Unraveling Saint Buddha

Patrick Pierce - Ego


I see his blood upon the rose
And in the stars the glory of his eyes,
His body gleams amid eternal snows,
His tears fall from the skies.

I see his face in every flower;
The thunder and the singing of the birds
Are but his voice—and carven by his power
Rocks are his written words.

All pathways by his feet are worn,
His strong heart stirs the ever-beating sea,
His crown of thorns is twined with every thorn,
His cross is every tree.

— Joseph Mary Plunkett

History and tradition are filled with twists and turns, highs and lows, glories and embarrassments. Sometimes, though, sorting through it all offers a path to truth.

When the Apostles were sent into the world to convert it, many went beyond the boundaries of the Roman Empire. One of these was St. Thomas, who famously had to touch Jesus\’ wounds to declare him “My Lord My God” thus fully realizing who He was (John 20:28).

Thomas went to India. While he was not successful in converting India to Christianity, there is evidence that he went, and evidence of ancient Christian areas in India. He is said to have come to Taxila in Western Punjab (currently in Pakistan) and evangelized. His efforts to convert the region may have been largely wiped out in later years by Kushan attacks, perhaps around 120 A.D. Still, stories persist through history of Christianity in India, a Christianity spread by Thomas, in the centuries after Christ. Indeed, there have even been stories of saints.

King Abenner, for example, is said to have persecuted the Christians of the third or fourth century, who tried to spread this foreign religion in his lands. He resisted and fought them at every turn. One day, though, his astrologers told him that the stars revealed that his only son, Josaphat, would become a Christian.

This horrified the king, and to prevent it the prince was kept close and watched over as much as possible. Still, the prince lived in the world and one day he met a hermit named Barlaam in the surrounding desert. Barlaam was a Christian and Josaphat became curious about his strange faith. Slowly, over time, Josaphat became a Christian. Eventually he left his palace to live in the desert to explore, practice and teach his faith.

In the late Middle Ages, Barlaam and Josaphat were held as saints and added to the Roman Martyrology, with their feast being celebrated November 27. The making of saints in that time was looser than it is today, and some saints whose stories have been questioned have been backpedalled from a bit in later times (St. Christopher being a story for another day). But, based upon the standards of the time, St. Josaphat was considered a saint of the Church.

Regions of India were later captured by Alexander the Great, and some of the stories from the East traveled through Greek and even Arab cultures on their way to the West. Names were anglicized, specifics were lost. And at the end of the process there was St. Josaphat, the son of a king who went off into the desert with his faith. He was actually born Siddhartha Gautama but his title was Bodhisattva, in Arabic Budhasaf, in Greek Ioasaph, in Latin Josaphat.

Also known as Buddha.

Buddha, the pre-Christian son of a king who went off into the desert with his faith. A story that had adapted as it worked its way West over centuries, and he emerged as St. Josaphat.

How could such a thing happen? Surely it is an embarrassing mistake that should be left in the dust of history. Surely there is nothing to be learned from it.

While it would be plainly wrong to suggest that Siddhartha Gautama\’s teachings are compatible with Christianity, the idea of God as Being itself has always been a part of Christian thought which should not be shied away from in overreaction to its nearness to some Eastern principles, and indeed that very teaching may be a place to meet the modern culture, and bring it to where it needs to be.

But first we have to talk about being.

As with many things, it begins in the Old Testament. Indeed, \”If . . . they should say to me, \’What is his name?\’ what shall I say to them? God said to Moses: \’I AM WHO AM.\’ He said: \’Thus shalt thou say to the children of Israel: ‘HE WHO IS hath sent me to you’” (Exodus 3:13-14).

St. Augustine of Hippo, the great doctor of the Church, himself noticed the connection between this verse and similar words from Jesus. \”Amen, amen, I say to you, before Abraham came to be, I AM,\” Jesus Christ said in John 8:58. This, of course, dovetails with John\’s revelation that Jesus was the Word of God, and as God\’s Word He preceded time itself (John 1:1). (See here for more on the Logos.)

