The Theology of Science-Fiction: Part I — Some Speculative Fiction Gospels*

crucifix, jesus, seder, sacrifice, triduum

crucifix, jesus, seder, sacrifice, triduum

“…when I was not prey to the temptations of this world, I devoted my nights to imagining other worlds. … There is nothing better than imagining other worlds…to forget the painful one we live in. At least so I thought then. I hadn’t yet realized that, imagining other worlds, you end up changing this one.”Umberto Eco, Baudolino.


For the past few weeks we Catholics have been celebrating the central tenet of our faith as Christians, the Passion and Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. While I was meditating about this, my thoughts strayed, and I recalled some of the science-fiction stories I had read before my conversion. It struck me that there are different ways of contesting the reality of the Passion and Resurrection. One way is to deny the historical reality of these events; another, taken by non-believing science-fiction authors, is to transform these events into an alternative, what-if, type of reality.

In this article I propose to explore (not in depth) how Jesus, the Passion and the Resurrection have been transformed by science-fiction to conform to a theology of non-belief. In subsequent articles I’ll discuss how science-fiction regards the intelligent non-human and its (his/her?) possible relation to The Church, and what science-fiction has to say in general about a deity, the afterlife and the Eschaton.

My survey will not be exhaustive, but references are given below to fill in gaps. (See for example the Wikipedia article about religious science-fiction.)


“From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.” Matt: 16:21

A favorite mode of science-fiction is the alternative history, “what-if?” This should really be called “speculative fiction” since the science component is usually negligible–only a different possible world is envisioned.  Such are the SF stories (“SF” standing here for “speculative fiction”) in which Jesus is not crucified and therefore is NOT resurrected. (So much for Christianity, the Son of God, etc…)

Some of these stories invoke time travel as a way to get around Christ’s Passion. The time traveler either takes the place of Christ or attempts to prevent it by other means. I don’t regard time travel as a worthy device in SF because of  such paradoxes as “you can’t kill your own grandfather before he sired your parent” sort. That is to say, if you alter the past, the present in which you were born no longer exists and then where are you?

The only SF story I know of that successfully deals with such paradoxes is Heinlein’s All You Zombies (warning: SPOILER!) in which a soldier of the future is his own mother and father.


There are more plausible alternative history approaches that still do no more than tickle the imagination (as is the case with most alternative history SF). In a story called Friends in High Places by Jack McDevitt, Jesus argues with God in the Garden of Gethesmane and changes his fate. I’ll quote from the description given in Holy Sci-Fi:

“Jesus waiting in the Garden of Gethesmane for the mob to take him. Jesus does not want to die, as we learn from his thoughts:

‘It sends the wrong message [Lord]. It will be a hard sell, persuading people You love them when you let this happen to me.’

Why? Why must we do it this way? We create a faith whose governing  symbol will be an instrument of torture. They will wear it around their necks,  put it atop their temples. Is this what we really want?’

In this story, too, Jesus escapes (to become a librarian in Egypt!), and as he begins his journey to a new life he thinks ‘how much better it was than a cross.’ What has happened is that God, apparently in answer to Jesus’ concerns about the Crucifixion, has changed the past.”

I would review this as the Passion according to Saturday Night Live. All the profound theological arguments about obedience to God, Jesus suffering for our sins out of love for His brothers, the Crucifixion required for our salvation, are swept away with the broom of a naive theodicy.

In another story an alternative history dispenses with the Crucifixion in a more plausible way. (Unfortunately this old guy can not remember the title or the author, nor have extensive online searches been helpful; but he is sure about the story.) Recall Matt 27:19

 “When he [Pontius Pilate] was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him.”

Pontius Pilate’s wife implores to set Jesus free. In the story her pleas are successful. Jesus goes back to Galilee as an honored prophet, but is largely ignored in further history. Ironically, Rome accepts Judaism with the Emperor becoming the Chief Priest of the Sanhedrin and with a new Temple built in Rome.


An in-depth treatment of the Passion and Resurrection has not been given by science-fiction authors, not even by those who account themselves Christian. Perhaps Scripture gives too little to elaborate, although I have always wondered–given the two natures of Jesus Christ–what he thought about dying and being resurrected. Scripture says he knew of his resurrection, but was he sure?

I’ve always wondered what Jesus did in Hell. There are theological speculations, but they’re only that. Perhaps, as the Greatest Miracle, The Resurrection can not be acknowledged by writers who don’t believe, and by those who do believe, what more can be said?

