middle east. The manifestation of the end of the world!

    We want our fundamental rights back. We want our souls back. we want peace for all humanity.This is the only way we will ever reach true freedom.
    And it needs to happen NOW.

  • dpharisee

    I am trusting the HOLY SPIRIT to do the rest of getting into the peoples mindd what the pope really meant. We should not be alarmed. Let the HOLY SPIRIT takes over. The pope is being USED in a most incredible way like no other. Yes he does not speak the language well so he cannot use terms to be understood but so are most of the stories we read in the bible if each of us had to interpret it on our own its hard for anybody to grasp..

  • Cathy Harrell

    Good job.

  • reader1968

    Such a headline sounds like it was written by a gossip magazine writer. The next headline is “Pope Francis: I was abducted by aliens”

  • Tionia

    I never rely on headlines but by what Pope Francis’ actual words were. Francis is bringing the Catholic Church and the Catholic Community back to what Jesus Christ taught. People are coming back to the church because of Pope Francis. I know people who have said they would never go back that are now back at home all because of Pope Francis.

    Infallibility belongs in a special way to the pope as head of the bishops (Matt. 16:17–19; John 21:15–17). As Vatican II remarked, it is a charism the pope “enjoys in virtue of his office, when, as the supreme shepherd and teacher of all the faithful, who confirms his brethren in their faith (Luke 22:32), he proclaims by a definitive act some doctrine of faith or morals. Therefore his definitions, of themselves, and not from the consent of the Church, are justly held irreformable, for they are pronounced with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, an assistance promised to him in blessed Peter.”

    The infallibility of the pope is not a doctrine that suddenly appeared in Church teaching; rather, it is a doctrine which was implicit in the early Church. It is only our understanding of infallibility which has developed and been more clearly understood over time. In fact, the doctrine of infallibility is implicit in these Petrine texts: John 21:15–17 (“Feed my sheep . . . “), Luke 22:32 (“I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail”), and Matthew 16:18 (“You are Peter . . . “).

  • Howard Payne

    Most of these posts appear to be from closed minds either way.
    What is needed is to talk to each other condescendingly. Our only source of
    truth as scholars say is the New Testament which is a 98% reconstruction
    of the original autographs of the Apostles.
    Even Jerome used it and the LXX to translate his Vulgate. We must
    use it to determine what a text says before we can extrapolate what it means.
    That is the process Paul advised Timothy in 2 Tim 2:15. The Greek word
    for “rightly dividing the Word of Truth” is “ortotomunto” = cut it straight.
    The first word means, “Make maximum effort.”

    There is only one verse Romanism claims to use to prove its
    continued existence and that is Matthew 16:18 (Google). If we can show by
    an analysis of Jesus words said that he would build his church on himself as its
    chief cornerstone then, that church should be identified as a fraud and has no
    foundation. Research 61years.
    Second book, “Counterfeit Church” free on request (263 pages).

  • Pingback: Celebrities Behaving Badly: The Popester Is No Dopester | Kibbitz Corner()

  • action hero

    Interestingly, St. Faustina

    > wrote in her diary that her “worst day of suffering”

    > where she felt as if she was in Gethsemane (where Jesus was

    > betrayed by Judas) was the SAME EXACT DAY POPE FRANCIS WAS

    > BORN. She writes:


    > ” December 17, 1936. I have offered this day for priests. I

    > have suffered more today than ever before, both interiorly

    > and exteriorly. I did not know it was possible to

    > suffer so much in one day. I tried to make a Holy

    > Hour, in the course of which my spirit had a taste of the

    > bitterness of the Garden of Gethsemane.”

    I think Sr. Faustina suffered so much bitterness and betrayal
    on that day (12/17/1936) because, unknown to her,the False Prophet
    was born somewhere on that day.

    It is also the day Pope Francis was born.
    What a marvelous coincidence!


    • It is indeed! How wonderful that St. Faustina seemed to know how our Holy Father would be attacked and vilified on the day he was born. St. Faustina, pray for our Holy Father, Pope Francis!

  • Jim M.

    Really hard to know what Pope Francis intends to say and do because I really wonder if even Francis knows what is behind his words and actions. Looking for a pattern, a theological current, an agenda may just be pointless. After great men like John Paul II and Benedict XVI, Francis just seems like the genial, slightly dotty old uncle whom everyone loves and the rest doesn’t matter. And that is OK. Not every pope needs to be profound and knowledgeable. The Lord bless Pope Francis, as Vicar of Christ he may be God’s sign that we need to laugh more. Since we have been given a clown pope, we need to be grateful and stop griping or arguing about it. On with the show!.

  • hobby fritz

    I think, if anyone has come close to destroying the Catholic Church it would be Benedict. I am not saying he destroyed it because no one mortal has that ability unless we allow it. I am saying that if a pope can just walk away then a portion of the foundation of the church is no longer solid. (If he left because of a mental issue and could not possible do the job then the people should be or should have been told that reason and that would be acceptable but other than that, no matter what kind of burden it becomes, you carry the cross you are given).

    • Well, popes have had the ability to resign for centuries, and Pope Benedict is not the first pope to resign. And yet, the Catholic Church has stayed strong. Interesting, isn’t it?

  • clayton3120 clayton3120

    Amusing article, Joanna. I must say, it does take a bit of stability and intelligence to keep the Church, the Pope, bishops etc. in perspective. Your article made me laugh, and yet instilled a bit of calm in all the noise of the media concerning the pope.

  • Jarl

    Pope Francis is garbage. Totally Jew controlled puppet pope. He should be hanged, honestly.

  • Jim M.

    Francis is wonderful because other popes were worse? Sure, JPII and BXVI were controversial, but usually for standing up for orthodox Catholicism in no uncertain terms. Yes, they had some odd moments when orthodox Catholics were confused by what they said or did, but those were few and far between. It is the repeat blunders by this new pope, so many in just a little over a year, that has many wondering. Now, he concelebrates the Mass with a pro-homosexualist activist priest who is arguable already under automatic excommunication. Francis also loves to bash free market economics without balancing his statements with criticisms of statist economics which usually causes even more poverty and general human misery. Dismissing people’s concerns won’t make them go away, not as long as Francis is still pope and we sit upon the edge of our seats awaiting the next bizarro actions or words from our wack-a-doodle pope.

    • No, Pope Francis is wonderful because he is loving and pastoral and does not deviate from Church doctrine. Are you saying that the pope should never celebrate Mass with sinners? If that’s the case, no pope ever should celebrate mass.

  • Aage Takvam

    MSM is NOT a place to read, if you are a serious person.

  • Not your business

    Let’s pray that his (can be an organization) wounds (as a metaphor not literally or physically) will heal after all. Sometimes when people dig pits for each other it is equivalent that they do it against themselves. Many people are looking for Jesus for money, wealth and power in order to serve them. It is allowed so they can demonstrate themselves to society and how they treat society.

  • Not your business

    Let’s pray that his (can be an organization) wounds (as a metaphor not literally or physically) will heal after all. Sometimes when people dig pits for each other it is equivalent that they do it against themselves. Many people are looking good for Jesus for money. It is allowed so they can demonstrate themselves to society and how they treat society.

  • Deanna Clark

    There is a difference between believing that all in Heaven are Catholic…that is they live in truth… and in believing that all in Heaven were practicing Catholics in their temporal life.

    The Holy Spirit leads all to the truth and to a good life. Jesus comes to many people in His many qualities…Counselor, truth, mercy, compassion, beauty, solidarity, magnanimity. God has other names throughout the Bible and Jesus exhausts every path to save the human soul. Heaven is full of surprises!

  • Tom

    Good work Joanna.. may our lord’s spirit fill you with his wisdom so that you can share & guide many to light

  • Ancient Mariner

    The Philippines MSM and high-profile progressive Catholic personalities extensively quoted Pope Francis in order to uphold the Philippines RH Law, which mandated government distribution of contraceptives, including abortifacient ones, for free, and which provided penalties for those who refused to take part in or abet the Law’s provisions. Those Bishops, priests, and laity who voiced opposition were overwhelmed by the media blitz. Their claims that the Holy Father’s words were being taken out of context looked rather feeble under the tsunami of papal quotes. The Philippines Supreme Court finally struck out the Law’s opening to abortion, and reaffirmed conscientious objection rights. But it was devastation on a spiritual scale equivalent to Typhoon Haiyan. Worried Filipino Catholics now expect the push for a Divorce Law to take advantage of this pontificate. And if the upcoming Extraordinary Synod turns out in the way that they fear, they see no hope of resistance to it.

    • You mean the media misquoted the Pope to advance their own agendas?? What a shock!

  • AugustineThomas

    *The massive amount of Novus Ordo Heretics have jointly brought “Catholicism”, aka Christendom, to its knees.

    • Sorry to hear that you feel the gates of Hell have prevailed against the Church. Are you an atheist now, since you believe Jesus was a liar?

    • AugustineThomas

      I think you’re confused Ms. Wahlund. Would you rather have me an atheist than a critic of the rampant heresy at the huge majority of Novus Ordo Masses?
      Can you explain to me why you support the inferior Mass over the superior one? Do you agree with Pope Francis persecuting the FFI for their orthodoxy, because they threaten his heretical leftist beliefs? Do you believe every pope has been perfect and one is not Catholic unless they say so?

    • Why bother criticizing any Mass if Jesus was a liar? Doesn’t that mean that He was not God (since God does not lie) and that Catholicism is a sham anyway?

      Can you quote Church teaching (say, a papal encyclical) stating that the Extraordinary Form is superior to the Ordinary Form? I wasn’t aware that was a teaching of the Church. For the record, I’m a both/and Catholic – my personal opinion is that they are both excellent forms of the Mass when celebrated properly and reverently. I don’t think that one is inherently superior than the other.

    • AugustineThomas

      I’m quite offended that you’re calling Jesus a liar. The fact that heretics at Novus Ordo Masses disobey Christ does not make him a liar. Christ our Lord and the Holy Spirit gave us the perfect Mass, through the work of faithful Catholics through the ages.
      The Novus Ordo Mass is a product of the narcissism of the Sexual Revolution and all the bad Catholics who participated in it and thus is filled with irreverent practices, which is why it is inferior to the Mass of the Saints. (To use one of my favorite Americanisms: If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!)

    • I’m not calling Jesus a liar; you are. I think that Jesus told the truth when He said the gates of Hell would not prevail against the Church. You are calling him a liar, because you are insisting that the gates of Hell have prevailed against the Church.

      What do you think of my quote from Benedict XVI, above? Is he a heretic too?

    • AugustineThomas

      You’re putting words into my mouth Ms. Wahlund. The Church has always been afflicted with heresy, that doesn’t mean the gates of Hell have prevailed against it. Did the saints and faithful Catholics who overcame the Arian Heresy also not believe in Jesus because they wanted to rid the Church of heresy?

    • You said, above, “The massive amount of Novus Ordo Heretics have jointly brought “Catholicism”, aka Christendom, to its knees.” That sure sounds like you’re saying that Catholicism has been destroyed by “Novus Ordo Heretics.” I don’t recall any of the Church fathers saying that the Arians brought Christendom to its knees.

    • AugustineThomas

      So to you, being brought to one’s knees and being destroyed completely are the same thing?
      And, yes, many great saints and orthodox Christians believed that the Church has been brought to its knees at several points in its history. The Holy Spirit is what lifts it back to its feet, by destroying heresy when the orthodox come together to rid the Church of it.

    • Yes, that’s what the idiom means. See here:

    • AugustineThomas

      You’re using a faulty resource.

      bring someone to his / her knees, to force someone into submission or compliance.

    • The Cambridge Idioms Dictionary, 2nd ed., is a faulty source? Why do you say that? And where is your definition from, given that you failed to cite your source?

      Could it possibly be that your source is the one that is faulty? Do you think that is within the realm of possibility?

    • AugustineThomas

      Here is another: 1. reduce someone or something to a state of weakness or submission.
      I can’t find your reference. The only dictionary I see giving this faulty definition is “The Free Dictionary”, which seems to have quite a lot of faulty modern definitions. People don’t take language seriously anymore and think whatever they want something to mean, that’s what it means, especially if they put it on a website.
      It seems quite illogical to suggest that I would be destroyed by being brought to my knees. I have been brought to my knees on several occasions and I’m still here!

    • You need to actually follow the link. That’s how citations work.

      bring somebody/something to their knees

      to destroy or defeat someone or something Sanctions were imposed in an attempt to bring the country to its knees. The strikes brought the economy to its knees.

      See also: bring, knee

      Cambridge Idioms Dictionary, 2nd ed. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006. Reproduced with permission.

      Given that the Cambridge Idioms Dictionary contains this definition, it can hardly be considered uncommon. You may want to rethink your usage of it, and use either a different idiom with a less problematic meaning or simply use clearer language.

    • AugustineThomas

      You’ve lost it. Destroying someone means to obliterate them, blow them up, put them to death. I’m sorry if you found a few bad dictionary entries (that’s not hard to do these days), but that doesn’t change the fact that “bringing to one’s knees” means to stop someone or something from moving forward by force.

      Anyway, this was a meaningless debate. The point is that Pope Francis is encouraging heretics and persecuting the orthodox (we have yet more proof of that now).

    • “There is no contradiction between the two editions of the Roman Missal. In the history of the liturgy there is growth and progress, but no rupture. What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful. It behooves all of us to preserve the riches which have developed in the Church’s faith and prayer, and to give them their proper place. Needless to say, in order to experience full communion, the priests of the communities adhering to the former usage cannot, as a matter of principle, exclude celebrating according to the new books. The total exclusion of the new rite would not in fact be consistent with the recognition of its value and holiness.” – Pope Benedict XVI,

      But I suppose you think he is a heretic too?

    • AugustineThomas

      I think BXVI rightly thinks that it’s better to have heretics near to orthodoxy than further away from it (i.e. that there should be a “beginner’s Mass” or a “Protestant-friendly Mass”). I agree with him. I’m not trying to ban the Novus Ordo Mass. What’s utterly insane is that heretics are trying to ban the Mass of the Saints.

    • That’s a very interesting interpretation considering that BXVI said nothing of the kind about the OF in his quote or the letter in its entirety. Can you give me a quote from BXVI where he sais the OF is a “beginner’s mass” or a “Protestant-friendly mass,” or a mass suited only for heretics? Because the beginning of the letter quoted above also has this:

      “In this regard, it must first be said that the Missal published by Paul VI and then republished in two subsequent editions by John Paul II, obviously is and continues to be the normal Form – the Forma ordinaria – of the Eucharistic Liturgy. The last version of the Missale Romanum prior to the Council, which was published with the authority of Pope John XXIII in 1962 and used during the Council, will now be able to be used as a Forma extraordinaria of the liturgical celebration. It is not appropriate to speak of these two versions of the Roman Missal as if they were “two Rites”. Rather, it is a matter of a twofold use of one and the same rite.”

      Do you disagree with him in that the OF and EF are a twofold use of the same rite?

    • AugustineThomas

      Of course he’s going to be more diplomatic than me about it. I think they’re equally valid and that the Mass of the Ages is superior. If we receive Christ’s body and blood, we’re participating in the most important miracle in the universe, no matter how much humans mess up the liturgy. I think it’s entirely up to Christ which Masses he blesses with his presence and that he will bless Novus Ordo Masses which are reverently celebrated. That doesn’t change the fact that one is superior and one is inferior.
      (For the record, I think the Byzantine and other rites are as beautiful and perfected as the traditional Latin Rite Mass. Only the Novus Ordo Mass is Protestantized and most often irreverently celebrated.)

    • But there is nothing at all in the text — or in any of his writings — to indicate that he believes that the EF is inherently superior to the OF, as you do.

      You can definitely prefer the EF to the OF. Even if you think that one is inherently superior than the other, that’s your prerogative. But it’s definitely bordering on hubris to claim that it is settled fact or Church doctrine that the EF is “inherently superior” to the OF. Benedict XVI doesn’t think so and he is a huge proponent of the EF.

      I’ve been going to OF masses my entire Catholic life (my confirmation was 11 years ago today!), along with the occasional EF mass. There have been a few OF masses that I thought could stand to have a little *more* reverence, but that weren’t outright irreverent. But then I went to an EF low mass once that, while celebrated perfectly as far as I can tell, was very hard to follow because I was wrangling several small children at the time. I had no clue what was going on (couldn’t follow along in the Missal because of the child wrangling) and the priest was speaking so low I couldn’t hear him. (BTW, if you’re ever in my neck of the woods, check out

    • AugustineThomas

      Perhaps if you go to more than a couple of them, you’ll begin to understand them. The mystery of a language that is not your native tongue can be a great grace. Furthermore, Latin truly makes us a universal and unified church.
      BXVI only celebrated Novus Ordo Masses when he was forced to as pope. That should tell you something. Of course he’s not going to offend Catholics he hopes to bring further up and further in, so to speak, by telling them that they could be going to a better Mass.

      There are plenty of Catholics being accepting towards heretics and apostates. It can’t hurt to have a few of us tell the truth even when it’s painful!

    • Okay, help me out here. Please provide a quote from BXVI where he says the EF is “Inherently superior” to the OF. Perhaps you can even write him a letter asking for his opinion.

      I’m sure BXVI prefers celebrating the EF. No surprise there. But having a preference and stating as fact that one is inherently superior than the other are not the same thing. I prefer the OF but I don’t think that it is inherently superior to the EF.

      Are you saying that the Holy Father Emeritus sacrificed truth on the altar of non-offensiveness? That’s really strange because he has never shied away from promulgating difficult teachings before, even when they offended people.

  • John McConnell

    JoAnna, you appear to be missing the point entirely. One can be immoral and still remain Catholic – as were the popes you list. But one cannot be a heretic and remain Catholic – as is Frannie the Funky Faith Guy. This is made clear in numerous infallible papal teachings. See for example Pope Paul IV’s Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, or Pope Leo XIII’s Satis Cognitum, which latter states: “The practice of the Church has always been the same, as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the Fathers, who were wont to hold as outside Catholic communion, and alien to the Church, whoever would recede in the least degree from any point of doctrine proposed by her authoritative Magisterium. Epiphanius, Augustine, Theodoret, drew up a long list of the heresies of their times. St. Augustine notes that other heresies may spring up, to a single one of which, should any one give his assent, he is by the very fact cut off from Catholic unity. ‘No one who merely disbelieves in all (these heresies) can for that reason regard himself as a Catholic or call himself one. For there may be or may arise some other heresies, which are not set out in this work of ours, and, if any one holds to one single one of these he is not a Catholic’ (S. Augustinus, De Haeresibus, n. 88).”

    • John, that’s not true. If one is baptized Catholic, one always remains a Catholic by virtue of his/her baptism, which leaves an indelible mark on one’s soul. One may be a dissenting Catholic or a non-practicing Catholic, but they are still a Catholic — just as those who are excommunicated are still Catholic. Benedict XVI remarked upon this when he issued a motu propio stating that even baptized Catholics who no longer identify as Catholic are still bound by canon law to observe the Catholic forms of marriage:

      Calling the Holy Father “Frannie the Funky Faith Guy” is very disrespectful, by the way. Dislike the man all you wish but have respect for the papal office.

    • John McConnell


      Thank you for your comment.

      On what authority are you *contradicting* Pope Leo XIII?

      1. Canon 188.4 makes clear a public heretic incurs latae sententiae excommunication – outside Catholic communion and alien to the Church; it bases this on Pope Paul IV, Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, 1559.

      2. By your logic Martin Luther was Catholic after he was anathematized and indeed everyone who is baptized is a Catholic because the pre-Vatican II Church declared sovereignty only over the baptized.

      3. Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, #22, 1943: 22. Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith, and who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed. “For in one spirit” says the Apostle, “were we all baptized into one Body, whether Jews or Gentiles, whether bond or free.”[17] As therefore in the true Christian community there is only one Body, one Spirit, one Lord, and one Baptism, so there can be only one faith.[18] And therefore if a man refuse to hear the Church let him be considered—so the Lord commands—as a heathen and a publican.[19] It follows that those are divided in faith or government cannot be living in the unity of such a Body, nor can they be living the life of its one Divine Spirit.

      In other words, your entire position, JoAnna, is refuted on multiple counts by Pope Paul IV, Pope Leo XIII, and Pope Pius XII. Your position is alien to authentic Roman Catholic dogma.

      So again – on what authority are you *contradicting* the Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church founded by Christ and His Apostles?

    • I’m not the one contradicting the Magesterium, unless you believe that Benedict XVI was a heretic too?

      The doctrine has developed since the time of St. Augustine and Leo XIII. No one can remove the mark of baptism indelibly placed on their soul. People can excommunicate themselves from the Church by their actions but they still remain Catholic by virtue of their baptism, even if they are not allowed to partake of the Sacraments.

    • Idjit As Hael

      Yes Benedict XVI was an heretic also, just like his predecessor JPII and Paul VI and John XXIII…
      You truly embody the Vatican II sect typical adherent.

    • But it’s really irrelevant as Pope Francis is not a heretic, nor has he promulgated any heretical teachings.

  • Mark G

    The simple fact is the Church, like Christ cannot be pigeonholed into one particular ideology or another. Christ far more than our view points.

    Here is what did not happen at calvary that we get very confused about as Christians (Catholic or protestant). One, Christ did not take away our free will. Two, Christ did not give man the last word.

    While Christ is the only gate we all pass through to heaven, it is not man who decides. ALL judgement has given unto Him and He will be the one who decides. That, is what it means when Christ NO ONE comes to the Father but through ME.

    For it does say NOT all those who say LORD LORD will enter into the kingdom of heaven but ONLY those who do the Father’s will.

    As for which Church is the true Church, well would it not be the one that represents the kingdom on earth as it is in heaven? How, ( I am confused by this too) would a protestant call the Church the whore of Babylon and yet accept the bible as it was put together by that very whore of Babylon? The canon was not really put together until the 4th century. Christians (the 1% of them that even knew how to read) did not have pocket bibles with addresses on them to quickly refer to. They did not have any of those things. Nothing like it. So, what did most Christians have? The oral tradition, which Paul refers to when he says repeatedly to HOLD FAST TO THE TRADITIONS as we have passed them on to you.

    On earth as it is in heaven. The words of the prayer from the Lord. A prophecy and showing how the Holy Spirit shapes the Church the faithful. The SAINTS. For those who insist we are not to refer to Mary as our mother, ignore what Christ proclaimed from the cross when He said, “Behold YOUR mother.”

    It is then affirmed in revelation 12:17 where it says, “The devil went off to wage war with the rest of her offspring, those who bear witness to Christ and keep God’s commandments.” Combine that with what Christ is saying to His beloved disciple and you see how even those words were eternal.

    On earth as it is in heaven. Read revelation and all of the images in there. Saints and angels sending prayers to the throne of God in the form of incense (Revelation 5:8). Elders gathered around the alter in lengthy white robes. Golden cups, the blood of the LAMB. All of these heavenly images being seen as the heavenly mass. Which is the one on EARTH as it is in HEAVEN? Which one of the 30,000 interpretations am I to follow? My own?

    The bottom line here is the Pope will often say things that step on the toes of the proud. Such is the way of Christ. Now, is it concerning to me that there is a socialist angle that will be taken from the words? Yes, it ought to concern all followers about the direction the church is guided. Faith, that the gates of hell will not prevail is to be reminded to everyone. Now, let us be clear here. Communism is not what this is. Communism is determined to destroy all faith. It is been that way and will always be that way.

    Remember, for those that insist they know how Christ will judge the nations in the end. He actually made it pretty clear in Matthew 25:31-46. He will separate the goats from the sheep, and He will say to the sheep, enter into the kingdom of my Father which has been prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For, when I was hungry you fed me…….

    And the “righteous” will ask when did we ever do these things unto You? He will say….Truly I say, each time you did unto the least of my bretheren, you did unto ME.

    Stop with the devils trap about who you think will get into the Kingdom. That is not up to us. Never has been, and never will be. I suggest Carl, if you read this, to hold fast to the traditions and stop speaking out against them, I strongly suggest that.

    • Lawrence

      Good sir you can interpret your way and I can interpret my way. The Fact is a person has to accept Jesus and also live as he would. That said no man is perfect and will make mistakes in his/her lifetime, but if you truly repent and ask for forgiveness you will enter into the Kingdom. The key word there is truly, God does know your heart, but he does not want to just know it he wants to have it.
      Here is what I say after I pray, “Let them see you in me.” That is our job in life to get people to know and live Christ not Mary, not the saints, no one but Jesus. I never said Mary and the saints are not men/woman of God just stop idolizing them.

    • Mark G

      Lets make something clear that is a big confusion among protestants in regards to Catholics praying “to saints.” First of all, there is ONE mediator. No argument there. Christ is the ONE mediator. However, there are many intercessors. Any time YOU pray for someone, you are interceding. Whenever you ask someone to pray for you, you are not praying to that person. You are in fact praying to Christ THROUGH intercessory prayer.

      That brings me to the false notion that protestants accuse Catholics of praying to “dead people.” First of all, those that die in Christ are not dead at all. That is affirmed in several places in scripture. The dead rose out of their graves when Christ died. There are inferences of the Saints and angels making prayers to the throne in the form of incense.

      To deny the Saints are alive is essentially calling Christ a liar. No other way to put it, since all of this is based on the very promises from Christ.

      No, this is our affirmation of Christs words by recognizing a communion with saints. It is too bad that protestants deny themselves these sorts of riches that has been offered freely from a God whose intentions was to establish the Kingdom as a family. Christ refers to God as Father. Followers as brothers and sisters in Christ. This is the image and images that are burned on our minds.

      Hence, the whole eternal reason for Jesus to be born through a woman at all. When Christ says to the disciple whom He loves to…BEHOLD YOUR MOTHER, those are eternal words. We cannot sit and say EVERYTHING ELSE Christ said was eternal except for those words. It is one of the last things He says, and one of the last things He gives before He gives up His life. You cannot just say.,….well those words were not eternal. Considering when it is affirmed in Revelation 12:17. The entire chapter refers to the woman that gave birth to Christ. It shows the devil pursuing the woman. It says…..”The devil became enraged and went off to wage war against the REST OF HER OFFSPRING, ALL of those who BEAR WITNESS to Christ and keep His commandments.”

      Combine that with what the Lord says from the cross to the disciple who is BEARING WITNESS and KEEPING HIS COMMANDMENTS. Those words from Christ are ALSO ETERNAL.

      We can get into how the church is infallible as the Bible is infallible. You see, that is also another confusion. The Bible was written through FALLIBLE men. Through sinners. Do no think that was not intentional either. All of the gospels are infallible and just as the Holy Spirit guides those that wrote the scripture, is the same Holy Spirit that guides the Church which is the pillar of truth. (1st Timothy 3:15)

      If all you see is the sin through the sinners then you might as well only look at the sin of the sinners that wrote the Bible. It is the exact same thing. It is human temptation.

      Again, the reason why the Pope called protestants wounded Christians is because of the denials of all these riches that has been given unto us though Christ.

      We can get into the notion that protestants actually think it is sinful to study saints in the past. They are quick to boast that they themselves are saints. Again, another dangerous road. When we start to boast that WE are saints, well watch out. Saints (true Saints) never boast of such things. In fact during the Last Supper, all of the disciples boasted that they would never betray Christ. Most of them said it to themselves and Peter openly exalted himself when proclaimed he would never betray. (That he was a Saint)

      Only ONE disciple did not do this. One of them leaned on Christs chest and asked if it was him that was going to betray when he asked….”Who is it?” Not coincidentally, it was that disciple that was at the foot of the cross BEARING WITNESS. In fact that was such a poignant moment when he reclined at the table, Peter later asked Christ after the resurrection about that disciple that reclined at the table.

      DO not boast about being a Saint. There are a lot of false teachings, and a lot of the pointing fingers. I would consider researching some things.

      Watch the Journey Home either on youtube or on EWTN. Listen to conversions and the false preconceived notions that have been taught or accused about the Catholic Church. The very Church the Bible itself came from.

  • Lawrence

    You Catholics are all nuts, Jesus is the way, the truth, the life nobody comes to the father but through Jesus. Everybody else on this earth to include Popes and Mary all fall short the glory of our Lord. You all pray to Mary and say the rosary and confess to Priest, all for not.
    Matthew 6:7
    7 And when you pray, do not use vain repetitions as the heathen do. For they think that they will be heard for their many words.) This is where the Rosary fails, it does nothing. You praise Mary 53 times and the lord only 6 while saying the rosary, sounds crazy to me.

    1 Timothy 2:5
    5 For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man[a] Christ Jesus, Mary is not a mediator, no one is.

    • Mark G

      Christ also said BEHOLD YOUR MOTHER. For those that believe those words were not eternal (if you do believe you can pick and choose which words are eternal and which are not then you are mislead down a wrong path) then we can affirm those words are eternal in Revelation 12:17.

      Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspring–those who keep God’s commands and hold fast their testimony about Jesus.

      Now combined those words affirmed in Revelations wiith what our Lord says when He says BEHOLD YOUR MOTHER. He did not say BEHOLD MY MOTHER. No, He said…Behold YOUR mother.

      There is ONE God and there is ONE Lord. The Lord said BEHOLD YOUR MOTHER. I suggest you do, and suggest you stop passing along false teachings, false doctrine, and a false Christ. You are with out understanding, and you are on dangerous ground when you pass on such lessons.

    • Lawrence

      I do believe in God so I guess I am lost on this mother thing. I accepted Jesus into my life when I became a Christian at around 25 years old. I guess I started of wrong calling Catholics nuts for that I apologize. I guess my question for anyone would be why do Catholics pray to Mary and or Saints. If you believe in Prayer you can’t get it to the Lord any faster if you do it through Mary or the Saints. I never said that Mary was a nobody, but she was a sinner like you and me. The scripture I stated clearly say what I mean, Mary cannot be a mediator, so why pray to her.
      Catholic doctrine is confusing being it can change with every Pope, but God never changes. My Friend you can go through life doing the Catholic thing, but if you don’t confess with your mouth and mean it with your heart you will not be joining me in the next life. You cannot be saved by works and good deeds, that’s where Catholics get confused like I did when I was a catholic my first 24 years of life.
      Side note:
      Also, if you like Music tune in to K-love in your area it has great Christian music, I listen to it 24/7 and I am filled with the spirit of God. Give it a try and tell me what you think.

  • NONAZITeabaggers!

    President Obama issues statement on papal canonizations:

    President Barack Obama has issued a statement on the canonizations of St. John XXIII and St. John Paul II.

    “The work and witness of both Pope John XXIII and Pope John Paul II shaped not only the Catholic Church but the world,” he said. “Pope John XXIII articulated powerful roles for the Church in the cause of global peace and justice, and by convening the Second Vatican Council he revolutionized not only aspects of worship but the Catholic Church’s relationship with other faith communities.”

    “Pope John Paul II helped inspire the Solidarity movement in Poland, a movement that spread and eventually helped to end communism in Eastern Europe, and he spoke out forcefully against apartheid in South Africa and genocide in Rwanda, President Obama continued. “He had a special rapport with young people, drawing many of them to the Church’s work and teachings.”

    “We celebrate these Saints and the leadership of His Holiness Pope Francis, and we look forward to continuing to work with Pope Francis and Catholics around the world to advance peace and justice for all people,” he concluded.

    Obama/Democrats=Jesuit Pope Francis Approved Catholic; Republicans/Teabaggers=Nazi/KKK Puritan Southern Racist Hatemongers who cannot accept that a Black Man is in the White House so they make up BS excuses to hate Catholic Values which are by definition Progressive.

  • Anonymous

    Catholicism is a cult, the Vatican and Catholics are the same level of secrecy and corruption as the Church of Scientology, the Pope is just a man, he has no higher value than the rest of us, you don’t need to pray to him or kiss his ring or bow to him. He is just a man. He does not have a right to tell me whether i go to Heaven or Hell, he is not God, nor the Son. He can not “bless” you, he can not choose your fate, he can not make true Christians bow to false idols such as a man named “Pope”. Because, he is just a man. He is not my God, he is not my Savior, he is not an Angel, he is a man, and he is a false idol. If you praise the Pope so be it, “but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord”-Joshua 24:15

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      What is cult about saving 850,000 Jews from the Nazis? Name one other supposed “cult” that did more to save the Jews than the Jesuits and the Catholic saints? There is none! They walk their talk and have currently the greatest Pope ever especially since hes a Jesuit whos exposing the Religious Reichers (especially in Amurica). Jesus was a Catholic Communist who today would be by definition an Occupy Wall Street Protester Amen!

      “THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,
      and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist.

      THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
      and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew.

      THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
      and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

      THEN THEY CAME for the Catholics,
      and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant.

      THEN THEY CAME for me
      and by that time no one was left to speak up.”–Pastor Niemoller, German Lutheran Anti-Nazi Protester Holocaust Museum Favorite

    • Lawrence

      And all Gods people say AMEN! Well said

  • AugustineThomas

    You’re confused. JPII and BXVI “got in trouble” with secularists for preaching the truth. Francis causes problems by babbling nonsense and appearing to be more committed to leftism than the One True Church. (Hopefully I don’t offend any Novus Ordo heretics with that term.)

    • Still haven’t learned that bearing false witness against one’s neighbor is a sin, I see.

    • AugustineThomas

      You still haven’t learned that so is heresy Ms. Wahlund!

    • Bill S

      Yeah. Just as I thought. You are more Catholic than the Pope.

    • AugustineThomas

      You’re more heretical than Nancy Pelosi.

    • Bill S

      Heretic is a word for religious zealots.

    • AugustineThomas

      ‘Heretic’ is a word that drives heretics like you crazy, I know.
      You should stop putting your desires above truth.

      God bless you! Sancta Maria, ora pro nobis peccatoribus!

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Leftism? You mean Pope Francis being a Jesuit is a problem? The Nazis used to spread the same conspiracy theory crap about the Jesuits for being “leftists”. Nazism is a Far-Right Wing ideology that happens to seduce Puritans who think they are better than the Pope instead of listening and humbling themselves to the Vicar of Christ who’s giving “tough love” to the Catholic and Christian world. Its a breath of fresh air and I can tell you as a born and raised Jew Pope Francis makes me want to convert to Roman Catholicism because its about time I hear a Catholic stand up to the Religious Reichers/Pharisees in America that keep Jews from taking Jesus seriously. If you want to know why Jews don’t like to accept Christ it really goes back to the Grandi quote “I like your Christ I don’t like your Christians”…its true. Walk the talk like Francis. Government has a role in social justice. Capitalism is the greatest tyranny of the 21st century, etc.

    • jmarple46

      Nazism is right wing? Do you know that it refers to the National Socialist Workers Party? Since when is socialism a right-wing ideology?

    • AugustineThomas

      You’re insane. I’m sorry that Catholic orthodoxy offends you so greatly. (That makes sense, you being an apostate.)

  • Micha_Elyi

    …the MSM proclaimed that Pope Benedict said condoms were perfectly okay for everyone to use…

    I failed to notice that the mainstream media outlets had gone that far in their distortion of what Pope Benedict had said. Your example itself fails to demonstrate your claim because it is an example of a major Establishment Media outlet pointing out that non-media issue advocates had proclaimed erroneous claims.

    All your other examples fail as well.

    The bottom line is that the Establishment Media doesn’t have to turn their Reality Distortion Fields to max when Pope Francis opens his mouth. I’ve come to suspect that his refusal to wear the traditional red shoes has nothing to do with humility but instead he detests their taste in his mouth.

  • Rationalist

    Until Catholics can get past grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone (Ephesians 2:8-9), everything else is a side issue…

    • Get past how, exactly? You don’t think Catholics should believe in Christ? That’d pretty much negate the entire point of Catholicism…

  • mark

    Long live ignorance.
    If child molestation is good enough to carry on protected for hundreds of years with the flock believing that it was just lies and enemy’s of the church to then see it was not lies from outside of the catholic church but lies from within.
    This disgusting un natural organisation will live on as long as the ignoramus faithful embrace its teaching as a divine prophecys and keep their head in the sand to reality

    • The irony of your first line is KILLING me. Thanks for the chuckle!

  • Jacob Snell

    He will be the detriment to Roman Catholicism and should be excommunicated from the Roman Rite and be tried in the Church for heresy and unorthodoxy teachings.

    • Really? Can you give me an example of a heresy that Pope Francis has committed?

    • NOTalibaniTeabaggers!

      The heretics are those who reject the Vicar of Christ aka Pope Francis. He saved the Catholic Church because him being a Jesuit brings the walking the talk of Jesus. He’s truly the best Pope because its about time the world had a leader that can denounce the heresy of Reagonomics and the Tyranny of 21st Century Global Capitalism that has marginalized the poor who are at the forefront of Christianity and the Gospel.

    • AugustineThomas

      We’ve had heretical popes before and the Holy Spirit protected the Church. The same protection will endure Pope Francis’ love of heresy.

  • Pingback: Him: Pope Francis and a Year in the Modern Imagination | Nosmerca()

  • melanie

    As a mother Iof a large family, I learned to ignore the bad and praise and give attention to what my children did that was good. Shouldn’t that be our focus as Catholics ? Surely that would give more honour to our Lord than allowing false media headlines to seduce us into bashing a pope who is trying to live the gospel

  • AndrewIsrael

    Pope Francis I saved the Catholic Church! I am Jewish and I can tell you its about time the Catholic Church elected a Jesuit who has philosophical policies that not only expose the Tea Party/MoxNews Religious Reichers for who they are. He has helped to bring back Christianity to its essencial roots and regather the disenfranchised who have unfortunately scapegoated Christianity’s Hypocrisy for Capitalism.

    “The perfect type of fascist throughout recent centuries has been the Prussian Junker, who developed such hatred for other races and such allegiance to a military clique as to make him willing at all times to engage in any degree of deceit and violence necessary to place his culture and race astride the world. In every big nation of the world are at least a few people who have the fascist temperament. Every Jew-baiter, every Catholic hater, is a fascist at heart. The hoodlums who have been desecrating churches, cathedrals and synagogues in some of our larger cities are ripe material for fascist leadership.”–Henry Wallace NYTimes, The Danger of American Fascism

    • Somehow I don’t think Pope Francis would approve of your gross stereotypes of conservatives.

    • NOTalibaniTeabaggers!

      I have many Jesuit friends who absolutely agree with me. What they admire most with regards to the Jewish people is that we vote more in line with Christ than Religious Reichers. We believe in government having a role in protecting the people through progressive legislation. Do not forget my Catholic friends, America used to be a country for only White Male Protestant Slaveowners.

      The Republican Party is no longer the Party of Ronald Reagan. Its clearly adopted the Tea Party Corporate Fascist agenda. This is your chickens coming home to roost after 40 years of the Nixon Southern Strategy which has lead to the most extreme historical revisionism in US history.

      American Catholics must come to a realization: reject the Tea Party Nazis or repent and follow Pope Francis. I can tell you that even being Jewish I would follow Pope Francis the Vicar of Christ over any other heretic who thinks he knows better than the Pope.

    • So, I’m curious. Which American political party do you think best reflects Catholic social justice teaching?

    • NOTalibaniTeabaggers!

      Democrat not because its “left-wing” but its the only sane party left. The Republicans are SOO extreme they are Fascist. They used to be Reagan but thats Obama now clearly. Obama like Reagan didnt tolerate the David Dukes. But this Republican Party does…wtf?

      Democrats are the party of Jesus. Democrats support Pope Francis I immigration reform.

    • So, tell me, how do you reconcile the Democrat party’s enthusiastic support of abortion, contraception, and homosexual acts with Catholic doctrine?

    • NOTalibaniTeabaggers!