From all of this St. Augustine could only conclude that \”God is present in, and to, the whole universe in such a manner as to be whole in the whole universe and whole in every part of creation, including the minutest and most insignificant part.\” See generally here. St. Paul\’s writings, looking back, did not disagree with the idea that Christ, as God, was Man but more than Man. For example: \”[A]ll things were created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together\” (Colossians 1:16-17). Indeed \”in Him we live and move and have our being\” (Acts 17:28).

St. Thomas Aquinas picked up the thought developed by St. Augustine, himself exploring and writing on ipsum esse, the idea that God can be thought of as the sheer act of being itself. (See here a pertinent section of the Summa Theologica.) Others in the Middle Ages also pondered this simple yet complex truth. However, the development of this aspect of Christianity slowed as the Middle Ages came to a close, and the Age of Reason began.

To get into contact with being, sometimes science, reason and even our ego-ridden thoughts themselves must necessarily be set aside. That is not to say that thought is bad, just that they it is not all the awareness can do, and often it is the only way to see that putting ourselves first is far from the best frame of mind.  \”If man is to petition God in the right way, he must stand in the truth. And the truth is: First God, first his Kingdom (cf. Matt 6:33). The first thing we must do is step outside ourselves and open ourselves to God\” (Jesus of Nazareth, Pope Benedict XVI).

Perhaps we have spent a few too many centuries on the side of reason over spirit, and ego has taken a firm hold during that time. At the encouragement of society, we have sided more and more with only one-half of what we are.

To see an object in nature and just sit with it and drink in its part in the majesty of God\’s creation is of value to everyone. To just feel yourself breathing and sink into the present moment with God can quiet the ego for just long enough to notice the stirrings of the soul. To tame your thoughts, know that they are not what is essentially you, and to clear a space in them for God can bring a profound spirituality whose truth is undeniable. To appreciate God in everything He has created is not pantheism, the belief that God is everything, but instead is an acknowledgement that the world is not the cold product of pure evolution and the matching of genes, but rather that it is wondrous, majestic and ever reflective of God.

The saints have spoken to this, but it could also be said that reason (as vital as it is) has buried this truth under an endless stream of thoughts. Reason is powerful and necessary, but it is, at most, half of life. The Church, through its history, knows this well.

St. Thérèse of Lisieux put it this way: \”I know from experience that ‘the Kingdom of God is within us’ (Luke 17:21), that Jesus has no need of books or doctors to instruct our soul; He, the Doctor of Doctors, teaches us without the sound of words. I have never heard Him speak, and yet I know He is within my soul.\”

Meister Eckhart said: \”The eye through which I see God is the same eye through which God sees me; my eye and God’s eye are one eye, one seeing, one knowing, one love.”

The depth of spirituality passed on through St. John of the Cross, who spoke of the trinitarian God found in silence was preceded by a history going back to the very beginning. The Desert Fathers of the early Church were contemplatives, nursing that seed of what today is often called mysticism. A seed which later fed the Eastern and Western Churches as they developed. And they naturally found much to contemplate, and to try to reconcile, in their own thoughts.

Ego is not a word in the Bible, but the battle with, and against, ego is on every page. It is there at the beginning. It is there in the time of Jesus, and he challenges it directly: \”For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted\” (Matthew 14:11).

When people do not take a moment\’s time in their whole lives to  come to the realization that they are not their endless stream of thoughts, that they are infinitely more than that, the culture that ends up being produced should surprise no one.

Ego in its quest to be right all the time, and a culture that acts as if it is post-God thrives in a relativism it is no longer cautioned away from. That is, if there is no truth, then ego can always define itself as in the right. On a supernatural level, this is poison. Embracing the search for truth is the cure for this pathology. The Church has found the truth, and offers it. But in so doing, it must always embrace what is true. And, in looking to history, we see that it has.

The Church Christ founded, before there even was a Bible, had to go into pagan lands, lands that believed something completely different than what the Church taught. While a modern might believe that this process involved Christians going into these cultures, stamping their feet and declaring their truths until everyone converted, catholic evangelism was often quite the opposite. While it held fast to the essential truths, it reached out to the culture where it was. St. Patrick is said to have started with the Celts worshiped Sun to tell them of the Son. He is said to have used the clover to describe the trinity, and whether he did or not there is no question that he met them where they were at.

Behind Patrick the England he left was invaded by Germanic tribes that St. Augustine of Canterbury was sent to convert. And when he returned with news that this was impossible, he had to be ordered back to try again–to try to reach them where they were.