“The New Testament writers speak as if Christ’s achievement in rising from the dead was the first event of its kind in the whole history of the universe. He is the ‘first fruits,’ the pioneer of life,’ He has forced open a door that has been locked since the death of the first man. He has met, fought, and beaten the King of Death. Everything is different because He has done so. C. S. Lewis, Miracles, ch. 16


In the second of this series I’ll discuss how SF treats intelligent non-humans and their relation to the Church. In the third, I’ll give the SF arguments that computers and robots do have souls.   In the fourth, I’ll consider the SF treatments of deity, the afterlife and the eschaton, including an in-depth discussion of one of my favorite SF books with a religious theme, that neglected classic, The Lord of the World (1907), by Msgr. Robert Hugh Benson.

*There have been two books published with the title “The Gospel according to science-fiction” (see the references below);  I’m not trying to replace or supplant these.

*Added 13 May, 2015:   I neglected to cite one very fine story by Michael Bishop, The Gospel According to Gamaliel Cruces, in which Jesus is recognized as the Son of God, but each alien race has its own Savior.


Wikipedia: Christian Science-Fiction, Religious Ideas in Science-Fiction (Jesus)

Holy Sci-Fi , a comprehensive review written by a non-believer;  light in tone; weak on theology and more important authors–Walker Percy, C.S. Lewis, Robert Hugh Benson.

The Gospel According to Science-fiction: from the Twilight Zone to the Final Frontier, by Gabriel McKee. (a fine and extensive compendium of Sci-fi with a religious theme; good and profound theological insights)

A Cross of Centuries–25 Imaginative Tales about The Christ (stories about the Christ from true believers, agnostics and die-hard atheists)

The Sci Fi Catholic ????

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest

12 thoughts on “The Theology of Science-Fiction: Part I — Some Speculative Fiction Gospels*”

  1. Pingback: The Theology of Science-Fiction: Part II -- Paradise Not Lost? : Catholic Stand

  2. Pingback: SATURDAY EDITION - Big Pulpit

  3. It seems to me that the historical Jesus was the best role model for the world to follow and we are extremely fortunate that the Roman Empire was converted to Christianity. It would be interesting to see an alternate reality in which Jesus was never born as in “It’s a Wonderful Life”. Or, instead of never being born, how about never being crucified?

    I personally don’t believe that Jesus really rose from the dead. I believe that was a positive spin put on his death to keep the movement going. The thing is: it worked.

    What would this world be like if it hadn’t?

    1. Stories have been written about this, as I remarked in the post. Unfortunately I don’t remember the title of the story in which Pilate, upon urgings of his wife, remits the crucifixion. See the post for the outcome. There is also a series by Robert Silverberg, “Roma Eterna”, in which the Jews don’t make it out of Egypt during the Exodus, so no Judaism in Israel/Judah and no Jesus. The Roman Empire lasts to the present as a consequence. There are other stories in which the Crucifixion doesn’t take place–see references at

    2. since Jesus is God, raising Himself from the dead makes perfect sense. I see no good reason to believe Jesus’ body mouldered in the grave. there is no evidence that supports the belief that Jesus’ body mouldered in the grave. all available evidence supports the Resurrection of Jesus’ glorified body.

    3. “since Jesus is God, raising Himself from the dead makes perfect sense.”

      The problem is with your premise that Jesus is God. Who knows what makes sense if that is true?

    4. Perhaps that positive spin was generated by The Holy Spirit? As a physician friend of mine remarked, “To think that a bunch of ignorant yahoos–fishermen and riffraff–could spread these teachings through the Roman world requires one to believe in God’s push”.

    5. Just a point, but historically, there have been many cases where a leader who was killed was later claimed to be alive by his followers; none of them except Christianity ever gained any traction.

      Further, I would posit that it is incredibly unlikely that of the apostles, not one of them in the face of increasing persecution, decided to opt out and admit that the whole Jesus rising story was made up. If they had, one would have expected either some sort of condemnation within the Church or claims by Christianity’s opponents that one of the chief early Christians admitted it was made up.

      I suppose one can believe some other reason they believed it, but I think it is hard to dispute that the eleven apostles who survived until Easter Sunday really believed that Jesus rose from the dead.

  4. I understand andere agree with most that was written in this article, felt only funny when I found the name of C.S. Lewis in the negatives. In my faith I experience the death and ressurection daily, what more His daily Presence in good and lesser days. C.S. Lewis has helped me much with his writings, Christ has used them in my life ( and uncountable others) to get healed and stay healthy in my faith in so many ways.
    Bless you all.

    1. thank you for your comment, Naji. I’m not quite sure what you mean by “found the name of C.S. Lewis in the negatives”. He is my literary hero (and I will write about his trilogy “Out of the Silent Planet” in future posts). The quote I gave from him affirms the Divinity of Christ and that his death has procured our salvation.

    Yes, because the end point of that sacrifice has not been made manifest. It’s a climax without a plot.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.