      “The symptoms of fascist thinking are colored by environment and adapted to immediate circumstances. But always and everywhere they can be identified by their appeal to prejudice and by the desire to play upon the fears and vanities of different groups in order to gain power. It is no coincidence that the growth of modern tyrants has in every case been heralded by the growth of prejudice. It may be shocking to some people in this country to realize that, without meaning to do so, they hold views in common with Hitler when they preach discrimination against other religious, racial or economic groups (Social Conservatives). Likewise, many people whose patriotism is their proudest boast play Hitler’s game by retailing distrust of our Allies and by giving currency to snide suspicions without foundation in fact.”–Henry Wallace, The Dangers of American Fascism

      Pope Francis: Government Has a Role in Addressing Inequality and Injustice

      “I ask God to give us more politicians capable of sincere and effective dialogue aimed at healing the deepest roots—and not simply the appearances—of the evils in our world! Politics, though often denigrated, remains a lofty vocation and one of the highest forms of charity, inasmuch as it seeks the common good.”–Pope Francis

      You either follow the Vicar of Christ Pope Francis I or your a heretic its that simple my friend. Republican Tea Party “Catholics” are an oxymoron. Your not a “Puritan” like the Southern Biblethumpers like Westboro Baptist Church who says “G-d hates Fags” “Jews killed Jesus” or the KKK who used to own slaves–YOUR CATHOLIC! Act like it stop being a Puritan with the social issues > economic reality!!

      You may have your views of abortions, gay marriage, etc. but that should not be the “wedge issues” as Pope Francis clearly addresses. Remember when he said Catholics need to not interfere with the spiritual life of gays? He wants Catholics to focus on the Jesuit message of putting the poor > rich. Capitalism and its inherent sin of income inequality is by definition the greatest tyranny of our time as he pointed out.

      Jesus Condemns the Pharisees and the Teachers of the Law of Moses

      23 Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples:

      2 The Pharisees and the teachers of the Law are experts in the Law of Moses. 3 So obey everything they teach you, but don’t do as they do. After all, they say one thing and do something else.

      RWW News: Beck Declares That “We Get Our Laws From The Laws Of Moses”

    • You call the murder of over 50 million innocent children since 1973 a “wedge issue”? Democrats have aided in the killing of many more innocents than the Nazis ever did.

      Pope Francis never called abortion a wedge issue. He merely said that Catholics shouldn’t focus on one issue at the expense of others. He has spoken out quite strongly against abortion.

      Additionally, the prohibition of contraception and homosexual acts as disordered are infallible Catholic doctrines. Democrats celebrate both. How do you reconcile that?

      What about the Democrat insistence on prohibiting the free exercise of religion? Does that bother you at all that they are forcing Catholics to pay for contraception and abortion?

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Of course you have to pay for contraception and abortions just like your paying taxes. Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars! Im not debating this considering Hitler banned abortions for his “Aryan Race” while killing the lgbt community…so issues do matter when put into context!! It scares me seeing the GOP/Tea Party adopt open Neo-Nazism.

      If you dont like homosexual marriage? Dont get one! If you dont like abortion? Dont get one! “Be the change you wish to see in the world”–Ghandi!

      Just work on being the best Catholic you can be thou shalt not judge thy neighbor. Live and let live as long as were a free and open democracy then we should be fine!

      Corporations are not people! The day Hobby Lobby gets baptized by Jesus will be the day Catholics can be considered Republicans.

      Until that day comes, Catholic Republicans are an oxymoron. There is nothing Catholic in supporting the death penalty (Islam), stoning of gays (Islam), outlawing abortion (Islam), social darwinism economics of corporations righting the laws > unions (islam), gun owners (nazis/kkk)…I mean where is the “universal” love in Republican “values”?


      1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism

      From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

      2. Disdain for the importance of human rights

      The regimes themselves viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

      3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause

      The most significant common thread among these regimes was the use of scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in controlled directions. The methods of choice—relentless propaganda and disinformation—were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite “spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists, socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals, and “terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.

      4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism

      Ruling elites always identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.

      5. Rampant sexism

      Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in Draconian laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of the country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.

      6. A controlled mass media

      Under some of the regimes, the mass media were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the general public unaware of the regimes’ excesses.

      7. Obsession with national security

      Inevitably, a national security apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting “national security,” and questioning its activities was portrayed as unpatriotic or even treasonous.

      8. Religion and ruling elite tied together

      Unlike communist regimes, the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless by their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves to the predominant religion of the country and chose to portray themselves as militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the ruling elite’s behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the “godless.” A perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite was tantamount to an attack on religion.

      9. Power of corporations protected

      Although the personal life of ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure military production (in developed states), but also as an additional means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of interests, especially in the repression of “have-not” citizens.

      10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated

      Since organized labor was seen as the one power center that could challenge the political hegemony of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was inevitably crushed or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass, viewed with suspicion or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being poor was considered akin to a vice.

      11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts

      Intellectuals and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated with them were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom were considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal. Universities were tightly controlled; politically unreliable faculty harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed. To these regimes, art and literature should serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.

      12. Obsession with crime and punishment

      Most of these regimes maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked power, leading to rampant abuse. “Normal” and political crime were often merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of criminals or “traitors” was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more police power.

      13. Rampant cronyism and corruption

      Those in business circles and close to the power elite often used their position to enrich themselves. This corruption worked both ways; the power elite would receive financial gifts and property from the economic elite, who in turn would gain the benefit of government favoritism. Members of the power elite were in a position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as well: for example, by stealing national resources. With the national security apparatus under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was largely unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.

      14. Fraudulent elections

      Elections in the form of plebiscites or public opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with candidates were held, they would usually be perverted by the power elite to get the desired result. Common methods included maintaining control of the election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising opposition voters, destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a last resort, turning to a judiciary beholden to the power elite.

      NOTE: The above 14 Points was written in 2004 by Dr. Laurence Britt, a political scientist. Dr. Britt studied the fascist regimes of: Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile).

      Does any of this sound familiar? As America sinks deeper and deeper into corporate greed will this country continue to be a democracy by the people and for the people or will it be ruled by the few? Will the trinity of money, power and greed over come one of the greatest countries in the world? Only we, the people, can keep it free. SPEAK OUT AND LET YOUR THOUGHTS BE KNOWN…ONLY BY SILENCE WILL WE BE DEFEATED!

    • So, you’re Protestant, then? Pope Francis teaches that abortion, contraception, and homosexual acts are all intrinsic evils. If you oppose him in this, then you are a dissenting Catholic and no better than those you decry. You can’t pick and choose which doctrines of the Church suit your fancy and ignore the rest. You can’t decry the fate of the illegal immigrant while dismissing the plight of the aborted child. It’s all or nothing.

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      No! Im more Catholic than you are since I only consider Jesuits real Catholics anyway. They overwhelmingly vote Democrat and were the greatest threat to the Nazis in Germany. Jesuits took an absolute oath to obey the Vicar of Christ > Satan Adolf Hitler. Simple logic. Now put into context:

      Rand Hitler Paul seems perfect then for you. He wants to outlaw abortion, wipe out the lgbt community…”Catholic values” 😉

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Be blessed you have a Jesuit Pope thank G-d!! Without the Jesuits Pope Francis is right Roman Catholicism would be swept away like a house of cards.

      You need a Jesuit to challenge the Religious Reich Republican Party and its takeover of America! You need REAL Christians like the Jesuits that overwhelmingly support the Democrats, Obama, Pelosi, etc.

      AND dont get me started with this picking and choosing with illegal and abortion. I CARE thats why I personally would never marry a women who would have an abortion. Im a male HOWEVER Im not going to allow the government to have WHITE PROTESTANT SLAVEOWNING MALES tell women what to do with their bodies. They deserve equal rights they are not subservient slaves! They know whats best and you know most would never abort anyway its a total wedge issue to sedduce Christians into the Republican Anti-Christ Nazi Party!

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Im starting to think Communist Catholics I know at this point are the most Christian people Ive ever met in my life.

      At least they have the guts to peacefully protest at Occupy Wall Street rallies while being mocked at by SS MoxNews Channel that thinks they are “lazy”.

      What is “lazy” about protesting for a socialist democracy where the people have a say in their government and NOT CORPORATIONS? Pope Francis definitely supports Occupy Wall Street > Teabagging Puritans! They actually walk his talk of standing up to the Tyrannies of Capitalism! Amen!

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Also “Capitalism”=Slavery! Its slavery to the Corporations. They are the plantation owners today. Look at sports its black men doing all the work for rich white racists! HELLO! I want to abolish Capitalism its destroying America and the PLANET!!

      We need a Catholic New Deal! We need a higher minimum wage for low income workers. We need more government jobs! We need more restrictions on corporate abuses! We need socialism so we can all come together! We need to focus on actually walking the talk of Christ!

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Protestantism=Nazism. I am a DEVOUT Catholic born and raised Jewish but Pope Francis is my inspiration to convert!!

      Here is a Wikipedia learning session!!

      The Protestant Reformation, and especially the English Reformation, brought new suspicions against the Jesuits, who were accused of “infiltrating” political realms and non-Catholic churches. In England, it was forbidden to belong to the Jesuits, under grave penalties, including the death penalty. Jesuitism is the term their opponents coined for the practices of the Jesuits in the service of the Counter-Reformation.[1]

      The development of Jansenism in 17th-century France led to intra-church rivalries between Jesuits and Jansenists, and although the pro-papal Jesuits ultimately prevailed, it cost them dearly with regards to their reputation in the largely Gallican-influenced French Church.

      Many anti-Jesuit conspiracy theories emerged in the 18th century Enlightenment, as a result of an alleged rivalry between the Freemasons and the pious Jesuits. Intellectual attacks on Jesuits were seen as an efficient rebuttal to the anti-masonry promoted by conservatives, and this ideological conspiracy pattern persisted into the 19th century as an important component of Frenchanti-clericalism. It was, however, largely confined to political elites until the 1840s, when it entered the popular imagination through the writings of the historians Jules Michelet and Edgar Quinetof the Collège de France, who declared “la guerre aux jesuites”, and the novelist Eugène Sue, who in his best-seller Le Juif errant depicted the Jesuits as a “secret society bent on world domination by all available means”.[2] Sue’s heroine, Adrienne de Cardoville, said that she could not think about Jesuits “without ideas of darkness, of venom and of nasty black reptiles being involuntarily aroused in me”.[3]

      Jesuit conspiracy theories from earlier eras often focused on the personality of Adam Weishaupt, a professor of law at a Jesuit school who went on to found the Bavarian Order of the Illuminati. Weishaupt was accused of being the secret leader of the New World Order, and even of being the Devil himself.[citation needed] Augustin Barruel, a conservative Jesuit historian, wrote at length about Weishaupt, claiming that the Illuminati had been the secret promoters of the French Revolution.

      Jesuit conspiracy theories found fertile soil in Imperial Germany, where anti-Jesuits saw the order as a sinister and extremely powerful organization characterized by strict internal discipline, utter unscrupulousness in choice of methods, and undeviating commitment to the creation of a universal empire ruled by the Papacy. Citing historian Friedrich Heyer’s metaphor of the specter of Jesuitism [Jesuitengespenst] and similar imagery from other authors, Róisín Healey writes: “The Jesuit of anti-Jesuit discourse had what might be called an uncanny quality: he was both subhuman and superhuman. Jesuits were allegedly so extreme in their submission to their order that they became like machines and, in their determination to achieve their goals, drew on powers unavailable to other men. The peculiar location of the Jesuit, at the boundaries of humanity, unsettled the producers and consumers of anti-Jesuit discourse. In this sense, the Jesuit specter haunted imperial Germany.”[4] Healy observes that “Feeling themselves haunted by the Jesuits, anti-Jesuits revealed themselves to be less rational than they believed.” Their discourse, with its “skewed” perception of reality, “resembled, in certain respects, the ‘paranoid style’ of politics identified by the American historian, Richard Hofstadter”.[5]

      Anti-Jesuitism played an important part in the Kulturkampf, culminating in the Jesuit Law of 1872, endorsed by Otto von Bismarck, which required Jesuits to dissolve their houses in Germany, forbade members from exercising most of their religious functions, and allowed the authorities to deny residency to individual members of the order. Some of the law’s provisions were removed in 1904, but it was only repealed in 1917.[6]

      In the 1930s, Jesuit conspiracy theories were made use of by the Nazi regime with the goal of reducing the influence of the Jesuits, who ran secondary schools and engaged in youth work. A propaganda pamphlet, “The Jesuit: The Obscurantist without a Homeland” by Hubert Hermanns, warned against the Jesuits’ “dark power” and “mysterious intentions”. Declared “public vermin” [Volksschädlinge] by the Nazis, Jesuits were persecuted, interned, and sometimes murdered

      This proves my point! Republicans will turn on the Jesuits. What will Catholics do to stand up for the Jesuits if Rand Hitler Paul comes to power and outlaws Pope Francis and the Jesuits from challenging the dictates of the Tea Party Fascist Agenda!?!? Will you continue to bravo Rand Hitler Paul on banning abortion while he starves the poor!?! Will you be willing to convert to the Nazis and do as they say?!!? I WILL NEVER OBEY THE NAZIS!! THE JESUITS AND DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE PEOPLE IS MY OATH!!

    • NONAZITeabaggers!



    • Also –

      “Don’t like slavery? Don’t own a slave. Don’t like child abuse? Don’t abuse a child. Don’t like rape? Don’t force anyone to have sex.” Etc.thisr arguments aound pretty dumb in that context, don’t they?

      If you support abortion, you support the murder of innocent human beings. Just like the Nazis, oddly enough (who did support abortion for “undesirable” human beings).

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Correct. BUT they banned it with regards to the Whites (like were seeing with the Republican Nazi South!). Im talking about gay marriage and abortion which are issues that Republicans have become flat out Nazi over. Stop trying to be eugenicists toward my lgbt friends and telling a women who YOU dont know about why she cant have an abortion!! Thats so puritan not Catholic!

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Also context with abortion matters. Pope Francis clearly says the Tyranny of Capitalism > Abortion.


    • jmarple46

      The pope said that catholics should stop talking so much about abortion. He is diminishing the gravity of the murder of children. You are a bit naive in your understanding of this pope.

    • Actually, I’m happy to inform you that Pope Francis did NOT say what you think he said! You are listening to the media’s interpretation of what he said as opposed to what he actually said – which was that Catholics should not focus on one issue to the exclusion of all others, regardless of what issue (so it also applies to Catholics who, say, obsess about immigration reform while ignoring abortion). And PF has spoken out very strongly against abortion. I can provide quotes if you wish.

    • NOTalibaniTeabaggers!

      The Tea Party and Catholic social teaching don’t mix – See more at:

      Tea Party Nazi Libertarian (Pink Floyd “The Wall”):

      Libertarian “Tea Party” Individualism = Free to individually starve, get sick, go broke and die, alone, ‘individually’, if you’re too “weak”, so nobody has to give a damn or have any responsibility to you, as a fellow citizen.
      Nothing about Libertarians is pro-Liberty or pro-Individual except Liberty for the individual millionaires and billionaires, wealthiest top 10% protecting their ill gotten wealth and hoarding it while killing the Middle Class and weakening people so they barely hang on financially and either on the poverty line or below it so they’re poor, uneducated, fearful and demoralized but brainwashed with Alex Jones, Aaron Russo, Lou Dobbs and Ron Paul conspiracy propaganda to keep them suspicious of conspiracies everywhere.
      Libertarians are “Anti-Financial Independence” by shackling people with debt, high prices, industry monopolies, oppression of workers’ rights (to reasonable pay and safe working conditions normally protected by regulations), anxiety, ill health and poverty in the name in “individual responsibility” and “individual liberty” (liberty to be “on your own” with zero Civil Rights protections to keep the wealthy and the corporations from exploiting your as cheap labor or no government enforced protections of YOUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS to be financially independent of corporate monopolies, high prices and a inhumane wages).

    • tl;dr

      Just a word of advice — paragraph breaks are your friend.

    • NOTalibaniTeabaggers!

      k…did you watch the video seeing the parallel connection between “libertarians” and nazis? Catholics I know hate Nazis thats why they vote Democrat.

    • No, I didn’t watch it. Also, see here for why no Catholic should vote Democrat:

      (One could also argue that no Catholic should vote Republican, also, but let’s limit the discussion to Democrats for now.)

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Catholics are centrists right? If I had to choose between Reagan and Carter I would go with Reagan by definition because he is a better uniter. Obama vs Mormon Cult SS Mitt Romney? Obama! Obviously since he is a Christian and Romney is a Nazi Occultist…but beside the point Obama is clearly more Reagan since he is a better uniter than Mormon Cult SS Romney.

      Catholics need to wake up and realize the Religious Reichers have conned you! Catholics are Obama. Catholics are Nancy Pelosi even Harry Reid. They are true men and women of character who have their heart for the common good. Republicans dont. They are Pharisees who put on a spectacle but are just Donald Trump fat cats–people who Jesus despised!!

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Please note I am only trying to help you. I can tell you have a good heart and mean well with the morality issues. I get it it matters…but its the big picture Catholics need to pay attention to. Pope Francis is giving them what they need: “tough love”

    • NOTalibaniTeabaggers!

      “When Hitler attacked the Jews
      I was not a Jew, therefore I was not concerned.
      And when Hitler attacked the Catholics,
      I was not a Catholic, and therefore, I was not concerned.
      And when Hitler attacked the unions and the industrialists,
      I was not a member of the unions and I was not concerned.
      Then Hitler attacked me and the Protestant church —
      and there was nobody left to be concerned.” –Pastor Niemoller


    • From the CCC:

      2303 Deliberate hatred is contrary to charity. Hatred of the neighbor is a sin when one deliberately wishes him evil. Hatred of the neighbor is a grave sin when one deliberately desires him grave harm. “But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven.”97

      Just FYI.

    • NOTalibaniTeabaggers!

      Fighting Fascism is not being violent its standing up against Satan’s army. Nazis are Satanists. Jesus stood up for the oppressed people, the homeless, the disenfranchised. “It is far easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven”–Yeshua

    • Even hating Fascists and Nazis is a sin, according to Jesus. Opposing their beliefs and actions is not the same as hating them. “But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven.” – Yeshua

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      I dont hate Nazis I feel sorry for them because they are clearly going to hell if they dont repent.

    • toft roger

      Judging by the length of life the main Nazi criminals seem to have, they are putting things off as long as they can !

  • Ben

    I’m late to this one, but what a terrific article!

  • John Schmidt

    Actually the Pope has not ruined the catholic church. Satan ruined it. Satan knew he could never abolish the church so he took it over. Rev 18:14 Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins,

    • So, your position is that the gates of Hell have prevailed against the Church, and thus Jesus was a liar? I assume you are atheist, then?

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Hes not an atheist its just disinfo. Please I can help you with your defense of Catholicism! The whore of babylon is Mecca. “Every Jew-baiter, every Catholic hater is a fascist at heart”–Henry Wallace, The Dangers of American Fascism

      Who Jew baits? MUSLIMS/Nazis! Who Catholic hates? MUSLIMS/Nazis!

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      Atheists are not bad people seriously like the Pope said with them going to heaven. They will if they are good. Think about all the wonderful brave Communists who fought against the Nazis? They are polar opposites but there works prove their salvation. They walk more like Jesus than most Religious Reichers (Pharisees).

    • NONAZITeabaggers!

      You do realize that is by definition Mecca she is the whore of Babylon. Mystery Babylon is Mecca. Hitler was a Muslim. Its easy to scapegoat the Catholics believe me I used to fear them being Jewish and then I saw the light meeting Jesuits who were wonderful people who vote Democrat and make fun of the Pharisee Republicans.

      Relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world

    • Hegesippus

      Mt 16: 18.
      No, he has not and will not for he cannot.
      The Church will never fall.

  • Maureen

    Defending Pope Francis by revealing misinterpretations of past Popes’s comments is hardly a defense.

    • I don’t need to defend Pope Francis, because he doesn’t need it. What needs defending is the concept of learning about Church teaching from the Pope instead of the MSM.

  • Deborah

    The true gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ:

    All scripture taken from the King James Bible.

  • Gretchen Bryan

    I don’t think so. He is amazing. He is breathing life into our Church!!! God bless him …in Jesus name. Amen!!! I love him. God loves us. … much… More than we can every know…God created all…God loves us ..more than we as human can ever know!!!! Thank you Lord for loving me so much!! I am your servant.

  • Ella White

    Can u say false prophet….. God does not change it says that in the bible… Which the pope must not read or he would drop to his knees with apologies for trying to change GODS LAW… Well GOD did tell us about the end and he warned us about the false prophets and the antichrist. Sodom and Gomora got destroyed because of all the sin that was there ppl open your eyes THE END IS HERE PLEASE CHOOSE CHRIST.. NOT THE POPE FOR HE IS A SINFUL MAN TRYING TO TAKE PPL TO HELL WITH HIM.

  • Patsy

    Surely the bible itself is your best source material. It is overflowing with examples that are not remotely worthy of a god, nevermind a benevolent one.

  • yeshua



    God isn’t real lol.

  • AugustineThomas

    The difference is that the media were actually distorting the words of the previous two popes. Francis needs no distortion for his fellow leftists–he’s more committed to Leftism than the Church.. He’s not our first bad pope and probably won’t be the last.. But let’s hope the next one is much more like Benedict XVI (having a heretic in the papacy is an extremely dangerous situation).

    • Bearing false witness against your neighbor is a sin, FYI. Pope Francis hasn’t said anything in opposition to Church teaching, let alone heretical. I’m sorry to hear that you have rejected Catholicism, though.

    • AugustineThomas

      Let me guess.. You go to Novus Ordo and help decorate and prance around the altar like it’s a Bed, Bath and Beyond display and then you snatch at our Lord like he’s a piece of trailmix (if you even believe in the Real Presence)?

      The Pope has made many heretical statements. It’s heretical to suggest that the proper, two thousand year old Mass is a fad and dangerous.
      It’s heretical to suggest that everyone can get into heaven no matter how much they reject the Church. (JPII and BXVI constantly reminded people that they still have time to repent–this is quite a different thing than suggesting that offending our jealous God is no big deal and won’t ever matter.)
      It’s heretical to teach people with your actions that the orthodox need to be persecuted and the baby murderers left alone and even celebrated.

      You guys love him because you’re heretics.. It doesn’t matter if you’re the majority, that doesn’t change the truth. (Your belief that the majority decides the truth is yet more proof of your rampant heresy, including, but not limited to Leftism and Americanism.)

    • Pope Francis never said any of those things, Augustine, which I think you know since you neglected to provide proof (i.e., direct quotes in context from a reputable source). For example, it seems clear that you are ignorant of the difference between redemption and salvation:

      I love both the Extraordinary Form and the Ordinary Form of the Mass. When I have the opportunity, I visit this community:

      I usually attend a very respectful, reverent OF mass as I happen to live right behind my parish. 🙂 With 5 kids and a full-time job, it’s a hectic schedule! I try to be respectful of our Lord in the Eucharist at Mass, and as a Lenten practice I’m going to try and attend Adoration more often.

      I don’t know why you’re so angry, AT, but I’ll pray that you find peace and contentment during this Lenten season.

    • AugustineThomas

      I’m angry because the American Church is full of heretics. And then people like you go after the orthodox and give a free pass to the baby murderers and rampant heretics who populate 90% of NO Masses.

      And why do we need the NO Mass? The proper Mass is always more reverential and even when they’re equally reverential, the proper Mass is still much better.

      The reason for the new Mass is that modern heretics want to pretend they’re great church fathers.. But the church fathers would be more strenuous in their denunciations of heretics and their co-dependent supporters like yourself.

      Why was Christ angry when he saw the money changers’ tables?

    • How have I “gone after the orthodox,” AT? I AM part of the orthodox. I fully believe in everything taught by the Catholic Church, and defend that truth regularly.

      The Church teaches that the OF mass is valid, and I submit to the teachings of the Church whether or not I believe the OF mass is “needed.” Why do you reject Church teaching in this regard?

      You are not Christ, AT. You’re raging against the Church that He gave the authority to teach in His name, and the Church that He gave the authority to bind and loose. Do you think Jesus would be happy with your behavior and attitude toward your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ, not to mention His Vicar?

    • AugustineThomas

      You actually believe that the Mass that has emptied the Church is orthodox?

      The fact that there is a pope who (fine I’ll tone it down a bit) verges on heresy and a small number of cardinals who vocally support it because it’s the trend of the time means that its orthodox?

      Are you unaware that popes and cardinals have, in the past, often supported heresy only to be proven wrong, even if it was after they died?

      You really think Christ wants you telling me I’m going to Hell?

      I’ve never made any judgement on your eternal salvation, only spoken the truth.

    • AT, have you studied the history of the Church at all? The OF did not exist in 1054, when the Eastern Orthodox Church split off, or in 1571, when the Protestant Reformation started. Both of these events caused the Church to “empty.” Yet, She remains. I believe that the gates of Hell will not prevail against the Church, no matter what. I’m sorry you don’t share that belief.

      Did you read my article at all, AT? I wrote about a Pope who died while in the act of committing adultery. So yes, I’m fully cognizant of the fact that popes and cardinals have sinned. They have never taught heresy as doctrine, though, so Christ’s truth prevails.

      I never said you were going to Hell, AT. Can you quote where you thought I said such a thing?

      I’m alarmed at your propensity to commit libel. It certainly doesn’t speak well for your credibility.

      I never claimed you’ve made any judgement about my eternal salvation, but you have certainly told lies. For example, “And then people like you go after the orthodox and give a free pass to
      the baby murderers and rampant heretics who populate 90% of NO Masses.”

      I don’t give a free pass to baby murderers or rampant heretics. Can you provide any evidence to the contrary? If not, will you please apologize for bearing false witness?

      And this: “You go to Novus Ordo and help decorate and prance around the altar like it’s a Bed, Bath and Beyond display and then you snatch at our Lord like he’s a piece of trailmix (if you even believe in the Real Presence)?”

      I do attend an OF mass but the rest of that screed is false. Again, can you provide any evidence to the contrary? If not, can you please apologize for bearing false witness?

    • AugustineThomas

      A pope hasn’t spoken infallibly and preached heresy.
      You haven’t heard of the pope who excommunicated a future saint and was later labeled to have been preaching heresy by the next pope? (Papal infallibility didn’t come around until the 1400s.)

      I’m saddened by your intense hypocrisy and pedantry. I wish you would actually learn about the history of the Church instead of making uneducated, aggressive statements about it like so many “modern” Catholics.

      By the way, where did you get your history degree? I graduated from the 12th ranked department in the world and my senior thesis was on Constantine and the Early Church.

    • Papal infallibility has existed since Pentecost, Augustine. That is a teaching of the Church. Which pope are you talking about?

      Hypocrisy? Pedantry? Why do you make these accusations? What have I said that is hypocritical? Why do you say I am obsessed with rules? Can you clarify?

      Can you give me your full name so I can verify your credentials? It’s odd that you claim to be such a learned historian, and yet you don’t seem to know anything about Church history. If you prefer, you can send them to me privately at my personal e-mail: jrwahlund at gmail dot com.

    • AugustineThomas

      So all the Northern European heretics were confused when they explicitly stated that their reason for leaving the Church was the formalization of papal infallibility?

      Of course, as orthodox Catholics, you and me, we believe that when the Pope spoke authoritatively he was speaking infallibly from the time Christ founded the Church, even if it hadn’t been formalized by a council of the Church.

      Pope Francis has yet to speak infallibly and won’t (thankfully). He’s not a theologian, he’s a rambler. Even BXVI, the greatest theologian in the world, never spoke ex cathedra.

      It’s odd that you’re so ignorant and think that calling other people ignorant will cover that up. You can look up anything I’ve told you. (Perhaps the problem is that you think if you haven’t heard it yet, it must not be true.)

    • Not sure what specific group of heretics you’re referring to, but many people leave the Church once dogma they don’t like is proclaimed infallibly. That’s why the Church does so, to make it clear that certain teachings (which have been taught since the Church’s inception) will never change. Everything old is new again.

      I said you were ignorant of Church history, AT. I never said you were ignorant, personally. If this is how you misinterpret people it’s not at all surprising that you severely misunderstand the words of Pope Francis.

      You’re the one making the claim so the burden of proof is on you to provide evidence to support your claim. That’s how debate works.

    • AugustineThomas

      If you’re too lazy to look up the Pope’s statements that’s your problem. The rest of the world heard the comments he made about people who attend the proper Mass being faddish, when he is the king of the fad chasers.

      You keep trying to teach me, but you don’t know anything. You seem to be quite a pedant, like most of the uneducated heretics who attend NO.

      Again, “by their fruits, you will know them”.. NO churches are full of old ladies and people who don’t even believe in the Real Presence, because they teach disrespect of the Church and self-reverence.

      Those problems do not exist at the proper Mass because it teaches reverence of Christ.

      I’ll pray for you that you get over the real fad and learn to love the tradition of the Church!

    • On the contrary, if you’re too dishonest to cite sources to prove your claims, that’s your problem. Since you are unable to do so, I can logically conclude that your claim is baseless and fraudulent. Good to know.

      Why do you say I am a pedant? Because I believe in the Church and all She teaches? I thought that was being Catholic.

      My experience with OF churches is the opposite of what you describe.

      These problems do exist, and I think you’re in denial because I cited several examples of where they do. Also, see here:

      You’re in my prayers as well.

    • AugustineThomas

      [Abp. Jan Graubner speaks:] When we were discussing those who are fond of the ancient liturgy and wish to return to it, it was evident that the Pope speaks with great affection, attention, and sensitivity for all in order not to hurt anyone. However, he made a quite strong statement when he said that he understands when the old generation returns to what it experienced, but that he cannot understand the younger generation wishing to return to it. “When I search more thoroughly – the Pope said – I find that it is rather a kind of fashion [in Czech: ‘móda’, Italian ‘moda’]. And if it is a fashion, therefore it is a matter that does not need that much attention. It is just necessary to show some patience and kindness to people who are addicted to a certain fashion. But I consider greatly important to go deep into things, because if we do not go deep, no liturgical form, this or that one, can save us.”

    • Thank you for actually providing something resembling a source. Since you did not provide a sourcelink, I Googled the quote and read its history and context. Apparently it’s a third hand report of something Pope Francis might have said in an informal setting, so I can’t say that I pay it too much heed. At any rate, I think Fr. Z has the right perspective on it:

    • AugustineThomas

      What are you talking about? It’s a direct quote from the Archbishop. Your claim is that the Archbishop is lying?

      Everyone is just fabricating all of these statements that verge on heresy?

      You’re one of those NO Catholics who, no matter what the pope says, tells us that we’re all confused and just forget about it.

      I never EVER had this problem with Saint JPII or BXVI!

      I am the biggest supporter of the papacy that I know, but that doesn’t mean I need to pretend that every pope is a good pope.

      God bless you!

    • The Archbishop told someone at Vatican Radio what Francis allegedly said. Since I wasn’t there, and since there is not a written transcript of the conversion they had, and since the report of the remarks have been translated to English from a different language, I have no way of knowing if it’s accurate. That’s why I deal with what Pope Francis has actually said, and not what he has only allegedly said.

      But I really don’t see anything insulting or worrisome about his comments if they are, in fact, accurate. A Jesuit who prefers the OF? Shocker! He didn’t say that the EF is wrong or illicit or evil or that it should be abolished. He also said that those with a love for the EF should be respected. So, not quite seeing what the problem is here, and Fr. Z agrees.

      My obedience is to the Vicar of Christ, whoever he may be. Jesus gave us a man who had publicly denied Him three times as our first Pope, so I can’t say that I’m too worried about Pope Francis. 🙂

    • AugustineThomas

      I am obedient to Pope Francis. I haven’t left the Church and I believe the teachings of the Church.

      Jesuits were once great men, but they do more harm than good now. Why doesn’t Pope Francis have a word to say about the rampant and unrepentant heresy in his own order?
      St. Ignatius would discipline or kick out most current Jesuits.

      If you don’t trust the Archbishop to tell you what Jose Bergoglio said then you must believe he’s been a mute since he’s become pope, because there is no one more trustworthy as to his words than a like-minded Archbishop.

      I think it’s just over-the-top offensive that such a fad chaser would accuse those committed to the two thousand year old Mass of being faddish.
      I understand it has changed, but the same Mass changed extremely slowly over two millennia.. No one EVER had the gall to think they could completely change the whole thing overnight.. IT wreaks of Satan’s kind of pride.

    • Your statements thus far are not one of someone who is obedient to the Holy Father.

    • AugustineThomas

      What statement did I make that wasn’t obedient to the Church?

      You put the pope ahead of Christ’s Church? In my eyes we only listen to the pope, because Christ gave him the keys and a vision to go to Rome.

      That doesn’t mean I’m not free to dislike the current pope and a majority of what he says. Luckily for me the chance that he will speak infallibly is as close to zero as possible so I won’t have to disobey the teachings of the Church in any way in order to not like Jose Bergoglio.

    • Um, all of your claims that the OF is evil and horrible? Or maybe bearing false witness against your neighbor? That’s not in keeping with the teaching of the Church.

      It’s not either the Church or the Pope, AT. It’s both/and. If you love one, you respect the other. It’s that simple. AT the very least, the Catechism instructs us to be charitable to others:

      “To avoid rash judgment, everyone should be careful to interpret insofar as possible his neighbor’s thoughts, words, and deeds in a favorable way: “Every good Christian ought to be more ready to give a favorable interpretation to another’s statement than to condemn it. But if he cannot do so, let him ask how the other understands it. And if the latter understands it badly, let the former correct him with love. If that does not suffice, let the Christian try all suitable ways to bring the other to a correct interpretation so that he may be saved.” (CCC 2477-2478)

    • AugustineThomas

      You should send a letter to Pope Francis about being charitable to those who attend the proper Mass. I don’t think God would like him persecuting the most faithful, because he’s embarrassed about his heretical beliefs.

      The Church and the pope are quite different. St. Peter denied Christ three times. Do we have to deny Christ? Wouldn’t it be to disrespect St. Peter otherwise?

      Christ leads the Church. He made promises and gave ultimate doctrinal authority to the pope. He never promised that everything every pope said would be true and he didn’t even promise that they would all be good guys. He gave him authority, that’s it. I do not deny any teaching of the Church, spoken authoritatively by any pope.
      Most people at NO Masses, on the other hand, do deny many teachings of the Church. Why don’t you spend your time educating them about the heresy they’ve fallen into while attending NO Masses?

    • I didn’t read his comments as uncharitable at all, if they are in fact accurate.

      We need to love St. Peter as our brother in Christ, and praise God that he repented of his denial of Christ!

      I do spent my time educating fallen-away Catholics, etc. That’s the purpose of my blog articles here, as well as my personal blog. But again, it’s not either I educate fallen-away Catholics or I educate anti-OF Catholics, it’s both/and. 🙂

    • AugustineThomas

      They were extremely uncharitable.
      I’m not sure if what you’re doing is called education.
      I do love Pope Francis and I pray for him everyday!

      St. Peter pray for us all!!

    • You’ve got an awfully funny way of showing love, if that’s the case.

    • AugustineThomas

      Does Christ not love us when he tells us we’re sinners in need of salvation?

      This is similar to the homosexuality argument. You don’t love people suffering from homosexual perversion by starting a parade to celebrate their sin.
      You also don’t love someone who is preaching nonsense by pretending what they’re preaching is wise.

    • Christ doesn’t show love for us by committing libel all over the Internet.

    • AugustineThomas

      And you’re not committing libel by falsely accusing me of committing libel?

      God bless you Ms. Wahlund! I thank God for your faith and the good work that you’re doing with this website.
      St. Augustine, pray for us! St. Thomas Aquinas, pray for us! St. Mary Magdalene, pray for us! St. Francis pray for us!

    • It’s not libel if the accusation is true. For example, you committed libel against Pope Francis when you accused him of saying that all atheists will go to heaven, which he did not say – instead, the confusion stems from the fact that you apparently don’t understand the difference between redemption and salvation.

    • AugustineThomas

      I said that he suggested that it doesn’t matter if you go to church or not, because God will save us no matter what, and that’s dangerous since our souls are at stake.

      You accused me of spreading libel all over the Internet, so even if I granted that your one accusation is true, which I don’t, you’d still be committing libel by accusing me of doing it constantly. (As long as you don’t have me put to death, you can libel me all you want by the way! You’re free to make mistakes.)

      Would you consider removing the log in your own eye?

    • False. You said, “It’s heretical to suggest that everyone can get into heaven no matter how much they reject the Church.” Source:

      You just committed libel AGAIN, because Pope Francis also never said or suggested that it doesn’t matter if you go to church or not because God will save you no matter what.

      What have I said that isn’t true?

    • AugustineThomas

      He did so suggest that. He goes after the orthodox and says “who am I to judge” and celebrates Notre Dame, aka Baby Murder University. I try not to read him because I don’t want to fall into heresy but I’ve heard from reliable sources what he’s suggested.
      You say I’ve committed libel, but I’ve only spoken the truth about what Pope Francis has suggested. You should seriously consider removing the log in your own eye.

    • he has never suggested such a thing, and the fact that you cannot provide proof of your claim is more evidence that he did not. If you have heard from reliable sources (of which Rorate Caeli is not one) that Pope Francis allegedly did these things, then provide your evidence. And stop claiming I have a log in my eye when all I ask is that you back up your accusations with evidence.

    • AugustineThomas

      If you don’t accept RC as a source, you’re obviously obsessed with lying to yourself that whatever you believe is ok and anyone who supports orthodoxy is guilty of some sin.

      Please tell me what’s wrong with being committed to orthodoxy.

      Are you seriously suggesting that you haven’t heard the “who am I to judge” comment?
      If the Pope can’t judge what is right and wrong, then who can?

      (You do know that pro-abortion politicians are now using his words to justify their support of baby murder?)

      This is the problem with Novus Ordo. It makes everyone believe that whatever they like is the true definition of orthodoxy and it makes them hate real orthodox folk like the people at RC.

    • Nothing is wrong with being committed to orthodoxy. But if you were truly committed to orthodoxy you wouldn’t be so eager to bear false witness against the pope.

      The Pope has spoken out strongly against abortion, so if pro-aborts are using his words to justify abortion, it shows how ignorant they are of what Pope Francis has said about it. Why are you blaming him for the ignorance and malice of those who support abortion?

      RC has demonstrated time and time again that they have no interest in promoting the truth, but rather promoting their own agenda even if they have to obfuscate the truth to do it. Pope Fracis had barely been elected when they declared him a heretic. The lost all respect I might have had for them when they pulled that stunt, and their eagerness to hide Michael King’s financial malfeasance at Fisher-More College by falsely proclaiming that Bp. Olsen hates the Tridentine mass is even more reason to distrust them.

      I see you have not yet provided evidence to support your claims against Pope Francis. I encourage you to read what the catechism says about lying and calumny.

    • AugustineThomas

      I encourage you to remove the log in your own eye.

      You’re a hypocrite and you’re the one who is pretending that her own quaint preferences are orthodoxy and anyone who disagrees with her is a this and a that and guilty of every kind of blasphemy.
      (It’s typical for people who are embarrassed of their heresy to accuse others to try to get the focus off of themselves.)

      All of the articles I’ve referred to are well known–so it’s you who is committing libel by accusing me of committing libel when I’m referring directly to published statements made by the current pope.
      Why are JPII’s and BXVI’s words immune to being used in support of heresy? Why was it impossible to turn their words to support heresy, but it’s so easy with Pope Francis’?

      You do seem to think that Catholicism is about getting on the majority side and figuring out who you can persecute.
      Why should the children pay for King’s supposed malfeasance? What does the proper Mass have to do with the running of a college? Listen to yourself. You’re suggesting that we should hold the proper Mass hostage over your ideological and political differences with your perceived enemies?
      Also, there you go being hypocritical again. There is no proof of King’s malfeasance, so far only unsubstantiated libel from the disgruntled professor, which you have repeated here.

      And why does the extreme commitment to orthodoxy of the Fisher More kids frighten you so much, but the rampant heresy, apostasy, and even outright support of baby murder at Novus Ordo Masses everywhere not even bother you?
      (You do realize that St. Fisher and St. More both died for the proper Mass you’re now trying to help others remove from their namesake college?)