There are stories like this from all over the world. Juan Diego, together with Mary, brought a vision of God to the Mexican people that brought them into the faith. The image of Mary that appeared on his cloak showed her as a native. Did Mary look like a native of Mexico? Probably not, but one would have to admit that she was probably closer to that image than the lily white she is depicted in so much of Western art. Not that either are offenses, they both point to the truth, and that is the point. To evangelize is to meet the culture where it is, to embrace its truths and unite them to the truth of Christ, where that is possible.

The Church, when and where it effectively evangelizes, assimilates. It does not succumb to the culture, does not bargain away its truths, but it enters the conversation where the conversation is. It looks for the truths of the culture and explains how all truth is from God, and here is what that means to you. St. Paul, when struggling to teach in Athens of just one God, came upon an altar to the unnamed God and used it make his point. People began to listen (Acts 17:23).

A similar act of meeting the culture where it is is necessary now. Yet the great Christian tradition of God as Being itself, Christ as the Word which holds the world together, remains undeveloped.

St. Josaphat, one might say, sits on the sidelines.  His story should be looked on not as a mistake but rather as the tendency to run from deep catholic truths that brush too close to other faiths.  What is wrong in Buddhism is easily distinguished, but there is also an essential facet of truth touched on by doctors of the Church which cannot be shied away from. In the very human story surrounding St. Josaphat is buried the essential catholic truth that God is Is, God is Being and to recognize that we should, we must, sometimes sit in the quiet with our souls, we must marvel at creation, we must exalt God by the simple act of admiring His work. Just as St. Francis of Assisi spoke of Brother Moon and Sister Sun as he admired creation, we must step back from the small view that causes us to drive over a bridge with spectacular views of nature which we never see because we are inside our own head the whole time, to the larger view of a gratitude for God whose creation offers miracles at every turn.

God is Love (1 John 4:8). Love is not found in books, not captured by words, not measurable by science. Thinking all day long will not be enough. To feel it you must set your thoughts aside and feel the moment around you. The same is so for many truths.

Sin, on the other hand, is ego curving onto itself. (For more on Incurvatus In Se see generally here and here.) Chief amongst the sins is pride, which is unchecked ego. If this is so, the desire to just be, to just connect with the moment and marvel at the glory of the God Who Is, is a help. And the more a person thinks that reason explains everything, and that they are only what they think, the more they need that help. After centuries of living in the mind, a carefully guided return of the culture to the soul is something  desperately needed.

Where is the evidence that this culture is running on unchecked ego? A few years ago Eckhart Tolle was all the rage. The author of the Power of Now and A New Earth, Oprah made him even more prominent. His works, for the most part, were a spin on certain aspects prominent in Buddhism, presented in a form that appealed to those who wanted the impossibility of being spiritual yet not religious. He started with the simple truth that people spend little or none of their time actually present in the moment, in the now. He pointed out that noticing this will reveal the grip that ego has on us, and how unaware we are of it. In this he was right, and in feeding the popular culture this truth he met with great success.

Certainly the totality of what Tolle proposed is not compatible with Christianity, but to deny the kernel of truth in what he restated, and that it resonated precisely because it was truth, is imprudent. To dismiss it because the culture likes it, or because it is not prominent in the recent Magisterium, could even be looked at as uncatholic.

The culture must be evangelized where it is, with the aspects of Christianity that will help it get to where it needs to go. Lost to our age of reason is the fact that reason is not all that is. That what you can see with your eyes is not all there is. That your thoughts, your body, your possessions, your accomplishments, are not you. You are a body connected to a soul, connected to your Maker by everything you look at, everywhere you go, because God, as well as everything else He is, is the sheer act of Being itself. It is time to reach back to the great thinkers of the Church and dust off that great Christian truth, drink it in, and then go forth with it to evangelize the culture.

As with all truths, it will undoubtedly begin people on a path to the others.

© 2013. Patrick Pierce. All Rights Reserved.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest

24 thoughts on “Unraveling Saint Buddha”

  1. All religion tells a universal truth, however many have been corrupted by those in power misunderstood over the years and conveniently edited.
    Jesus and Buddha told the same truth to different people at different times and different culture, is there one man that is God or are we part of the one god?
    Both the Buddha and Jesus often talked of the interconnection between all living things, in our hearts, we all know this is true, there is no beginning or end and there is no hierarchy all moves in the same direction and is part of the same thing an endless cycle of death and resurrection.