    • btw, the existence of the SSPX proves that not everyone who loves the EF is in obedience to the Church. IMO, they’re just as bad as the alleged heretics who attend OF masses.

    • AugustineThomas

      We’re addicted to orthodoxy, the ancient, proper Mass and Christ’s teachings. Pope Francis and all his NO minions are addicted to the fifty year old fad and being right and they seem to get high from persecuting the orthodox while ignoring the rampant heretics. (And that’s when Jose isn’t going around telling everyone how humble he is.)

      Thank you for your prayers! Prayers to God, even from heretics, are always a good thing! (I used to be a heretic and before that an apostate so I know all about the game!)

    • We’re all part of the same Church, AT, and we’re all brothers and sisters in Christ. Satan sows division, not Jesus. And yes, prayer to God is very efficacious!

    • AugustineThomas

      Yes we are! Heretics are a part of the Church every bit as much as the orthodox. That doesn’t mean we need to start listening to heretics!

      Satan has used the NO Mass to sow quite a bit of division and heresy. The proper Mass was immune to that kind of thing for fifteen hundred years and still is.

    • He didn’t use the OF mass to sow heresy. He used the people who hijacked the OF mass to sow heresy. Big difference. If the EF has been immune to that kind of thing, and still is, how do you explain the current situation with Fisher-More College?

    • AugustineThomas

      Why do you make so many accusations and then you’re outraged at being accused?

    • What accusations have I made?

    • AugustineThomas

      That I’m ignorant of Church history and risking Hell if I refuse to call the NO Mass proper and support every rambling of Jose Bergoglio.

      I don’t claim to know everything, but I know that Christ said “by their fruits, you shall know them”.

    • AugustineThomas

      Since a majority of Catholics now support abortion and same-sex marriage, do you believe those actions to be graces as well and I’m going to Hell if I don’t call baby murder and homosexual perversion orthodoxy?

    • As Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI has said, truth is not determined by majority vote. Abortion and homosexual acts are intrinsic evils and grave sins. That is what the Church teaches, and that is what I believe.

    • AugustineThomas

      Well I agree with you that the NO Mass isn’t invalid (just as an SSPX Mass isn’t invalid, but that doesn’t mean I’ll start supporting Holocaust denying bishops)..
      I’ve just never heard anyone make a compelling argument for the existence of the NO Mass, except “that’s what a majority of people like”.

      It’s so insulting to hear Pope Francis call people who support the proper Mass faddish, when he’s made his entire career out of appeasing the majority by giving them whichever fad they desired.

      I don’t see how a preference for the unreverential, easier Mass is any different than a preference for “population control” or “equality” in this context (even though there are powerful cardinals who support both).

      Of course abortion is a clear evil, but should we not even discuss the evil effects of the NO Mass? Should we put our heads in the sand the way leftists do about baby murder?

    • An OF mass is both valid and licit, however, whereas an SSPX mass is valid but illicit. I’ve never heard anyone make a compelling argument for the existence of the duck-billed platypus but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a valuable function in the world. My heart was opened to the truth of Catholicism by a beautiful, glorious, reverent OF Mass (Basilica of St. Mary Easter Vigil, Easter 2003), so that’s one good reason for it, IMO. 🙂

      Can you substantiate the claims you make against Pope Francis? You keep claiming he said all these awful things but you don’t provide any evidence. Can you link to his statements on where he allegedly said these things so I can read his words in context?

      Here is how it is different: the Church teaches that the OF mass is valid and licit, therefore it’s not sinful to prefer it (just like the EF mass is valid and licit, so it’s not sinful to prefer it). One who supports contraception and/or abortion as a means of population control or gay marriage as a means of equality is supporting intrinsic evil, so it’s sinful to prefer either or both of those things.

      I don’t think that the OF mass has evil effects. I think that people who are trying to hijack the OF mass to promote their own agenda are the ones promulgating the evil effects, just like the EF mass can be hijacked to promulgate evil effects — or pretty much anything in the Church.

      I am 100% pro-life, without exception, and if you read my past CS articles (as well as my personal blog:, you will see that I do not have my head in the sand re: abortion. Why do you assume that I do?

    • AugustineThomas

      You haven’t heard the Pope’s statement calling people who attend the proper Mass faddish?

      I’m glad that you were brought into the Church, even if the Mass that brought you could have been more reverential.
      It’s a numbers game.. The heresy of the NO Mass has pushed far more people away than it has brought in and I suspect you would have been won over by the presence of Christ even if it had been a proper Mass.. I’m not trying to say that NO isn’t a real Mass, just that there is absolutely no reason for it except to make “modern” people feel self-important.

      Again, I’m not calling the NO Mass itself evil. I think the intrinsic evil part comes in the way that people use it.
      Heretics are a lot more likely to commit abortion than the orthodox.

    • Can you provide a link from to this alleged statement so I can read the Pope’s words in context, AT?

      The mass that brought me into the church was incredibly reverential. It was beautiful and glorious and brought tears to my eyes.

      This is what you don’t seem to get. It’s not the OF mass that has pushed people away at all. It’s the people who have hijacked the OF mass to push their own agenda, the “spirit of Vatican II folks” who have never actually read the Council documents for themselves. It’s sin and Satan who have pushed people from the Church.

      When you blame the OF mass for what Satan has done, you’re playing right into his hands.

      If you want to know why the OF was implemented, why not read the document that explains why?

    • AugustineThomas

      You’ll notice that the proper Mass is immune to being hijacked by heretics.

      I’m glad the Mass that converted you was reverential.. My points still stand. Most NO Masses aren’t reverential. You would have been converted by the proper Mass just the same.. It was the Truth, the Logos, that converted you.. It strengthens my faith in Christ to hear yet another story that he speaks to people in all places, even outside of Mass, if they’ll only listen.

    • The EF is immune to hijacking? Um, not quite. See: the SSPX, the Old Catholic Church in America, Mel Gibson, Fisher-More College, etc.

      Most NO masses aren’t reverential? That’s odd, because I’ve been Catholic for over 10 years, and I’ve seldom been to one that isn’t (and yes, I attend Mass every Sunday and HDO unless sick or something). So, that hasn’t been my experience at all.

      I encourage you to listen to what Pope Benedict said in Summorum Pontificum: “There is no contradiction between the two editions of the Roman Missal. In the history of the Liturgy growth and progress are found, but not a rupture.”





    • Don’t be sorry. I enjoy a good joke! 🙂 Thanks for the chuckle.

  • David Brainerd

    Are you still sticking to this as he keeps attacking Catholicism in every statement and proving himself to be a Lutheran?

    • Really? Do tell. I’ve yet to hear of Pope Francis saying anything that contradicts Catholic teaching. Can you give me an example?

  • Overlysensored

    you are scum, you are filth, you are vile, you are wanting a return to pope julius the III, pope paul the III, pope john XII, pope benedict IX, pope stephen VII, pope alexander VI, pope boniface VIII, pope leo X, pope urban II, pope sergius II, or any number of other popes that I am sure you would prefer that truly ruined peoples lives, many many people. You are such scum, filth, nothing but filth

  • Overlysensored

    You are such an idiot and so many here are idiots. This man will go down as the greatest pope we ever had, We have a long and disgraceful history of people who have led the catholic church, some being among the most evil people in history yet……yet you have the GAL to call this man out. You are killing the church with you venom and intolerance. This man is filling pews like no pope has done in hundreds of years and unlike those of his predecessors he is doing it not out of fear but out of hope and love. I can only hope that he lives forever and you are smitten with many plagues only to be healed by his prayer and words you insufferable and disgustable excuse of a human being. May all your children become gay and your bloodline end here.

  • Walter Lauinger

    It is too soon to judge Pope Francis, one way or another. Why don’t we all just give him time to settle in?

    • Leila Miller

      Just making sure that you know that this piece is satire, Walter. Thanks!

    • Walter Lauinger


  • Philip Maguire

    Despite your efforts I think this Pope should temper his comments and be more aware of how the media will spin them. That is, unless he is well aware in advance and perfectly happy with what he expects to be reported. Right now he is a gay icon. The gay Advocate’s man of the year as well as Time Magazine’s Choice. I doubt that St Peter, our first Pope, could have achieved that. I expect Francis to do far more harm than good?

    • The only reason Pope Francis is a “gay icon” is because the media is deliberately misinterpreting his words (just as they hailed Pope Benedict for saying that condoms were okay when he actually didn’t). I expect Francis to do far more good than harm, personally.

  • notna

    Boom, boom! Well stated. Pope JP2 stated, when asked about his role in the fall of Communism, that it was a rotten old tree that only needed a good shake to send it tumbling down. Then he immediately went on to say, with emphasis, that there was another rotten tree called Capitalism, and that it too needed a good shake. People forget.

  • David Orozco

    If Jesus came back right now and seen what you people do in his name he’d never stop vomiting. Stop trying to think like God it’s an impossiblity!

    • I love the irony of your first sentences when contrasted with your second sentence. Thanks for the chuckle! 🙂 Very clever.

  • tom

    You should go fuck yourself. This pope is doing Jesus’s work.

  • Dan

    Only fellow Catholics would have something negative to say about a man urging people to embrace, love, support and be a good person. Why not follow his example and love instead of spreading judgement and hate? That’s what is wrong with this world, we preach so much hate that we leave no room for love. It’s articles like this that make this world what it is, not what Pope Francis is doing.

  • historian

    i love the article in general, i only can say for, my studies of history, you need to know,

    Leo X wasn’t a bad pope, he has good intentions, but he has character, and his family, the most powerful family in all italy in that moment,was pressing very hard the pope with political and monetary matters.

    Clement VII was a very clumsy politician, the “Sacco di Roma” was truly a accident, even the Emperor Charles V apologize himself to the pope for what their troops made.

    and a awful pope you didn’t name, was Julius II 1503-1513, who literally the only thing he did was rampaging across tuscan

  • Guest

    He’s not destroyed the Catholic faith. HE is just doing what Jesus would do. You haters can say what you want about him, but that is also not following what Jesus would do either. Is it? There is nothing wrong with Pope Francis. Pape François, as the French say.

  • Joseph Hammes

    Nice piece…But you have Clement VII wrong; he was also known as the Butcher of Cesena and elected as a 2nd Pope to oppose Urban VI who was completely unhinged. This is during the 14th century, when the Papacy moved to Avignon, France. Makes for totally un-believable reading!

  • Pope+Francis+Must+Resign

    Pope Francis is a heretic and shouldn’t be Pope in the first place

  • Catherine

    The ONE thing NOT mentioned was what can be done when reading these defamatory remarks about the Pope is not only to yawn but to check out the truthfulness –by checking out Catholic Answers, or actually writing the Vatican for the REAL take on an issue.

    • RFISSR


  • 1Johnny

    Pope Francis is supposedly trying to shake up the Church, but I fear is going to divide the Church similar to the division of political parties in the US. Second, all Catholic organizations, including Network, the Vatican (and the Pope) and all other organization need to stay out of politics. Politics in the US has become vile and down right disgusting. Catholics themselves need to focus on what they can do to improve the lives of others in these awful economic time. Catholic and Catholic Organizations (like Network) need stop pointing fingers and blaming others for hardships and focus on what they can do to help others.

  • WSquared

    So please, fellow Catholics, the proper response when reading a MSM
    headline about the Pope changing a long-held doctrine of Catholicism is
    not panic or rage or despair. Rather, it’s a yawn,
    an eye-roll, and a resigned sigh.

    …or laugh! Know that God has a great sense of humor: never, ever underestimate the kind of media stupidity that can and will bring somebody to consider the Church or help bring somebody back to the Church. The condom kerfuffle was one of the signposts on the way back for me. A whole lot of stupid in the room can and will lead to confusion. But ultimately, some people will smell a rat.

    I had left the Church, but after some years, had come to respect her again, and become interested in the Catholic faith again, though I didn’t know what she really taught. In fact, I didn’t know where to look, or how to look. John Paul II had been Pope all my life, and when we got Pope Benedict, I was indifferent.

    Then came the whole condom thing– Fr. Robert Barron summed up the shenanigans in an editorial that he wrote called “Condoms, condoms, condoms!” and what he described made me annoyed and livid enough at the stupidity to make me go over to Borders to read Light of the World in one sitting in one afternoon.

    That one really dumb condom incident introduced me to both Fr. Barron and Joseph Ratzinger. Not bad, huh?

    • Opinionated

      Welcome back.

  • Maria

    Excellent post. Thank you.
    I think Pope Francis’ offhand statements and the media’s grappling of them – at least gives food for thought in mainstream media putting the Christian voice “out there” and forcing those who only read/listen to secular news to get something from the Vatican.

  • colonel marstellar

    Could you please expound on pope. francis’ life before he became pontiff?? Its alledged that he espouses liberation theology and conspired with mass murdering heads of south american states as cardinal in south america??

  • Filipino

    I Believe In God, Not In A Catholic God – Pope Francis

  • PJ


  • Chris

    The Pope is so much like Jesus; the commentators of Jesus time also took everything He said out of context too. He did not condone what they said but carried on loving them anyway.

  • Ann Arbor Girl


  • Pingback: Are the Pope’s Off-the-Cuff Comments Destroying the Church? | Defenders of the Catholic Faith | Hosted by Stephen K. Ray()

  • omar

    Why distract yourselvers with such things?? There is one thing you
    people need to do & that is to be open to the truth. I think you are
    good, well intentioned people but really, would it be so difficult to
    open up a book? Just one book!

    Inside The Holy Qu’ran there the
    last of the prophets (pbuh) has laid out the final testament, please
    people take the time, be open minded – you have only but one life and
    bismillah you need to live it right. I invite you brothers and sisters
    both, to share in this, the most beautiful poetry of life.

    • james

      Omar, unless the Sunnis and the Shiites agree on a successor and stop their honor killings, blowing up weddings and funerals and innocents, their idea of
      God isn’t worth studying. They are where we were 600 years ago and don’t deserve any respect at this time in history. Of course, the Sufi’s, persecuted
      by these two factions are the exception and the only ones who deserve to be called Muslims.

  • Nathan DeParis

    And that is the Catholic Stand! Amen!

  • Pingback: the Hype()

  • Bob

    Great article, Joanna! I now have a new favorite Catholic website!

  • Matthew Fradd

    First of all you’re title is ridiculous. Secondly you haven’t dealt with what Pope Francis actually said. I’m open to thinking that he is unwise, imprudent, etc. but you’re article hasn’t addressed anything he has said in his own words. Try again. I’m open to the discussion.

    • Leila Miller

      I think you may have missed the point, Matt? Her title was facetious.

    • Matthew Fradd

      Leila, you are exactly right. That’s what I get for skimming instead of reading. Thanks for correcting me.

    • Leila Miller

      No problem, Matt! I know your work, so I knew it was a mistake. I’ve done the same thing myself.

  • JoFro

    OK, I’m sorta going to ruin the party here Joana but anyhoo, I think your argument is invalid!

    There is a difference in a Pope committing a heresy and a Pope involved in other sins!

    All those bad Popes you mentioned did horrible things but they did not claim what they did was good or changed Church teaching to suit their purposes!

    The reason why so many rad-Trads are so angry with this Pope is because he continues to say things that literally lie on the verge of a heresy or atleast sound like he’s close to declaring a Church teaching a heresy!

    It doesn’t help that even before he was made Pope, he seemed to make life tough for those wanting to celebrate the pre-Vatican 2 Tridentine Mass in their parishes and now a Traditionalist group has been blocked from saying that Mass under his watch while clown Masses and other weird masses have still not been condemned by him.

    I like the Pope but noting that the media continues to completely rehash his views and misinterprets them, you’d think our dear Pope would get the message and start being a bit more careful about the way he talks and writes!

    • Carl Grillo

      private morality of any Pope is not protected by the charism of infallibility –
      Popes are not impeccable – however; the public relation of the Pope to the
      teaching of the universal Church is protected in the sense that if he teaches
      heresy as a “private theologian” – which is what Francis is doing by
      his “off the cuff” statements; he “ipso facto” loses the
      Pontificate. Cardinal Billot in his theological treatise “De
      Ecclesia” states that: “…the Roman Pontiff is the proximate rule of
      faith for the universal Church [proxima regula fidei];” if he falls into
      heresy as a private theologian [because he cannot define heresy when he speaks
      ex cathedra]; he loses the Pontificate. A heretic cannot be the proximate rule
      of Catholic faith and morals if he publicly denies this rule; which, being
      public Revelation [whether by Scripture or Tradition] is easily known by all,
      “…even in the present condition of the human race.” [cf. Vatican I,
      Const. Dog., De Revelatione; and Vatican II, Const. Dog., Dei Verbum, Proemium.]

    • Please illustrate where Pope Francis has changed Church teaching to suit his own purposes. As a matter of fact, Pope Francis has never said anything that contradicts Church teaching (in fact, the entire point of the article is that the media wants you to THINK he did when in fact he did not). Oh, and regarding your second-to-last paragraph, it’s untrue. Please get your news from sources that aren’t run by uber-radical Traditionalists bordering on being sedevacantists.

    • Carl Grillo

      He said that the Word became incarnate to give an example of brotherly love. This is not Catholicism – it’s Masonry. The Word became incarnate to redeem the human race from the Fall of Adam and Eve and its consequences for all of us – excepting Jesus and Mary. He did say “…in the end, God will be all in all;” this is exactly the heresy of apocastasis taught by Origen and condemned by the Church. It is the Christological Pantheism taught by Teilhard De Chardin, and condemned by Pope John XXIII in 1962 (Holy Office “Monitum”)
      He says he does not believe in a “Catholic” God. This makes no sense. If he means by this that the Catholic doctrine on God is no better than any other religion – then this too is heresy. Trinity, Incarnation, and Redemption – all consigned to the bonfire. And in the centre of this fire is God Himself.
      Your attitude and that of some on this blog is flippant to the point of mockery of Christ and His one true Catholic Church. [cf., Lumen gentium, 8, and Dignitatis humanae, Proemium.]

    • Carl, I’m very happy to be able to report that the Holy Father did NOT say what you think he said. The interview in question was very badly translated into English. This is what Pope Francis actually said:
      “The Son of God became incarnate to infuse into the soul of men [could say “the human soul”] the feeling of brotherhood.” (source:

      How have I mocked the Church??

    • Aces

      You’re a sanctimonious Bitch

    • JoFro

      As I said, it’s not that he has changed the teachings of the Church but that his statements – many of them – fall on the verge of either full blown heresy or or not clear enough. Maybe it’s just his style and maybe he believes his listeners know enough of the Faith for him to not make his statements clear.

      Either way, he needs perhaps better people to manage the translation of his words because its getting really messy out there in Medialand, when every time he says something, it ends up with faithful Catholics having to desperately explain what he actually meant to say!

    • Please, illustrate where anything Pope Francis has said “falls on the verge of heresy.” As for being “not clear enough,” that’s also an accusation made about Popes Benedict XVI and JPII (see examples above).

  • Carl Grillo

    What did Benedict say?

    What did he say?

    “…he actually said that someone was trying to act in a moral fashion by not spreading disease, and that trying to act morally could be a good first step on the road to repentance.”

    Why do you have to spew forth a mouthful of rhetoric when explaining what he really
    said? This shows that Benedict is disingenuous. It would have been better if he
    said that condoms are ok for all. The use of a condom by a homosexual does not
    in any way change the morality of the act; which, according to Catholic moral
    doctrine, is intrinsically evil.

    Some moral theologians would even say that it increases the malice of the act,
    because it invites one to commit sin with impunity – without consequences,
    moral or physical. This is not what John Paul II taught the Church in
    “Veritatis Splendor.” He stated that an intrinsically evil act
    remains “irremediably evil;” regardless of intentions or
    circumstances. Benedict contradicts this teaching
    point blank.

    As for Francis, he is destroying the entire objective moral order revealed by God
    and infallibly proposed by the Church.

    It is time for a heresy trial.

    • I recommend a hot bath and a glass of wine. It might help you relax.

  • Pingback: Pope Francis Has Single-Handedly Destroyed Catholicism - Christian Forums()

  • A J MacDonald Jr

    Francis is a modernist, and a universalist: God’s mercy and grace redeems everyone… repentance, faith, and holiness are not required. This is also known as the preaching of a false gospel by a false prophet. He’s an ear-tickler… and a prophesier of pleasant things…

    “For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions” ~ Saint Paul (2 Timothy 4:3)

    “For they are a rebellious people, lying children, children unwilling to hear the instruction of the LORD; who say to the seers, “Do not see,” and to the prophets, “Do not prophesy to us what is right; speak to us smooth things, prophesy illusions, leave the way, turn aside from the path, let us hear no more about the Holy One of Israel.” (Isaiah 30:9-11)

    • I guess the Catholic Church is also modernist and universalist, as the CCC also teaches that God’s mercy and grace redeems everyone. See here:

      Whether or not people choose to respond to God’s gift of mercy and grace is a different question entirely. Some choose not to do so and thus do not attain heaven.

    • Carl Grillo

      In his October 1 interview with “La Republicca,” Francis does in fact
      propose the heresy of universal Salvation, not Redemption: “Our Species (sic – !) will cease to exist; but in the end God will be all in all…the spark of the divine within each one of us…each one must do Good and avoid Evil as he sees it…” This is utterly unCatholic, and everybody knows it.

    • Sorry, I’m not seeing where that quote says that everyone will achieve salvation. It’s also not a quote in full context.

  • Mark

    I used to be a Catholic for over 30 years, but I am now a born-again Christian. The reason why I left was because after I started reading the Bible and the Catholic Catechism, I discovered many serious problems and contradictions. I also believe that this transformation of the Catholic Church you are seeing with the current pope is in fulfillment of the Bible prophecy. I will leave with two points to ponder. 1.The book of Revelation speaks of two women, which represent churches in the last days. The true church shall be persecuted. Revelation 17 says that there shall be a political/church system called the Mystery Babylon, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations and she will be riding the beast, and all the wicked people will follow it. I believe this is the Catholic Church/New World Order which you see forming today, and is a revival of the Roman system. 2. Jesus says in Matthew 7:13 to enter through the narrow gate, because wide is the gate that leads to destruction, and many people go there. The true church is very small, and it will be persecuted for the truth. The Catholic Church is the largest religion in the world and is also far from persecution. God bless, those that want to know the truth.

    • Frederick o

      Did someone mention “rolling eyes” and “yawn” recently?

    • Mark, Catholics are Christians too! It seems pretty evident that you did not know your Catholic faith when you left it. Everything you said above has been thoroughly debunked.

      The Catholic Church isn’t persecuted? Really? Tell that to the nuns living in Syria, who are in danger of their lives.

  • ME

    Did you know what was coming today when you wrote this one?

  • Jonathan

    Thank you JoAnna. But I’m not sure I would say the proper response is a yawn, since he’s challenging us, Catholics. He is refocusing the entire Church from moralism and orthodox triumphalism to the love of Christ! I cant yawn after that! It’s a challenge to me!

    • the yawn is in response to the media twisting, not the challenge involved in evangelizing 🙂

  • Sir Mark

    Great! I have one quibble. You claim that the media exists to make people rich. It would seem to me that if this were the case, our scribes and talking heads would spend less time deliberately antagonizing the consumers of mass media. Yes, some want to get rich, but there are many others who just want a platform from which to talk down to the ignorant rabble.

    • Like so many aspects of Catholicism – it’s not either/or, it’s both/and 🙂

  • ***”Rather, it’s a yawn, an eye-roll, and a resigned sigh – as well as a realization that we’re once again called upon to engage in the new evangelization for the sake of the Kingdom in the realm of social media and among our friends and family.”***
    The truth of the matter is that we Catholics have to learn to realize that the “new evangelization” actually involves re-evangelizing those brother and sister Catholics who are consistently being “othered” by offensive labels such as those in the above links.
    Any of our panicked and fearful fellow Catholics who don’t yet “get” our new Holy Father often are being met with personal ridicule and contempt leveled by those of us who are actually called upon to help re-evangelize them, not by our anger and derision, but rather by our example of *charitable* and patient truth-telling.
    I would suggest that the work of evangelization is about planting seeds, seeds that are as healthy as they can possibly be–seeds not soaked in the poison of anger and personal animosity and labels and othering.
    I am actually encouraged that your post, Joanna, steers clear of this kind of othering and instead brings substance and context to the issue of the MSM coverage of the pope. Thanks for that. Now my prayer is that readers and commenters take a similar high road and speak truth charitably to one another instead of stooping to personal rancor and name-calling, something all too commonly found in the Catholic blogosphere….

    • Catholic, but not conservative

      Yet the readers of this website could certainly take heed of much of what the Holy Father has said in his interview the day after this original article was published. For example:

      In this quest to seek and find God in all things there is still an area of
      uncertainty. There must be. If a person says that he met God with total
      certainty and is not touched by a margin of uncertainty, then this is not good.
      For me, this is an important key. If one has the answers to all the
      questions—that is the proof that God is not with him. It means that he is a
      false prophet using religion for himself. The great leaders of the people of
      God, like Moses, have always left room for doubt. You must leave room for the Lord, not for our certainties; we must be humble. Uncertainty is in every true discernment that is open to finding confirmation in spiritual consolation. Our life is not given to us like an opera libretto, in which all is written down;
      but it means going, walking, doing, searching, seeing … We must enter into the adventure of the quest for meeting God; we must let God search and encounter us.

      And also:

      We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods. This is not possible. I have not spoken much about these things, and I was reprimanded for that. But when we speak about these issues, we have to talk about them in a context. The teaching of the church, for that matter, is clear and I am a son of the church, but it is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time.

      The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently …

      We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel. The proposal of the Gospel must be more simple, profound, radiant. It is from this proposition that the moral consequences then flow.

      I say this also thinking about the preaching and content of our preaching.

    • Joe G


  • Brian F Hudon

    So this pope is not bad because he is not as bad as other popes? That is relativism defined and exemplified.

    • Hey, Brian, you seemed to have missed this paragraph: “We once had a Pope who was murdered while engaging in the act of adultery
      – and the Church survived! After that, can anyone honestly believe that
      the Church will be utterly decimated and destroyed simply because the
      current pope made statements about atheists that were deliberately
      misconstrued by the media in order to boost ratings?! Perhaps the Holy
      Spirit is insulted by the implication that His protection of the Truth was considered so weak and ineffective.”

  • Pingback: Bed-wetting Reactionary Wusses…()

  • Anabelle Hazard

    well done Joanna.

  • nannon31

    Great point Joanna…but you were frightfully nice to Pope Alexander VI. Nepotism looks nice when placed near his actual life choices.

  • Anne

    Pope Francis’ actions speak beyond the headlines – showing us Jesus’ example of fraternizing with those the religious consider to be sinners, sharing Christ’s light beyond the walls of our sparsely attended churches. Most importantly he focuses on replacing greed with love and humility. By following these examples, in imitation of Christ, we would have less poverty, hunger, and war, just as God intended.

  • Pingback: What it Means to be an Altar Server -

  • Leila Miller

    Bam! Rock on, girlfriend.

  • Macy

    In the past, misrepresentations were usually pretexts for Church bashing by the usual suspects. Lately they seem to be pretexts for pushing liberal agenda. Quite different phenomena. I think the latter is worse, your patronizing insouciance and exaggerations notwithstanding.

    And you mistakenly cite Caritas in veritate (published in 2009); instead, the document that got the reaction you mention was NOT the encyclical (which was generally understood and well-received, having come out at a time — the wake of the 2008 financial crisis — when politicians themselves started to sound like moral theologians). The document in question was a MUCH less authoritative “note” released by a Pontifical Council in 2011; this is explained in the article to which you yourself link… Oh right: but you’re in the media, so you’re just interested in making a splash. Never mind.

    • Actually, Caritas in Veritate was heralded quite a bit as “the Pope hates capitalism,” from what I remember. See an example here:

      I’m trying to figure out the purpose of your comment. Do you think the media is being forthright and honest when it reports on the Pope, and you object to my viewpoint?

      “your patronizing insouciance and exaggerations notwithstanding” – care to give an example? What am I indifferent to, and what did I exaggerate?

    • paulzummo

      No, you’re completely correct JoAnna, the Encyclical garnered a lot of criticism from people who thought it was too anti-capitalist. Remember George Weigel going through the thing trying to figure out which parts were written by the Pope?

      By the way, a tip of of the hat to my fellow “media” member.

    • Bill

      Terrible comment. JoAnna is dead-on accurate.

  • charrell

    Great article! Thanks for writing it. All it takes is a little research to find out what was actually said. But like my kids say “Haters gonna hate.”

  • Patrick Catholic dad

    Well done, young lady. Well said; well written. mGrby

  • GodsGadfly

    Fantastic! Sheldon Vanauken said that the “Bad Popes” were the keys to his conversion: the Church survived them, yet Protestants are constantly splitting up over scandals. People often quote John Chrysostom that “the floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops,” but there’s also what the Cardinal-Archbishop of Paris reportedly said to Napoleon when the latter threatened to destroy the Church: “Popes and bishops have been trying to do that for 1800 years; what makes you think you’ll succeed?”
    Alexander VI not only practiced nepotism: he created his son a cardinal and was the great-grandfather of St. Francis Borgia. The infamous Lucrezia was his daughter. When sedevacantists talk about JPII “kissing the Koran,” I point out that that was, at worse, a personal sin (and I don’t think it necessarily was), but it did not amount to Heresy any more than the adulteries and murders committed by Alexander VI and others.

    • Carl Grillo

      Kissing the Qu ‘ran is an act of public apostasy. This book states that whoever believes in the Most Holy Trinity is worse than fecal matter.

    • AugustineThomas

      It wasn’t a sign of belief, it was a sign of love, which heathens especially need and deserve.

  • Connie Rossini

    Pope Benedict said what about condoms???? No wonder the Church is in such a mess! Just kidding, JoAnna. You explained this very well. And you’re right. Popes should watch what they say, but even when they do the MSM will misreport it. It’s the Church contra mundum, a perennial problem.

    • Bill S

      For the prevention of the spread of AIDS, Pope Benedict should have said even more than he did say. The Church should have recommended condoms for that purpose and made it clear that such use is not a sin.

    • MarieS

      Church teaching is quite clear that such use is sin, as is any other artificial separation of the procreative from the unitive act. That applies both ways: IVF as well as contraception and sterilization.

    • Bill S

      Use of condoms for the purpose of preventing the spread of AIDS in places like Africa is not a sin according to Pope Benedict. Do you think the Church went out of its way to spread that news in Africa? If it didn’t it is responsible for untold suffering and death among Catholics who thought it was a sin to take this simple protective measure.

    • Bob

      Did you read the article above? And actually, teaching abstinence in Catholic countries has actually been far more effective than condoms. Apparently, one million condoms sent to Africa from the UN (which had contracted with the lowest bidder) where found to be breaking because they were bought on the cheap.

    • Bill S

      Simple question. A woman tells her husband that, not that she doesn’t trust his fidelity, but the only way she will have sex with him is if he wears a condom. She is not doing it to avoid pregnancy but to avoid an STD. So they make love with him using a condom. Is that a sin? According to Benedict, it isn’t. If it isn’t, why don’t more Catholics know that it isn’t?

    • AugustineThomas

      Yes it is a sin. The safest sex is between two monogamous partners and they don’t have to wear condoms if they don’t sleep around. Again, the statistics are against you. Regions with the highest condom use have the highest rates of STDs (New York City and London for instance).

    • Bill S

      For the example that I gave you, I really don’t care if you think it is a sin. “Sin” really loses all meaning when it is used by people like you who see everything as being potentially sinful. I’ve enjoyed my life because I haven’t let people like you tell me what I should and shouldn’t do.

    • Opinionated

      Why would she be having sex with him if she doesn’t trust that he has always been faithful? Just asking. Of course, if I thought my husband were unfaithful I wouldn’t be deciding whether or not to use a condom. I’d be deciding which coffin to by for him & which non-extradition treaty country I’d be living him once he was buried. 😉

    • Bill S

      I’m sure you could imagine a scenario where a woman might be pressured to have sex with her husband and would want him to use protection. We don’t live in a perfect world.

    • Carl Grillo

      The use of a condom by HIV/AIDS victims does not
      in any way change the morality of the act; which, according to Catholic moral doctrine, is intrinsically evil. An intrinsically evil act remains “irremediably evil;” [cf., John Paul II, Veritatis Splendor] regardless of intentions or circumstances. The Pope cannot negate the sinfulness of an intrinsically evil act by his private theological opinion stated in a book-interview. The SCDF clarified this point [cf., Note on the Banalization of Sexuality in the Book, “Light of the World.”].

    • Bill S

      You people need to get real. First the Pope says it is ok then somebody else says it isn’t. It is ok.

    • David Bowman

      “Far be it from Christians to be led to embrace another opinion, as if the Council taught that nowadays some things
      are permitted which the Church had previously declared intrinsically evil. Who does not see in this the rise of a depraved moral relativism, one that clearly endangers the Church’s entire doctrinal heritage?” (Paul VI, Address to Members of the Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer, September 1967:
      AAS 59, 962)

    • Bill S

      That is the problem. Only the Catholic Church can be right about morality and all other views are ” relativism”. And once a pope says that something like contraception is “intrininsically evil” we’re supposed to be stuck with that opinion forever. It can never be corrected. Sorry, that’s not how it works in the real world.

    • David Bowman

      Why don’t you get off this web-site…you are not Catholic. NSA?

    • AugustineThomas

      You shouldn’t chase him away. The ones who seem the most angry and bitter are often the ones most questioning and ripe for conversion.

    • ME

      I hope you realize that what the pope says about faith and morals comes through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, right? So its really God telling us what is right and wrong, not the Pope. Oh and there’s that pesky thing about Peter being told “whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven…”

    • Bill S

      That is a Catholic tenet. There is very little chance that God speaks to us directly through the Pope. All you have to do is look at the history of the papacy to know that it doesn’t work that way.

    • AugustineThomas

      You seem to be a confused and bitter man. I’m not sure why anyone would trust your strange beliefs.
      The Church will always stand against popular sin, even if it appears to waver at times, no matter how much that upsets sin-loving secularists like yourself.

    • Bill S

      “Sin-living secularists”. Love it.

      For you to say that about me says more about the way you see life than it does about me. You don’t even know me but that doesn’t keep you from judging (and condemning) me.

    • AugustineThomas

      You’re on the record glorifying sin. I’m not condemning anyone. That’s your straw man to try to paint me as a persecutor in order to avoid real debate. You have no argument except for that you really, REALLY want sin to be ok.

    • Bill S

      If recommending condom use translates to “glorifying sin” to you, then I can’t help you. Live with your religious obsessions as best as you can. That’s the only advice I can give you.

    • AugustineThomas

      Your love of sin is making children miserable.

    • Bill S

      How does that work? Does using condoms keep children from being born thereby making them miserable? I don’t get it.

    • AugustineThomas

      Perverting children in order to try to get them to support your sin politically makes them miserable. Forcing pornography on them to “prove something” to religious folk makes them miserable. Forcing condoms on them to “prove something” to religious folk makes them miserable.
      Your satanic beliefs make them miserable.

    • Bill S

      You are taking condom use by a married man to bizarre extremes. You just can’t accept that there is nothing wrong with it. Therein lies your problem. It has to be wrong or your whole belief that the Church is always right goes up in smoke. Deal with it. There is nothing wrong with it.

    • AugustineThomas

      I think you’re enslaved by your sin. I suffer too! I’ll pray for you!

    • Bill S

      You’re not getting it. Condom use is not a “sin” anywhere except in the minds of deluded folks like you.

    • AugustineThomas

      You’re not getting it. Condom use is a sin, no matter how much you abuse sex for pleasure and tell yourself lies about the “benefits of condom use”.

    • Bill S

      Ok. According to your worldview and the Catholic Church, condom use is a sin. Let’s just say that a sin is something that the Church says is wrong and leave it at that.

    • Opinionated

      Don’t take offense at that title. Plenty of us are sin-loving Catholics. Sin always presents itself as lovable. If it wasn’t something that looked good, and sounded like a lot of fun, who would do it? Seriously. If you know that a sin is prohibited by God who made you and loves you, would you do it if you thought it was going to be something rotten, nasty and ugly? Of course not. That’s why sin is always something that looks attractive and gives momentary pleasure even as it brings about long term unhappiness.

    • Bill S

      I like you, Opinionated. You’re a hoot.

    • Opinionated

      It’s exactly the way He speaks to us, although not the only way.

    • Bill S

      No. The popes are men who make everyone think that God is speaking through them. Knowing that there are no gods, angels, demons, etc., it is plainly obvious to me that these men are frauds.

    • AugustineThomas

      BXVI told the truth, that condom use increases dangerous sexual habits exponentially and thus INCREASES all STDs and unwanted pregnancy and he was supported by many experts, including the head of the Harvard Public Health Project.
      It was the sex obsessed mob that crucified him because the demons want their sin to continue. Satan fights back hard when you threaten his grip on a huge number of souls.

    • Bill S

      It was the sex obsessed mob that crucified him because the demons want their sin to continue.

      With that kind of outlook on life, you are not someone to whom I am going to be able to have a logical and sensible conversation. You sound like one of those “more holy than the Pope” types.

      There are plenty of situations where one should use a condom. If you have a problem with that then you probably have problems with a lot of things that are just part of living one’s life the best one can.

    • AugustineThomas

      Regular condom use INCREASES one’s chances of getting all STDs, including HIV/AIDs. You’ve been sold a great lie.

    • Bill S

      I’ve used condoms for practically my whole life. Needless to say, I find your opposition to it to be silly and symptomatic of a religiously induced phobia.

    • AugustineThomas

      I get it. You love your sins more than the truth. That’s where you and me are different. I hate my sins.

    • Bill S

      Your calling my use of condoms “sins” is just plain silly. It’s also none of your business.

    • AugustineThomas

      You love your sins. I hate them. And it is most definitely my business when you and your ideological brethren destroy my society with them.

    • Bill S

      They are not my “sins”. You have a concept of sin that is based on a very narrow interpretation of life that most of us do not accept. It’s your problem not mine.

    • Opinionated

      “There are plenty of situations where one should use a condom”

      They make great water balloons.

    • Bill S

      I was thinking more utilitarian than that 🙂

    • Opinionated

      No, that is not what he said. What he DID say is if a person who is a prostitute uses condoms to prevent the spread of a disease that indicates that that prostitute is moving toward trying to act morally and that should be encouraged because it is a good first step.

      That isn’t the same as saying “using condoms is a good thing”.

      So we learn…

      Being a prostitute, whether you use condoms or not, is NOT living a moral life. Recognizing that giving someone a disease that could kill him and trying to not do that is a step toward the moral life. It is that recognition and not wanting to kill someone else that is the good part – not the prostitution or the use of the condom part. Hopefully, if the prostitute is thinking about the morality of killing someone they may later recognize other problems about their behavior and correct them as well.

      p.s. AIDS was spread so widely in Africa because husbands very often leave the family to go work a great distance from their homes because there are no local opportunities. While away from home they frequent prostitutes, contract HIV, bring it home to their wives who in turn gave birth to children with this disease.

    • Bill S

      Thank you for that clarification. That was the one glimmer of hope I had that Bennecict wasn’t a complete moron. Now my opinion of him is complete.

    • Bob

      If I have The flu, I’m not going to take a sip of someone else’s coffee or a bite of their donut because that would be selfish and I could possibly make that person sick. If I have AIDS, I’m not going to have sexual intercourse with that person because I could kill them and that would be selfish. Condoms are not full proof, and your playing Russian roulette with someone else’s life.

    • Bill S

      That kind of ethical and health related decision must be made by a couple. The fact is that condom use for AIDS prevention is not a sin and the Church has not been forthcoming in informing people that the practice is allowed as per Pope Benedict’s not widely publicized statement.

    • AugustineThomas

      You’re lying. Using condoms is a sin and even Pope Francis isn’t confused about the issue.

    • Bill S

      People who are smart enough to think for themselves know that there is nothing wrong with condom use. Benedict did make a statement that has been taken to mean that condom use to avoid AIDS is preferable to not using a condom in that case.

    • AugustineThomas

      Nonsense. BXVI was frequently on the record and was even persecuted for making the claim that condoms INCREASE the number of AIDs victims. The head of the Harvard Public Health Project even came out to defend him. The statistics all point to the fact that condoms give people a false belief in invincibility which makes them have sex over and over again until the condom fails.

    • Bill S

      BXVI did give one example of when use of a condom would be less immoral (or whatever he said) than not using one. It wasn’t very helpful anyway. If what you say is true, it is just by dumb luck that the Church is right about condom use. It opposes it for a completely different reason.

    • Opinionated

      Here we go… I found it.

      “On the pages in question, the Holy Father refers to the completely different
      case of prostitution, a type of behaviour which Christian morality has always
      considered gravely immoral (cf. Vatican II, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes, n. 27; Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 2355). The response of the entire Christian tradition – and indeed not only of the Christian tradition – to the practice of prostitution can be summed up in the words of St. Paul: “Flee from fornication” (1 Cor 6:18). The practice of prostitution should be shunned, and it is the duty of the agencies of the Church, of civil society and of the State to do all they can to liberate those involved from this practice.

      In this regard, it must be noted that the situation created by the spread of
      AIDS in many areas of the world has made the problem of prostitution even more serious. Those who know themselves to be infected with HIV and who therefore run the risk of infecting others, apart from committing a sin against the sixth commandment are also committing a sin against the fifth commandment – because they are consciously putting the lives of others at risk through behaviour which has repercussions on public health. In this situation, the Holy Father clearly affirms that the provision of condoms does not constitute “the real or moral solution” to the problem of AIDS and also that “the sheer fixation on the condom implies a banalization of sexuality” in that it refuses to address the mistaken human behaviour which is the root cause of the spread of the virus. In this context, however, it cannot be denied that anyone who uses a condom in order to diminish the risk posed to another person is intending to reduce the evil
      connected with his or her immoral activity. In this sense the Holy Father points
      out that the use of a condom “with the intention of reducing the risk of
      infection, can be a first step in a movement towards a different way, a more
      human way, of living sexuality.” This affirmation is clearly compatible with the
      Holy Father’s previous statement that this is “not really the way to deal with
      the evil of HIV infection.”

    • Bill S

      Having successfully used condoms my entire adult life (over 40 years) I can only chuckle at a buffoon who comes up with long and convoluted explanations that have zero use or relevance. What a crock !

  • Pingback: Worst! Pope! Ever!!1!()

  • Robbe Sebesta

    This is great Joanna! Thank you for setting the record straight. It’s maddening whenever the secular press jumps on whatever the Pope says…..but I’m glad we have people like yourself to defend and explain our Catholic faith. By the way, I recently “un-friended” Kirk Cameron on Facebook because just the other day he posted: “The Pope Says Atheists Can Get To Heaven On Their Own Consciousnesses.’ I responded, basically saying – “As a Catholic I can say…no he didn’t….” I so wish people would research what they put out there as truth. Kudos to you on a great article. And I’m praying for a safe arrival of your new little one!

    • Collin Wahlund

      Being a Protestant, he’s likely to get his Catholic news from crappy sources like that. Sadly, they also tend to believe it given what most denominations teach about the Church.

      I try to explain these kinds of things, but it ain’t easy when all the info a Protestant gets is anti-Church. Sometimes I feel that the best way to get through is by associating at joint functions such as pro-life and religious freedom rallies. You see items in common there.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      Agreed. Commonalities is what we need…not more strife!


      the roman catholic church will soon be destroyed despite u guys using language of commonalities…. the city of seven hills will be destroyed specially vatican…

    • Yolanda

      Richard, I disagree. The Catholic Church will endure.

    • Jen

      Richard the gates of hell will not prevail against it!! Our catholic church has stood thru good and bad times!! Many protestant churches have closed. God bless.

    • Irene Teresa

      I agree the Catholic/universal church will endure. Pope Francis brings Christ’s message into the full light of reality especially when it comes to the poor of the world.

    • AndrewIsrael

      The best part about Pope Francis is how he riles up the Republican Religious Reichers. I love it! They need his tough love!

    • Julie

      Do you come from Portland Oregon????

      The public newspapers have comments like that all time time…sounding like silly teenagers.

    • texastea2

      Or simple people that are sick of the religous trying to force everyone to live as they( the religous right ) want.
      Silly teenagers only believe in santa claus tooth faries and god if their silly parents adamantly teach them to.

    • Julie

      Who is forcing pornography, free sex and the std’s on young kids, filthy talk, drugs, campus sexual assault, infantidice, domestic violence on people??

      It sure isn’t the Church.

    • texastea2

      Nobody I know. Is there some reasoning to these questions.I will get back to you tomorrow I am written out now and this is going to be a long answer.
      It sure isn’t atheist. We are not organized nor do we have an agenda other than to live in peace. Let people live their own lives by their own morals as long as it does not harm others in any way.What organization has been caught many times sweeping the rug over the fact that their god fearing righteous leaders have been sexually molesting little boys.
      Oh yeah THAT would be the church.Write more tomorrow have a good night.

    • Julie

      The biggest consumers of kiddie porn is American men…they are waiting for you.

      Don’t bother getting back…because you sound like all those who turn a blind eye to what the sex obsessed culture is doing to our people and how it is affecting people around the world….

    • texastea2

      Peace be with you. Sometimes the truth hurts and apparently it has hurt you deeply.Sex obsession as you state is one of the least of mankinds problems.
      Sex is neither wrong nor filthy the human body is beautiful in all of its sizes and shapes. Children start thinking about sex naturally about age three and continue usually until death.
      I forgive you for insinuating I am a child molester.I do wonder what traumatic event has happened to you or a loved one for you to strike out with such ferocity attacking me in such a specific sexual manner. Was it an sexual assault?
      No matter what it was I am sorry for your pain and suffering.There are things that can help with those suffering PTSD. I wish you well in life.

    • Julie

      You are not viewing all the form licentious sex has done to our children, to women, and to men making men themselves abusers.

      Abuse always separates the person from their own humanity.

      Religion means to bind in Latin…and that pertains to only one religion — that instituted by Christ in defining His only Church — the universal Christian Church.

      Christ restored us to God, to others, and to ourselves.

      If you would only look at authentic church history and not the spins of the atheistic death culture that believes it can destroy religion…aka the Catholic Church…the name given it by St. Ignatius of Antioch in 107 AD, you will see that it is the Church that set down the framework of universal care for all people….caring for the dying pagans in ancient Rome who were thrown out on the streets to die, the hospitals and hospice, schools, the establishment of universities for the common people, the value of children as human beings, the right of women to be educated and not used as chattel, the framework of common law as we know it today, the arts and music, the contributions to philosophy and the employ of reason, the monasteries that developed agriculture and irrigation for the common people, I could go on and on.

      Instead…free sex, sexually transmitted diseases we see now in young teens, bullying, nudity, abortion, infanticide, suicide, profanity, stealing, lying, murder…all for personal freedom.

      No sorry, you are very misguided and you are basing your opinions on propaganda.

      Civil and secular entities have caused more deaths than true religion…any day.

      The greatest death is the loss of the human soul.

    • texastea2

      If you would only look at facts. Abuse has been with us a long time for probably hundreds of thousands of years.your mythical god seems to look the other way. That is likely due to his non existence.
      Your church has not prevented it. There are have been and likely will be bad peoplefor as long as humans survive.Such is our species with all of its flaws. Sad but true.
      If your god exist he could have stopped it anytime. He she it whatever has not. In fact he left every one hanging leaving it up to (well noone for hundreds of thousands of yrs) a Few people to convince everyone else of an absolute miraculous story. Never even showedhis face. Very strange and even twisted and sick. Freewill wod only work if one knew the truth. It is simply another of the many strange myths invented by man to try and understand what they csnnot undersand. Love and compassion empathy these are traits needed to prevent sexual abuse. Not belief in myths.

    • nworder

      It is belief in the myth of evolution – ie that there is no God who will judge us.

      Evolution makes us think that only the strongest will win – there is no fear of God’s judgement . This very thing has driven people like genghis khan ,stalin , mao , pol pot hitler etc to murder 100’s of millions throughout history.

      You have the wrong end of the stick. God intervenes when we repent and believe in Him. Jesus preached love and forgiveness.
      It is atheism that results in cruelty far more than even fake christianity of which there is much.
      The devil worshipping tribes were cruel – like the aztecs sacrificing thousands in their ceremonies – alive with hearts still beating.

      Without this we just have empty and merciless time and chance – your false God without evidence.

      “Dr. Gray goes further. He says, `The proposition that the things and events in nature were not designed to be so, if logically carried out, is doubtless tantamount to atheism.’ Again, `To us, a fortuitous Cosmos is simply inconceivable. The alternative is a designed Cosmos… If Mr. Darwin believes that the events which he supposes to have occurred and the results we behold around us were undirected and undesigned; or if the physicist believes that the natural forces to which he refers phenomena are uncaused and undirected, no argument is needed to show that such belief is atheistic.’ We have thus arrived at the answer to our question, What is Darwinism? It is Atheism. This does not mean, as before said, that Mr. Darwin himself and all who adopt his views are atheists; but it means that his theory is atheistic, that the exclusion of design from nature is, as Dr. Gray says, tantamount to atheism.”

      Hodge, Charles [late Professor of Theology, Princeton Theological Seminary, USA], in Livingstone D.N., eds., “What Is Darwinism?”, 1994, reprint, p.156

      “Thus, a century ago, [it was] Darwinism against Christian orthodoxy. To-day the tables are turned. The modified, but still characteristically Darwinian theory has itself become an orthodoxy, preached by its adherents with religious fervour, and doubted, they feel, only by a few muddlers imperfect in scientific faith.”

      Grene, Marjorie [Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of California, Davis], “The Faith of Darwinism,” Encounter, Vol. 74, November 1959, pp.48-56, p.49

    • texastea2

      You keep referencing all these talks and professors as I have stated their are hundredz and hundreds of professors scholars and scientist that dispute them .Geez you are the party meme.
      Polpot hitler stalin you truly believe they and hundreds of othrrs acted so ruthlessly because they were atheist. What a shock. Not surprised at all. Heard that before probably from the same meme that has indoctrinated yoh with such illogical nonsense.
      So according to your logic there simply arent any decent people if they do not bieve as you. There lies the problem. I guess by the same logic jim baker jimmy swaggart and many many others caught cheatinv molesting children ( catholic preist and those that did not care enough for those boys to help them, such fear of god). Weregod fearing gentlemen. The crusaders the conquistidors the british. King leopold and on snd on all atheist? Nope Christians. You are writing the same old crap one can getfrom any sunday school. The same rhetoric the christians have been preaching for decades.Rubbish.
      If you or anyone else need to be scared to death in order to keep you from murdering on a genocidal scale you and they are even more scarier than I believed. I need no twisted deity to thraten me in ordr to prevent me from committinv genocide.Christians have killed indigenous people on an inconceiveable scale FACT (of course those do not deter you from the party line .Repeating something over and over does not make it true it means you are brainwashed).Enough already I am tired of typing for no reason.
      Besides your God could have prevented pol pot stalin whatever. HE IS EVERYTHING!!! Must be quite sick himsels ( itself or whatever) . Your post id illogical and predictable so lets just call it a day. It is getting old. Have a great night.I am going to watch some football and see who your God favors thid week Lol

    • Julie

      So you are supporting the Islamic Caliphs that murdered so many Christians….Egypt, Syria, Palestine were teeming Christian populations until Islam wiped them out. You will never be taught that…for 400 years Christians in those lands cried out for help and finally the Crusaders were called out.

      You don’t want to be educated except by Hollywood?

      Islam killed 270 million in the name of Allah. Communism killed close to 100 million if you combine USSR, China, Pol Pot, Vietnam. These are beloved atheistic governments that killed their own people.

      LOL….go watch tv…the wasteland.

    • texastea2

      Weird that such a loving all knowing all seeing Deity such as your christian god. would just sit and watch all of that cruelty suffered upon “his people”. I guess he simply cannot get enough gratuitous violence from hollyweird. I know you have the answers. Freewill God works in mysterious ways, All part of Gods plan. What a sick and twisted CRUEL plan. Oh I forgot the boogeyman Satan it is all the work of Satan. Whom God created and allows to perpetrate such unfathomable cruelty.( at least to most humans including your hated non believers.) Of course you do not blame God nor Satan no you blame Atheist. Illogical IMO

    • nworder

      God allowed his own innocent son in whom was not a single sin , who is God in the flesh , to suffer like a lamb before slaughter. God and the Holy Spirit would also have felt the pain of evil as Jesus was crucified in the most painful torture devised by evil men.
      Mary watched her son crucified and felt a sword going through her heart.
      This was done so that Jesus would conquer evil and the power of sin – not for His sake but for our sake since God cannot allow anyone in His presence who is tainted by sin . The only way is for one to repent from sin and accept Jesus as your lord and saviour and follow all His commandments.
      So God watched evil men torture His son to death for our benefit.

      You cannot grasp what it is all about since you cannot accept the spiritual but are only interested in the things of the world like your own survival.

    • texastea2

      Gods only begotten son. That has always been turbid to me. What is so difficult about a GOD sacrificing someone? He had already allowed the slaughter of millions of his ” beloved”. He could also have created Jesus without taking Josephs wife. He could have trillions of sons every second of every day.Not really much of a sacrifice if one thinks about it. Seems like a strange way to conquer “evil” which incidently was created by GOD.

    • nworder

      Yes Jesus said that God could raise up sons of Abraham from stones .

      God can do anything – He could have taken Noah and the other seven in his family to heaven until the flood was over – BUT he didn’t and told Noah to build an ark as an act of faith taking over a hundred years. This is 400 man years

      of work if you assume the wives did the cooking and housework.

      It is about love and self sacrifice – the condition of one’s heart which is something you cannot comprehend.

      You think your unthinking comments are clever :-

      “For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.


    • TruthSayer

      Angry sir, suffering is part of life. Suffering drives us to overcome, suffering leads to development to relieve that suffering. Now imagine will you a movie/video game/ or a novel with no conflict, nothing to overcome and nothing to save or change no ambition for something greater.

      Would that be enjoyable, no it wouldnt. Likewise life would not be as deep and precious without pain. Pain drives us to care for one another for fear of losing each other, it drives us to cling to what happyness we do have increasing it’s value. All aspects of life, science, nature, and divinity is sacred as they exist because of God and serve a purpose only truely known to God and the Catholic Church in which he leads to the right path.

      The Church and science and shouldn’t be in conflict because both were created by God.

    • texastea2

      Angry Madam, yes suffering is part of (human) life. One does not need to suffer to overcome an obstacle. One must simply be motivated to do so.
      Life is not a novel nor movie or game. I can assure you that if you were the human suffering a mass murder of your family, torture rape etc… you would not be thinking, I am so glad I get to suffer through a brutal rape and then be doused with fuel and set ablaze. Life would just not be “enjoyable” if Not for this horriffic suffering. Now when I am happy my happiness will feel happier!!
      Happiness is not created by suffering. Absurd. Science and religion are in conflict . Religion is based upon myth science upon evidence . Thatcreates a conflict. angry madam .Catholisism is just another myth just ss the myths that it is formed upon. You may call yourself truthsayer but a more accurate name would be belief sayer. There is no evidence of God much less the christian story. Nor any of the hundreds of other religions that claim “TRUTH”
      Hope you and family have a h

    • texastea2

      You conveniently left out the numbers of people have been killid in the nameo christinity. I am sure there is a most extraordinary reason such as it has never happened. Just as I suppose the Catholic church (rulers of europe) were right for punishing those that claimed the earth was not the center of the universe.
      Do you not know that Hitler did not do the killing himself. Pass this on to the (aptly named) n worder if you will.
      Hitler used lies and propaganda to convince the people (mostly CHRISTIANS) of the need and justification for killing the people of Jewish faith.(one of many religions based on the “good book”) . Must have been easy given how even today christians would rule America with an iron cross (they would probably use gold they seem to adore the metal) and make everyone assimilate to their beliefs.( All out of love and concern ofcourse.) if they thought they could. They do everything they can now to start a war that they beleive when bring there savior Jesus down for them.SCARY

    • knight4444

      @julie, get real, the catholic church has murdered uncountless millions of people in it’s BLOODY, insane,
      SATANIC history, are you serious??? remember a little thingy called THE CRUSADES??, THE SPANISH inquisitions??? HELLO, LOL maybe you need to go watch some tv, BTW, during ww2 guess what church secretly supported HITLER?? yep, the catholic church, go look it up @julie.

    • Julie

      Show the documented truth. But you won’t find anything. What you are doing is falling for the hatred of Catholics by Restorationists of the 19th century that literally created the numbers.
      So you think it OK the Islamic caliph decimated the Christian populations of Egypt, Syria, and Palestine…and that it took the Church 400 years to finally respond with the Crusades to help the ancient Christian culture?….
      The Catholic clergy in Spain worked to exonerate thousands of those accused in the Inquisition the temporal rulers…in response to 700 years of plundering by the Muslim Moors…who imposed dhimmitude on the Spanish Catholics and Jews…read documents about how non-Muslims were treated in Spain as second class citizens, who had to wear green badges, who could not share or expand the faith in Spain. They wanted the Muslims out of the country, who were later posing as Christians and committing sacrilege receiving communion at Mass, receiving with no faith. To this day Muslims think Spain belongs to them.
      The blame for falsehoods lies on the backs of English and American Protestants for creating so many lies about our faith. …so much for their Christianity, and likewise for the enslaving religion of Islam.

      You need to research and find out who the real enemies of humanity really are.

    • texastea2

      Change and blame. Typical christian tactic. I guess there is no evidence of the catholic church BURNING WOMEN AT THE STAKE WHILE VERY MUCH ALIVE for being witches neither.
      I will get back to you with the “documented” evidence for which you refuse to easily find yourself simply by typing 4 words into a search engine. Truth be known you would refuse to accept any and all evidence provided to you. You do not seek the truth or facts. You accept the church as your source for, well everything.

    • Julie

      Problem is it is your type of Christianity that wastes alot of time pointing out scandals…and many times what you use are compromised or even false information…and you are drawn to it.

      I know many people have become atheists because of the profound prejudice and hatred by so called Christians in your neck of the woods….it is notorious…

      And our Church has nothing to hide.

      People have brought up such in the past…and it turns out to be bogus.

      The Catholic Church never authorized the burning of women at the stake. But that doesn’t mean lay people did.

      Go ahead…I am familiar with the English junk.

      What a waste of energy…hating Catholics….and totally ignoring the Good Christ has done through our faith.

      You focus not on Christ but on scandal…It doesn’t make you any better…it is a form of anti Christ…using religion as a veil for malice.

    • texastea2

      You claim that I use compromised and false information and allegations. I did not. The catholic church knew good and well women were being burned at the stake. FACT They also acted atrosiously in WW2. They have also tried to keep secret the sexual and other abuses perpetrated by many of their preist upon innocent young biys and girls. FACT (not compromised or false). Many more wrongs. The integrity of the church was more important to the leadership of the catholic church than the welfare of children FACT
      Sure the church does some good charity work. So does the motorcycle gangs. It is all abiut the image.
      You also wrongly claim ( again that I hate.That is simply your anger. I do not hate the church. As for what goes on ” in my neck of the woods” I have no idea what you are writing about.there. I live in America.
      Most people are atheist because they read and educate themselves. They realize that it is totally illogical. The story of God has been told many many thousands of times with many diffrrent Gods many different stories. The god in the jewish bible is simply a rehashing of a more ancient story . One that with few exceptions is the same story. They also learn that the one and only “TRUTH” depends largely upon where one lives on the planet. Knowledge is what makes people Atheist. Atheist is what the label says we are actually just humans. We do not HATE. We disagree with religion ( any of the current 2000 or so preaching myth asfact. That my sister is not hate. Perhaps in your neck of the woods.
      Help me out with your meaning of “my neck of the woods” where exactly is that?
      For a church that has nothing to hide they sure have hidden alot.
      Then you claim to know “what I am drawn to” Pardon my frankness but that is silly. I am not drawn to false information. I encourage people to check sources recheck cross check and come to their own conclusion.The christian religion borrowed many aspects of their faith from previous rdligions. All of the different religions cannot be right. They can however ( and I conclude that they are) all be wrong.
      I wish you well I hope you and your family have a wonderful holiday.
      Ps Have you ever educated yourself on the reason as to why Christmas is celebrated on the date that it is?

    • Julie

      There is alot of bigotry against Catholics in the South. “Who Burned the Witches?” Sandra Miesel.

      Likewise you come across as very angry and biased and cannot recognize anything but that which has failed.

      Every single social instiution, and the Church is a social institution, has people have failed and are failing…the deposit of faith is there.

      As far as witches go, I had an encounter with one in my work in the church….I felt the need to pull back from this person, someone who had many complaints…I started to sense, with no prior experience, that this person was into the occult. She was a clairvoyant. A priest told me she came to his parish and he told her to leave. She turned out to be a pathological liar.

      The exorcist priest spent time with me and in the end told me she was using goat horns to get information and cause all sorts of dishevel, always it ending in her favor and causing people overseeing this…to step back…it was so crazy.

      Later someone contacted me 11 years after the event. He said she was out to destroy his reputation and career…like she did mine to a certain degree but he had taken her to court before and won…she was using false documents. Later he told me the police were called to her home because she was sacrificing animals. When they got there, they could do nothing.
      She was sacrificing domestic animals, goats.

      A priest asked me to go to a talk on satanism…I heard an ordained minister say he did not believe in such things…but when he observed an exorcism in San Francisco….he saw footprints on the floor made of oil and then go up the curtains, saw someone levitate, and then saw a woman with hip surgery get down on the floor and writhe across the room like a snake.

      The symbol of Satan is the goat head.

      The Church as well as other protestant churches saw witches as dangerous…and I know for a fact I experienced it and the damage to me.

      All forms of witchcraft cause evil, no matter how supposedly the healing powers are…what happens when such a person has someone get in their way?…stand back and be meek?

      There is good reason people ought to be aware of witchcraft and satanism. There are over 700,000 Americans now involved in some form of pagan craft, and about 180,000 are joining each year.

      Witchcraft is nothing to work yourself up to defend…but if you yourself are into some form of it, then you should think twice about what you are really into.

    • texastea2

      I might ask you to read your replies and see if you would agree with me that you cpome across as one who is angered and offended. The deep south of America is called the bible belt fir a good reason. Lots of religous god fearing people. Not much on education freedom science environmental concern or a decent wage for work performed. Fir those reasons I prefer most anywherd else in America. Where they believe in personal freedom good paying jobs science the environment and above all EDUCATION .
      I do not believe in witchcraft satan occults or the tooth fairy neither. As far as I am concerned it is just more supernatural myth with absolutely no evidence. There is no scientific evidence for god satan angels. Etc etc… As far as getting information from goat horns LOL good luck.
      As far as sacrificing animals that comes from your god whom the bible says enjoys the smell of burning flesh from burning animals. Of course the bible just got the idea from earlier religions that used sacrifices of humans and animals as well.
      As far as the hate and anger I have encountered that from christians many times. Sometimes I do get angry as we all do. It usually is them that are actually angry because I challenge their religous beliefs. I do not believe in magic witches gods or any other supernatural hocus pocus.
      I noticed that to your credit you did not deny all of the facts about the catholic church I pointed out. I do not state them to hate. I simply state the things we have learned through the evidence. Do not fear the occults or witchcraft jjust more myths playing on peoples fears.

    • Julie

      Christmas…?…..If you think we are celebrating paganism…that is another spin.

    • texastea2

      Jesus was not born in december. Wonder why his birthday is celebrated on the 25th of dec.
      Think ROME think CONTROL think period.

    • Micha Elyi

      The Catholic Church never authorized the burning of women at the stake.

      True. That whole witch burning stuff was a Protestant thing.

    • Julie

      You are showing your own ignorance

    • TruthSayer

      Ironic person who names yourself Knight,

      First of all Hitler had plans to destroy the Church and create a religion based upon himself. The Church only went along with quitely because he had control of all of Italy and could have sent 20 tanks into Rome If he wanted.

      On to the main point on Catholic nations. Of one nation let’s use The Spanish Empire shall we, If they had succeeded in conquering a large amount of the world and was also able to convert it what would be the result of all the bloodshed? Would it be worth it? You would get centuries of stability and a economic boost which would lead to technological, agricultural, and architectural progress. These advancements would lead to more conquests and conversions and the end result would be a stable world wth the resources and technolgy to take care of a higher percentage of the world’s problems. In short it would be vastly worth the cause of the suffering of a few for the progress and happyness of the many generations of the future. It is risk that is more than worth it.

      Now please go read a history textbook or better yet go to Church and sit there and listen with a open mind even If you don’t agree just listen to their words and try to understand it.

    • texastea2

      Hypocrit that calls themselves “truthsayer”.
      You are a uniquely gifted person. You “KNOW” that the world would not be enjoyable or “interesting” without humans being raped tortured ravaged by starvation and disease or killed by christians for not converting . GRAND ILLUSION!!!!!!!
      Now you imply to know what the world would be like IF history were DIFFERENT. Ridiculous.
      Justifying the catholic churchess action in WW2 as well as minimalizing those actions does not change the facts THE TRUTHS!
      What does your all knowing source of past present future and WHAT IFS say would have happened if the catholic church would have been willing to DIE knowing that they would go to heaven( which according to you will not be enjoyable nor happy for there will be no suffering) for their beliefs? Now go read a history book science book or listen to a good lecture. Keep an open mind well , try to open your closed mind.

    • Julie

      The more I read your posts, the more irrational they are.

      Sorry….I am focusing on the season of Our Lord’s brith int our world.

      Look at the Vatican Library, greatest in the world and testament to faith and reason…all for the glory of Christ.

    • texastea2

      You just wrote a post on people being exorcised of the devil and goat horn magic and I sound irrational. OKAY!!!
      Peace be with you. I am going to celebrate a day of love with my friends family and some of those in need.

    • Julie

      Yes…it sounds irrational…but then you can accuse the archdiocesan exorcist as the same.

      There is evil as there is good. You are at fault for totally denying the good that is in the Church. You think we are full of nonsense.

      It is the Church that is the foundation of Western Civilization. Our faith reached out to the dying going back to ancient times…the monasteries that supported the local populations and taught and assisted them in agriculture and irrigation…this happening in the so called Dark Ages…you don’t know about the Augustinian monk Mengel of whom Darwin studied his works, or how the Church founded hospitals, hospice, schools and universities for the common people. Likewise the framework of modern law, the modern concept of charity and good works, economics…is from the work of Catholics who contributed their lives to humanity.

      It is the Catholic schools who are successful in educating inner blacks…

      Yet you reflect the South…you defend those who have alot of prejudice against Catholics…

      You totally miss the point of Satanism and its works of harming people, that involve those in cults.

      You totally miss the point that we believe in faith and reason and the testimony is there for the public to see.

      Hope you can some day as well…

    • texastea2

      Money greed and power are the foundations of western society. As is all of human society. We will just simply disagree.

    • Julie

      There is a Jewish organization called Pave the Way, and the director grew up with alot of contempt for the Church and Pius XII, and after being allowed into the Vatican LIbrary, itself a testament to reason and faith….he came out realizing no one had done more for the Church than Pius XII and the campaign to smear him was done by East German communists.

      The Catholic bishops of Germany did not support Hitler. The majority of Catholics in Germany did not vote for the Nazi party. The documents are there in the book on Pius put out by Pave the Way. There were over a thousand to three thousand German priests executed for defying Nazism.

    • Julie

      I will also add you know nothing of our faith so take your vitriol some where else.

    • texastea2

      I do not care what you add. Take yourarogant self somewhere else. Funny how christians never behave like their saviour Jesus teaches them to. Of course you have only defended your church ( if calling names and slinging accusations and denying the truth is defending) not your TRUE teacher Jesus. What a shock. You go
      somewhere else. Its a free country lady. Stop replying especially with that nonsense about how private catholic schools are educating poor impoverished inner city children. Black only I guess according. Where are the schools doing this great job? Ridiculous.

    • Julie

      You also make out the ridiculous insinuations on the 50 miles of the Vatican that were finally opened and give a greater historical perspective to past events.

      You know nothing of my faith and of its work because you don’t want to.

      You are so prejudiced and self righteous…you really are…in Texas…Deep South….an atheist revealed to me he grew up in a fundamentalist home that hated catholics and he said there is so much of it there….

      Never want to live there….my relatives looked for a church one time there and the townspeople told them they were not welcomed there…

      You make up and insinuate….and make slurs nothing more.

    • texastea2

      Let it go. The only thing one needs to know is that all of the good that it does could have been and can be done without all the bad. Simply stop worshiping imaginary beings. We humans hopefully will get there someday. A world without imaginary gods and imaginary demons created by imaginary gods does more good.

    • texastea2

      Merry Christmas Julie.
      I hope that your family is safe and warm and all come home for the holiday. Peace be with you.

    • Julie

      You need to go to Pave the Way and find out the truth about the Catholic Church and Nazi Germany. The Church opposed Hitler and the Nazis.

      The Concordat signed by the Church with Hitler only regarded the freedom for Catholics to practice their faith and nothing more.

      My father was in the Benedictine seminary for 2 years and at the end of his time there, the ‘Black Book of Poland’ came out.

      There were in fact or a thousand German priests who were executed by the Nazis for opposing it.

      The Vatican held over 5,000 within its walls protecting them.

      The Spanish Inquisition was written by an Englishman after the Reformation but his scenario was of the ilk one could find done by the KGB — complete distortions and fabrications.

      The actual document of the Inquisition was not made public until August 2003 and it affirmed what Catholics had long sensed…that such English speaking allegations were unsubstantiated.

    • Julie

      american junk talk.

    • dwarf

      Go watch The Scarlet and the Black.

    • larry

      Knight…I will address only one of your errors. You look for the truth on the others. The Crusades were started in response to Muslim aggression. Eventually Muslims conquered up through Spain until they were defeated.

    • Lakota

      I’m a Christian, but the blind eye you turn towards the crimes committed by Christians…in the name of Christianity breaks my heart.

      As a person who had grandparents suffer beatings and abuse by the church, it breaks my heart that as a Christian, you would overlook the pain and suffering of millions of people that suffered under “Christian” wars and conquerings.

      Millions of Indigenous people around the world suffered at the hands of false Christian men. That’s not in a hollywood book. That’s lived history. You can’t deny the lived experiences of my family or ancestors…no matter how inconvenient it is for your argument.

      You do the church and God no favors by denying the crimes of false Christians…in fact, it hurts and damages…instead of bringing people to the Church, your lies and blind eye drive people away. So you’re doing no favor to God by trying to prove you’re being right. It’s not about rightness, but it’s about doing right by God,….not a pissing contest.

    • Julie

      I worked with native Indians as a young woman, and we went out to visit them once they were back in school…I don’t know of any who committed crimes against the Indians, but yes I have read what was done… I don’t know how in the world you would think that…as i grew up in the inner city among minorities as well…and also you don’t know of the many excellent missionaries who served the Indians in my region of the country who came to them on their level and worked with them…I know the NW indians…and have met Catholics among them…very gentle people with great and deep faith and if the missionaries were as bad as you say….they would not have this faith. I personally knew the priest who started a mission on Skid Row…actually who the one who named that area…and his service was to the NW Indians who came to Mass there in this simple, poor chapel.

      Likewise I worked with Italian missionaries…and when I was first starting I asked the priests…coming from the stereotype Americans have of missionaries from the movies…and from the attitude of those towards the Indian people….if they liked us…I was immediately told they had great respect for us…and when I arrived in my mission…the work the priests, sisters, brothers, and lay were doing for the indigenous people was tremendous. They worked to accept the people at their level, to work within their culture, to educate and nurse them… and help them with any problems they had…I visited technical schools, elementary, high schools, and colleges….tremendous work…and the sufferings the missionaries had…

      You don’t know the opposition missionaries went through to bring the Good News to the Indian people…and I think of the Jesuits…who first came to NE America and into Canada…many suffered torture and some were murdered in a most serious way…the Iroquois…and then there were other tribes who greatly and openly received Christ.

      You don’t know about how the Spanish bishop Zumarraga in Mexico gave women and girls the the right to an education hundreds of years before North Americans were, or how they had universities back in the 1500’s with native Indians serving as professors…so much you don’t know…but yes you have suffered so very much by what has happened to your ancestors…and Lakota..I am so sorry for what happened to them, they did not deserve that…no one does…

      And it is so bad when people hide their malice for their fellow man using the veil of religion…it is the worst thing and can destroy a person’s soul from every turning to God and experiencing His great love for them.

      So I wish you the deepest and most profound blessing…and that you work to let that go…we all have our own tragedies and injustices that have happened to us…and we always put those who have suffered in the past…just as right now I think of the poor little children around the world who are suffering so much by terror, rape, sexual slavery, seeing their parents murdered in front of them…children beheaded, shot in the face….little innocent and pure children…I cry at night for them….

      We can only do so much…but we have to let go and turn to God and to forgive….don’t let the past hold you down…those are like little ghosts…pray for the souls of your loved ones…and place them in God’s mercy so they can be with them forever…as this world is a place of tears and sorrows…

      Turn to God and forgive those particular Christians who did those wrong…forgive them…and be free.

    • nworder

      You write the way you think – jumbled and fuzzy – full of cliches and children’s school book thoughts on science .

      We demanded freedom to know good and evil. So you are being tested to see if you are worthy to live eternally thats why God does not always intervene.

      If people like you reject and slander God – and there are billions like you then why do you expect Him to rush to help you in your life of rebellion.

      The world is full to the brim with God’s blessings that He made for us – it is human sin that is the problem not God .

      You know nothing about science – just schoolboy evolutionary rhetoric and TV brainwashing.

      “Unfortunately many scientists and non-scientists have made Evolution into a religion, something to be defended against infidels. In my experience, many students of biology – professors and textbook writers included – have been so carried away with the arguments for Evolution that they neglect to question it. They preach it … College students, having gone through such a closed system of education, themselves become teachers, entering high schools to continue the process, using textbooks written by former classmates or professors. High standards of scholarship and teaching break down. Propaganda and the pursuit of power replace the pursuit knowledge. Education becomes a fraud.”

      George Kocan, Evolution isn’t Faith But Theory, Chicago Tribune, Monday, April 21, 1980.

    • texastea2

      You must be slower than a bag f least that is how you write.You just defend yourbelief and ignore any thing and everything any one counters with.
      Look you can believe Noahs family built that huge ship ( or apparently you have been taught to say it was god itself that did to make it more believable you guyd are always cherry pick and changinv ) and jonah lived in a whales mouth and cain married an ape one must conclude for there was NOONE else on earth. HaHa. Listen good I do not expect GOD to do anything more than he ever has which is nothing. EVER you have never seen him BECAUSE HE IS NOT THERE..gooxnight and goodbye

    • nworder

      God designed the ark – Noah built it. The design ratios are still used today.

      Jonah was inside a whale – no problem to the creator of the universe.

      Adam and Eve had many children – no timeline is given for Cain but there were cities built by the time he got married.

      Maybe you have not fully evolved from your apelike ancestors – still to develop critical thinking skills . You may be only 12 for all I know.

      “Darwinian theory is the creation myth of our culture. It’s the officially sponsored, government financed creation myth that the public is supposed to believe in, and that creates the evolutionary scientists as the priesthood… So we have the priesthood of naturalism, which has great cultural authority, and of course has to protect its mystery that gives it that authority—that’s why they’re so vicious towards critics.”

      Phillip Johnson, On the PBS documentary “In the Beginning: The Creationist Controversy” [May 1995]

    • texastea2

      Same old Rhetorical brainwash nonsence .It appears you do not undersand the def of critical thinking. God did thisno timeline for this made up “interprative” rhetoric. Your skull must weigh like a ton.Where exactly in genesis does it say that entire cities were built before poor cain came back? That should be easy for someone who seemingly know “everything”.
      Lets see you still have not attempted how noah gathered up what you ( so intelligently) suppose is a mere 5000 animals .How about the 750,000 + different insects .ShouldI mention the thousands of birds? Much ess all the plant life. Fungi on and on. Again the disperal?
      No you pat yourself on the ack feeling superior and oh so wise. Calling me names and giving sources well circulated and touted by christians doez not make you intelligent.Well read and a what a grown man. You have no idea how we got here Just as the rest of human kind do not.I am sure you willAGAIN ivnore the questions or when you have no choice but admit you haven’t a clue it will be “God ” that did it. See you later.

    • nworder

      Insects were not needed on the ark – but there would be plenty – they lay eggs which survive under water. Your knowledge is so bad that I am bored debating with you even though I enjoy a good debate with evos – intelligent ones that is .

      Cain went to live in the land of Nod and built a city. Fungi does not need to avoid the flood there was masses of floating vegetation.

      You have never asked an intelligent question or any question for that matter you just blurt out rehashed “darwin for kids” nonsense.

      Why would the inhabitants of the ark not disperse. The dispersal of the population in the bible is still used by atheist professors who study language and peoples as the most accurate history of population movements .

      STEPHEN GOULD, Harvard, “…one outstanding fact of the fossil record that many of you may not be aware of; that since the so called Cambrian explosion…during which essentially all the anatomical designs of modern multicellular life made their first appearance in the fossil record, no new Phyla of animals have entered the fossil record.”, Speech at SMU, Oct.2, 1990

      PRESTON CLOUD & MARTIN F. GLAESSNER, “Ever since Darwin, the geologically abrupt appearance and rapid diversification of early animal life have fascinated biologist and students of Earth history alike….This interval, plus Early Cambrian, was the time during which metazoan life diversified into nearly all of the major phyla and most of the invertebrate classes and orders subsequently known.” SCIENCE, Aug.27, 1982

      RICHARD MONASTERSKY, Earth Science Ed., Science News, “The remarkably complex forms of animals we see today suddenly appeared….This moment, right at the start of the Earth’s Cambrian Period…marks the evolutionary explosion that filled the seas with the earth’s first complex creatures….’This is Genesis material,’ gushed one researcher….demonstrates that the large animal phyla of today were present already in the early Cambrian and that they were as distinct from each other as they are today…a menagerie of clam cousins, sponges, segmented worms, and other invertebrates that would seem vaguely familiar to any scuba diver.” Discover, p.40, 4/93

    • texastea2

      Your ignorance can only be surpassed by your arrogance. I know you are not THAT stupid. You are however that arrogant . There has been no debate. Questions you cannot answer with a logical response you dismiss and lash out. So typical . Take care. Live a good life.It has been fun Good luck wish you well. NOD yeah page 5 of genesis.Funny sorrynot there. Be good .Peace

    • nworder

      Bye Bye – keep taking your meds

    • texastea2

      Bye bye oh great smart one. Perhaps some day with a lot of psychiatric help or simple common sense you learn how utterly inconceivable the story of Noahs ark is as most theologans have. I doubt it though LOL! I will keep taking my meds. Someday with all the advances in science such as biology( which by the way smart guy is almost entirely based on EVOLUTION)(ever heard of genes?) CHEMISTRY and PHYSICS there will be some medical help for your advanced stage ignorance compounded by arrogance.
      I would not take it if I were you healing sick is afterall playing god.So if you ever are unfortunate enough to be in a car accident you could tell them to take you to church not hospital where the professional tasked with healing you work with science not GOD. That my friend would take REAL FAITH. Good luck I myself would recommend the science but you know way more than me so hey! Have a good life. I hope you find the reassurance you seek. We just disagree on where you will find it. Again live well and good luck.