  2. Guardian Of Truth

    “See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive
    philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual
    forces of this world rather than on Christ.” Col 2:8

    Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to
    a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day.
    These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.
    Do not let anyone who delights in false humility and the worship of angels
    disqualify you. Such a person also goes into great detail about what
    they have seen; they are puffed up with idle notions by their
    unspiritual mind. They have lost connection with the head, from whom the whole body, supported
    and held together by its ligaments and sinews, grows as God causes it to grow.
    Since you died with Christ to the elemental spiritual forces of this world,
    why, as though you still belonged to the world, do you submit to its
    rules: “Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch!”?
    These rules, which have to do with things that are all destined to perish
    with use, are based on merely human commands and teachings.
    Such regulations indeed have an appearance of wisdom, with their
    self-imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of
    the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence. ” Col 2: 16-23

  3. St. Clement of Alexandria mentions the Buddha – aware of who he was, as founder of the Buddhist sangha – in book 1 or 2 of his Stromateis, where he says that the (Mahayana) Buddhists worship him “on account of his great sanctity”. I’ve often wrestled with the historical question as to how the history could simultaneously be known correctly and also convoluted into a legend of St. Josaphat, but that is a question for historical scholars to decide.
    In any case, the horrendously ridiculous remarks by a commenter below about him being “in hell” (were you present at his judgement and condemnation by Christ, Hollie?), the Patristic witness is that Siddhartha Gautama was a sage and a saint, whom I would expect to have been brought out of Hades by Christ on Holy Saturday together with the other righteous Gentiles and Jews. And I long to see a Catholic theologian more intelligent than myself do with Buddhism what St. Thomas did with Aristotle.

    1. It is sometimes gratifying to see that one of the commentators actually got what you were saying :).

  4. Patrick, it took you a very long time to get to the point, of which, you never did arrive, but I see that you had a legal background, which explains your problem and why we need to get all of the lawyers out of politics, in order to get this country back to God once again. I find it so sad that so many craddle “catholics” don’t want to face the Truth and to follow the Teachings of the Church, which is the Teachings of Jesus. The devil always gives some truth when he appears to the likes of Buddah, Mohammand, Luther, etc., just enough to make himself seem harmless and once he has their attention, comes the real lies. +JMJ+

  5. Salvador Almeida

    Hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, of descendants of people evangelised by St Thomas still live in South India. St Thomas was martyred in Chennai, (formerly Madras) in South India and his tomb in the basilica built where he fell is a tourist draw among Indian Christians. How come this fact and his South Indian connection were not mentioned in the report.

  6. Pingback: Unraveling Saint Buddha | Catholic Defender Daily

  7. “Regions of India were later captured by Alexander the Great ….” Later than WHAT? Later than the life of Gautama? Sure, but you had not mentioned him yet — the last time frame mentioned was “the late Middle Ages”.

  8. Pingback: Catholic Dating in the Bible Belt - BigPulpit.com

  9. Good, Patrick !! Good. I hope someday you … graduate to Krishna Consciousness,
    the Hindu Way. Bahagavad-gita means ‘ As it is ” It’s all about God the Father. Of
    course, reading it will only meet you where you are. Understanding it’s mirror image
    to our faith takes guts. Evangelization cuts both ways. : )

    1. Jim:

      I’ve considered such things in the past, and I truly do consider this a compliment of sorts, but I decided long ago that what I’m describing in my article is a slice of the truth that fits better within Catholicism and its traditions. Moreover, the balance of the Eastern faiths contain tenets I just can’t accept (and indeed wholeheartedly reject). They have no room in their ideological structures for the possibility of Jesus Christ as God the Son, who is, quite simply, the Way, the Truth and the Life.

      The modern mind rejects miracles in the midst of a million miracles. It rejects the idea of a greater intelligence in a universe clearly ordered by such an intelligence. It rejects the soul that even it feels deep down under the endless chatter.