    • nworder

      From atheist scientists who dont even believe in Darwin :-

      “The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution.”

      Stephen Jay Gould (Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University)

      “The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that ‘a tornado sweeping through a junk yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein’.”

      Sir Fred Hoyle (English astronomer, Professor of Astronomy at Cambridge University), as quoted in “Hoyle on Evolution”. Nature, vol. 294, 12 Nov. 1981, p. 105

      “Echoing the criticism made of his father’s habilis skulls, he added that Lucy’s skull was so incomplete that most of it was ‘imagination made of plaster of Paris’, thus making it impossible to draw any firm conclusion about what species she belonged to.”

      Referring to comments made by Richard Leakey (Director of National Museums of Kenya) in The Weekend Australian, 7-8 May 1983, Magazine, p. 3

      “We add that it would be all too easy to object that mutations have no evolutionary effect because they are eliminated by natural selection. Lethal mutations (the worst kind) are effectively eliminated, but others persist as alleles. …Mutants are present within every population, from bacteria to man. There can be no doubt about it. But for the evolutionist, the essential lies elsewhere: in the fact that mutations do not coincide with evolution.”

      Pierre-Paul Grassé (University of Paris and past-President, French Academie des Sciences) in Evolution of Living Organisms, Academic Press, New York, 1977, p. 88

    • texastea2

      Geez let me be very clear. Yes evolution is a “scientific theory) It has been tested for many decades. Much evidence has been found.MUCH. all of which matches observation. None has yet been shown to disprove the theory. PERIOD. Not a fact as you presume I believe.I have no ” beliefs” I simply look at evidence. There is tons of evidence none of it however points to your creator story.
      PS. Even if evolution is proved wrong someday there would still be NO EVIDENCE for the bible story of God nor the christian story of Jesus.

    • nworder

      Give us your evidence for evolution then – why have you not given any evidence in all your blogs. No scientist has proved evolution by any test – you are just making up stories.

      “Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact.”

      Dr. T. N. Tahmisian (Atomic Energy Commission, USA) in “The Fresno Bee”, August 20, 1959. As quoted by N. J. Mitchell, Evolution and the Emperor’s New Clothes, Roydon Publications, UK, 1983, title page.

      “A five million-year-old piece of bone that was thought to be a collarbone of a humanlike creature is actually part of a dolphin rib, …He [Dr. T. White] puts the incident on par with two other embarrassing [sic] faux pas by fossil hunters: Hesperopithecus, the fossil pig’s tooth that was cited as evidence of very early man in North America, and Eoanthropus or ‘Piltdown Man,’ the jaw of an orangutan and the skull of a modern human that were claimed to be the ‘earliest Englishman’.

      “The problem with a lot of anthropologists is that they want so much to find a hominid that any scrap of bone becomes a hominid bone.'”

      Dr. Tim White (anthropologist, University of California, Berkeley). As quoted by Ian Anderson “Hominoid collarbone exposed as dolphin’s rib”, in New Scientist, 28 April 1983, p. 199

    • texastea2

      I guess cain was followed by some brothers and sisters. ( great tracking skills) built an entire city married his sister and then came back to eden. Of course the book of genesis leaves most of that out It simply states (very plainly) that there was Adam and Eve there two sons. Cain killed Abel was banished from Eden and went to dwell in the land of Nod. Period. Next paragraph Cain knew his wife. No mention of the great city nor of all the people you mention. Not one single word. You simply interpret and comprehend what you want to see.Guess it comes from that superior critical thinking ability you believe you posess.

    • nworder

      You dont even know the first chapters of the bible – no timeline was given for cain’s marriage – in 800 years the population growth would stagger you if you studied it – but you are too immature and infantile to put up a good debate.

      Genesis 5:4 – And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:

      Genesis 4:1 – And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.

      Genesis 4:2 – And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.

      Genesis 4:25 – And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, [said she], hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.

      Genesis 5:1-32 – This [is] the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; (Read More…)

      When did your two evolved apes get together – they would need to be at the same stage of evolution.
      What were the names of the first apeman and apewoman – and did they build a city – how many baby apemen and apewoman did they begat.
      Did their first ape children mate with each other since they would have to keep separate from the real apes who were still around.
      What animal gave rise to the apes and if apes became human why are apes still around ??

      Believing in your ludicrous fantasy evolution blind faith is much harder than believing the bible .

    • texastea2

      Genisis 4:16 then cain went out from the presence of the lord and settled in the land of Nod east of eden.
      Genesis4:17 and cain knew his wife.From there is starts stating cains sons and their wives. Your story of seth comes later. Guess “the lord was intentionally trying to confuse people with his sequence of events. It is afterall only the proof of EVERYTHING. The only proof. Besides probably less than 20% of the earths population could read. Your God is strange indeed.
      I have no desire to show you evidence which is freely available EVERYWHERE. Try Cambridge Harvard. Yale anyplace of higher education scientific magazines for petes sake. You know it is there but choose not to. quote any of it.It simply does not matter to you.Your mind is made up.For every one of the scientist and or prof. you reference there are literally hundreds at same said institute who will gladly show you “evidence” that disagrees.This is goofy. I am beginning to feel as though I am beating a dead horse. Which would just be wrong.

    • nworder

      You have an obsession with cain and his wife that you no doubt get from reading Dawkins et al. But you have no such objections to your uncle and aunty ape who changed 300 million parts of their DNA code into humans and managed to get wives at the same stage of evolution – lol.

      You keep referring to universities and magazines as your proofs of evolution

      so lets get even ONE proof from your multitudes of sources – it should be easy for instead of blowing off wind and flak without substance .

      Here are some more quotes from evolutionists who you know much more than , but keep it secret – you little genius :-

      “By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them.” (Luther Sunderland, “Darwin’s Enigma”, p.10)

      “The more one studies paleontology, the more certain one becomes that evolution is based on faith alone; exactly the same sort of faith which is necessary to have when one encounters the great mysteries of religion… The only alternative is the doctrine of special creation, which may be true, but is irrational.” (Dr. L.T. More)

      “I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme… (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, “incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.”)

      “The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation…” (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin’s “Origin of Species”)

      “What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events… An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle… (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)

    • texastea2

      I am sorry if you cannot admit a simple truth about your bible. Call it what you want. I stand behind my perception of the “actual” words and you can just continue making up proofs and interpretations . Whatever gets you through your night.Thanks for the laughs. You might be brainwashed but you are as stubborn and relentless as a wolverine.
      Again my childish friend the evidence is that evolution has NOT been disproven. Seek and ye shall find. I suggest FOR THE LAST TIME any reputable institute of higher learning . The the site at Cern Take a biology course again ANYWHERE. You simply choose to argue instead as a bufoon wearing blinders. I wish you well.

    • nworder

      The cern atom splitting site does not prove evolution in the slightest – just saying “cern” proves evolution shows how your simple mind works.

      Why cant cain marry and have a wife ? what is your problem with this

      It is probably from the daft film inherit the wind which was a parody of the truth.

      “Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE… It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of “Evolution from Space,” after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)

      How about giving us ONE example from your Bible of evolution – LOL

    • texastea2

      What is even more absurd than the probability of originating at random is the probability of a deity that did not even originate at all. Simply infinite. Yet everything else every massive particle everything without mass.EVERYTHING was created by a deity that was miraculously not created at all.
      Ever wonder (since you say the chances of life even at bacterial level originating at random is absurd) how utterly absurd it is to believe then with that thought in mind that there is a creator that was not created at random or by any other circumstanceor causation. Just simply always has been always will be.
      An infinite being with no beginning that got so bored he decided to create ( well EVERYTHING from gluons to galaxies.)
      Now let me see absurd for any form of life to originate EXCEPT through the deity with no ORIGIN. Yeah I see your point. Such critical thinking. Genius. Brilliant.
      I cannot wait for your reference to prof voodoo which absolutly PROVES that God exist with no evolving to the being it is today. Rather infinite, not created at all.Infinite.Nothing just god. Originating out of nothing. Oops my bad apparently I forgot NO ORIGIN. Now that is absurd. Why the odds of life originating from an infinite being with no origin and having no beginning nor an end must be so high only a fool would bet against it. Why that MUST be it. No need to explain how this originated orhd no need to originate

    • JARay

      The point you are missing is that because there HAS been CREATION there MUST have been a CREATOR. This Creator MUST have existed WITHOUT BEING CREATED. This Creator is NECESSARY for CREATION. Creation exists therefore the CREATOR exists. This Creator we call God. God is the One, Only, Being whose existence is NECESSARY. Your existence is not necessary, you just happened. It would not matter in the least if you had never existed. But God MUST exist because Creation exists. Everything which has been created must have a Creator. The supreme creator is necessary or there would be NO creation.

    • texastea2

      Pardon me. In your opinion I am missing the point. Clarify that first.I usually do not debate with those that start out authoritativly stating that I am missing the point. We usuallend up with the belligerent badgering back and forth for days as one can see.
      However allow me to counter by stating I do not think I missed the point and do not follow your logic.I would ask you to please explsin how then, did the creator come to exist.If there was creation from nothing.Then your creator could not have existed because there WAS NOTHING. On the opposite one arrives at the delima that If the creator did indeed exist. Then then suf

    • texastea2

      Then suffice it to state that there was something so everything could Not have been created from NOTHING for the very existence of the creator PROVES that there WAS something. The “something”we could therefore Prove would be the creator . Which would prove that there was NO CREATION from NOTHING. Simply God is something so no creation from nothing. Nocreation from nothing no creator created everything from nothing.
      If it is possible for your creator to be infinite. It would also be possible for the universe to be infinite applying that same logic.

    • nworder

      So strange of you to hate God who you also say does not exist.
      If you went to a shrink and told him that God has caused all the trouble in the world and that you hated him but also that he does not exist the shrink would classify you as insane.
      HOWEVER ! If God does exist and you blame Him and hate Him I would be very very worried.
      So you have to make a decision – either God exists and you quickly submit or God does not exist so there is no point in getting angry at someone who you say does not exist .
      So you are left to blame Mr Evolution for your problems – cruel and merciless evolution – survival of the strongest who kill the weak.

    • texastea2

      Still no proof of Jesus ‘ miracles eh? Take your time. You are going to need it.

    • nworder

      You have given not one iota of proof for your evolutionary miracles but miracles from Jesus are still happening today.
      The miracle of creation is all around you but you refuse to see .

    • texastea2

      Look around for yourself. Again all of the life sciences are based on evolution( not the mythical miracles of Jesus) might I suggest you start out simple just go to From that one simple site you can find all of the TONS of evidence supporting the “THEORY” of evolution.
      Again evolution is not a fact but it has been tested many times still standing. Are you mentally challenged? Or are you just an asshole?

    • nworder

      Science is totally independent of the unproven “theory” of evolution – it is not needed at all for science. Science was around long before Darwin and the great scientific disciplines were founded by bible believing christians.

      You keep talking about “tons” of evidence but you have provided zilch.

      “I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The ‘others’ are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles… It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)

    • texastea2

      If you are too stupid or too lazy to simply duck duck go the words. ” evidence supporting the theory of evolution” again PISS OFF . You will actuually have to be careful for.there are several sites which I am sure you are aware of like “All about Science” which is a typical christian tactic which is actually a site named ALL about God.
      Where one will find sevral references to Sir Hoyle as well as probably all the rest of your references.
      ALL science is based upon EVIDENCE
      you MORON.
      Speaking of not ” one iota” of evidence how you doing with all of that evidence for your FACTS ABOUT JESUS BEING SUPERNATURAL.
      Please as I have so many times stated sites where any IDIOT could find literally thousands of references for not just your obsession ee call evolution(which even if. Proven wrong someday does NOT mean creation wins by default as your idiotic rants suggest you ” believe”. 27000 words written repetitively yet you have said absolutely nothing of any worth to your ” beliefs” FOOLISH WASTE OF TIME. Later my nutty friend .
      Until next time.

    • nworder

      Ok – once again I ask to give even one example of evolution – you have not so far done this – just a lot of bluster is your mark.

      “Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species.”
      (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)

    • texastea2

      OMD you are belligerent.Try this and then FUCK YOU STUPID ASSHOLE
      Try readingAbiogenesis
      Or Smithsonian Institutes HUMAN ORIGINS
      Kozmiks, Role of PAX GENES IN EYE EVOLUTION.
      Visit InternationalHAP MAP PROJECT
      Simply visit ANY science dept at ANY accrrdited university not associated with religion.
      Read Fc Chin’s Genomic divergences between humans and other hominids.
      Okamoto’s A secondary symbiosis in progress.
      Take a class in astronomy biology anthropology geology.
      Performing supernatural acts such as RAISING THE DEAD BACK TO LIFE. Stand up or SHUT UP YOU DICK!!!!!

    • nworder

      Abiogenesis is just a name for life from the muddy pool – you dont fool anyone.

      I am asking YOU for one evidence of evolution not a list of meaningless words.

      You cant provide one – I take it !

      “I reject evolution because I deem it obsolete; because the knowledge, hard won since 1830, of anatomy, histology, cytology, and embryology, cannot be made to accord with its basic idea. The foundationless, fantastic edifice of the evolution doctrine would long ago have met with its long- deserved fate were it not that the love of fairy tales is so deep-rooted in the hearts of man.” (Dr. Albert Fleischmann, University of Erlangen)

      “The entire hominid collection known today would barely cover a billiard table, … the collection is so tantalizingly incomplete, and the specimens themselves often so fragmented and inconclusive, that more can be said about what is missing than about what is present. …but ever since Darwin’s work inspired the notion that fossils linking modern man and extinct ancestor would provide the most convincing proof of human evolution, preconceptions have led evidence by the nose in the study of fossil man.”

      John Reader (photo-journalist and author of “Missing Links”), “Whatever happened to Zinjanthropus?” New Scientist, 26 March 1981, p. 802

    • texastea2

      My reply must have been censored again when I wrote F~€》off you dick I will try again. I can only imagine how many ass beating you must have deservedly received in your life. You are astonishingly stupid and belligerent.

    • nworder

      Are you still looking for your ONE example of evolution – lol

      “A five million-year-old piece of bone that was thought to be a collarbone of a humanlike creature is actually part of a dolphin rib, …He [Dr. T. White] puts the incident on par with two other embarrassing [sic] faux pas by fossil hunters: Hesperopithecus, the fossil pig’s tooth that was cited as evidence of very early man in North America, and Eoanthropus or ‘Piltdown Man,’ the jaw of an orangutan and the skull of a modern human that were claimed to be the ‘earliest Englishman’.

      “The problem with a lot of anthropologists is that they want so much to find a hominid that any scrap of bone becomes a hominid bone.'”

      Dr. Tim White (anthropologist, University of California, Berkeley). As quoted by Ian Anderson “Hominoid collarbone exposed as dolphin’s rib”, in New Scientist, 28 April 1983, p. 199

      “We add that it would be all too easy to object that mutations have no evolutionary effect because they are eliminated by natural selection. Lethal mutations (the worst kind) are effectively eliminated, but others persist as alleles. …Mutants are present within every population, from bacteria to man. There can be no doubt about it. But for the evolutionist, the essential lies elsewhere: in the fact that mutations do not coincide with evolution.”

      Pierre-Paul Grassé (University of Paris and past-President, French Academie des Sciences) in Evolution of Living Organisms, Academic Press, New York, 1977, p. 88

    • texastea2

      I see you still have not ANY LICK OF EVIDENCE FOR JESUS’ SUPERNATURAL FEATS EH!!! I am confident from reading your stupid repetetive rants about evidence that you will send it to me as soon as you find it.

    • nworder

      Anyone reading up on DNA will know that a muddy pool could not create this incredible code – only a supernatural God could create this DNA miracle.

      “Why do geologists and archeologists still spend their scarce money on costly radiocarbon determinations? They do so because occasional dates appear to be useful. While the method cannot be counted on to give good, unequivocal results, the number do impress people, and save them the trouble of thinking excessively. Expressed in what look like precise calendar years, figures seem somehow better … ‘Absolute’ dates determined by a laboratory carry a lot of weight, and are extremely helpful in bolstering weak arguments.

      “No matter how ‘useful’ it is, though, the radiocarbon method is still not capable of yielding accurate and reliable results. There are gross discrepancies, the chronology is uneven and relative, and the accepted dates are actually selected dates. This whole bless thing is nothing but 13th-century alchemy, and it all depends upon which funny paper you read.”

      Robert E. Lee, “Radiocarbon: ages in error”. Anthropological Journal of Canada, vol.19(3), 1981, pp.9-29. Reprinted in the Creation Research Society Quarterly, vol. 19(2), September 1982, pp. 117-127 (quotes from pp. 123 and 125)

    • texastea2

      Dr Tim white will also let you see All the evidence you need MORON He id chancellor of california universities. He was ( READ OVER AND OVER TIL YOU COMPREHEND) Prof of integrative biology laboratory for HUMAN EVOLUTION. So adk HIM for EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION I am positive he would gladly point you in the right dir.You putz.
      Fred Hoyle actually was a brilliant astronomer and physicist.Yet not a BIOLOGIST.
      Hoyle ( again please focus here) discovered that carbon could not have been formed in the universes infancy he Proved how carbon is formed by nuclear fusion in stars.NOT BY INSTANT MIRACULOUS CREATION. His theory of a steady state universe has been discredited. He was a brilliant scientist none the less and deserved a nobel prize.IMO
      Finally we arrive at your refrrrnce of Albert Fleischmann jr. (1862-1942) As Kellog noted in 1907 ( which was 107 frickin yrs ago ) He was the ONLY biologist who publicly declared his rejection of evolution.
      The director of The British Museum where Fleischmann was employed as an assistant keeper of geology stated that fleischmanns OPINION does NOT in any way represent scientific opinion in this museum.
      I will close by asking you if that is all you have? RUBBISH
      By the way your coveted words of fleischmann jr are irrelivent. After all he DIED in 1942 BEFORE the modern synthesis of evolution was settled on genetic basis about time of FLEISCHMANN Jr’s DEATH.
      Any progress on that evidence or proof for your devine supernatural Jesus.Of course not for we both know THERE IS NONE So until next time take care my funn friend.

    • nworder

      Darwin was 150 years ago you dimwit and was never a scientist and you swallow his theory whole without blinking.

      Prof Hoyle disproved evolution but he was never on a star to test the carbon theory.

      “The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that ‘a tornado sweeping through a junk yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein’.”

      Sir Fred Hoyle (English astronomer, Professor of Astronomy at Cambridge University), as quoted in “Hoyle on Evolution”. Nature, vol. 294, 12 Nov. 1981, p. 105

    • texastea2

      Tic tok tic tok I am still waiting for that evidence hotshot. One would think after reading your belligerent post’ about evidence I consevatively and REPEATEDLY stated although not a fact the evidence speaks overwhelmingly in its favor.
      You on the other hand claim everything in the combined books of what is commonly called old and new
      testaments to form the christian bible.Yet you have provided not one shred of evidencefor any of your claim of FACT.
      No evidence for the existence of the biblical God. No evidence for Jesus being said Gods supernatural son.No evidence for his changing water into wine. No evidence for Jesus’ supernatural ability to walk on water. Nor his bring the dead bact to life. No evidence for the red sea “parting”. In fact you cannot even prove the jews were enslaved by Egypt much less a mass exodus after moses’ plagues. No evidence whatsoever that Noah gatheted

    • texastea2

      Noah gathered and saved all forms ofland life. With the exception of your ridiculous argument( loosely used) claiming that ALL insect life was spared because the larvae of all insects are not affested by water(much less salt water) .
      You also claim that fossils found on Mt Everest is proof of a great earth wide flood just several thousand yrs ago which added at least 33000′ of water covering the entire earth compared to todays sea levels.
      I could go on for months.and you could still not find any evidence for any of your claimed FACTS.
      I try to be patient even though it is outside of personality. So
      I as well as everybody crazy enough to still be reading this beating of dead horses and those I share it with and encourage to keep reading, well we will wait patiently to stop the press and get that nobel prize shined up anticipating your proof. The entire world awaits your evidence. Until then I will continue like the earth and all is wondrous forms of life to AGE.
      Get back with that evidence. I do hope it is not an illness that is causing the delay. Take care.

    • nworder

      You are the one who provides no evidence – just sound and fury signifying nothing.

      “Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless.” Louis Bounoure. The Advocate, 8 March 1984, p. 17.

      “With the failure of these many efforts, science was left in the somewhat embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of living origins which it could not demonstrate. After having chided the theologian for his reliance on myth and miracle, science found itself in the inevitable position of having to create a mythology of its own: namely, the assumption that what, after long effort could not prove to take place today had, in truth, taken place in the primeval past.” Loren Eisley, The Immense Journey (1957), p. 199.

      “If complex organisms ever did evolve from simpler ones, the process took place contrary to the laws of nature, and must have involved what may rightly be termed the miraculous.” R.E.D. Clark, Victoria Institute (1943), p.

      Huxley – Darwin’s bulldog :-
      ” `Creation,’ in the ordinary sense of the word, is perfectly conceivable. I find no difficulty in conceiving that, at some former period, this universe was not in existence, and that it made its appearance in six days (or instantaneously, if that is preferred), in consequence of the volition of some preexisting Being. Then, as now, the so-called a priori arguments against Theism and, given a Deity, against the possibility of creative acts, appeared to me to be devoid of reasonable foundation.” Thomas H. Huxley, quoted in *L. Huxley, Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, Vol. I (1903), p. 241 (1903). 63.

    • texastea2

      I am not the one making outlandish supernatural claims. I need no evidence. Evidence that evolution is still a viable scientific theory?
      You are the dumbass that claims all
      750,000+ species of insect would survive underwater. Where the f@#k is that evidence. You are quite fascinating TO A PSYCHOLOGIST.LOL

    • nworder

      Not even atheist skeptics object to insects not being required on the ark.

      The eggs last under water and can be on floating vegetation. Repeat insects were not air breathing and can survive floods no problem as they do to this very day – do you practice intellectual dullness ?

      “In fact [subsequent to the publication of Darwin’s book, Origin of Species], evolution became, in a sense, a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to `bend’ their observations to fit with it. . To my mind, the theory does not stand up at all . . If living matter is not, then, caused by the interplay of atoms, natural forces, and radiation, how has it come into being? . . I think, however, that we must go further than this and admit that the only acceptable explanation is Creation. I know that this is anathema to physicists, as indeed it is to me, but we must not reject a theory that we do not like if the experimental evidence supports it.” H.S. Lipson, “A Physicist Looks at Evolution,” Physics Bulletin, Vol. 31, p. 138 (1980) [emphasis his].

      “The theory of evolution is impossible. At base, in spite of appearances, no one any longer believes in it….Evolution is a kind of dogma which the priests no longer believe, but which they maintain for their people.” Paul Lemoine. Encyclopedie Francaise 1937 edition. (President of the Geological Society of France and director of the Natural History Museum in Paris.)

      [The Big Bang] “…represents the instantaneous suspension of physical laws, the sudden, abrupt flash of lawlessness that allowed something to come out of nothing. It represents a true miracle—transcending physical principles….” Paul Davies, The Edge of Infinity (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981), p161.

    • nworder

      There is plenty of photographic evidence for the exodus – you just have done no research.

      [Evolution]“…a full-fledged alternative to Christianity…Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.” Michael Ruse. Saving Darwinism from the Darwinians. National Post (May 13, 2000). pB-3.

      “As the creationists claim, belief in modern evolution makes atheists of people. One can have a religious view that is compatible with evolution only if the religious view is indistinguishable from atheism.” Will Provine, No Free Will. Catching Up with the Vision, Ed. By Margaret W. Rossiter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999) pS123.

    • texastea2

      More idiocracy . Funny you did not leave a link for famous “photographic evidence” you write of. What on earth are you referring to as ” photographic evidence?
      Must not be illness that prevents you from providing evidence. As you seem to feel well enough to write jibberish CONSTANTLY.
      FYI the egyptians kept pretty good records. How many children were born weather “reports” crop yields battles trade deals etc etc. Yet no mention of pharoa chasing down Moses and his soldiers being swallowed up by the red sea after supernaturally parting for thousands of “slaves” to escape.
      Please enlighten as to the whereabouts of all this evidence. It would be greatly appreciated.

    • nworder

      I assumed that you know how to google – it was a team of Israeli archaeologists – it was on TV . It shows pictures of the split rock , chariot wheels , the burnt top of mount sinai in Saudi arabia – Joshua’s temple etc etc

      [Darwin, speaking about Huxley:] “My good and kind agent for the propagation of the Gospel, the devil’s gospel.” Robert T. Clark and James D. Bales, “Why Scientists Accept Evolution”, 1988, p. 45.

      “Darwin wrote in his autobiography: `I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true …” M. Grano, “The Faith of Darwinism”, Encounter, November 1959, p. 48

      “The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory – is it then a science or faith?” L.N. Matthews, “Introduction” to Charles Darwin, Origin of the Species, pp. x, xi (1971 edition)

      “… post-Darwinian biology is being carried out by people whose faith is in, almost, the deity of Darwin. Colin Patterson, The Listener (Senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, London.)

      “[Karl] Popper warns of a danger: ‘A theory, even a scientific theory, may become an intellectual fashion, a substitute for religion, an entrenched dogma.’ This has certainly been true of evolutionary theory.” Colin Patterson, “Evolution”, 1977, p. 150.

      “The irony is devastating. The main purpose of Darwinism was to drive every last trace of an incredible God from biology. But the theory replaces God with an even more incredible deity – omnipotent chance.” T. Rosazak, “Unfinished Animal”, 1975, p. 101-102.

      “Evolution is sometimes the key mythological element in a philosophy that functions as a virtual religion.” E. Harrison, “Origin and Evolution of the Universe”, Encyclopaedia Britannica Macropaedia (1974) p1007.

    • texastea2

      More rubbish by people indoctrinated with religion. A simple man knows the main difference between science and religion is EVIDENCE a scientific theory as the theory of evolution is today can be tested and disproven or confirmed by observation.Which the theory has been tested directly and indirectly hundreds of times.
      There simply no evidence that all human life descended from one man and his wife a few thousand years ago. Again your references are idiotic and laughable . They are opinions of religous people who by the way knew what they were saying was controversial but hey it got there name out there. Even if it was only seriously accepted by the religous community.
      This has been interesting and I have enjoyed reading you replies if just for the humor. I am growing tired of it though. I was hoping you might provide some new information. Or even some well kept secret previously unknown evidence. Alas you have NONE. Nor will you. Just more silly quotes from educated christians.
      Is that all you have? That is it?
      Like the people you so painstakingly quote you could get some magazine or newspaper outside the scientific community to write about your great discorery.LMAO
      Later slick Willie

    • nworder

      BUT YOU SAY THAT VERY THING : That all life descended from a single cell in a muddy pool – you don’t even recognise your own idiotic statements .

      Still waiting for your ONE example of evidence for evolution – there should be trillions – why are you taking so long ?

      More atheist honest science :-

      “We have all heard of The Origin of Species, although few of us have had time to read it…A casual perusal of the classic made me understand the rage of Paul Feyerabend…I agree with him that Darwinism contains ‘wicked lies’; it is not a ‘natural law’ formulated on the basis of factual evidence, but a dogma, reflecting the dominating social philosophy of the last century.” Kenneth J. Hsu, “Sedimentary Petrology and Biologic Evolution,” Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 56 (September 1986): p730.

      “I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science.” Rocket scientist Wernher von Braun as quoted by James Perloff, Tornado in a Junkyard (Arlington, Massachusetts: Refuge Books, 1999), p. 253.

      [The Big Bang] “…is only a myth that attempts to say how the universe came into being….” Hannes Alfvén “The Big Bang Never Happened,” Discover 9 (June 1988), p. 78.

      “This evolutionist doctrine is itself one of the strangest phenomena of humanity…a system destitute of any shadow of proof, and supported merely by vague analogies and figures of speech….Now no one pretends that they rest on facts actually observed, for no one has ever observed the production of even one species….Let the reader take up either of Darwin’s great books, or Spencer’s ‘Biology,’ and merely ask himself as he reads each paragraph, ‘What is assumed here and what is proved?’ and he will find the whole fabric melt away like a vision….We thus see that evolution as an hypothesis has no basis in experience or in scientific fact, and that its imagined series of transmutations has breaks which cannot be filled.” Sir William Dawson, The Story of Earth and Man. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1887, pp. 317, 322, 330, 339.

    • texastea2

      Still no evidence for Jesus performing supernatural feats such as bringing the dead back to life.
      Try reading up on DNA or Abiogenesis.
      Visit the International Hap Map project.
      Read : Molecular Biology of the cell. Or Okamotos’ A secondary symbiosis in progress.
      Try visiting Smithsonian Institutes Human Origins or TheNational Science Teachers association.
      We both know I could go on and on as I had previously tried. Apparently you are too lazy to look or ( more accurately) you refuse to honestly look and COMPREHEND the evidence.If none of that helps ask a 16 yr old science student.Then I beg of you please TAKE YOUR MEDICATION. Or visit your doctor( oh yeah that would involve BIOLOGY)

    • nworder

      Funny you still delaying the moment when you cant provide a single example of evolution. I have given you about maybe 30 quotes from cutting edge scientists who were atheists who say there is no evidence at all in 150 years of evolution yet real science continues not Darwin’s religious fantasy.

      That’s why you need to abuse since you have no answers .

      “The essence of Darwinism lies in a single phrase: natural selection is the creative force of evolutionary change. No one denies that natural selection will play a negative role in eliminating the unfit. Darwinian theories require that it create the fit as well.”

      Stephen Jay Gould (Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University), “The return of hopeful monsters”. Natural History, vol. LXXXVI(6), June-Jule 1977, p. 28

      “And in man is a three-pound brain which, as far as we know, is the most complex and orderly arrangement of matter in the universe.”

      Dr. Isaac Asimov (biochemist; was a Professor at Boston University School of Medicine; internationally known author), “In the game of energy and thermodynamics you can’t even break even.”. Smithsonian Institute Journal, June 1970, p. 10

    • texastea2

      Abuse? That is what happenz when you claim FACTS and then you claim quotes from people who have had those said quotes condemned by the vast majority of their contemporaries, as EVIDENCE. You seem to not even know what the definition of the word evidence is.
      I have also provided you with plenty of leads where you ( or anyone) can easily see the evidence showing that evolution ( after hundreds of test) has
      not been disproven. You simply enjoy acting belligerent apparently.
      I could care less if someday it is proven wrong . That day has not come yet in over a century.
      Call people liars they tend to call names back. Even when done cowardly by using yet another opinion quote from someone else.( as in FOOL)
      I am bored of you. You are rude idiotic belligerent and perhaps schitzophrenic and delusional. A moron defenitely at the least. I wish you wl. I will no longer reply back to your bullshit replies. Go claim your victory. Tell your church how you defeated satan. LOL Whatever gives you a good nights sleep.
      I would reccomend you seek counseling outside of you evangelical circle.I’m just saying. Farewell friend Peace be with you.

    • nworder


      In actual fact I was an evolutionist for 35 years – did not question it until I saw the light and knew I had been sold a load of hogwash.

      “Evolution requires plenty of faith; a faith in L-proteins that defy chance formation; a faith in the formation of DNA codes which, if generated spontaneously, would spell only pandemonium; a faith in a primitive environment that, in reality, would fiendishly devour any chemical precursors to life; a faith in experiments that prove nothing but the need for intelligence in the beginning; a faith in a primitive ocean that would not thicken, but would only haplessly dilute chemicals; a faith in natural laws of thermodynamics and biogenesis that actually deny the possibility for the spontaneous generation of life; a faith in future scientific revelations that, when realized, always seem to present more dilemmas to the evolutionists; faith in improbabilities that treasonously tell two stories—one denying evolution, the other confirming the Creator; faith in transformations that remain fixed; faith in mutations and natural selection that add to a double negative for evolution; faith in fossils that embarrassingly show fixity through time, regular absence of transitional forms and striking testimony to a worldwide water deluge; a faith in time which proves to only promote degradation in the absence of mind; and faith in reductionism that ends up reducing the materialist’s arguments to zero and forcing the need to invoke a supernatural Creator.” R.L. Wysong, The Creation-Evolution Controversy (1981), p. 455.

      “The facts must mould the theories, not the theories the facts . . I am most critical of my biologist friends in this matter. Try telling a biologist that, impartially judged among other accepted theories of science, such as the theory of relativity, it seems to you that the theory of natural selection has a very uncertain, hypothetical status, and watch his reaction. I’ll bet you that he gets red in the face. This is `religion,’ not `science,’ with him.” Burton, “The Human Side of the Physiologist: Prejudice and Poetry,” Physiologist 2 (1957).

    • texastea2

      Although I said I was not going to do this here it goes. I could care less. You have obviously decided evolution is wrong and as you said you have ” seen the light”. Just as the muslims have the buddhist Hindus Jews all the different varieties of christians the hundreds of aboriginal and tribal religions.All have seen “THE LIGHT” . Of course they all have seen a different light.
      Again if you really must just hear me say the theory of evolution is done well I will reluctantly dissappoint you. I unlike you have seen no such evidence. Even considering the quotes you claim as evidence. Obviously they have seen “the light as well.
      That proves one thing at least and explains this senseless conversation. It proves that YOUdo not require any evidence to think something is true. Hence your faith in the supernatural. Which if you were totally honest you would admit that there simply is no evidence supporting that faith.
      The use of the term creation theory was dreamed up by evangelical leaders after failing AGAIN way back in 1920 to have evolution disavowed and have creation taught as science to the children of ARKANSAS USA. They simply came up with the phrase creation “theory” . Which is ridiculous. The supreme court has tried and successfully stopped their assault on our children. They are still trying today.
      Again disproving evolution will NOT again NOT prove supernatural creation. It simply will not ever happen.There iz no evidence for any of the supernatural events claimed in the old or new testament.

    • nworder

      You believe in evolution without a shred of evidence and worship at Darwin’s feet – so you have your faith based religion.

      The only truth is the Bible – the WORD made flesh.

      “Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless.” Louis Bounoure. The Advocate, 8 March 1984, p. 17.

      “And the salient fact is this: if by evolution we mean macroevolution (as we henceforth shall), then it can be said with the utmost rigor that the doctrine is totally bereft of scientific sanction. Now, to be sure, given the multitude of extravagant claims about evolution promulgated by evolutionists with an air of scientific infallibility, this may indeed sound strange. And yet the fact remains that there exists to this day not a shred of bona fide scientific evidence in support of the thesis that macroevolutionary transformations have ever occurred.” Wolfgang Smith, Teilhardism and the New Religion (Rockford., Ill.: Tan Books, 1988), pp. 5-6. Dr. Smith, taught at MIT and UCLA.

    • texastea2

      Right back to being a snivveling little dick I see. Thats okay. My bad for giving you s chance. There is way more evidence ( which could be miniscule) for evolution than for ANYTHING in the bible. No mattrr what your Vetrrinarian prophet RL Wysong writes.Believe whatever you want. I unlike you question things rven evolution.
      Creation WOULD NOT PROVE ONE SINGLE WORD OF THE BIBLE QUARAN OR ANY OTHER RELIGION by the way. It wojld prove something created life. Not the illogical writings of the bible. Have a great life and a great (whatever happens if anything) afterlife. I will not check to read your proof of your enlightenment.

    • nworder


      Which one you choose will determine your eternal destiny.

      From hardened evolutionists but with a degree of honesty :-

      “There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution.”

      (Dr. George Wald, evolutionist, Professor Emeritus of Biology at the University at Harvard, Nobel Prize winner in Biology.)

      “Most modern biologists, having reviewed with satisfaction the downfall of the spontaneous generation hypothesis, yet unwilling to accept the alternative belief in special creation, are left with nothing.”

      (Dr. George Wald, evolutionist, Professor Emeritus of Biology at the University at Harvard, Nobel Prize winner in Biology.)

      “Evolution [is] a theory universally accepted not because it can be proven by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible.”

      (Professor D.M.S. Watson, leading biologist and science writer of his day.)

      “My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed…..It is not even possible to make a caricature of an evolution out of paleobiological facts…The idea of an evolution rests on pure belief.”

      (Dr. Nils Heribert-Nilsson, noted Swedish botanist and geneticist, of Lund University)

    • texastea2

      You are again choosing to believe what you want. A supernatural creator DOES NOT HAVE TO BE THE GOD OF THE JEWISH BIBLE. PERIOD.
      Quote all of the christians atheist jews WHOEVER.They are WRONG Goodbye and goodluck.
      All evangelical christians have been taught the same idiotic nonsence.
      It boggles my mind how they blindly believe . But then again many believe they can speak in ” tongue”
      No different than many other cults.
      FYI your creation story and story of mankinds saviour after your perfect creator decided he did not like his creation. ARE SIMPLY Modified versions of previous stories.( we found the anceint skript) which will not matter to you. You write as if you are the worlds smartest man and there is NOTHING in the universe you do not know. Good for you.
      I am satisfied saying I do not know.
      If “God” is the christian god then he is a psychopath. I do not see any reason to believe in a creator that leaves eternal damnation up to people as you. That is just sick.Later oh great genius. Perhaps if yur god had made you and simply cloned YOU he wiuld have had trillions of less “souls” in hell. Your creator is a psychopath
      Fortunately you do not KNOW half as much as you claim to know. Peace

    • nworder

      But you believe in only one truth – Darwin the pope of the evolution faith.

      Faith is described as believing without evidence – of which there is none for evolution .

      “250,000 species of plants and animals recorded and deposited in museums throughout the world did not support the gradual unfolding hoped for by Darwin.”
      (Dr. David Raup, curator of geology at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, “Conflicts Between Darwinism and Paleontology”)

      “The pathetic thing about it is that many scientists are trying to prove the doctrine of evolution, which no science can do.”
      (Dr. Robert A. Milikan, physicist and Nobel Prize winner, speech before the American Chemical Society.)

      “The miracles required to make evolution feasible are far greater in number and far harder to believe than the miracle of creation.”
      (Dr. Richard Bliss, former professor of biology and science education as Christian Heritage College, “It Takes A Miracle For Evolution.”)

      “Scientists at the forefront of inquiry have put the knife to classical Darwinism. They have not gone public with this news, but have kept it in their technical papers and inner counsels.”
      (Dr. William Fix, in his book, “The Bone Peddlers.”)

      “In the meantime, the educated public continues to believe that Darwin has provided all the relevant answers by the magic formula of random mutations plus natural selection—quite unaware of the fact that random mutations turned out to be irrelevant and natural selection tautology.”
      (Dr. Arthur Koestler)

    • texastea2

      What is your major malfunction?
      For the (i don’t know at this point) 47,000 th time. I do not declare evolution a fact. Yet (again for the 47,000th time) it has withstood over a century of scientific scrutiny and hundreds of test. Millions of fossils genetic trails that PROVE common ancestory. On and on. Does this all add up to fact? I unlike yourself still question. Having said that it has NOT BEEN DISPROVEN YOU RUDE LITTLE BABBLING BUFOON.

    • texastea2

      ALL FROM SOMETHING THAT “JUST IS” infinite. Then in order to ( make it easier to understand and clarify) this infinite creator tells ONE little creation out of all that not to eat a certain plants fruit. A creature on a tiny little rock out of the trillions he created in a few earth days. THEN it purposefully causes them to eat said fruit ( apparently simply for the pleasure it derives from punishing its one SPECIAL creation.) Then apparently it ask them to slaughter the finest of some of its other creations ( very picky it turns out as well as jealous and narccissistic) and burn them simply because it enjoys the smell of burnt flesh) Just me but he could of just thought any smell it liked and voila . Then after oh screw it.This is. FRUITLESS
      Now you and your brilliant dare I say genius mind have no qualms with ANY of that. Yet if one simple little man disagrees with you and states that evolution though not explaining how lif began appears to explain a progression from simple PRIMITIVE LIFE FORMS to what we have today on earth. One tiny tiny rock.
      Yeah uh sure. No need for evidence for all that . Much more reasonable.
      Besides he or it was brilliant( obviously) enough to write many “frickin books” to let us know how we got here and which words we speak are ” naughty” and so forth. Of course the catch being only one is the REAL ONE.( out of i

    • texastea2

      The cath being one does not know which one is THE BOOK.(another trap to show how much IT LOVES ITS SPECIAL CREATURE) Of. Course you KNOW. Many believe that they do as well. I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY EVIDENCE FOR ANY OF THAT.You on the other hand claim to have all kinds of indisputable evidence PROVING this. ( I actually just scratched the surface it gets even more unbelievable in order to arrive at your FACTS-BELIEFS.

    • texastea2

      Just as Fleischmann died in 1940 his comrade Dr Etheridge retired BEFORE 1940. Neither were biologist.The evidence you claim has never been shown to you is in the DNA. Geez this is not bartending.

    • nworder

      Darwin was not a biologist but a minister of the gospel who rightly had an overwhelming fear of Hell , so much that he rejected the path to salvation.

      He died long before Etheridge and Fleischmann – you always trip yourself up and never provide evidence of Darwin’s theories who himself admitted he had found nothing. You are basing your eternal destiny on a fantasy.

      “Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory.”

      Ronald R. West, PhD (paleontology and geology) (Assistant Professor of Paleobiology at Kansas State University), “Paleontology and uniformitarianism”. Compass, vol. 45, May 1968, p. 216

      “The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on earth must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.” – Charles Darwin 1902 edition.

      “…I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science….It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] & holes as sound parts.” Charles Darwin to Asa Gray, cited by Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin, (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1991) pp. 456, 475.

      “Nowhere was Darwin able to point to one bona fide case of natural selection having actually generated evolutionary change in nature….Ultimately, the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century.” Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crises (Bethesda, Maryland: Adler & Adler, 1986) pp. 62, 358.“I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science.” Søren Løvtrup, Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth (New York: Croom Helm, 1987), p. 422.

    • texastea2

      Just a quick note for you. Science was started way before Christianity was.
      The director of the British museum of which Flieschmann jr was an assistant keeper of geology stated unequivocally that mr Fleischmanns opinion is defenitely not the scientific opinion of this museum.
      Fleischmann was born in 1862 and died in 1942. The modern synthesis of evolution was basically settled on genetic basis in 1940.
      Since then ( AGAIN) basically ALL of the life sciences are based upon the theory. THAT MY FRIEND IS AN UNDISPUTED FACT. Your beligerrent denials and rants cannot change that.
      Funny your reference of fred Hoyle.He discovered that carbon ( the base for EVERY KNOWN FORM OF LIFE) is fued thru nuclear fusion in stars. ( actuall all elents above lithium which as you know is only the third element.
      Therefore it was not created in six days by a supernatural being much less the one in the bible.LMAO

    • Julie

      Are you into witchcraft….?

    • texastea2

      More imaginary nonsense. Witches LOL. Bewitched was pretty good though that samantha.

    • Julie

      Someone replied…derogatory from this thread….anyway…was reading this woman’s ranting….and I am sorry I spent any time with her…I think she is into witchcraft.

    • nworder

      Cain got a wife probably a cousin – why do you have a problem with this – adam and eve had many children – no timeline is given.

      Science is nothing to do with evolution – it gets along nicely without the crazy theory – why would saying ” cambridge harvard” prove evolution ”

      rhyming off nonsense – you are maybe ten years old.

      You certainly believe in bigger miracles than the bible – the whole universe popping out of a tiny speck in minutes ????? LOL

      The first cell designing itself out of mud ???? LOL

      The first cell teaches itself to divide – easy ? LOL

      You believe in a trillion x trillion miracles without anyone doing them ???

      Your comments are idiotic and quite boring – please refrain.

      “To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner)

      “Evolution is a theory universally accepted, not because it can be proved to be true, but because the only alternative, ‘special creation,’ is clearly impossible.” (D.M.S. Watson, Professor of Zoology, London University)

    • texastea2

      Or a deity that simply always has been no need to pop out at all now there is something to bet on.
      As for your obsession with evolution do you even speak english? Apparently you do not read english so well.AGAIN ( PLEASE CONCENTRATE) Evolution though not a proven fact has lots of evidence supporting it. It has not been disproven in spite of all the attempts.It is a theory up there with the big bang. Might be proven wrong someday yet that day is NOT today.
      No timeline for the bible. First thing one reads is the TIMELINE for your God to create the universe. Which is 6 earth days. Then he had to rest .LOL There are no timelines in the bible simply because you do not want there to be timelines. For that would make the story even more ficticious.

    • texastea2

      The only basic differences between that story of creation and (at least two) other even MORE ANCIENT stories of creation is the number of “Gods” doing the creating. Perhaps just another attempt by the TRUE God to confuse us.That rascal. I am sure this is just made up however.As for references to this tall tale well again someone with your critical thinking abilities can easily find them.
      If you had the desire. Which you do not. I know as well as you there is simply nothing that would change your beliefs. Even if God himself told you it is not true. You would say it is in the bible that this would happen. What a glorious time it must be for you knowing the “end times are here”

    • nworder

      How did your “god” create everything ? we know that things dont design and make themselves so how did your god do it ?

    • texastea2

      Let me more blunt .If God created you claim to know. Then the obvious question would be who or what created God?
      That my stubborn friend is what I asked you. Yet again you ignored it. Just the same better than your answers anyway..
      I have no God I do not believe man knows how we got here. What the universe is or how it got here. I do notcaim to know. By the way one more time I do not know if evolution is true. Can you sink that into your thick skull and at least stick to the truth. Where we differ is you say you have proof that the “theory” of evolution is wrong. I claim you do not. You claim the bible to be literal and factual I claim it is not.
      You claim something cannot come from nothing. Yet you claim GOD did I claim that is false.
      All of this schoolyard playing is because I wrote that your God is not real Childish!!!!!

    • nworder

      You have contradicted yourself – you say that “nothing” created everything then why do you then think that God needs to be created.

      God lives in eternity which we cannot grasp – He had no beginning or end
      – He created time and we live in it without being able to grasp the concept of eternity where we will spend our future – either in eternal torment or eternal bliss by being saved from our sins which must be punished by the Judge or covered by Jesus taking the penalty for us.

    • Julie

      Grow up.

    • texastea2

      Now you come across as a school girl arguring on the playground. Good luck. I wish you well.
      PS. Pope pious Xll ignored repeated request to help jews that were being deported from spain the mid east and
      elsewhere. He chose to ignore them on groundz of NEUTRALITY. He did secure visas for 3 thousand jews into brazil I believe. Only after they converted to catholicism. Most were later revoked when it was learned that they were actually still practicing judaism. Grow that up. If you can’t handle a challenge to what you write in an adult manner then by all means do the MATURE thing and tell them to grow upLMAO
      By the way for such an adult as yourself one who knows all the facts about the catholic church over 2000 years of history and ydt STILL claims that the church has nothing to hide. Surely you know about the ” SECRET VATICAN FILES” the churches name for them not mine. They contain over 50 MILES of stacks of documents. Never opened to the public.
      Nah they have no secrets.

    • Julie

      Now I remember who you are…..

      You are the one going around claiming Christians believe in Santa Claus and the tooth fairy…

      You know nothing about my faith and in how we believe.

      No…you need to read documented history of Pius…go to

      The Jewish organization came out wondering why the Church did not defend itself more.

      If the Church is what you say it is…and by the way, this country America turned a boat of refugee Jews away from our shores and they were sent back to be killed…so you also share in the sins of our country….If the Church consists of all that you say it does…then it would be gone a long time ago.

      The sexual deviants in the Church are 5%…and this is the result of the kind of culture our world has become…obsessed with sex….the sex abuse of secular atheism is hundreds of times higher…95% of the clergy are decent men and to label an entire priesthood….

      You are no different than any other bigot while you defend the sickness of our society…because you refuse to look at the world you live in .

      Our country is the worst in spreading free sex without responsibility…and putting on props doesn’t work…it goes deeper, it goes to being faithful and raising children in a stable home…which is what my Church has long upheld….abortion, pornography…sex slavery and trafficking…

      You make up all sorts of things that we are ignorant when you have no concept whatsoever of all the good the Church has done — mainly by those who have given themselves totally to God for human welfare…our Church a great testament for the bettering of mankind.

      So…when you just with crazy comments or only bring out scandal and make claims we believe in fantasies….and make out all priests are evil…and refuse to respond or acknowledge anything…you come across as a hysteric and dishonest..

      You can go on any website here…most come out of America…one of the worst anti Catholic countries in terms of propaganda and tampered or out of context information…and come out like how you are.

      La la la…that is how you come across.

      You should spend your time learning facts and trying to help the suffering in our country instead of mouthing off a bunch of stereotypes and false accusations and insult to the faith we share.

      Shame you…


    • texastea2

      Yyou are really getting worked up calm down . Write what you want to. I know what I wrote and I stsnd behind it. Again you show no eviddnce disputing the facts. Wise on your part. Childish ranting things like well America did this so you share that DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACTS. Believe what you want. There is no more evidence for the christian god than there is for santa or the tooth fairy on that you can rant and make up stories again you can claim footprints on the curtain goat worshipping whatever. Will not ( again) create any evidence for god or any of that exorcism nonsense.
      Perhaps the evidence is hidden in the “secret vatican files”. They are extensive. Just me but if I were you I would let this go. Try asking yourself What would Jesus do?
      As for your pave the way site I will check it out. I will go out on a limb and state now before hand that it is written by catholics. Shocking!!!!!!! Try venturing out of the church andd into a library.

    • knight4444

      I don’t fully agree with @teaxastea but there is a lot of truth in what they’re saying, and BTW, before you start attacking me, I am a follower of Christ, have been for over 35 yrs. I’m just a realist, I call it as I see it! organized religion has been the most destructive force on earth!! PEDIOD! look how the GOP has CONNED millions of catholics into buying their HATE! the GOP has fooled catholics in voting for them and ANYONE who has actually READ the bible knows that neither political party is of Christ! wake up!!

    • Julie

      We Catholics see the interaction of grace in evolution.

      Darwin likewise is very limited. Science is continually making new discoveries, but God alone gives meaning and value and purpose to all things.

      The Books of Proverbs, Wisdom…point to the fact that God made everything according to weights and measure…the Natural Law and He follows that which He created.

      Faith without reason is fanatical and fragmented. Reason without faith is fragmented and material, both leading to totalitarianism and the loss of God given freedom to become what we are called to be.

      I would not get too concerned or troubled by evolution as God is always with us.

    • nworder

      There is not one thing about evolution in the Bible – God is a creator – His power is unlimited . All the miracles are instant creative – Jesus did not evolve bread and fishes but instantly created them cooked.
      Lazarus was dead and smelling – so was dust – his body was recreated and started with instant creative power as adam was created from dust .

      God does not need to learn through evolution nor does he ” roll the evolutionary dice out ” He is in total control of every event.
      If you read the quotes from famous scientists you will see that evolution has less evidence now than ever – in fact it is main;y debunked as a theory although many scientists ignore the elephant on the room – they know that everything they look at is designed but cant speak too loud.

      The atheist evolutionists know that the bible does not line up with evolution
      so you can easily defeat them head with the tons of evidence for desigh and instant creation.

    • texastea2

      Not even circumstantial evidence supporting anything you just so authoritatively just typed.AGAIN The brainwasbing sure took root in your brain.

    • texastea2

      Seems twisted does it not. God only intervenes when one believes in him.All the great God creator of all would have to do is show everybody he is real.Have to admit it would be easy to do. Nope just leave peoples “souls” in the hands of ( well lets see Christians Buddhist, Hindus Jjews, Muslims and all of the varying denominations they have formed. All believing they know the truth.) We arespposedly made in “his” image. Which would imply we use logic as “he” would. Yet all of that addd up to something more illogical than the Mayan sacrifices to their Gods. At least they were ignorant God is well, GOD.

    • nworder

      God has shown Himself in the bible – he wrote it !
      All other religions are false and run by the demons and satan – who had free choice as angels but like you rejected the truth which is written on everyone’s heart but they deny it since they want to live in darkness.

      Just look at the creation around you – its design and complexity – only a fool would say there is no God …….. proverbs.

    • nworder

      God was not created He always existed. The complexity of life is beyond our imagination – you could spend a whole lifetime on just the water molecule and still not scratch the surface.
      Since you think everything you see in the mechanisms of the creation came about by accident then you have no understanding of probability – you would need a trillion x trillion x trillion chance events to create even simple mechanisms – so this is mathematically impossible as Prof Hoyle says and he was an atheist .
      The NT bible was written down immediately – Luke addressed his gospel to a contemporary – Theophilus – Paul wrote his letters to the churches and they were read out immediately – as you would not putting them on a shelf for 40 years – absurd. Jesus predicted the attack by the Romans in 70 ad and this is mentioned nowhere in the NT so the NT including Revelations – so the NT was done and dusted before 70 ad – real Christians always knew the fake gospels of satan.
      The apostles wanted no one’s gold – just because bad people wanted to use the church for gain does not negate the bible message.

      To those who do not believe no explanation is possible to those who believe no explanation is necessary.

    • nworder

      You have not provided one iota of proof in your God of evolution – time and chance – its useless to debate with a fool as the proverbs say.

    • Lakota

      As a Christian and a tribal person, I find that extremely unfair to call my people and my ancestors devil worshiping.

      Lest you forget, it was “Christian” men that massacred and killed thousands of innocent women and children in our tribal history. “Christian” soldiers would cut the testicles and breasts of Indian people, and use them for bags.

      Furthermore, throughout European history, thousands of people were killed more cruelly and violently under the name of God and church. What is more savage or barbaric? People were burned alive at the stake, skinned alive, quartered, impaled, beheaded…all done my “Christian” men and churches.

      My people never sacrificed others.

    • Julie

      You are very subjective and want to believe in that which serves the flesh but dismiss all the evil it has brought to our society, and to our own reputation as Americans. We are the promoters of gross immorality around the world, and I have heard people tell me they think America is a nation of sex obsessed people…I chose to change the word, America that does not value the dignity of the human being or the foundation of the family, but instead on narcissistic sexual indulgence.

      Sorry but the abuse we see today reflects the kind of society you adore.

      The existence of man is to humanize it the earth, not live in caves.

      You do not know Christianity, its truths that would answer such comments.

      Darwin studied the genetics laid out by Augustinian monk, Mendel. Pope Pius IV had no problem with evolution. What you are reacting to are the

      If you can break away from the spin zone, check out John Paul II, “Threshold of Hope”. Try and read it and open up your mind because all you are doing is spinning the momentum of materialism.

      Another good read is the New Yorker’s article on the Vatican Library, greatest in the world that is testimony to authentic faith with reason, and the great contributions to the world by Catholic members.

      I pray for young people like yourself…you come across young…that have been indoctrinated to believe such myths and make up stories that do not stand the test of time…and great suffering.

    • texastea2

      Wow you must live in utter fear. You seem to have an absolute obsession with sex. I am sorry for your pain. Do not know what happened but apparently something terrible. The world is not pissed at America because many of us enjoy the pleasures of sex ( holy crap) it is because they arr sick of getting screwed by our government and the governments corporate masters. Geez .
      As for me personally if you attack me again with your angry hateful unwarranted slandering then I will simply tell you what you can do and be done with this craziness. Peace

    • Julie

      You thought I was accusing you of being a sex abuser when I never said that…you are too much into the spin zone….I have laugh…anyway, there are some good football programs on….

    • texastea2

      I live for the flesh or the predators are waiting for me.I yearn for a society full of sexual predators. None of that rings a bell? Go back and read your post if it helps your memory.The only thing you know about me is that I am not a christian as you are Nor do I believe the bible.How you conclude that I am any of what you claimed. is bizarre. Not surprising but scary none the less.

    • wtf are you talking about???

    • 18patrioticfamily22

      Dear, I appreciate your stand for peace and non-interference between atheists and believers and only wish those activists of Freedom From Religion would share it. I’m a committed Catholic who would never dream of suing atheists for not conforming to MY standards and activities.

    • texastea2

      I think most do share it. The problem for us atheist is simple. Your belief that mankind will be destroyed and all that is written in the bible is scary to us. We do not fear not going to heaven because we do not believe it even exist. We do fear the consequences of the actions of millions that do believe. The evangelical radicals in the USofA are doing everything in their power to influence and control the government (laws) our culture. Our foreign policy as well as domestic. We do not like the doctrine of trying to convert others to unproven and illogical beliefs. Christians prefer to call this “saving someone”. Muslims call in converting. You guys (not so much Cathollics) seem to encourage this escalating conflict between different religous beliefs. None seem to work as hard to stop the insanity. Religion is going to kill many more millions than it already has. Christian churches try and sway their members to vote republican no matter what. They never ever say a word about our intervening and killing in for.countries. War period. All is written in the book of life. We disagree. We are on our own and being led by religious people has done nothing but destroy this planet and the life which it supports. All for profit at the top. The rest (millions) seem to be brainwashed to us. If there was no common belief in supernatural creator and all that goes with these stories there would be little terrorism if any. On the christian side they helped with the exploitation and genocide of every part of the world that was not as they. This has led to the insanity that those of us that believe religion is just another story( strong evidence supports this) are forced to live and raise our children in. We find this insane and scary. Religion has ruled for some thousands of years and is destroying our life giving planet. They have no fear for they believe it is written that this is what is SUPPOSED to happen. We believe that this belief is wrong and deadly.
      I have read the new testament and how they ever come up with those interpretatio

    • It’s a secret.

    • Julie

      You are saying silly things.

    • texastea2

      Like what exactly is ” silly” about it? The part about it being true. You actually find the terrible truth “silly”?

    • Julie

      What is truth? Another good read, ‘Veritatis Splendor’, John Paul II.

      What is Truth is more about Who is Truth.

      Open your mind and stop being so prejudiced.

      You are a tool used by the Death Culture. When you come to your day in need, the Death Culture will offer you the choice to terminate and return to your nothingness. Is that what is life about??

    • larry

      Portland is a liberal mecca. Recently gays smashed in the stained glass windows of Mars Hill church because they don’t like the church’s message. Very tolerant

    • Tom

      Nazi Tea baggers ? Republican Religious Reich? You seriously think that is a Catholic approach to disagreements with other Catholics? And you don’t need some tough love?. I would rather be a tax collector than a Pharisee.

    • texastea2

      Speaking of taxes how about churches paying some? Before collecting taxes tell your church to start paying some. Or stay out of politics!!

    • Julie

      You don’t see all the public works the Church provides to all people?

      Or the fact that Catholics pay their taxes but because of their faith, they cannot have a schoolbus they pay for refuse their children the same??

    • texastea2

      Of course I do.I also see all the bad I am not blind. Nor do I wear blinders. Nor do I ignore the stifling of science and anyone who dared disagree with them ( much as you do now with argument) I could go on not even gotten started with all the bad the church has done to innocent people around the earth.
      As for taxes churches are exempt as Iam sure you know. They are extremely wealthy billions!! They own businessrs property etc etc. They were given special treatment.If they want to push their beliefs on the rest of the citizens through politics they should start paying their share.They try to make all of us assimilate and try to control our countries policies. Pay as the other corporate crooks.

    • Julie

      You don’t even know what you are talking about…you know how much work private school parents do for their schools, their heavily involvement, all the fundraisers they do…and how they work to serve others…and Catholic parishes…as I deal with facts and we are provided accounting sheets, you would be very surprised to see how much of parish funds go to non church people in their civic community.

      You are really beginning to come across as histrionic…

      I would just go get some rest and put your attention onto things that make you feel good.

    • texastea2

      I do not know if you can”t read or simply cannot comprehend what you do read. Prrhaps a quick nap would help.

    • texastea2

      What they really need is to have their money taken away.All of it. Or pass law that says they can no longer be tax exempt while trying to write policy through monetary influence.

    • mary riley


    • johnStjohn

      You are an idiot. Tea “baggers” want pure, Constitutional government. You apparently want putrified socialist garbage, with this Jesuit socialist as your posterboy. how sad, how sad it is.

    • Winston

      The fact he’s a Jesuit is woefully frightening and comes from a country rich in liberation theology. Read Malachi Martin’s book “The Jesuits.”

    • desertvoice

      I disagree. Jesuits are sincerely seeking the truth. I am a lay person, but have gotten a theology doctorate from the Jesuits. There is a zeal for truth in them, however imperfect!

    • texastea2

      Then they should read some science books

    • desertvoice

      The liberation theology is indeed a Latin American incubation. It was
      the belief that people should not wait for Jesus to liberate them from
      economic oppression,and that they should take justice in their own
      hands. Initially, some Jesuits sided with this radical view. I mention here my good friend Gustavo Gutierrez, SJ, who wrote “La fuerza historica de los pobres.” But prof. Gutierrez eventually softened his vievs. Today, the
      Jesuits believe that armed struggle contradicts the Gospel,
      and that the conversion of hearts to justice should take priority. This
      does not mean that we should sit idle and suffer without raising our
      voices in protest. St. John Paul II was the first Pope to propose a
      universal solidarity as response to the abuses brought about by greedy
      capitalism. The liberation theology thanks to that Pope’s efforts has
      today fallen in disrepute. But the struggle for economic justice goes
      on! I myself have written about the need to confront the “structures of economic sin” that fester like parasites on the present world!

    • texastea2

      Wait for jesus to save them. The same jesus that allowed thousands of his followers come to the Americas and slaughter hundreds of thousand or more.
      Probably a good idea not to wait.Fool me once!!!!

    • desertvoice

      It is not just waiting, but also doing everything we can to change the situation of the poor for the better, with the understanding that our true home is not here, but in Heaven!

    • texastea2

      Could have just let them be to start with. Mother earth is our only home.
      Did you skip past the part where I wrote the “truth” stating how christians murdered many of their ancestors. I guess they were simply trying to help.
      Help themselves to all of their resources.
      Bunch of bull about helping the poor. White christians have created far more poverty than they could ever help even if they truly tried. To the point of suffering themselves as the christian bible ask the christians to do. Well they do not. Never have and probably never will.
      Over750,000,000 christian households that is enough to house feed and love well over 1 billion humans suffering from hunger and senseless disease.Not going to happen again it is all due in large part because christian businessmen bankers and politicians screwed them for monetary gains.
      Save that helping the poor meme for some poor fool.

    • desertvoice

      Poverty is not just material. It is also spiritual. I have long ago given my only home to those who had none. Now I give what is left, my spirit, to those who need the truth! That is being Catholic for me!

    • texastea2

      Poverty is poverty. I am glad you gave of yourself to others .would have worked just as well to share your home. I f I read correctly you just freely gave away your house? Where do you live now? Were those you gave it to able to pay the bills on the house?
      As far as people “needing the truth” I would agree.
      Telling them that the bible is true is not the truth however. There is no evidence supporting the bizzarre mystical stories of the bible.
      I know you ” believe” you know the truth just as Jews Buddhist Muslims. Hindu and hundreds of other religions as well as those of ancient times “knew” the sun needed sacrifices along with posieden and on and on and on.All have been wrong.
      The real truth is we do not know exactly how we got here and/or if anything is beyond this life.Th

    • nworder

      We do know how we got here- the bible tells us. Now that science evidence tells us that evolution is a fraud there is only “The Creator” left.
      The bible gives us an overview of instant creation from nothing by the word of God – there is no other explanation.

    • texastea2

      “Now that science tells us that evolution is a fraud” if I may be blunt is ridiculous. What evidence are you referring to?
      The bible is a mythical story nothing more. I presume You have scientific evidence that is widely accepted in the scientific community.
      Fact is 99.9% of scientist think the bible is absurd. Period. Believe what you want but please stop justifying your beliefs in magic by claiming that science has proved evolution to be “a fraud”. Simply made up rubbish.

    • nworder

      Your 99.9 % is made up .

      So since you know so much about the bible – give one instance of events that proves the bible was wrong.

      Since you know so much about evolution give us one example of evolution
      since no one ever has . You must be better than everyone.

      “We are told dogmatically that Evolution is an established fact; but we are never told who has established it, and by what means. We are told, often enough, that the doctrine is founded upon evidence, and that indeed this evidence ‘is henceforward above all verification, as well as being immune from any subsequent contradiction by experience;’ but we are left entirely in the dark on the crucial question wherein, precisely, this evidence consists.”

      Smith, Wolfgang (1988) Teilhardism and the New Religion: A Thorough Analysis of The Teachings of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Rockford, Illinois: Tan Books & Publishers Inc., p.2


      STEPHEN GOULD, Harvard, “…one outstanding fact of the fossil record that many of you may not be aware of; that since the so called Cambrian explosion…during which essentially all the anatomical designs of modern multicellular life made their first appearance in the fossil record, no new Phyla of animals have entered the fossil record.”, Speech at SMU, Oct.2, 1990


      BOTHERSOM DISTRESS, STEPHEN J. GOULD, Harvard, Lecture at Hobart & William Smith College, 14/2/1980. “Every paleontologist knows that most species don’t change. That’s bothersome….brings terrible distress. …They may get a little bigger or bumpier but they remain the same species and that’s not due to imperfection and gaps but stasis. And yet this remarkable stasis has generally been ignored as no data. If they don’t change, its not evolution so you don’t talk about it.”

    • texastea2

      The evidence simply speaks for itself.Some of your references I sm familiar with. They do not disprove evolution.
      It only takes months to prove that life evolves.
      If scientist and even doctors think that life does not change and evolve why do they contstantly have to change the anti viral med in flu shots. EVERY year. If you really want to disprove evolution then simply find a flu vaccine from one yr ago or even better just for good measure 10 yrs ago inoculate yourself with the old vaccine (only if you are SURE life does not evolve) then inject yourself with the same flu viru that is going around today.See what happens.It really is that simple.It is not some new life form it is the same old flu virus that has been with us for a very long time.
      If it has not evolved you are 100% safe. I assure you you will not be safe. There is not one shred of evidence that disproves evolution.
      It would be easy to do yet ever since the theory was first proposed it has not happened.
      The 99.9% was just made up of course however it is pretty close it appears to me.

    • nworder

      Like Darwin you think breeding from EXISTING Dna is evolution – it decidedly is NOT. The breeding of viruses and bacteria disproves evolution – they have bred a trillion trillion times but are STILL viruses and bacteria – they have not evolved into birds lol .

      There is not one shred of evidence for evolution.

      You just swallow the school textbooks. Darwins swimming iguanas are still iguanas. His finches are still finches albeit with adaptable beaks that are built into their DNA which can change their beaks in three generations.

      This is built in adaptability which all species have in their DNA .

      It is called breeding . All the dog family – wolves , poodles , pekingese all came from TWO dogs (the start of the canine family ) They normally lose DNA to breed.

      There is not even a mechanism for evolution and it has never been evidenced in a lab or in the wild.

      These are not creationist scientists but just doing their job honestly
      looking for evidence :-

      GENUINE KNOWLEDGE, D.B. KITTS, University of Oklahoma, “Despite the bright promise that paleontology provides a means of “seeing” evolution, it has presented some nasty difficulties for evolutionists, the most notorious of which is the presence of ‘gaps’ in the fossil record. Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them… The ‘fact that discontinuities are almost always and systematically present at the origin of really big categories’ is an item of genuinely historical knowledge.”, Evolution, Vol. 28, p. 467

      STORY TIME OVER, DEREK AGER, Univ. at Swansea, Wales, “It must be significant that nearly all the evolutionary stories I learned as a student…have now been ‘debunked.’ Similarly, my own experience of more than twenty years looking for evolutionary lineage’s among the Mesozoic Brachiopoda has proved them equally elusive.”, PROC. GEOL. ASSO., Vol.87, p.132

      “FOSSIL BIRD SHAKES EVOLUTIONARY HYPOTHESIS”, Nature, Vol. 322, 1986 p.677, “Fossil remains claimed to be of two crow-sized birds 75 million years older than Archaeopteryx have been found. …a paleontologist at Texas Tech University, who found the fossils, says they have advanced avian features. …tends to confirm what many paleontologists have long suspected, that Archaeopteryx is not on the direct line to modern birds.”

      REPTILE TO BIRD W.E. SWINTON, “The origin of birds is largely a matter of deduction. There is no fossil evidence of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved.” BIOLOGY & COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF BIRDS Vol. 1, p.1.

    • Julie

      Fact: the ancient peoples all drew from the same myths…but when dealing with eschatological thought…where we came from who we are and where we are going…..all mankind has considered this.

      What you don’t know is that Truth can exist within common myths.

      You use alot of words, absurd, magic, rubbish, fraud, alot of spin that is not based on facts.

      You need to get educated.

    • desertvoice

      This is not a place to talk about each other. Suffices to say that I signed off my house to the Catholic Church, so that a home for the elderly could be built with the proceeds. I rent since that time. As for the truth, you know it in the measure you know God!

    • texastea2

      The truth cannot be found in the bible.It is far from the truth.

    • nworder

      Give us one example of where you think the bible is wrong.

    • texastea2

      There is no wrong or right.They are simply made up embellished stories.Noah did not build such a fantastic ship for one. He did not gather up all of those animals. Which would have been tens of thousands or more.Then herd them on board keep the predators from the prey handle all the logistics such an undertaking would involve such as (somehow capturing animals on every continent on earth as well as many islands) Then we get to the birds.Then one wonders what all these animals ate after the miraculous flood (everything else was killed.) Then of course would be the task of somehow dispersing to the four corners of earth AGAIN.
      All done by one simple family I can’t recall how many men 4 5?
      Ps genetics STRONGLY SUGGEST’S that all of mankind DID NOT come from one family a few thousand yrs ago.Did not happen.Do you have any evidence to disprove me.Do you have any evidence ( real scientific evidence) that proves your creator is real. That the bible factual? Just one?

    • nworder

      You have been brainwashed with Darwinian claptrap.

      There is right and wrong – good and evil and you know this , it is perfectly clear. You have been brainwashed.

      Noah did build a ship and it only needed AIR breathing animals about 11000 kinds easily held on the size of boat. This has been well researched.

      The sedimentary layers which cover the earth were laid down by water mainly in one great flood . They contain trillions of fossil right up to the top of the mountains that were killed suddenly by flood water and immediately covered by sediment. There is no other way this could have happened .
      There was not millions of little floods – water does not stand in columns .

      God brought the animals to the ark – you dont know the bible.

      After a flood vegetation springs up and many plants can live under water for a period such as the olive plant.

      Whats hard about dispersing to the four corners of the earth over time – naturally easy.

      One simple family ? You believe that two apes evolved into all the humans on earth – ridiculous.

      Genetics DO suggest that all humans came from two ancestors .

      But you believe they all came from two apes ????

      You have just provided your own opinions – no evidence of anything you have said.

      DESIGNS, S.J. GOULD, Harvard, “We can tell tales of improvement for some groups, but in honest moments we must admit that the history of complex life is more a story of multifarious variation about a set of basic designs than a saga of accumulating excellence….I regard the failure to find a clear ‘vector of progress’ in life’s history as the most puzzling fact of the fossil record….we have sought to impose a pattern that we hoped to find on a world that does not really display it.”, Natural His., 2/82, p.22

      Required Transitional Forms Missing

      DARWIN’S BIGGEST PROBLEM, “….innumerable transitional forms must have existed but why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? ….why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this perhaps is the greatest objection which can be urged against my theory”. ORIGIN OF THE SPECIES.

      MORE EMBARRASSING, DAVID M. RAUP, Univ. Chicago; Chicago Field Mus. of N.H., “The evidence we find in the geologic record is not nearly as compatible with Darwinian natural selection as we would like it to be. Darwin was completely aware of this. He was embarrassed by the fossil record because it didn’t look the way he predicted it would…. Well, we are now about 120 years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn’t changed much. …ironically, we have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin’s time. By this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as the result of more detailed information.” F.M.O.N.H.B., Vol.50, p.35

    • texastea2

      Wow you are to out there to discuss this further. I am brai nwashed!!!
      Funny. when stated by you .NOAH BUILT THE ARK. and it has been”RESEARCHED” ( READ WELL HERE) yet (key words coming pay attention) NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN FOUND EVER!!!!!!!! Your “research” is not PROOF .It is proof that no evidence has been found after exhaustive research.Your reply is silly rhetorical rubbish. Absolutely conjured up hocus pocus.
      Believe in Santa Claus for your entire life. ( why would i or anyone care ) We don’t. But when you keep insisting (you have proof that the other 5.whatever billion humans are going to burn in some horrible damnation.because they did not believe some crazy fantastical story told to them by some MAN

    • nworder

      The evidence of a great flood is all around you no matter where you live.

      The sediments which cover the surface of the earth were laid down by a WW flood. Go to a beach and look at the rocks filled with cemented fossils – go to mt everest and see the rocks full of fossil fish and trilobites.

      The ancient looking hardened sedimentary canyons at mt St Helens happened only 30 years ago and there are fossils there as well in spirit lake – it was a mini noah like flood.

      The rocks at Mt St Helen’s were dated at 1.2 million years LOL.

      “I have always thought it curious that, while most scientists claim to eschew religion, it actually dominates their thoughts more than it does the clergy.”

      Hoyle, Sir Frederick [late mathematician, physicist and Professor of Astronomy, Cambridge University], “The Universe: Past and Present Reflections,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 20, 1982, pp.1- 35, p.23.

      “With the failure of these many efforts [to explain the origin of life] science was left in the somewhat embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of living origins which it could not demonstrate. After having chided the theologian for his reliance on myth and miracle, science found itself in the unenviable position of having to create a mythology of its own: namely, the assumption that what, after long effort, could not be proved to take place today had, in truth, taken place in the primeval past.”

      Eiseley, Loren C., [late Professor of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania], “The Immense Journey,”

      “Thus, a century ago, [it was] Darwinism against Christian orthodoxy. To-day the tables are turned. The modified, but still characteristically Darwinian theory has itself become an orthodoxy, preached by its adherents with religious fervour, and doubted, they feel, only by a few muddlers imperfect in scientific faith.”

      Grene, Marjorie [Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of California, Davis], “The Faith of Darwinism,” Encounter, Vol. 74, November 1959, pp.48-56, p.49

      “The more one studies palaeontology, the more certain one becomes that evolution is based on faith alone; exactly the same sort of faith which it is necessary to have when one encounters the great mysteries of religion.”

      More, Louis T. [late Professor of Physics, University of Cincinnati, USA], “The Dogma of Evolution,” Princeton University Press: Princeton NJ, 1925, Second Printing, p.160.

    • texastea2

      There are literally hundreds of published articles that essentially disprove all of those claims.I will state that roughly 9 out of 10 geoligist disagree VEHEMENTLY. with those findings. I think logically speaking you already know this as well as the author. Thanks for chatting. Live well and let others do the same.

    • nworder

      Your 9 out of ten is just made up by you.

      Try doing some research outwith your religion of Darwinism.

      Noah’s Catastrophic flood :-

      EDWIN D. MCKEE, “The chief significance of ripple lamination in the geologic record is that it is an indicator of environments involving large and rapid sand accumulation… areas where addition of new sand normally is at a slow rate have little chance of developing into superimposed ripple lamination…In contrast, areas in which sand accumulates periodically but rapidly, as in river flood plains were sand laden waters of strong floods suddenly lose velocity are very favorable for building up ripple laminated deposits.” Primary Sedimentary Structures and Their Hydrodynamic Interpretation, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, p.107.

      ADOLF SClLACHER, Geoiogisches Inst., Univ. Frankfurt, “This proves instantaneous deposition of the individual beds, as postulated by the turbidity-current theory….the sandy layers of the Flysch did not accumulate gradually but were cast instantaneously by turbidity currents each bed in its entire thickness, in a matter of hours or less.” Journal of Geology, Vol. 70, p. 227.

      Alan V. Jopling, Dept. of Geology, Harvard, “it is reasonable to postulate a very rapid rate of deposition; that is a single lamina would probably be deposited in a period of seconds or minutes rather than in a period of hours. …there is factual evidence from both field observation and experiment that laminae composed of bed material are commonly deposited by current action within a period of seconds or minutes.” Some Deductions on the Temporal Significance of Laminae, Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp.880-887.

    • Julie

      Just like the global warming people who turned out to be frauds.

    • texastea2

      It is abundantly clear you simply have ignored the evidence.PERIOD.
      I do not quote you any of the studies disproving your ” belief” because they are to numerous to counteasily. Such is blind faith.

    • nworder

      I have given evidence – you have given none – such is your blind faith.

      DARWIN’S BIGGEST PROBLEM, “….innumerable transitional forms must have existed but why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? ….why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this perhaps is the greatest objection which can be urged against my theory”. ORIGIN OF THE SPECIES.

      MORE EMBARRASSING, DAVID M. RAUP, Univ. Chicago; Chicago Field Mus. of N.H., “The evidence we find in the geologic record is not nearly as compatible with Darwinian natural selection as we would like it to be. Darwin was completely aware of this. He was embarrassed by the fossil record because it didn’t look the way he predicted it would…. Well, we are now about 120 years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn’t changed much. …ironically, we have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin’s time. By this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as the result of more detailed information.” F.M.O.N.H.B., Vol.50, p.35

    • Julie

      In those days, people travelled at most 22 miles…and geographically there are signs in that part of the world there was a huge flood at that time in context to their lives.

      If you study any beliefs, you have to look at history and society and geography and sociology and anthropology.

    • texastea2

      Too far out there to bother. Good luck with that fairytale research crap(oops is crap a word that your toothfairy will throw you in a fire over).What a scholar using words like researched instead od researched and no supportive evidence. Noahs ark is illogical and silly. Left to their own any 10 to 12 yr old would tell you it is a MYTH.NO EVIDENCE and of course you KNOW this. As usual when discussing with christians or others their weird creation myths 3/4 of the population is wrong the evidence proves we all descended from one family a few thousand years ago aftersme fairy go fathrr created us told us not to eat apples waited awhile got pissed off decided to have a zon( the old fashioned way ) with some guys wife. Then wait a couple hundred yrs finally publish a condensed book of facts on what the fairy godfather wanted his sheep to do nos that his rage has subsided He will never be seen nor heard and he will leave TONS OF CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE against this magical faifytale blah blah blah.
      Enough already. So bored and fruitless like I am write to a vegetable. (Turnip) dont even care about spelling. Have a good life. Perhaps someday you will seek the trugh.
      PS Darwin could be wrong you poor brainwashed man. That if it were proven would still not prove any fairytale you have”brainwashed” yourself with.good. luck. Peace.

    • nworder

      Your religion of evolution is a fairytale for grown ups :-

      You believe that two apes were the ancestors of the human race – there are about 300 million DNA differences between apes and humans.

      There are worms and jellyfish which we have more DNA In common with .

      Only a super creator God could make DNA , tweaking it to form all species.

      The surface of the world is EXACTLY as one would expect with a worldwide flood – sedimentary layers can only be laid down by floodwater and trillions

      of fossil creatures can only be killed suddenly and fossilised by sediments.

      There was no simple to complex life forms – all life is complex beyond our imagination. A trilobite is as or more complex than a human.

      You are full of Darwinistic cliches that were debunked long ago.