      I’m trying to point out a solution to these modern, cultural issues, which is on the mystic side of things. I’m happy to meet you there and say hello but I would very much like to introduce you to my friend Jesus who is there as well :).


    2. Patrick, you’re talking to a cradle Catholic with 12 years of parochial
      education with the good sisters of St Joseph and Notre Dame. You
      are reading thoughts from someone who goes to Mass and says the
      rosary. Granted, I survived the inception and completion of Vat II and
      came away changed. Those windows that John XXIII threw open let
      in the Holy Spirit and it blew where it would and the result is ecuminism
      on a grand scale. Of course Jesus will always be Lord and Savior but
      our Church is lacking in theological precision. Someday, purgatory will
      be reincarnation. You can’t throw out a belief system that is 1000 years
      older than Christianity and has all the same RULES. Anyway.I agree
      about the modern world lacking a higher power esp in the face of the
      modern miracles that science has wrought but feel that every soul is
      somehow touched by God. We just have to be the example: the seed
      that falls on good ground.

    3. Interesting thoughts, and I appreciate them. On the other hand, I am wary of sentences where “relativism” can slip comfortably into the place of “ecumenism” without changing the meaning :). Admittedly, I am an odd soul and as such a rather peculiar fan of mysticism. To me to identify what is true in another culture is a wholly Catholic thing to do, but it does not mean that the whole of that other tradition is true. Much of it can be quite false, regardless of its age or popularity, and it is appropriate to point that out as well :).

    4. This is very true.
      I had an interesting response from a good friend once, who, when told by me, that Jesus is the only one who died for US,
      said ” au contraire ” She went on to say that Buddah died so
      we would know the Truth also. And that he vowed to keep reincarnating until everyone understood the cycle of life-sin-death. In Hinduism, Krishna speaks about the need for a
      savior – a divine manifestation of Godhead – to return to
      earth whenever there is a severe decline in worship and
      religion. The fact is: none of the major and original forms
      of revelation espoused by religions are going away. They
      will either morph over millenia into something we can not
      concieve of, or they will join to promote Truths that give us
      an adequate picture instead of the fractals we now see. 🙂

    5. Reincarnation is a LIE and Buddha DID NOT DIE for anyone’s salvation, he just killed himself by being lazy and fat. His bones are in the earth and his soul is in hell, nevermore to be able to spread his false beliefs. +JMJ+

    6. “You can’t throw out a belief system that is 1000 years older than Christianity and has all the same RULES.” Only it doesn’t. It does have some overlap, even in places significant overlap, but let’s not get carried away. If you’re saying that the only important part of religion is ethics, and the differences between Buddhist and Christian can be ignored, then of course they will seem to be alike to you in all the important ways, because that’s what you assumed. There is, however, more to religion than ethics, and even in ethics there are real differences.

    7. As you know, we cafeteria Catholics pick and choose. I choose
      only re-incarnation as the significant contribution to the pantheon
      of Catholic dogma.

    8. I will concede, though, that Indian and Chinese paganism anticipates the Gospel just as much as Greco-Roman paganism did, and the Church has made good use of Greco-Roman culture. St. Thomas Aquinas was able to “baptize” Aristotle; some future St. Thomas might succeed in similarly “baptizing” Gautama and Confucius.

    9. The more I think about this point, the more I like it. Some of the classical viewpoints are not that great a fit with Christianity/Catholicism but seem to have been treated more gently due to a general Western reverence for their author’s cultures.

      The Christian view to this day is influenced by the Platonic idea that the world of forms/spirits is separate and distinct from our own, which is not a Biblical view in my humble opinion. Similarly, I don’t think the mind and the soul are the same in any way, where these concepts seem basically interchangeable in Plato.

      For both East and West I think we embrace what is true and call out what is false. Good point.

    10. The Church is from Jesus and She will not change to suit you or any others; yes, there will be an upheaval when the one that doesn’t belong (the antichrist) will sit on the Royal Throne, but his time will be short. It doesn’t matter how long a false belief system is as it is not compatible with THE TRUTH. +JMJ+

    11. Why would anyone want to follow the devil, when we have Jesus and THE TRUTH? Convert and get right with God. +JMJ+

  10. Pingback: Unraveling Saint Buddha - CATHOLIC FEAST - Every day is a Celebration

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.