      STORY TIME, COLIN PATTERSON, Senior Paleontologist, British Museum of Nat. History,

      “You say I should at least ‘show a photo of the fossil from which each type or organism was derived.’ I will lay it on the line-there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.” “It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another. … But such stories are not part of science, for there is no way of putting them to the test. … I don’t think we shall ever have any access to any form of tree which we can call factual.” HARPER’S, Feb. 1984, p.56

      SEPARATE LIVING KINDS, STEPHEN JAY GOULD, Harvard, “Our modern phyla represent designs of great distinctness, yet our diverse world contains nothing in between sponges, corals, insects, snails, sea urchins, and fishes (to choose standard representatives of the most prominent phyla).”, Natural History, p.15, Oct. 1990

      “From 1860 onward the more distant fossil record became a big issue, and over the next two decades discoveries were made that at first seemed to give support to the theory particularly the claimed discovery of a well-ordered sequence of fossil horse’ dating back about 45 million years. Successes like this continue to be emphasized both to students and the public, but usually without the greater failures being mentioned. Horses according to the theory should be connected to other orders of mammals, which common mammalian stock should be connected to reptiles, and so on backward through the record.
      Horses should thus be connected to monkeys and apes, to whales and dolphins, rabbits, bears. … But such connections have not been found. Each mammalian order can be traced backward for about 60 million years and then, with only one exception the orders vanish without connections to anything at all. The exception is an order of small insect-eating mammal that has been traced backward more than 65 million years…”

      Hoyle, Sir Frederick [late mathematician, physicist and Professor of Astronomy, Cambridge University], “Mathematics of Evolution,” [1987], Acorn Enterprises: Memphis TN, 1999, p.107.

    • nworder

      It is you that believes in the tooth fairy – the fairy that stuck her evolutionary wand in the muddy pool and created the first LIVING cell – just like that.! lol

      “… Life cannot have had a random beginning … The trouble is that there are about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all in a random trial is only one part in 10 to the power of 40,000, an outrageously small probability that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup. If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training into the conviction that life originated on the Earth, this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court …”
      (Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe, Evolution from Space)

      “The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 noughts after it … It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution … if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.”
      (Sir Fred Hoyle, astronomer, cosmologist and mathematician, Cambridge University)

      “…An intelligible communication via radio signal from some distant galaxy would be widely hailed as evidence of an intelligent source. Why then doesn’t the message sequence on the DNA molecule also constitute prima facie evidence for an intelligent source? After all, DNA information is not just analogous to a message sequence such as Morse code, it is such a message sequence.”
      (Charles B Thaxton, Walter L Bradley and Robert L Olsen: The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Reassessing Current Theories (New York Philosophical Library 1984) pp 211-212)

      “Evolution lacks a scientifically acceptable explanation of the source of the precisely planned codes within cells without which there can be no specific proteins and hence, no life.”
      (David A Kaufman, Ph.D., University of Florida, Gainsesville)

      “Is it really credible that random processes could have constructed a reality, the smallest element of which – a functional protein or gene – is complex beyond … anything produced by the intelligence of man?”
      (Molecular biologist Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (London: Burnett Books, 1985) p 342.)

    • Julie

      fairytale crap toothfairy noah ark weird creation myths, fairy god father….vegetable..

    • texastea2

      What? Was there some point? Made up myth. Jolly green giant etc etc point iz they all have something in common with “god” They do not really exist.

    • Julie

      You need a break. Really, let people believe what they want and you make something of the life you have. Find peace.

    • texastea2

      bI have always let people believe what they want to believe.You were the one who wrote about how sexual predators were waiting for me all because I did not believe in your god. I could care less what you or anyone else believes.You christians online do not like it when someone tells you that the book you believe tells of magical battles and how ( according to you and others out here) all the filthy sexually obsessed stupid deviant abusive murdering scum that did not believe the magical story passed down and evolved for 2000 yrs when they read the same book , told as you were that it is all fact. You are the one that OVERREACTED of course you know that.It is meme like behaviour passed down as strategy for dealing with ” non believers or infidels if you prefer. It’s okay I have been through this almost exact thing with christians many times. Nothing new or surprising.( besides your bizarre attitude towards sex as if anybody that enjoys it is a rapist if male and a tramp if female. Besides ( it always appears as you guys forget or disregard your saviors teaching of not judging not worrying not fearing ) but loving a

    • Julie

      Where in the world did I tell you sex predators were waiting for you….you misconstrue like so much and over react with all sorts of elementary and juvenile stereotyping…that doesn’t even bear up to facts.

      You are really needing help…give yourself a break. Really, take a break, think about something else, and find inner peace because whatever your belief system is at present, it is not helping you at all.

    • texastea2

      “The biggest consumers of kiddie porn is American men(which by the way is false) they are waiting for you”
      That is what YOU WROTE.
      Now either they await me because I am some kiddie porn leader ie sexual predator or you are hoping I am a child ” kiddie” and the predators are waiting for me ( the kiddie)
      Construe that however you want.You amaze me as the clever nworder ( even his synonym is “n sensetive”.) does with your arrogance you misconstrue as learned knowledge.Such hypocrites.

    • Julie

      So true about the biggest consumers of kiddie porn and child sex trafficking…you missed it on tv last week.

      You need to realize that you promote free sex and sex is good and no sense of morality or right or wrong….you could be like those who eventually get hurt by sexual license. I was relating back to you…

      Your choice and depth of your hyperboles of words.

      You describe a type of perception that certainly doesn’t jive with millions of faith based people in our country, who likewise uphold the sanctity of human life and permanent marriage the best in raising our children.

      You misconstrue and create a belief system anybody with any sense doesn’t believe think you are so much better.

      So don’t go around naming people hypocrites either.

      You need to take care of yourself and stay out of faith issues…it has been around since the beginning of mankind and likewise there are all sorts of faith and belief practices.

      Just leave it alone and find peace in the good that surrounds you.

    • texastea2

      What you need to realize is the fact that I “promote” none of the things you claim I do. Just more runhgcchhcchhgfhijbvsunsuu

    • Julie

      Your posts lack reason and common sense.

    • texastea2

      Ouch coming from someone I hold in such high esteem for their reasoning and common sense LMBO I am absolutely crushed.We all cannot be as brilliant as you so please forgive me. I am striving to emulate your superior intellect.It is so great however I might need infinite time to even come close. You and God must get lonely.

    • Julie

      Look at your use of language…it is meaningless…and not bright…just parroting…
      I gave you references…so start reading and then see what you don’t know.

    • texastea2

      Oh my I have seen the light thanks to your rantings on your obsession with sex. I do not care about your references they prove nothing. They are opinions. I did get a laugh out of your one reference IT WAS ON TV that was a good one. Keep em coming they are well thought out. Your language skills are simply unmatched your use of “hyperbole…words”was simply ingenious. What it must be like to have such command of the english language. Again keep it coming. I feel privledged to read such brilliant articulate rantings. Thanks.

    • Julie

      You are very immature…

    • texastea2

      Thanks for your reply.

    • Julie

      How in the world can you call over a billion Catholics lonely.

      The Vatican Library holds so many contributions by Catholics to the world.

      Check it out and get educated….

      Again, I think you are thinking Christianity is some sort of small cult superstitious group….a stereotype.

      You stereotype…again…either get educated into what true Christianity is or let it go….because all the things you say fall back on you…..

      No you need to forgive yourself for keeping yourself so narrow minded and prejudice.

    • texastea2

      Try reading the post AGAIN.I will help you out. “YOU AND GOD MUST GET LONELY” Word for word exact quote. You read THAT and then you proclaim that you just read a post stating that all catholics are lonely. Next time just do not bother to read the post. Just start tapping out some angry nonsensical rant. One on the other end would never even know. Perhaps I will post that I saw a gay man in Rome and you can respond back stating what an ignorant uneducated blasphemis satan worshiper I am for writing that the Pope is Gay. Good greif and good luck.

    • Julie

      Again…you are not making any sense….beause you don’t know what you are even talking about.

    • texastea2

      Forgive me but you come across as someone in need of psychiatric help.I could not have pointed out more clearly your false proclamations. This
      discussion is over. You apparently cannot read english.

    • Julie

      I think you need to go back and look at all the name calling you initiated…

      You won’t find Santa Claus or the tooth fairy or whatever in any Catholic institution.

      You are very good at making all sorts of slurs about people of faith, but when someone calls you on it,…you really get off.

      You refuse to educate yourself…you can find excerpts of what sources I gave you easily on the internet…and they don’t mention any of the nonsense you accuse people of faith and reason as having.

    • texastea2

      Try educating yourself visit the national academy of science, Oxford University , Royal academy Harvard university even a few in your neck of the woods Universiyy of Alabama University of Texas Berkley the list goes on and on and on. I never called you anything until you just kept on and on.
      Calling a magical creator as the one in the bible portrays as no different than believing in the tooth fairy santa sun god zues or the jolly green giant. Is different than lets say calling you silly immature and uneducated. Or saying you have no idea or that your use of language is childish( sound familiar?) The proof for their existence is identical to your proof that jesus was a devine being that walked on gwater and changed wine into water.The proof is the same. You laugh and ridicule those that believe something that actually has scientific evidence to support their beliefs if it diffrrs from yours. Simply put not my problem. Again we are done
      I will continue to be just fine and I hope you will as well. If you do not like people saying your belief in your religion is equated to belief in the tooth fairy. I would suggest you stop telling others it is a fact. Sometimes the truth hur

    • Julie

      What kind of degree do you have?????

      You are a sick person…you use language such as matical creator, the tooth fairy, santa, sun god zeus…your spelling is wrong…or the jolly green giant.

      This is junk out of your head.

      You should study the Vatican Library and see that it is the Church that laid the foundation of a humane society, gave women and girls the right to an education, who established hospitals and hospices, founded schools and universities that the pagans and atheists never did.

      You are totally ignorant so don’t be attacking true faith…that is always united with reason…You don’t realize how off base you are.

      You are sick.

    • texastea2

      So be it. Poor dumb me. Should have been killed with the thousands upon thousands of women burned and tortured by the catholic church for witchcraft. You win. Your superior knowlege is obvious. Pat yourself on the back.
      Oh yeah I just seen another story of preist molesting little boys and the church covering it up!!!! Probably my sick dumb self imagining things AGAIN Thanks for the reply .Have a good day.
      I do apologize for the spelling but it is a cheap mobile. Hope it helps you understand english better.

    • Julie

      Thought we believed in the tooth fairy…

      Your claims are unsubstantiated. And you refuse to open your mind…spin zone….we will all be held accountable for everything coming out of our mouths…including lies.

    • nworder

      In all your posts you have not provided one single evidence for evolution – just

      bluff and bluster signifying nothing.

      “”The fossil record with its abrupt transitions offers no support for gradual change…” (Dr. Stephen Jay Gould, famous Harvard Professor of Paleontology)”I admit that an awful lot of that has gotten into the textbooks as though it were true. For instance, the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs (in the American Museum) is the exhibit on horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has been presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook.
      Now I think that that is lamentable, particularly because the people who propose these kinds of stories themselves may be aware of the speculative nature of some of the stuff. But by the time it filters down to the textbooks, we’ve got science as truth and we’ve got a problem.” (Dr. Niles Eldridge, Curator of Invertebrate Paleontology at the American Museum)”

      The fundamental reason why a lot of paleontologists don’t care much for gradualism is because the fossil record doesn’t show gradual change and every paleontologist has know that ever since Cuvier.
      If you want to get around that you have to invoke the imperfection of the fossil record. Every paleontologist knows that most species, most species, don’t change. That’s bothersome if you are trained to believe that evolution ought to be gradual. In fact it virtually precludes your studying the very process you went into the school to study. Again, because you don’t see it, that brings terrible distress.” (Dr. Stephen Jay Gould)

    • nworder

      That’s what I have been hoping you do but you keep coming back
      – since satan will not give you up until you renounce him.

    • nworder

      Satan has always been against the WORD of God since he convinced Eve
      that God was lying and did not mean what He said.
      You can profess no belief in the powers of darkness even while being a servant of satan which is rebelling against the word of God.

    • nworder

      Even the Pharisees could find no sin in Jesus so the only thing they could get Him on was that he called himself God (in the flesh). The only son of God as part of the trinity. Jesus existed before He was born in the flesh.
      So if you find ant sin in Jesus then you are worse than the Pharisees.

    • Julie

      Hang it up

    • Julie

      Didn’t I tell you to let it go?….you are so mistaken…Get some rest

    • Julie

      Are you a student of Campbell, the guy who calls everything a myth???

      All this is subjective relativism.

    • texastea2

      That is as they say the gospel. They do not need assurance that their suffering will be rewarded when they -DIE especially when their trouble started when the “truth” arived on their doorstep in the late 15th century.
      I admire your love and compassion that is what humans are in need of. Not “spirituality” .Truth does not take away nor does it create poverty.It simply states the facts. False truths no matter how strongly felt “in ones heart” do humans grave harm however.
      Great conversing with you hope we do it again. Peace

    • Julie


    • JesusisLord

      pope francis is just a liberation theology jesuit, for crying out loud – DO SOME RESEARCH. he is false. the catholic institution is doomed, mark my words. JESUS CHRIST WOULD NOT SAY MANY of the things francis has said, no way, no how.
      but go ahead, you catholicizers, eviscerate me – yes, how dare i attack your pope. the one who thinks climate change is the greatest challenge we face globally. (pure deception)

    • Micha_Elyi

      Richard doesn’t believe Jesus, eh?

    • texastea2

      Nor the jolly green giant or jack in the bean stalk presumably. Hopefully.

    • Winston

      The gates of hell verse is speaking of Christ’s church, which is not the catholic church, which was created 300+ years after Christ’s death. Constantine was the consummate politician, not a man of the cloth.

    • Julie

      Just as the Vatican is not on 7 hills, Constantine was not a Christian, only baptized within days of his death.

      You are listening to one of those kooky American independent preacher men who can stand up to no truthful, documented historical facts.

      They need somebody to put down because they do not have enough upstairs in the head.

      Rather, note the world, that when the pope speaks it listens.

      Do yourself a favor and seek Christ in those who are well educated and can present facts and bring about the fruit of the Holy spirit. Christ did indeed institute one church, visible to the world, not one that is invisible full of thousands of sects where nobody wants to go to church with each other. I don’t like you, or etc., I will go to another church. So much of Christian charity.

      Check out the foundation of the liturgy, from the turn of the first century, less than 100 years after Christ’s death and resurrection. Note the books of Catholic Scripture are of the Septuagint tradition, same as Christ used, as well as the apostles and St. Paul’s. Then note the Church beginning with apostles and the appointed bishops. After that the tenants of the Creed found in the baptismal rites, which is Catholic.

      If you have received a Trinitarian baptism, which is a Catholic, OK, Katholic rite, — you are already baptized into the universal Church, be it West or East.

      When we mean Catholic, we are simply using the Greek work, international language then as English is today. Katholic meant all Christianity, both West and East.

    • texastea2

      Facts the use of the word is meaningless coming from the religous. Faith is not based on FACT!! Fear would be a better word.

    • Julie

      Why are you even bothering to read anything about religion???

    • texastea2

      It is not my reading about religion that bothrrs you it is my writing on the subject that does.
      I write about it hoping to make a small contribution to society. People believing that life begins “for real” when you die is killing us.

    • Opinionated

      Au contraire. Christ’s Church is the one He founded when He told Peter he was the rock on which He would build His Church. Peter was our first Pope as the first Bishop of Rome. He and the other apostles spread the Church. Constantine gave the Church appeal because he ended the practice of killing Christians under Roman rule.

    • texastea2

      Then the christians spread around the world killing native peoples and stealing all from them. HMM

    • jacobhalo

      The Catholic church was created 300 yrs. After the death of Jesus? In 107 A.D. Ignatius of Antioch “Whenever the bishops shall appear,there let the multitude also be; even as, Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic church.” In 155, Polycarp mentions the Catholic church
      I believe that you are talking about the Edict of Milan of 313, which allowed the Catholic Church to come out of the Catatcombs. Jesus Christ established the church. The word Catholic, which means universal, was used when it started to spread to other countries.

    • Winston

      You are bamboozled by catholic propaganda. It is a pagan institution that co-opted Christianity to achieve its temporal ambitions. It’s doctrine, its holidays and its priestly garb are all pagan. The robes and mitre are that which were worn by the priests of Mithras. The Vatican is built of its temple site. St. Peter’s Basilica sports the pregnant belly of Isis while the Obelisk represents the phallus of Osiris. Interesting how complementary Washington DC is to that arrangement. Soon you will discover how corrupt this institution has been throughout history. Wish I could remember the title of this book but it is a comprehensive but older work on the history of the papacy. These men were absolute scoundrels. The escapades are jaw-dropping. How can you respect this institution?

      Pope Sixtus IV (1471–1484). According to the published chronicle of the Italian historian Stefano Infessura, “Diary of the City of Rome”, Sixtus was a “lover of boys and sodomites” – awarding benefices and bishoprics in return for sexual favours, and nominating a number of young men as cardinals; some of whom were celebrated for their good looks.[47][48][49] However, Infessura had partisan allegiances to the Colonna and so is not considered to be always reliable or impartial.[50]

      Pope Leo X (1513–1521) was allegedly a practising homosexual, according to some modern and contemporary sources (Francesco Guicciardini and Paolo Giovio). He was alleged to have had a particular (albeit one-sided) infatuation for Marcantonio Flaminio.[53]

      Pope Julius III (1550–1555) was alleged to have had a long affair with Innocenzo Ciocchi del Monte. The Venetian ambassador at that time reported that Innocenzo shared the pope’s bed.[

      Pope Alexander VI (1492–1503) had a long affair with Vannozza dei Cattanei while still a priest, but before he became pope; and by her had his illegitimate children Cesare, Giovanni Borgia, Gioffre Borgia, and Lucrezia. A later mistress, Giulia Farnese, was the sister of Alessandro Farnese, and she gave birth to a daughter (Laura) while Alexander was in his 60s and reigning as pope.[51] Alexander fathered at least seven, and possibly as many as ten illegitimate children, and did much to promote his family’s interests – using his offspring to build alliances with a number of important dynasties.[52] He appointed Giovanni Borgia as Captain General of the Church, and made Cesare a Cardinal of the Church – also creating independent duchies for each of them out of papal lands.

      Pope John XII (955–963) was accused by his adversaries of adultery and incest.[31][32] The monk Benedict of Soracte noted in his volume XXXVII that he “liked to have a collection of women”. According to Liutprand of Cremona in his Antapodosis,[24] “they testified about his adultery, which they did not see with their own eyes, but nonetheless knew with certainty: he had fornicated with the widow of Rainier, with Stephana his father’s concubine, with the widow Anna, and with his own niece, and he made the sacred palace into a whorehouse.” According to E. R. Chamberlin, John XII was “a Christian Caligula whose crimes were rendered particularly horrific by the office he held”.[33] Some sources report that he was rumoured to have died 8 days after being stricken by paralysis while in the act of adultery,[31] others that he was killed by the jealous husband while in the act of committing adultery.[34][35][36][37] (See also Saeculum obscurum)

      This is just a small sampling. You can turn a blind eye, but this is a gnostic, deceiving institution.

    • Julie

      Again you are cherry picking and with out context.

    • Chris Blackington

      All your knowledge about the Holy Church has come from hostile sources. You owe it to yourself to see what the church says about itself. At the moment you are like somebody finding out about Jews by reading nazi propaganda.

    • Helene

      …and Judas was one of Christ’s apostles. That doesn’t mean the other 11 were apostates. The Church was founded by Jesus Christ Himself, but it is made up of fallible human beings. If the Catholic Church was indeed a false church, it could not have lasted 2000+ years. That’s proof the Holy Spirit is guiding it.

    • Saints InProgress Chowchilla

      I think you can clear up a lot by checking out Catholic Answers at and radio broadcast Catholic Answers Live on EWTN Global Catholic Radio Network at 3:00 PM Pacific
      Fellow Saint in Progress

    • Julie

      The Catholic Church began at Pentecost.

      All Constantine did was sign the Edict of Milan that made Christianity legal. He was a pagan up to days before his death.

      This spin about Constantine came out this past century. Before that people had enough education within Protestantism to know this is not true.

      But evangelicals and other non denominationals have cut off the 7 sacraments except Trinitarian baptism…so when the roots are just about all cut off and as time passes, it is very hard to communicate as they have lost so much the sense of Church and the desire to learn church history.

    • texastea2

      Jesus was a jew not a christian.

    • desertvoice

      Jesus was a Christian from Eternity!

    • texastea2

      If jesus ever even existed he eas a jew.

    • desertvoice

      Before the Jews were, Jesus was God!

    • texastea2

      if you lived 4000 years ago I would bet that your “truth” would have been way different. Yet ironically your knowing of the absolute real truth would have still depended upon your place of birth just as it does today in large part.With the exception of the scientific community and those that question “the facts without any evidence whatsoever” and take the time to learn on their own.

    • desertvoice

      No one is forcing you to believe what others believe!

    • texastea2

      Now there is something we agree on.Nor am I trying to force anyone to believe anything.So I really do not understand your reply.
      I would and do encourage people to educate themselves look at the evidence of combined human knowlege and come to their conclusions based on the evidence.
      Faith simply means to believe something with out any evidence whatsoever.

    • nworder

      You believe in the Darwinian fairy story even no evidence has been found
      so you are into religion and blind faith in a big way.

      You believe that all the matter of the universe popped out of a tiny speck in a few minutes (God said He took a day – 24 hours) – all the laws of thermodynamics were suspended including the unbreakable 1ST Law .

      This takes blind faith on your part.

      You believe that the magic muddy pool fairy touched the water and made the first cell with billions of DNA code , a membrane and about billions of other mechanisms.
      Impossible – there is no simple cell when you study even a little biology. Darwin in his ignorance thought it was a “blob” . You dont have that excuse.

      EVIDENCE A MATTER OF FAITH, A.C. SEWARD, Cambridge, PLANT LIFE THROUGH THE AGES, p.561, “The theoretically primitive type eludes our grasp; our faith postulates its existence but the type fails to materialize.”

      “WE KNEW BETTER”, NILES ELDREDGE, Columbia Univ., American Museum Of Natural History, “And it has been the paleontologist my own breed who have been most responsible for letting ideas dominate reality: …. We paleontologist have said that the history of life supports that interpretation [gradual adaptive change], all the while knowing that it does not.”, TIME FRAMES, 1986, p.144

    • desertvoice

      What matters is that faith saves! And humans like and need to be saved millions of times, historically, in everyman’s life! This is why, historically, it pays to believe!

    • texastea2

      What??? Have a good life people need the truth. Then they might work harder to save themselvez from themselves. Instead the wars and hunger suffering all must hsppen before jesus comes down and reigns foreverall part of the gods plan. That rubbish does not save our species. IT WILL DESTROY IT.

    • desertvoice

      Faith is not for all, I have said this before. First and foremost, faith is for those who want to live eternally! You are clearly not one of those!

    • texastea2

      Like I have previously stated. Faith is simply believing in something that has no evidence to substantiate it. Believing in something that all evidence poits to it not being true yet believing.
      We can only hope tat the faithfu do not lead us all to extinction i their zealous attempts to make their prophesy come true. Once the war they look forward to is over and those that survive see that no omnipotent ghost comes down and saves them for “eternity”( whichincidentally most humans do not fully comprehend) then humans can hopefully begin anew without killing each other over whos mythical creation stories are right.
      It appears nothing short of that will stop the self destruction of our species. Have a wonderful life.Thanks for conversing. May we all find the truth someday.It really is not important.What is important is saving this rock in the incomprehencably expansive universe so humans can live in peace and harmony as a species

    • nworder

      But you need blind faith to believe in evolution and there is no evidence – you have not come up with one example.

      “In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists accepted it and many are prepared to ‘bend’ their observations to fit in with it.”

      H. J. Lipson, F.R.S. “A physicist looks at evolution” Physics Bulletin, vol 31, 1980

      “I think we need to go further than this and admit that the only acceptable explanation is creation. I know this is an anathema to physicists, as indeed it is to me, but we must not reject a theory that we do not like if the experimental evidence supports it.”

      H. S. Lipson; Prof of Physics, University of Manchester, A paper published by The Institute of Physics, IOP Publishing Ltd., 1980

    • nworder

      Thats strange I thought the religion of evolution is about wiping out the weakest – as Darwin Stalin Hitler Mao Pol Pot etc believed.

      If the species were created through Jesus then your religion of evolution is rubbish.

      “GOOD RECORD-BAD PREDICTION, NILES ELIDRIDGE, Columbia Univ., American Museum of Nat. Hist., “He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search. … One hundred and twenty years of paleontological research later, it has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” The Myths of Human Evolution, p.45-46

    • texastea2

      Someday after the huge war religous fanatics create and FINALLY understand that the great toothfairy is not coming ALL churches and mosques etc etc… will fade away and humanbeings can finally end this horrible chapter in our history and begin to move forward.

    • jdh63

      seriously, are you so arrogant to think that Jesus Christ was talking about the catholic institution, and NOT HIS universal body of born-again believers? Ohhhhh, I get it, since Jesus was talking to Peter, (whom you have co-opted to be your first “Catholic” leader, you assume Jesus is talking about your catholic institution). Well, Peter doesnt “belong” to the Catholics, ok? He is Christ’s servant, and a leader of the early Christians after Christ ascended. Has nothing to do with Catholicism.
      The Catholic Church as an institution will pass away, make no mistake. Only Jesus’ true spotless Bride will welcome Him when He returns, and that Bride has nothing to do with the catholic institution. so PLEASE, stop the misguided arrogance.

    • BrandonR

      fact: Jesus established a church (that has BOTH visible and invisible qualities). fact: Jesus gave authority to his apostles. fact: Jesus’ apostles appointed successors. fact: there is an unbroken chain of successors that lead the Catholic Church today.

      Stop assigning your own interpretations to scriputures in Revelation.

    • Julie

      The Church is not on a hill.

      The Church is across the Tiber on low land.

      You need to get your facts straight and you can only do that when you seek the truth of Jesus Christ.

      BTW, Jerusalem and Athens are on 7 hills……and so are countless cities in the world…Seattle is on 7 hills and is up there with Portland with the most casual sex in the country…..

    • Winston



      You should do more reading and less LOL’s, you might learn something….

    • Winston

      Practice what you preach. Reading is how I garnered this knowledge–decades of it. Perhaps you only read catholic propaganda. Try the truth. Christian I am, a Bible-believing Christian. I excommunicated myself from the Catholic Church when I learned the truth.

    • Julie

      Are you an SDA?

    • Bellfri

      Much to our delight.

    • Julie

      Study geography.

    • AugustineThomas

      I’d be more worried about your forty thousand thirty-man churches constantly warring with each other and the One True Church.

    • Julie

      The 7 hills of Rome do not have the Vatican…it is across the Tiber River….and not on a hill.

      But I wonder if you live in a city or town near you that have 7 hills….there is Jerusalem for a starter, as well as Athens, Greece….a Catholic fellow got his geography book out and gave the protestant a long list of cities with 7 hills.

    • Chris Blackington

      Richard, Richard…. see my previous comment please

    • desertvoice

      Jesus has said that “the powers of hell will not be able to destroy His Church”! I trust His word!

    • Julie

      The 7 hills of Rome do not include the Vatican…It is across the Tiber River and not on the 7 hills….

      So is Athens, Jerusalem, and countless other cities in the world, including Seattle that has 7 hills..Portland Or has 7 bridges.

    • Micha Elyi

      Jerusalem is on seven hills. So is Cincinatti, Ohio and Cincinatti has sin in its name–twice!

      And Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 A.D.–prophecy fulfilled!

      Meanwhile, the Church founded by Jesus whose vicar of the Rock resides in the Vatican; the Church which compiled, authorized, promulgated, translated, and preserved the Bible (all of it!) continues on struggling against the Gates of Hell.

      Richard, if you really knew your Bible you’d be Catholic.

    • Julie

      Rome is on 7 hills…if you are still around and hoping you have also spent some time away from your SDA mindset…the Vatican is across the Tiber and not on 7 hills.

      You should find out if your town is sitting on 7 hills…or is it Jerusalem, or Athens?….somebody out there gave a long list of cities and towns situated on 7 hills.

    • AugustineThomas

      Since the Church has emphasized “commonalities” it has emptied out.

    • Winston

      The smoke of satan entered the Vatican at Vatican II.

    • Julie

      Well, it entered actually the sanctuary, according to Pope Paul VI, when there were fallen priests who entered into satanism.

      And likewise devout Catholics retained the faith, though marginalized, including priests and bishops….Revelations 12 speaks of the stars swept by the dragon’s tail, 1/3 from the sky…consecrated souls.

      The American and Canadian seminaries were allegedly infiltrated by communists to ….their words, protestantize our faith…meaning to remove ancient disciplines, embracing one’s cross and doing penance.

      Satan was given the 20th century to destroy the Church from within. It is now being cleaned out. Things are changing. And this is also why Pope John Paul II said that the next millenium would be a new spring time for Christianity….beginning with the families.

      Check out St. Francis’ of Assisi’s letter to Catholics written in 1221.

      Be ware of easy religion that treats God commonly or has to put other Christians down or condemn them using compromised and condemning bible passages, making them speak a different message of….hate.

    • Winston

      Your faith should be in Jesus Christ, not the Catholic Church. The RCC is antichristian. You will find out soon.

    • Julie

      The Church finds its life in Jesus Christ. Its deposit of faith is Christ. The members of the Church focus our entire life on the Lord.

      You should not be making such terrible judgments about the Church based on what.

      You are following false teachers. They are teaching you misconceptions…and your faith is based on hatred and not on the Lord.

      If you did, you would seek the truth in all things.

      Just because the Catholic Church is large, it is made up of human beings, not images. You have no concept of how much hurt your cult makes on innocent people.

    • Winston

      Speaking of images, have you read the real ten commandments in Exodus 20? Conveniently, the catholic church leaves this out of its version, as if it is okay for the RCC to alter God’s commandments: You shall not make unto you any graven images.

    • Julie

      Then when you get into an accident some day…I actually hope you don’t….then don’t call for an ambulance, just pray to get help.

      The Book of Maccabees was removed by Luther 1500 years later….from there so many denominations sprung up, each one following men and not Christ and His apostles and their successors.

      If you ask for someone to pray for you, you are already asking for intercessory prayers. You are not seeing that person as God but someone to also pray with you for your intentions.

      You die, you have chosen Christ, you live in Him. There is no second death. People in heaven don’t sit on clouds…they pray with the angels and saints for the perseverance of the just and the conversion of sinners, and pray with us for all our needs…afterall, Scripture says heaven watches us with a thousand eyes…….

    • Winston

      Julie, there is another lie you must overcome. The Catholic Church is not the apostolic succession of Peter. Jesus never made Peter a pope. When he was talking about the “rock,” Jesus was speaking of Himself. Read the Bible and see how many verses confirm that Jesus is the rock or the stone or the cornerstone. Further, several times Peter states in his epistles that he is only a man and an apostle of Christ. The RCC interpreted this verse in its favor. That is why there is always more than one witness in the Bible to verify context, concepts and understanding of usage. Read the Bible. It will open your eyes.

      Peter never, ever went to Rome let alone preach in Rome. Paul did. Peter was never buried in Rome. His tomb was found in Israel. Research and as the Bible states, “It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.” — Psalms 118:8

      “Thus says the Lord: “Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart turns away from the Lord. He is like a shrub in the desert, and shall not see any good come. He shall dwell in the parched places of the wilderness, in an uninhabited salt land.” — Jeremiah 17:5-6
      Julie, please read the Bible and please focus on unfulfilled prophecy. God bless. . .

    • Julie

      You are the one who is looking at man too much. Non denominationals cannot perceive our focus…which is on Christ alone. We adorn the House of the Lord, just as is reflected in the building of the ancient temple. Our altars are adorned as such because ours is the fulfillment of the inner sanctuary, which by the way had two ‘graven’ images of angels on both sides of the Mercy Seat.

      Note the Lord’s dwelling is called the Mercy Seat.

      Likewise you are not look at documented history 2000 years ago.

      You are reading certain sources…seen those claims, read those claims and read rebuttals…

      Cherry picking to support oppositional and anti-Church bias, man oriented Christianity based on one’s hang ups and bias. It is not God centered..those who seek the truth, but merciless.

      We cannot base our faith on our own self-righteousness, but on the Lord’s grace that enlightens our faith.

      If you understood the nature and mission of the Church, let alone read objective history…you would not be in the situation you are in.

      Atleast put your focus on Christ, let God be God and let God take care of the Catholic Church…me included.

    • Winston

      How is my focus not on Jesus Christ by sharing the truths of the Gospel with you? He has commanded us to do so. With all due respect, my research is extensive, not lukewarm. I pray a God opens your eyes. Be well.

    • Julie

      You are basing your anti Catholicism on misconceptions.

      You are following divisive men.

      You should go to….find the article on Catholics and Muslims….a talk was given on Palestine….but when he mentioned Catholics, the whole place reacted most intensely by the Protestants.

      You should spend your time in prayer and reflection and seek the truth.

      Shoebat is a former Muslim who became an Evangelical Christian. There is alot of time thinking about the Rapture and other things….and not seeing the reality of what is coming. He used to teach his children to throw stones at icons.

      Then he came to see what the Catholic Church teaches, its history and now he publicly repents for the slander he caused our Church.

      There is no substantiation whatever based on your opinion. Two thousand years of documented history, consistency in faith and practice, Sacred Scriptures using the tradition by the Lord Himself and His apostles and St. Paul, the bishopry and the creed…..and sacred worship….all in place by 100 AD.

      We don’t follow opinions of individual men.


      Winston you are correct he did because THIS is the Church he must destroy, he’s not to worried about the others is he?

    • Sister,

      This is a grave error. We need the “sacred” and not the “profane”, the “secular”, or the “humanistic”.
      This man, whom you call “pope”, is a Freemason; and for anyone who has the basic knowledge of our Catechism, much of what he declares is heretical and blasphemous.
      How can a pope talk in front of the European Parliament and COMPLETELY omit the name of JESUS CHRIST? This is unacceptable.

      Please, pray for discernment, for it is the “angel of light” who is the “wolf in sheep’s clothes”.
      Listen to what the Mother of God Has Said in Her apparitions. Read the Book of Revelation. Understand the St. Michael the Archangel Prayer, and know that the 100 years between 1917 to 2017 was the century of Satan: the False Prophet, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, is going to be followed by the Antichrist very soon.
      Then, the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church will fall, and the Remnant Church of the true faithful will raise – for the gates of hell shall never prevail against her.

      AMEN + + +

    • Dugger

      Now the Pope says I am evil because I design and build machines to protect Christians…eg..USN and USA and USAF…has he lost his mind? This Pope is not next to GOD, he does not talk to GOD. He is a FRAUD.

      Everybody on this site is TOO sex centric, you all think SEX is the only important subject…IT IS NOT…YOU FOOLS think SEX is the most important thing in the world while the world burns dumb shits…GOD don’t care about reproduction..he cares about integelent thought: when you die do you think he will interrogat you about who and when you fucked him he don’t care…he will be more interested in what you did for mankind, how did you help your race..the human race. He wont care about what is between your loans…irrewlevant..what did you do to help your fellow man? Have you ever contribyuted anything towards more perfection in the human race, or are you simply more concerned with avoiding sin of SEX, Get your heads out of your ass and understand what GOD demands!

    • Julie

      Too bad Protestant ecclesial communities cannot focus more on Christ as we do.

      Thankful we don’t hear about anybody being bad at Catholic Mass. I don’t go there to hear gossip and slander about fellow human beings, our separated brethren in Christ, but come to the Lord to receive and grow in him.

    • Winston

      The catholic mass and transubstantiation are pagan practices. There is no purgatory, man cannot atone for his sins by good works, and you can’t pay a loved one’s way out of purgatory with deceitful indulgences. Mary was not immaculately conceived, was no longer a virgin after the birth of Christ and was not assumed into heaven nor is she an intercessor to Jesus Christ. These are just a few anti-biblical tenets embraced by the pagan RCC.

    • Julie

      Another falsehood from your cult…

    • Winston

      Every day, in every church, in every city/nation globally the RCC is killing Jesus over and over and over again. Then you are eating his body and drinking his blood, concepts that are steeped in Satanism and rebuked by the Old Testament. On the cross, Jesus said, “It is finished.” Yet, the RCC is killing Him over and over everyday, through multiple masses in multiple churches. I don’t think you really know what you are involved in. Perhaps you had better make a study of the Old Testament.

    • YouCannotHandleTheTruth

      Satanism is a Jewish cult.

    • JEM

      As well as Roman Catholicism which is a blend of mysticism, Judaism and Babylonian mystery religion. Have you heard about the satanic rituals held in the catacombs below the Vatican? Very credible witnesses have come forth. We shall see some very vile things soon as we spiral into the last of the last days.

    • Winston

      I am not involved in any cult. I am a simple biblical Christian. Would you prefer that I lie to you? The truth shall set you free. . .it did me.

    • Julie

      Free from what?

      The bible alone…no church, no authority, no intercessory prayers for you, no consecrated to discern truth from false in each generation where the Word of God gives Life.

      Sorry, I don’t believe in the Lone Ranger bible alone religion. Christ did not pass out bibles, the apostles didn’t and alot of people then and now cannot read. Rather it is Christ Himself Who is present in Word and Sacrament…by those chosen by Him and given authority to manifest the fullness of the Lord.’

      Sorry….no Lone Rangers accountable to no one.

    • nworder

      “Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ ” St Jerome.

      “Man cannot live by bread alone but by EVERY WORD (the whole bible) that proceedeth from the mouth of God ”

      The ‘sword of the spirit” is the Word of God – ie the scriptures.

      Without this sword we cannot defeat Satan – Jesus used the words of srcripture to make the devil flee when He was tempted in the wilderness.

      The average member of the CC is woefully inadequate in scripture study – 5 minutes a week is a drop in the ocean. But even if you go to mass every day it will take years to get through only part of the bible.

    • Julie

      If you go to Mass for Cycle A – Matthew plus the Old T estament and Psalms, Cycle B which is Mark, plus OT and Psalms, and then Cycle C – St. Luke with OT and Psalms, these cycles each last one year. If you go to Mass every day for 3 years you will have heard the whole Bible…just like the ancients did rather than books in their hands.

      When we hear the Word of God — it is the Eucharist that brings the Word to life and gives it understanding and brings us in to the Eternal presence of the Lord,
      I Am Who Am, and thus to know all the pages of Scripture alone without the Church communion is different and you learn linear…one page at atime, and you cannot understand the various parts.

      You can read a book and get a certain impression of the story. You can sit face to face with the story teller and each of you can pick up where things aren’t clear or you can ask questions to ask what they mean or to clarify. That is what happens at Mass.

      The other great event that transcends individual reading of Scripture is to hear the Word of God in the assembly at Mass. The readings of the Old and New Testament come to life and it is as if we are in this great arena hearing the same Good News as our forefathers amidst the Lord’s people.

      So in this the Word becomes infleshed by the Eucharist among us, breaking open and giving life to the Word and the communion with those who have gone before us in the walk of faith, going back to the ancient Jewish people.

      So we don’t have time to put down anybody as our focus is not on people but on the Lord and His people.

    • Winston

      The RCC mass will not get you into heaven. I know how the RCC picks and chooses verses that they can manipulate and take out of context. Reading verses randomly loses the real context in that book and chapter. Read it yourself.

    • Julie

      The Mass IS heaven on earth and we commune with Jesus and that is how you go to heaven….

      I was thinking about you at Mass today….so it took 300 years with many people to assemble the Bible….and the Church has been lived out for 2000 years….but then you are want to follow those who have been around 500 years who want to pick and choose text to suit their particular way of looking at things.

      When you do that…you end up in oppositional position.

      That is partly why it is a waste of time to argue with a Catholic, even though we are not set up or even hear about anybody else at Church because we are Christ focused.

    • nworder

      A common myth – the council merely authenticated the scriptures which were already in circulation and were well known to genuine christians – it did not take 300 years – the NT scripture were all complete at the time of writing and before 70 ad at the latest.
      They were put into one Canon at the council but had been circulated for 250 years – a long time .

      There are many differences in the CC but they are hidden under one umbrella.

      There were seven “different” churches in Asia – which must have had various practices and attitudes since Jesus gave each one a different letter – a report card.
      If there had been only one church in dominion then only one letter to the Roman church would have sufficed.
      I believe in the theological position that these 7 churches are TYPES of churches but also a TIMELINE to the end .
      We are now in the Laodicean age the “lukewarm” “people power ” age .
      So we could have a philadelphian (brotherly love) church (most commended) in the Laodicean age or vice versa .

      No christian should avoid these letters which are short but have a supernatural depth. There are many excellent commentaries on this topic and you have Jesus’s blessing at the beginning for those who read and understand.

      We have different catholic churches eg the SSPX versus the “Liberal” CC
      and catholic “prophets” who have large followings but are not recognised by Rome.

    • Julie

      Sorry, try again.

      I would recommend to you, if you can handle it because it is Catholic and I don’t know if you have ever read anything defending Christ’s Church and its history…
      ‘Consume the Word’, the explains the background of the development of the Bible…by Dr Scott Hahn, another former anti-Catholic Calvinist.

      He was a most highly educated ordained minister when he slipped into a Catholic Church. He sat in the back pew and did not want anyone to know he was there.

      But he began to understand the movement of the Mass, the symbols and the ritual.

      It is just that I worked all last night on a hospice case and don’t have the energy to debate you…as well as wondering what good it would do.

      It is better to pray for people like yourself. You spend too much time being this way…you should take your energy and use it to find the Lord in a greater way. You are wasting your time.

    • nworder

      I am a catholic and have read Scott Hahn . You have said nothing of substance to debate what I have said. What “way” am I ?

    • Julie

      The problem is that these comments in response to an article are not the place to debate.

      Have you read Dr Hahn’s ‘Consume the Word’, that gives a concise history of how the Bible was assembled…and yes it did take over 300 years. It took 200 years to verify the Book of Hebrews was to be used, that it was only 4 of the apostles that would be used for the Gospels…the epistles took more time….

      I think it good the Church took the time it did to ensure what we learn is edifying and building up the universal Church.

      If you are talking about different churches….did you know there are 22 rites within the Roman Catholic Church, one most common is the Maronite, the Chaldean, the Ethiopian,….for example.

      It is your use of language.

    • nworder

      Paul’s letters to the Hebrews , Corinthians would have been read out in and copied in the churches right away – there is no way they would lie on a church shelf for 200 years – there are authenticated scripture going right back to the

      to the apostles.

      New Testament 1st Cent. A.D. (A.D. 50-100)
      2nd Cent. A.D. (c. A.D. 130 f.)
      less than 100 years 5600 scripts accuracy of text 99.5%

      As you can see, there are thousands more New Testament Greek manuscripts than any other ancient writing. The internal consistency of the New Testament documents is about 99.5% textually pure. That is an amazing accuracy. In addition, there are over 19,000 copies in the Syriac, Latin, Coptic, and Aramaic languages. The total supporting New Testament manuscript base is over 24,000.

      Almost all biblical scholars agree that the New Testament documents were all written before the close of the First Century. If Jesus was crucified in A.D. 30., then that means the entire New Testament was completed within 70 years. This is important because it means there were plenty of people around when the New Testament documents were penned–people who could have contested the writings. In other words, those who wrote the documents knew that if they were inaccurate, plenty of people would have pointed it out. But, we have absolutely no ancient documents contemporary with the First Century that contest the New Testament texts.

    • Julie

      Thank you…good post…Agree….but it took time for the Church to affirm the books…the Bible Christians know just didn’t happen over night….and who put it together….

    • nworder

      The bible is not covered in 3 years even if you go every day which only a tiny minority do – so the weekly reading must be backed up by constant reading of scripture or you will have no sword of the spirit to defeat satan’s darts.

      EG The proverbs are so important for guidance but are not in the readings.
      This is the same in many churches so bible study is the most important leg of the faith to make up for the gaps.

      Communion is essential but must be along with bible study.

      Even if your arithmetic is correct if someone goes to church once a week it will therefore take 21 years to get through some of the bible since some of the readings will duplicate – not very inspiring.

    • Julie

      Again… my post to Winston.

    • Winston

      Put on the whole armor of God. Ephesians 6.

    • Winston

      Very sad to hear your misguided position. The New Testament had not yet been written during Jesus’ ministry. It was being lived. Further, Jesus read and referred to the Old Testament as the Holy inspired Word.

    • nworder

      This is a common myth. The NT letters and the gospel were written down almost immediately after the events – not 40 years later which would be absurd.
      Luke addresses his gospel to theophilus .
      You cant live a message unless you RECEIVE the message – you might receive it in writing or orally but you have to get it .
      Paul’s letter to the corinthians would have been read out in the churches right away – they did not sit on a shelf for 50 years . It would have been copied extensively and circulated among all the churches at the TIME they were written as well as the gospels and other NT letters.

      The early Jewish Christians were steeped in the OT and they knew how to preach the NT scripture – just because the NT may not have been in one bound book does not mean the NT gospels and letters sat on shelves gathering dust.

      The NT was written before the foundation of the world and is Jesus – the WORD made flesh – Jesus being the WORD.

      Even Revelations must have been written before 70 ad since there was no mention of the destruction of Jerusalem in Rev. or any other scripture.
      Plus the destruction was predicted by Jesus showing that all the NT was written down before 70 ad .

    • desertvoice

      Those who do not love Mary, do not love Jesus! That is a wound that the Reformation had visited upon the Church of Christ!

    • Winston

      Be careful what “christ” the RCC is referring to. If truth be told, the RCC puts more focus on Mary teaching that she is mediatrix which is heresy. It is not biblically supported nor is any immaculate conception, lifetime of virginity or assumption into heaven. Does scripture not tell us to verify all gospel messages with that of Scripture like good Bereans? Gid’s Word is the authority, not the RCC and its errant gospel message.

      Do we not see most RCC churches named after Mary and the saints?

    • Helene

      Would God break his own commandments? The 4th Commandment says to ‘Honour thy father and mother’. Jesus’ mother is to be honoured. If you dishonour her, you dishonour Christ. He gave her to all humanity from the Cross (see the Gospel of John). She was a consecrated virgin. When the Archangel Gabriel told her she was ‘full of grace’, that she would conceive and give birth to the Son of God, she replied ‘How could this be since I know no man?’ She was already betrothed to Joseph so if they were to have conjugal relationships she would not need to ask this question. That’s proof she had no intention of consummating her marriage. She remained a virgin even after Christ’s birth. If she had other children, how do you explain the fact that one of the last things Our Lord did from the cross was entrust her to John? That means there were no other children to take care of her. She also loves you and wants to intercede for you to her Son. That’s what she did at the wedding of Cana, she interceded for the married couple who had no wine.

    • Chris Blackington

      I recently suggested to a protestant friend that all his information about Catholicism came from sources hostile to the church, and that maybe getting his knowledge about the Holy Church in this way was like finding out about Judaism by reading Mein Kampf….

    • texastea2

      Next time you attend a ” woman must doas YOU want her to” rally stop by the orphanage and give some life to some of the thousands of children you could raise and nurture if you spent you money as your saviour TRIED to teach you.
      Jesus (according to the books written after his death WAY after ie new testament) would have helped the LIVING children. Not spent his time yelling baby killer and murderer at some poor woman.
      Besides you were taught to let god judge.Seems most christians have a learning disability.

    • Discipleinprogress

      it is not “anti-Church” so stop being so arrogant. Stop calling the Catholic institution the “Church” – it isnt. the Church of Jesus Christ is HIS BODY OF BELIEVERS WORLDWIDE, catholic or non-catholic. The very definition of the Church has nothing to do with the “Catholic” institution.

      How sad is it that so many Catholics love to mock non-catholics who give honest humble reproof to catholics, but most of the time catholics arrogantly discount it as just anti-catholic bias bla bla bla.

      Read the garbage, the LIES, that Francis spoke recently in the Phillipines to a huge gathering of youth. Blathering on about the greatest challenge facing mankind being climate change ????!!! ARE YOU KIDDING ME? That is a pack of lies, anyone who knows this trash spouted by these liars like al gore. and the global “pastor” of the catholic “church” agrees with al gore. Instead of talking about the REAL Greatest challenge: THAT OF A LOST & DYING WORLD DYING WITHOUT JESUS CHRIST.
      Oh, no, it’s GLOBAL WARMING.

      open your eyes, people. seriously.

    • Collin Wahlund

      Sadly this is the kind of nonsense having no authority except one’s only “God given” interpretation of scripture brings. Funny how Protestants all are infallibly guided by God in their pure interpretation of scripture yet come to thousands of different conclusions.

      Would an all wise and loving God leave His people with no guidance other than personal preferences in how to follow His Son’s holy will? No, He did not leave us spiritual orphans, He gave us His Church. The one He specifically gave Peter the keys to bind and loose sins in His name and He said would be with us until the end of time and that would never fall.

      Did this Church magically disappear and make Christ a liar until the true “holiness” of the anti-Semite Martin Luther appeared and pulled it out of nowhere? Damnedable nonsense.

      Without the Church that He told us to listen to we are without hope and He would be a liar. Christ is not a liar but the father of lies has deceived many into following false teachings in His name.

      I was a Protestant once, then I allowed myself to think beyond the party line I was told. I recommend reading, praying, and studying to learn the truth.

      As far as to what any given Pope thinks grave threats are to our physical well being, that’s their opinion. If you look beyond what you’ve been told, the Pope only teaches infallibly about certain matters and in certain situations. Catholics are free to disagree about a great many things, but the roots of the faith aren’t up for grabs as whims determine such as for Protestants.

      It may be worth considering however that we are called by God to be good stewards of His creation, and careless abuse of the Earth would not please Him greatly. This is coming from someone who believes that the seriousness of the climate change scare is greatly overstated and widely abused for profit.

    • larry

      Where is Pope Frankie’s response to SCOTUS decision on gay marriage. He hasn’t responded at all.

    • Carl Grillo

      Merely natural good works make the atheist a humanitarian – not a Christian. To suggest – as Pope Francis does – that philanthropic good works are some sort of “common ground” for believers and non-believers is false…a
      meritorious good work must have the supernatural motive of love of neighbor for God’s sake. This supernatural motive is completely absent from the atheist who negates God by his very existence. His “good works” will not save
      him; any more than they will save the Protestant who does humanitarian works;
      but does not obey the precepts of the objective moral order. Do not get me
      wrong – I am not saying that Francis is preaching the heresy of universal
      salvation [i.e., apocatastasis] but he is preaching the heresy of good works alone – without supernatural faith.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      Yes Carl, but Pope Francis is not preaching the heresy of good works alone. If you take what he said in context, he said that he stands by what the Church has always taught when it comes to salvation, and that is: if a person does not know the Truth, yet seeks it however he knows to, this person too has a chance at eternal life. He’s not saying, “Those who know in their heart of hearts that the Catholic Christian faith is the only way to God, and yet refuse to comply with it, they are still saved.” He is speaking to the ones of ignorance, which is what the Church has always said.

    • Carl Grillo

      Their ignorance will not save them, if they do not elicit the Acts of faith, hope, charity, and perfect contrition for their sins necessary for salvation. If they only have imperfect contrition for their sins; how can they be restored to a state of grace without Sacramental Absolution – Confession to a Roman Catholic Priest? This is what the Church has always said.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      That’s not true Carl. The Church has always spoken of those invincibly ignorant, and it was clarified with Vatican II –

      The Church recognizes that God does not condemn those who are innocently ignorant of the truth about his offer of salvation. Regarding the doctrine in question, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (quoting Vatican II document Lumen Gentium, 16) states:

      This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no
      fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church: Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience—those too may achieve eternal salvation. (CCC 847)

      Vatican II document Gaudium Et Spesteaches similarly on the possibility of salvation:

      All this holds true not only for Christians, but for all
      men of good will in whose hearts grace works in an unseen way. For, since Christ died for all men, and since the ultimate vocation of man is in fact one, and divine, we ought to believe that the Holy Spirit in a manner known only to God offers to every man the possibility of being associated with this paschal mystery.

      This teaching is consistent with Jesus’ own teaching about those who innocently reject him: “If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin” (Jn 15:22).
      But once a person comes to know the truth, he must embrace it or he will be culpable of rejecting it. We see this in Jesus’ words to the Pharisees: “If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, ‘We see,’ your guilt remains” (Jn 9:41).

    • Carl Grillo

      Jesus’ words that you cite actually increase the guilt of Jews, Pagans, Infidels, [Moslems] and Atheists; it does not “let them off,” as you say. He has in fact come in the Flesh; He has in fact spoken – therefore they have no excuse…The Council only mentions – in a non-infallible manner – the “mere possibility” of their being saved. Fr Barron – with whom I do not agree – stated this “mere possibility” about non-Christians with reference to the documents of the Council: “…the possibility [not certainty]…of sharing in the Paschal Mystery;” and, “may achieve eternal salvation,” not, “will achieve…” This is in line with the statements of Pope Pius IX in “Singulari quaedam,” and “Quanto conficiare moerere,” where he spoke of remote sufficent grace given to non-Christians who have not yet heard [Pagans] or received [Jews, Moslems] the Gospel of Christ. If they cooperate with remote grace, they will receive the proximate grace of conversion to the true Catholic faith by means of Missionaries. “Faith cometh through hearing [fides ex auditu], says Saint Paul. “But how can they believe if they have not heard, and how can they hear if no one is sent?”
      This is the “hermeneutic of continuity…”
      Take it or leave it.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      So Carl, you are arguing against the Magisterium. And I think I will keep listening the Church and what she has spoken about salvation, rather than any individual who interprets the bible on his or her own accord.

    • Paul

      Thank you! This response makes me smile 🙂

    • Carl Grillo

      I am not interpreting the Bible of my own accord; [Catholics do not do that] you are interpreting the Magisterium of your own accord by practically teaching the heresy that all men are saved – except those who stubbornly refuse to become Catholics, while knowing that this is the one true Church; falsely basing this notion upon “Lumen Gentium, 16 and the CEC. But the Magisterium has always taught – and still teaches – that Jews, Pagans, Infidels, Agnostics and Atheists CANNOT be saved if before death they do not elicit these acts referred to above. [scil., faith, hope, charity, and perfect contrition (in the abscence of a Priest); or imperfect contrtion (with the Sacramental Absolution of a Priest)]. The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, which is referenced in the footnotes to Lumen Gentium, 16: “An implicit desire [for Baptism] is not sufficient for salvation if it is not informed by true supernatural faith and animated by charity (towards God).” Theologians add that an explicit faith in the Trinity, Incarnation and the Redemption is necessary by a necessity of means [necessitate medii]; after the Incarnation of Our Lord Jesus Christ. This point of dogma was not mentioned in the 1949 Letter because it was not addressing itself to this issue [cf., Monsignor Francis Fenton, The Church and Salvation, 1959]. Christ shed every drop of His Precious Blood upon the Cross to institute the Seven Sacraments which are morally necessary for salvation. Non-Christians do not have ANY of the Sacraments, and “Baptism of Desire” is difficult – if not impossible – for them because it must be informed by faith, hope, charity and explicit belief in Christ.

      You and many other “new Church” Catholics seem to suggest that there are TWO Economies of Salvation: one for Christians, and the other for non-Christians and the “whatevers” who believe in anything or nothing. The Church of Vatican II and the Roman Catholic Church; which are one and the same – for there is only one Church – does not in fact teach two economies of salvation. There is no Luther, Mohammed, or Buddha in Heaven – only Our Lord Jesus Christ.

      I am out of here: there is no use in multipling words when nobody is listening.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      Carl!! Is this what is stated in YOUR Catechism? –

      The Church recognizes that God does not condemn those who are
      innocently ignorant of the truth about his offer of salvation. Regarding
      the doctrine in question, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (quoting
      Vatican II document Lumen Gentium, 16) states:

      This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no
      fault of
      their own, do not know Christ and his Church: Those who, through no
      fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but
      who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try
      in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of
      their conscience—those too may achieve eternal salvation. (CCC 847)

      Vatican II document Gaudium Et Spesteaches similarly on the possibility of salvation:

      All this holds true not only for Christians, but for all
      men of
      good will in whose hearts grace works in an unseen way. For, since
      Christ died for all men, and since the ultimate vocation of man is in
      fact one, and divine, we ought to believe that the Holy Spirit in a
      manner known only to God offers to every man the possibility of being
      associated with this paschal mystery.

      This teaching is consistent with Jesus’ own teaching about those who
      innocently reject him: “If I had not come and spoken to them, they would
      not have sin” (Jn 15:22).
      But once a person comes to know the truth,
      he must embrace it or he will be culpable of rejecting it. We see this
      in Jesus’ words to the Pharisees: “If you were blind, you would have no
      guilt; but now that you say, ‘We see,’ your guilt remains” (Jn 9:41).

      Because, this is what I find over and over again – everywhere I’s even on the Vatican’s homepage. So, I don’t know what you are reading that is so different from mine, but I know mine is Roman Catholic. I don’t need to “interpret” anything because the Magisterium does that FOR me, and for you too. But somewhere, something is not right when you are telling me I am wrong, when I am simply cutting and pasting what is stated in every Roman Catholic Catechism. I believe what the Magisterium teaches. I would not be Catholic if I didn’t. Again I say, you have an apparent issue with Rome, not with me.

    • John Deere

      For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him should not perish but hve eternal life. Simple. Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved. Simple truth, easily understood, nothing ambiguous. My advice for you, come out from among those who would lead you astray with philosophy and vain deciet.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      John Deere…is that your real name?? Anyway, thank you for your comments. I agree, of course with the Gospel of John 3:16, as I agree with all of what Our Lord taught. It is simple too. However, problems arise sometimes with the subject of people who have never truly been exposed to Christ, yet seek the truth as best they can. This was the subject of which I was talking about with the above Carl. I appreciate what you said though.

    • ME

      So you leave no room for anyone born into a protestant faith and taught all their lives that salvation is through faith alone, and just because someone from the Catholic church tells them that is not true (again because they’ve been taught all their life that the Catholic church is the whore of Babylon or some such nonsense), that they are automatically disqualified from being invincibly ignorant? I have come to realize the fact that it is a lot harder to convince someone that what they’ve been taught all their lives is not the truth than you’d think it should be. I believe there is also an element of understanding that must be taken into consideration in order for their to be true “sin”. Granted, I see a lot of people who I might think appear to be adamantly in denial of the truth, but do I know if that is truly denial or if it is invincible ignorance?

    • Maria

      We have to try and understand culpability and it’s hard for a “righteous” person to do this. Before, you think that I’m suggesting you are a righteous person – stop – I am not. Culpability is a difficult teaching to understand properly and Robbe is demonstrating a good awareness of it.

    • mia

      i’m listening, Carl. thanks for your efforts to explain. : )

    • Carl Grillo

      Thank you for listening…

    • Kelly

      “There is no Luther, Mohammed, or Buddha in Heaven – only Our Lord Jesus Christ.”

      Prove it Carl. Prove it.

    • Mar Ia

      You are so right Kelly. How true! Blessings!

    • Tom

      how do u know who is in Heaven? No one on earth does. We don’t even know if Hitler or Bin-Laden confessed at the moment of death.

      The surest way to Heaven is through the Catholic Church. However, what about the young boy or girl who dies in remote sub-saharan Africa or remote Asia. They have never had a chance to accept the Catholic Church.

      So what becomes of we who didn’t evangelize and help the Holy Spirit convert those who don’t believe and save their souls? Very few people deserve or earn Heaven. Those that do are called Saints. I am not one although we are all supposed to strive to be and all could be if we choose. as a matter of fact, I can only think of 1 woman who is in Heaven.

      We all need to pray that all souls are saved. God have mercy on us and the whole world.

    • Kelly

      What “She” has spoken about? Sheesh, you people are truly insane.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      Kelly, “the Church” is made up of people. It is not a building.

    • Kelly

      Where did I say it was a building? Methinks thou doest protest too much.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      Kelly, you made a comment about me calling “The Church” she. “She” is considered the bride of Christ and “she” is a living, breathing gathering of people in God’s name. Me thinks thou is not following the conversation.

    • Kelly

      Newsflash: The world doesn’t revolve around you or your writings. So sorry I misinterpreted your crazy-talk.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      Newsflash: No one ever said it did. And if its such crazy talk, why do you continue to engage with me? You sound so hostile for no reason.

    • Kelly

      Well, you seem to think of yourself as ‘the one with the correct knowledge’ on this matter. Did you ever stop to think that perhaps you might be wrong, or that this entire discussion is based on myths that you (and others) were taught as children? I have a feeling you need to have the last word because deep down the more people you can try to convince that your way is the right way, the less doubt you’ll have about your belief system.

      But that’s just me. I’m sure you’ll agree we’ll have to agree to disagree. And that’s all this is…a disagreement.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      Kelly, I’m not trying to convince you or anyone else what the truth is. I don’t claim to have found the truth, but I know it has found me. Only the Holy Spirit can move peoples’ hearts. All I am is a believer in the One true God. And I thank him every day I had parents who shared their faith with me. He loves us all so much and that includes you. You needn’t believe it. It just is what it is.

    • Kelly

      You proved my point. Your parents indoctrinated you, so that’s why you believe. You’re entitled to that belief, but again, that’s all it is, a belief. One that excludes billions of others around the world who believe in other gods, or question if the concept entirely. More than anything, I have a feeling you’re trying to convince yourself, but that’s just my opinion. Have a good life! 🙂

    • Kelly, I can’t speak for Robbe, but I’ve stopped to think that I might be wrong plenty of times. Then I use logic and reason and realize that the evidence that God exists is overwhelming.

      Have you ever stopped to think that perhaps you might be wrong?

    • Kelly

      Of course I have. I’m not saying I’m right — all I’m saying is that no one can say they are, and everyone else is wrong. As I mentioned above, that’s religious blackmail, a HUMAN emotion, not a ‘godlike’ one. In my opinion, there’s far more proof that man created god than the other way around, but I’m sure we’ll have to respectfully agree to disagree. 🙂

    • AugustineThomas

      One thing we can do is look at the fruits of peoples’ beliefs.
      The beliefs of members of the Church led to modernity and so much charity people from the barbaric ages wouldn’t have thought it was possible.
      Your secularist beliefs have only led to murder and mistreatment on a level also previously believed to be impossible.

    • The Catechism uses the same terminology, so why are you calling it “crazy-talk”? Why are you so hurt and angry?

    • Kelly

      I’m not sure what the ‘Catechism’ has to do with anything — you’ll find that most religions have the same terminology, the same fairy stories, etc..

      Why am I so hurt and angry? Because I grew up being harrassed, bullied, shamed, beat up and nearly suicidal because people use the Bible as an excuse for their homophobia and bigotry, just like they did with blacks, with women, etc., etc..

      Fortunately, times are changing, and more and more people (even some “Christians”) are realizing how divisive religion is, and are realizing that we’re all the same. I’m grateful for that, and am working on letting go of my anger and hurt. Thanks for asking.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      Ugh… Kelly no wonder you are bitter. I am so sorry you were hurt by these people. Not all Christians are like that.

    • Kelly

      Thanks Robbe, I appreciate your comment. And agree…not all Christians are so bigoted.

    • AugustineThomas

      Secularists are far more brutal than religious folk. I think you may be upset that your favorite sin is in fact a sin and you’re projecting that on to those people. We all have others hurt our feelings. In your case you may be building these people up in your mind because, even in their wickedness, they reminded you of a truth you can’t stand to hear.
      I used to be an atheist and in my case the Christians I despised actually weren’t so bad and I was simply jealous that they seemed happier than me and weren’t as plagued by sin as me.

    • Kelly

      “Secularists are far more brutal than religious folk.”

      Hilarious, if it weren’t so untrue and sad. The bible is full of ‘god-sanctioned’ murder and bloodshed.

    • AugustineThomas

      Do you have any evidence? The bible is full of God convincing his people to defend themselves against outside aggressors.
      You guys have no argument that doesn’t derive from biblical verses taken out of context.
      Christians built modernity and gave more charity to others than any group in history by so much that secularists could never catch up even if they actually started doing charity.
      Secularism brought us Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc., etc., etc.

    • Winston

      Perhaps you don’t know the truth of the Old Testament if that’s what you believe. The secret to the Old Testament is in Genesis 3:15 and 6:4, if you can interpret it accurately. It led to the reason for the flood.

    • Kelly

      “Truth”? Okay, whatever. The Bible is a book of fairy tales, bizarre stories and is filled with contradictions and multiple interpretations over thousands of years. And of course murder and bloodshed.

    • Fruitbearer

      Kelly, salvation is a free gift of grace and by faith it’s bestowed to all who believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. To be born anew is to have your spirit made alive by the Father and that happens the moment you believe in his Son. All who believe in the Son are regenerated spiritually and instantly born into the family of God, forever. The Father will never not be your Father. All who believe will go to the place called Heaven. As children of God however, we’re now required to grow up and mature to the point of bearing fruit which means producing good deeds by his power and on his authority. This is sowing to the Spirit, not the flesh. This maturing process is by faith, and it’s at this point that repentance is required. Repentance is daily, 1 John 1:9. Jesus is our current High Priest and makes continual intercession for us as expressed in the third person of the trinity which is the Holy Spirit who is ruler and governs our lives from his throne which currently is in our hearts. This is the Kingdom of God the Holy Spirit. This means, we are required to cooperate with the leading of the Holy Spirit and volunteer to lay down our lives (self-life, selfish life, ie. human sinful mind, self-will, emotions fueled by our five physical senses) for Jesus’ Sake and follow him. We are to be lead by Spirit. Praying in Spirit. Walking by the Spirit. Sowing to the Spirit. Listening to the Spirit. God the Father is Spirit and we are to Worship him in Spirit. God is Jesus and Jesus is the Word. We are faithful to truth. Faith means to believe in the truth of who Jesus Christ is and what he taught. He modeled how to submit to his Father and he stayed under the Will of the Father regardless of how he felt. He exposed evil and did not come to earth to condemn it, but to save it. He did not come to bring social equality, he came to set the captives free so all who would believe could be saved and do the will of the Father. Not everyone does God’s will, but there’s rewards for those who obey God. God wants every child to know his Son, and to learn to imitate his Son and exhibit Christ-like characteristics. Healthy fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom and necessary in order to understand the true doctrine of Works. We don’t work to get saved or to get to heaven. We work as God’s employee in his field doing his mission work and he will give rewards and pay us for our obedience to him. God’s definition of Love is that we obey him. He wants us to obey him SO HE CAN REWARD US WHEN HIS KINGDOM COMES. He’s COMING TO EARTH and all who earn the inheritance of this Kingdom with work along side of him for a thousand years in the millennium. The Word of God is Jesus Christ. 1 John 1:1 and it is eternal. Our sowing on earth will be reaped in eternity. Thy word is forever settled in heaven. Faith is a lifestyle and it’s a life-long process of becoming like Jesus. We all must grow in grace, unto maturity because it is the fruits of the Holy Spirit that will distinguish the true believers from the fakes. Many professing Christians do not know the truth of what salvation is all about. They think heaven is the end-goal. It is not. The Kingdom of Heaven and inheriting future positions is the goal. True adult Sons of God cooperate and are continually being renewed in their minds unto Christ’s likeness and more and more humility should be exhibited as we learn to overcome the power of sin, the power of our flesh, and the power of our enemy. Everyone struggles with sin. No matter what sin, all sin is offensive to God because he is Holy. But one day soon, at his return, the struggle will be over and we truly will be free. Many Christians will be disappointed when they arrive in Heaven to realize they were deceived on the earth. Any righteous works done in the power of the flesh or for selfish ambitions or to try to GET TO HEAVEN, will be burned up in the Bema seat judgment. 1 Cor. 3:13-15. God is interested in Spiritual matters and a pre-req. is dying to our sinful selfish self. Most Christians don’t know the real creator God nor do they know anything about agape love. A free gift to heaven is unconditional for all who believe. Whether we obey is our choice. Many will be sad to discover they will be disqualified to become co-heirs with Jesus Christ and will be disinherited. To lose your soul is to be disinherited. Saul lost his inheritance due to disobedience. Lot lost his inheritance due to his love of the things of this world, Esau lost his inheritance due to his rebellion and sold his birthright for a bowl of red stew. “what would it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul”. Spirit salvation is a free gift and it’s unconditional, but soul salvation requires sanctification and that requires our willingness and free will to make faith choices to choose Christ’s life over our own selfish will. Success in this endeavor is called being an overcomer and they will inherit all things. Rev. 21:7. Being an overcomer is a VERB and takes determination. No believer ever need worry about going to Hell. That’s a LIE OF SATAN. It’s the rewards at question. This reward is a Kingdom inheritance attained through faithful obedience and it’s about positions of service, prestigious status, honor, high level of glory and being in close proximity to the King in his upcoming Government on the earth. To inherit this honor, a person must die to self, pick up his cross, and imitate Jesus Christ. Giving up lusts of the flesh is not easy for any human being but it will be worth it. The bible is written to Christians and sadly, most do not heed the warnings. No one who practices a sinful lifestyle without repentance will inherit the Kingdom but there is no sin that can send a believer to Hell. You are sealed forever by his Spirit and he’s not an Indian giver. All who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ will be spiritually and bodily redeemed and given a glorified body, but to inherit the Kingdom crowns and thrones of authority, we must live in Christ and put off the old deeds of the sinful self. While on earth, we constantly remain and abide (live) in the true vine Jesus Christ. Please read John 15. Heaven is a free gift. Inheriting the Kingdom is conditional.
      First Fruits Ministry –

    • Kelly


      I’m sure you mean well, but you don’t realize what you’re basically saying boils down to religious blackmail, i.e., “If you don’t believe in my religion, then you’ll be sorry (you’ll go to “hell”, etc..)

      If there is a “God”, he or she or it would never blackmail or threaten anyone that has different beliefs. Never.

      There’s something called ‘unconditional love’. You might want to read more about that.

    • Tom

      I am so sorry you were treated like that. However, of all the places you can go you will not find a place were you are more accepted or loved than the Catholic church. And if Catholics have bullied you than I am especially sorry for that. They are not expressing true Catholicism. The Church is not for the saints but for us sinners. No one will be bullied or harassed for thier sexual identity or practices. the church is full of fornicators, adulterers, and homosexuals. Being a sinner in the church is not the same as being an untouchable in India. It is between you and God.

    • Kelly

      Thanks for your kind words, but sorry, the Catholic Church, with it’s long and continuing history of pedophilia, is the last place I’d ever want to go. But we’ll have to agree to disagree, as I don’t believe any one church or religion is “better” than another. I’ve received more love and acceptance from atheists…

    • brandonr

      Rob, Let me reason with you… there’s no reasoning with the unreasonable… trust me 🙂 Peace be with you, brother!

    • Opinionated

      Calm down, Carl. No need to shout.

      On the sixth page of
      the introduction of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Saint John
      Paul II wrote

      “Therefore, I ask all the Church’s Pastors
      and the Christian faithful to receive this catechism in a spirit of
      communion and to use it assiduously in fulfilling their mission of
      proclaiming the faith and calling people to the Gospel life. This
      catechism is given to them that it may be a sure and authentic
      reference text for teaching catholic doctrine…”

      Get your copy of the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Turn to Part One,
      Section Two, Chapter Three, Article 9, Paragraph 3 The Church Is One,
      Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic. I am cutting & pasting from the
      copy on the Vatican

      This authentic teaching reference for Catholics, and I assume you count
      yourself as one, says the following:

      “Who belongs to the Catholic Church?
      “All men are called to this catholic unity of the People of God. . . .And to it, in different ways, belong or are ordered: the Catholic faithful, others who believe
      in Christ, and finally all mankind, called by God’s grace to salvation.”

      Continue reading. Several lines later we come
      to the part that covers our relationship with the Jews.

      “The Church and non-Christians
      839″Those who have not yet received the Gospel are related to the People of God in various ways.”325

      The relationship of the Church with the Jewish People.

      When she delves into her own mystery, the Church, the People of God in the New Covenant, discovers her link with the Jewish People,326 “the first to hear the Word of God.”327 The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God’s revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews “belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ”,328 “for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable.”329
      840 and when one considers the future, God’s People of the Old Covenant and
      the new People of God tend towards similar goals: expectation of the coming (or the return) of the Messiah. But one awaits the return of the Messiah who died and rose from the dead and is recognized as Lord and Son of God; the other awaits the coming of a Messiah, whose features remain hidden till the end of time; and the latter waiting is accompanied by the drama of not knowing or of
      misunderstanding Christ Jesus.”

      This says to me that the Jews are our spiritual ancestors and that when we interact we (you & me) should share that Jesus is the Messiah that they are waiting for. It’s like visiting your great-grandmother who has never used a computer but has been looking for the next generation in typewriters all her life –
      until you introduce her to the PC computer which has been around for
      quite a long time.

      Next it talks about, how did you put it, the “Infidels, [Moslems]”

      Our catechism, in the very next line says:

      841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims.
      “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator,
      in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold
      the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful
      God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”330

      Our Muslim friends profess that they know the faith of Abraham. So more information must be shared with them. Abraham knew God the Father, but not God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. We know that God is One God in Three Persons. We must introduce the Three Persons.

      Keep reading, Carl. The next line goes on to address your “Pagans” saying:

      “842 The Church’s bond with non-Christian religions is in the first place the
      common origin and end of the human race:

      All nations form but one community. This is so because all stem from the one stock which God created to people the entire earth, and also because all share a common destiny, namely God. His providence, evident goodness, and
      saving designs extend to all against the day when the elect are gathered
      together in the holy city. . .331

      843 The Catholic Church recognizes in other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he gives life and breath and all things and wants all men to be saved. Thus, the Church considers all goodness and truth found in these religions as “a preparation for the Gospel and given by him who enlightens all men that they may at length
      have life.”332

      OK, Carl. Roll up your sleeves because there is more teaching to do here. This is starting from the beginning with someone who has not had the opportunity to learn what you know, so go share it.

      Keep your head in the book and keep reading. Next we come to the atheists. Our authoritative teaching tool says:

      “844 In their religious behavior, however, men also display the limits and errors
      that disfigure the image of God in them:

      Very often, deceived by the Evil One, men have become vain in their reasonings, and have exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and served the creature rather than the Creator. Or else, living and dying in this world without God, they are exposed to ultimate despair.”333

      Surely Carl, you cannot have harsh feelings for anyone in such a pitiful situation
      although teaching here begins before the beginning since very often this person has hardened himself against the Truth and may be not only defiant but antagonistic. So you have to love him and keep loving him because God is Love. That is why love conquers all.

      Finally in summation the catechism continues with:

      “845 To reunite all his children, scattered and led astray by sin, the Father
      willed to call the whole of humanity together into his Son’s Church. the Church is the place where humanity must rediscover its unity and salvation. the Church is “the world reconciled.” She is that bark which “in the full sail of the Lord’s cross, by the breath of the Holy Spirit, navigates safely in this world.” According to another image dear to the Church Fathers, she is prefigured by Noah’s ark, which alone saves from the flood.334″

      But don’t go away now! The next part of your post is addressed by the very next part of the catechism:

      “Outside the Church there is no salvation”
      846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church
      Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:

      Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would
      refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.336

      847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own,
      do not know Christ and his Church:

      Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by
      grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience – those too may achieve eternal salvation.337″

      Gee. That last part is the same as Robbe’s post. I guess that means instead of sitting around splitting hairs over who is and who isn’t going to be saved, we all…and that’s you included Carl…need to start loving each other a whole lot more. Because when you love the people around you, your demeanor changes and you become attractive, approachable, someone that other people want to know and want to talk to. When you leave your comfort zone and make
      connections with all kinds of other people, you have opportunity.
      Some people call it networking and use it for business. We call it
      evangelizing and let God use it and us to teach in teachable moments.



    • Robbe Sebesta

      Richard, You seem to misunderstand The Church. The Church is made up of people, period. And every one of us is sinful, which means, there are good and bad that make up everything. And you can believe whatever you want, but to say “Her judgment will soon come……” is saying that an inanimate object will have judgment – it’s impossible. People will be judged, and not any institution.

    • Joe G


    • Catherine

      Carl, should you want to make charges/comments as these, please, please, will you get the CORRECT information – look at Catholic Answers or or gee, maybe even the Catechism! Don’t assume you “know” what you are talking about – when we do that we merely show the world how foolish we can be!

    • Carl Grillo

      The Catechism is not intended to be a dogmatic treatise; but merely an “authentic norm” for catechesis. I studied Dogmatic and Moral theology before the Catechism was issued. I have no prudent fear of error – but you should.

    • Robbe Sebesta

      The Magisterium is the source of the Catechism Carl. Since you know better, maybe you should be the Pope.

    • Kelly

      Absolute nonsense. You’re suggesting, as so many other religions do, that if one doesn’t believe as you do, or as your religion has indoctrinated you to believe, then one will go to hell. That is religious blackmail, pure and simple, and blackmail is not something a loving ‘god’ would ever consider.

      So sad that so many people over the age of 10 still believe this stuff. So afraid of living in the 21st century, let alone the 19th.

    • ccmnxc

      For an (implicitly) self-proclaimed rationalist, I see a lot of knee-jerk posturing and very little thinking. First of all, I can think of maybe three religions off the top of my head that believe in anything remotely resembling the Christian conception of hell. That’s a pretty far cry from “so many other religions.” Second, you completely misrepresented what Carl said. He did not say “Anyone who does not believe in God is going to hell.” What he did say was that good works for an atheist and good works for a believer are different, so the appeal to common ground is faulty. Stemming from that, you find the notion of hell to be blackmail based on a rather childish, simplistic notion of hell. It is something along the lines of “Do what God says and wants, or you will be sent to hell.” Of course, the bigger point is that sin leads to putting of oneself before God, which is just a temporal example of hell, namely rejecting God for eternity and suffering from the separation (but still not repenting even due to that suffering).
      Then of course, there is your last sentence, which is just as dogmatic and anti-rational as any fundamentalist saying might be. I take personal amusement out of it considering just today I was writing a paper on the dogmatism fallacy. Your’s would have been a good example to include.
      And finally, since you seem to have no problem psychoanalyzing others, I’m sure you won’t mind if I do the same to you. It appears to me that your reasons for rejecting God and religion are largely emotional since affirmation of Christianity would deprive you of the lifestyle you desire. It has less to do with reason and logic and more to do with an “I’ll do what I want” mentality.

      By your standards, it seems my above assessment was entirely fair. Applied consistently, it would appear that you should have no problem with it since I simply included some of your favorite tactics. If you didn’t entirely like my tone or what I said, maybe it would be time to give up the condescending , Dunning-Kruger effect, style attitude and actually address people as if they weren’t children. Your call, though.

    • Kelly

      Sorry, but it’s not fair. I wasn’t replying to Carl, didn’t even notice his posts. I was engaged in a discussion with Robbe and JoAnna.

      The “lifestyle I desire”? Newflash: Sexual orientation is not a choice, not a “lifestyle”. That statement alone shows your monumental ignorance on the subject.

    • ccmnxc

      Not sure what you mean in saying you were not replying to Carl, since it shows your post being a reply as designated by the arrow to Carl’s name. Still, it is less who you were responding to and more what you said at all.

      Further, I never mentioned sexuality, so what you stated was a misrepresentation of what I said. But let’s run with that example. I would agree that sexual orientation isn’t a lifestyle simpliciter. However, it can certainly play a large factor in lifestyle (lifestyle being a broader range of dispositions and actions). So I’d say my comment still stands (at least as far as the validity of psychoanalyzing goes).

    • AugustineThomas

      Let me guess: you believe people can become gay, but not become straight? Or are all people who become homosexual later in life complete liars?

    • Kelly

      Your ignorance knows no bounds. Sorry to be so blunt, but it’s clear, you can’t even read let alone comprehend what others have written. To spell it out for you, people are born gay, bisexual or straight. No one “chooses” their orientation.

      And no one “becomes homosexual” later in life. You might try a PFLAG meeting — seriously — or a library — so you can educate yourself on the subject. 95%+ knew they were ‘different’ when they were around 4-5 years old.

      And seriously, think about it? Who would choose to be part of a group that is so despised, so ridiculed, and humiliated? At least that negative attitude is finally changing.

      Best of luck.